Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Melanoma of the Skin, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Indiana 6,10 17.8 (17.4, 18.3) 1,237 stable stable trend -3.6 (-8.4, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 20.3 (20.2, 20.3) 68,242 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
Switzerland County 6,10 32.5 (19.4, 51.3) 4 stable stable trend -23.9 (-44.5, 4.4)
Monroe County 6,10 31.0 (26.6, 35.8) 38 stable stable trend 0.1 (-12.7, 14.8)
Brown County 6,10 29.3 (19.3, 43.4) 6 stable stable trend -6.4 (-54.0, 90.4)
Lawrence County 6,10 27.3 (21.3, 34.5) 15 rising rising trend 20.6 (2.4, 42.0)
LaPorte County 6,10 26.4 (22.4, 30.9) 33 stable stable trend 5.8 (-14.9, 31.6)
Jackson County 6,10 25.9 (19.7, 33.3) 12 stable stable trend -12.6 (-37.1, 21.4)
Jay County 6,10 25.6 (17.3, 36.7) 6 stable stable trend -20.5 (-41.2, 7.7)
Ripley County 6,10 25.3 (18.0, 34.7) 8 stable stable trend -4.6 (-40.6, 53.4)
Hancock County 6,10 25.3 (20.4, 31.2) 19 rising rising trend 20.4 (6.8, 35.6)
Wells County 6,10 24.7 (17.3, 34.3) 8 stable stable trend -10.8 (-27.2, 9.3)
Whitley County 6,10 24.4 (17.7, 32.8) 9 stable stable trend -3.9 (-16.9, 11.1)
Wabash County 6,10 24.4 (18.0, 32.5) 10 stable stable trend 6.2 (-22.0, 44.8)
Dubois County 6,10 24.0 (18.1, 31.2) 12 stable stable trend 11.4 (-8.8, 36.0)
Greene County 6,10 23.8 (17.4, 31.9) 10 stable stable trend 6.2 (-16.2, 34.5)
Posey County 6,10 23.5 (16.1, 33.1) 7 stable stable trend -13.4 (-36.7, 18.6)
Adams County 6,10 23.0 (16.3, 31.6) 8 stable stable trend -17.8 (-35.1, 4.1)
Pike County 6,10 22.8 (13.2, 37.1) 4 rising rising trend 44.3 (4.0, 100.3)
Hamilton County 6,10 22.8 (20.2, 25.6) 60 stable stable trend -4.4 (-27.3, 25.8)
Kosciusko County 6,10 22.7 (18.3, 27.8) 19 falling falling trend -11.8 (-20.7, -1.8)
Randolph County 6,10 22.6 (15.7, 31.8) 7 stable stable trend -18.0 (-43.8, 19.6)
Shelby County 6,10 22.6 (17.1, 29.2) 12 stable stable trend 7.0 (-34.2, 74.0)
Owen County 6,10 22.6 (14.9, 33.0) 6 stable stable trend -3.6 (-55.3, 108.2)
Pulaski County 6,10 22.0 (13.0, 35.4) 4 stable stable trend 21.4 (-21.1, 87.0)
Blackford County 6,10 22.0 (12.8, 35.7) 4 stable stable trend -21.2 (-39.9, 3.3)
Johnson County 6,10 21.7 (18.4, 25.4) 32 stable stable trend -2.0 (-17.8, 16.9)
Huntington County 6,10 21.5 (15.6, 29.0) 9 stable stable trend -21.8 (-42.1, 5.6)
Spencer County 6,10 21.5 (14.2, 31.4) 6 stable stable trend 7.2 (-28.3, 60.2)
Morgan County 6,10 21.3 (16.8, 26.8) 16 stable stable trend -5.0 (-33.1, 35.1)
Delaware County 6,10 21.0 (17.5, 25.1) 26 stable stable trend -4.0 (-23.7, 20.7)
Starke County 6,10 20.9 (13.7, 30.7) 6 stable stable trend 6.4 (-28.9, 59.1)
Fulton County 6,10 20.9 (13.2, 31.5) 5 stable stable trend -9.5 (-44.3, 46.9)
Bartholomew County 6,10 20.7 (16.5, 25.5) 18 stable stable trend 8.8 (-26.6, 61.4)
Knox County 6,10 20.6 (14.8, 27.9) 9 stable stable trend -16.4 (-30.9, 1.1)
Rush County 6,10 20.4 (12.0, 32.5) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-20.7, 21.9)
Tippecanoe County 6,10 20.3 (17.1, 23.9) 29 stable stable trend -6.5 (-26.6, 19.1)
Wayne County 6,10 20.3 (16.1, 25.2) 17 stable stable trend -12.2 (-44.8, 39.6)
Clay County 6,10 20.1 (13.5, 28.9) 6 stable stable trend -22.0 (-45.2, 11.1)
Franklin County 6,10 19.7 (12.9, 29.1) 5 stable stable trend 19.6 (-29.3, 102.4)
Grant County 6,10 19.6 (15.4, 24.7) 16 stable stable trend -10.6 (-32.9, 19.0)
Gibson County 6,10 19.4 (13.5, 27.1) 7 stable stable trend -2.9 (-19.1, 16.5)
