Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Indiana 6,10 61.7 (60.6, 62.8) 2,422 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 53.4 (53.2, 53.5) 100,643 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Adams County 6,10 39.8 (28.3, 54.6) 8 rising rising trend 23.8 (1.5, 50.9)
Allen County 6,10 52.6 (48.2, 57.4) 107 stable stable trend -1.6 (-8.8, 6.2)
Bartholomew County 6,10 58.0 (48.9, 68.5) 29 stable stable trend 3.0 (-21.6, 35.2)
Benton County 6,10 86.3 (55.4, 129.7) 5 stable stable trend -6.4 (-57.8, 107.9)
Blackford County 6,10 54.7 (35.3, 82.6) 5 stable stable trend -3.8 (-27.3, 27.3)
Boone County 6,10 54.8 (43.8, 67.7) 18 stable stable trend -11.0 (-33.9, 19.7)
Brown County 6,10 52.2 (34.6, 77.3) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-13.3, 19.1)
Carroll County 6,10 51.0 (35.0, 72.5) 7 stable stable trend 9.7 (-12.8, 38.0)
Cass County 6,10 76.7 (62.2, 94.0) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-22.3, 27.4)
Clark County 6,10 80.6 (71.2, 91.1) 54 stable stable trend 1.7 (-3.3, 7.0)
Clay County 6,10 52.0 (38.2, 69.7) 10 stable stable trend 27.8 (-15.0, 92.1)
Clinton County 6,10 50.1 (37.3, 66.1) 11 stable stable trend -10.7 (-35.8, 24.1)
Crawford County 6,10 65.2 (40.4, 100.9) 4 stable stable trend -9.6 (-26.6, 11.4)
Daviess County 6,10 52.8 (39.1, 69.9) 10 stable stable trend 4.7 (-36.1, 71.6)
DeKalb County 6,10 58.5 (45.8, 73.8) 15 stable stable trend -6.9 (-25.0, 15.6)
Dearborn County 6,10 66.0 (53.6, 80.6) 20 stable stable trend 0.8 (-29.8, 44.6)
Decatur County 6,10 48.1 (34.3, 66.0) 8 stable stable trend -17.8 (-34.1, 2.5)
Delaware County 6,10 66.2 (58.0, 75.4) 48 stable stable trend -5.4 (-21.1, 13.6)
Dubois County 6,10 36.8 (27.5, 48.6) 11 stable stable trend -3.0 (-31.8, 38.0)
Elkhart County 6,10 61.3 (54.9, 68.2) 69 stable stable trend -4.2 (-16.8, 10.4)
Fayette County 6,10 79.0 (61.1, 101.2) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-17.0, 18.9)
Floyd County 6,10 65.0 (54.9, 76.5) 30 stable stable trend -2.8 (-25.7, 27.1)
Fountain County 6,10 62.0 (43.9, 86.2) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-33.2, 46.9)
Franklin County 6,10 56.7 (40.7, 77.4) 8 rising rising trend 29.8 (6.6, 58.0)
Fulton County 6,10 58.9 (42.9, 79.7) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-28.4, 40.0)
Gibson County 6,10 55.0 (42.1, 71.1) 12 stable stable trend -4.6 (-33.6, 37.0)
Grant County 6,10 68.7 (58.6, 80.2) 34 stable stable trend 1.4 (-11.0, 15.5)
Greene County 6,10 63.6 (49.5, 80.8) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-21.4, 25.4)
Hamilton County 6,10 40.2 (35.2, 45.8) 48 stable stable trend 4.6 (-11.3, 23.4)
Hancock County 6,10 65.9 (55.2, 78.1) 28 stable stable trend 4.6 (-3.0, 12.9)
Harrison County 6,10 72.6 (58.2, 89.8) 18 stable stable trend 17.1 (-0.2, 37.5)
Hendricks County 6,10 59.2 (51.6, 67.6) 45 stable stable trend -6.7 (-15.7, 3.4)
Henry County 6,10 60.2 (49.2, 73.3) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-23.8, 30.1)
Howard County 6,10 65.8 (56.6, 76.2) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.2, 4.1)
Huntington County 6,10 46.9 (35.3, 61.4) 11 stable stable trend -17.3 (-55.0, 52.0)
Jackson County 6,10 64.5 (51.8, 79.7) 18 stable stable trend 2.0 (-20.6, 31.0)
Jasper County 6,10 64.4 (49.8, 82.3) 13 stable stable trend 3.3 (-25.3, 42.7)
Jay County 6,10 51.4 (35.5, 72.5) 7 stable stable trend 5.8 (-36.9, 77.5)
Jefferson County 6,10 81.9 (65.2, 101.7) 17 stable stable trend 9.6 (-11.4, 35.6)
Jennings County 6,10 73.1 (55.6, 94.6) 12 stable stable trend 4.8 (-33.0, 63.8)
Johnson County 6,10 62.4 (54.9, 70.6) 52 stable stable trend -5.4 (-19.8, 11.7)
Knox County 6,10 64.2 (51.1, 80.0) 17 stable stable trend 5.6 (-3.1, 15.1)
Kosciusko County 6,10 65.9 (55.8, 77.3) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-10.2, 9.6)
LaGrange County 6,10 52.1 (38.5, 68.9) 10 stable stable trend -8.3 (-41.3, 43.3)
LaPorte County 6,10 66.7 (58.4, 76.1) 48 stable stable trend 1.4 (-5.1, 8.3)
Lake County 6,10 61.0 (57.1, 65.0) 190 stable stable trend 1.1 (-7.4, 10.3)
Lawrence County 6,10 76.1 (63.0, 91.5) 25 stable stable trend -6.7 (-27.0, 19.3)
Madison County 6,10 66.2 (58.6, 74.6) 58 stable stable trend -3.6 (-11.4, 5.0)
Marion County 6,10 69.4 (66.1, 72.8) 338 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 3.0)
Marshall County 6,10 59.7 (48.1, 73.5) 19 stable stable trend 21.4 (-8.0, 60.2)
Martin County 6,10 48.7 (28.2, 80.1) 3
*
*
Miami County 6,10 61.8 (48.0, 78.7) 14 stable stable trend -4.2 (-25.0, 22.2)
Monroe County 6,10 56.5 (48.7, 65.3) 39 stable stable trend -8.6 (-17.5, 1.2)
Montgomery County 6,10 66.4 (52.9, 82.6) 17 stable stable trend -8.3 (-26.2, 13.9)
Morgan County 6,10 68.2 (57.3, 80.6) 29 stable stable trend -9.1 (-30.7, 19.4)
Newton County 6,10 53.4 (34.7, 79.8) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-24.1, 29.7)
Noble County 6,10 50.7 (39.3, 64.5) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-24.9, 31.3)
Ohio County 6,10 94.2 (58.6, 147.5) 4 falling falling trend -24.3 (-39.9, -4.5)
Orange County 6,10 62.6 (44.8, 85.7) 8 stable stable trend -3.6 (-34.5, 41.9)
Owen County 6,10 65.4 (48.0, 87.7) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-27.2, 33.8)
Parke County 6,10 64.7 (45.3, 90.2) 7 stable stable trend -17.3 (-42.1, 18.3)
Perry County 6,10 86.8 (64.5, 115.0) 11 stable stable trend -10.9 (-48.1, 52.9)
Pike County 6,10 55.3 (36.3, 82.3) 5 stable stable trend -15.5 (-41.1, 21.3)
Porter County 6,10 64.1 (57.1, 71.7) 64 stable stable trend -5.9 (-18.4, 8.4)
Posey County 6,10 46.9 (33.1, 64.8) 8 stable stable trend 5.0 (-18.5, 35.4)
Pulaski County 6,10 47.3 (29.5, 73.2) 4 stable stable trend 8.4 (-4.4, 22.9)
Putnam County 6,10 75.1 (59.8, 93.3) 17 stable stable trend 4.6 (-16.3, 30.7)
Randolph County 6,10 57.2 (42.9, 75.3) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-16.4, 15.9)
Ripley County 6,10 60.7 (46.0, 79.0) 12 stable stable trend -3.5 (-23.8, 22.4)
Rush County 6,10 72.9 (52.7, 99.0) 9 stable stable trend -10.0 (-40.0, 35.0)
Scott County 6,10 79.4 (60.5, 102.8) 12 stable stable trend -3.9 (-22.3, 18.8)
Shelby County 6,10 62.9 (50.6, 77.5) 18 stable stable trend -2.1 (-29.5, 35.8)
Spencer County 6,10 53.1 (37.4, 73.8) 8 stable stable trend -4.4 (-50.2, 83.6)
St. Joseph County 6,10 57.7 (52.5, 63.2) 96 stable stable trend -7.1 (-14.8, 1.4)
Starke County 6,10 88.8 (68.9, 113.2) 14 stable stable trend 5.4 (-22.6, 43.7)
Steuben County 6,10 62.7 (48.7, 79.8) 14 stable stable trend 11.1 (-6.7, 32.2)
Sullivan County 6,10 51.3 (35.9, 71.9) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-24.5, 35.7)
Switzerland County 6,10 62.7 (38.5, 97.8) 4
*
*
Tippecanoe County 6,10 58.4 (50.9, 66.7) 45 falling falling trend -9.9 (-14.1, -5.5)
Tipton County 6,10 45.2 (29.0, 68.4) 5 stable stable trend -9.9 (-43.0, 42.2)
Union County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vanderburgh County 6,10 64.2 (57.7, 71.2) 75 stable stable trend -0.7 (-9.4, 8.8)
Vermillion County 6,10 95.9 (72.4, 125.6) 11 stable stable trend 12.2 (-16.1, 50.0)
Vigo County 6,10 69.4 (60.5, 79.3) 45 falling falling trend -10.3 (-19.2, -0.5)
Wabash County 6,10 54.5 (41.8, 70.3) 13 stable stable trend -8.8 (-28.6, 16.4)
Warren County 6,10 73.0 (44.6, 114.5) 4 stable stable trend -33.0 (-60.1, 12.6)
Warrick County 6,10 48.2 (38.6, 59.6) 18 stable stable trend -6.9 (-18.5, 6.4)
Washington County 6,10 69.1 (52.5, 89.5) 12 stable stable trend -11.7 (-33.9, 18.1)
Wayne County 6,10 70.9 (60.7, 82.5) 36 stable stable trend -1.0 (-14.9, 15.3)
Wells County 6,10 35.3 (24.4, 50.0) 7 stable stable trend 26.5 (-15.2, 88.6)
White County 6,10 56.5 (42.1, 75.0) 10 stable stable trend -3.0 (-43.7, 67.1)
Whitley County 6,10 45.5 (33.6, 60.6) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-46.6, 82.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/29/2016 7:38 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top