Elkhart County 6,10 19.2 (16.6, 22.2) 38 stable stable trend 1.3 (-24.3, 35.6)
Boone County 6,10 19.1 (14.4, 24.9) 12 stable stable trend -20.3 (-57.6, 49.8)
Decatur County 6,10 19.0 (12.7, 27.6) 6 stable stable trend -11.9 (-31.2, 12.8)
Jennings County 6,10 19.0 (12.6, 27.5) 6 stable stable trend -26.0 (-55.6, 23.3)
Henry County 6,10 18.9 (14.0, 25.0) 10 stable stable trend 6.0 (-14.2, 30.8)
Orange County 6,10 18.5 (11.3, 28.8) 4 stable stable trend -20.7 (-58.7, 52.1)
Allen County 6,10 18.4 (16.4, 20.5) 67 stable stable trend -6.7 (-14.9, 2.4)
Vigo County 6,10 18.2 (14.9, 22.1) 21 stable stable trend 3.7 (-22.7, 39.1)
Marshall County 6,10 18.2 (13.3, 24.4) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-45.8, 85.6)
Jefferson County 6,10 17.9 (12.3, 25.2) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-33.4, 47.6)
Daviess County 6,10 17.9 (12.0, 25.6) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-34.3, 51.9)
Carroll County 6,10 17.8 (10.7, 28.0) 4 stable stable trend -29.4 (-59.3, 22.2)
DeKalb County 6,10 17.8 (12.7, 24.3) 8 stable stable trend -9.6 (-41.4, 39.2)
Vermillion County 6,10 17.7 (10.3, 28.8) 4 stable stable trend 5.9 (-10.2, 24.9)
Warrick County 6,10 17.6 (13.3, 22.9) 12 stable stable trend -6.3 (-37.3, 40.1)
Hendricks County 6,10 17.5 (14.6, 20.9) 25 stable stable trend -18.3 (-34.8, 2.3)
Tipton County 6,10 17.3 (9.7, 28.8) 3
*
*
Porter County 6,10 17.1 (14.4, 20.1) 31 falling falling trend -10.0 (-18.6, -0.6)
Steuben County 6,10 16.9 (11.7, 23.8) 7 stable stable trend 17.1 (-11.8, 55.5)
Howard County 6,10 16.8 (13.2, 21.1) 16 stable stable trend 1.4 (-8.9, 12.8)
Clinton County 6,10 16.6 (11.1, 23.9) 6 stable stable trend -21.0 (-49.4, 23.2)
Harrison County 6,10 16.4 (11.3, 22.9) 7 stable stable trend -5.8 (-38.4, 44.0)
Fayette County 6,10 16.3 (10.3, 24.7) 5 stable stable trend 3.0 (-61.5, 175.6)
Madison County 6,10 16.3 (13.5, 19.5) 25 stable stable trend 0.4 (-22.3, 29.7)
LaGrange County 6,10 16.2 (10.6, 23.5) 6 stable stable trend 19.3 (-23.4, 85.7)
St. Joseph County 6,10 16.0 (14.0, 18.3) 46 falling falling trend -10.4 (-16.7, -3.8)
Dearborn County 6,10 16.0 (11.5, 21.6) 9 rising rising trend 36.5 (7.7, 72.9)
Washington County 6,10 15.8 (10.1, 23.6) 5 stable stable trend -16.8 (-45.5, 26.9)
Floyd County 6,10 15.1 (11.6, 19.4) 13 stable stable trend 14.0 (-8.8, 42.6)
Scott County 6,10 15.1 (9.3, 23.3) 4 stable stable trend 9.7 (-38.2, 94.8)
Noble County 6,10 14.6 (10.3, 20.2) 8 stable stable trend -9.2 (-29.9, 17.7)
Putnam County 6,10 14.1 (9.4, 20.4) 6 stable stable trend -3.2 (-51.2, 92.3)
Marion County 6,10 14.1 (13.0, 15.3) 121 stable stable trend -4.5 (-9.4, 0.6)
Vanderburgh County 6,10 13.8 (11.4, 16.4) 26 stable stable trend 4.9 (-23.2, 43.2)
Perry County 6,10 13.7 (7.9, 22.5) 3
*
*
Clark County 6,10 12.8 (10.0, 16.0) 15 stable stable trend -2.6 (-15.8, 12.7)
Sullivan County 6,10 12.6 (7.1, 20.8) 3
*
*
Miami County 6,10 12.2 (8.0, 17.9) 5 stable stable trend -17.0 (-43.5, 22.0)
Montgomery County 6,10 12.1 (7.9, 17.9) 5 stable stable trend -28.4 (-54.7, 13.3)
Cass County 6,10 11.3 (7.4, 16.7) 5 stable stable trend -12.6 (-46.9, 43.6)
Jasper County 6,10 10.9 (6.5, 17.2) 4 stable stable trend -20.1 (-48.5, 23.8)
Lake County 6,10 10.7 (9.4, 12.0) 58 stable stable trend -2.4 (-14.9, 12.0)
Benton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fountain County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/27/2016 6:41 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top