Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Breast, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Indiana 6,10 120.0 (118.4, 121.6) 4,558 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 123.3 (123.1, 123.5) 224,504 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Boone County 6,10 141.9 (123.8, 161.8) 46 stable stable trend -6.1 (-12.5, 0.7)
Crawford County 6,10 139.6 (101.6, 188.3) 9 stable stable trend -12.0 (-27.1, 6.2)
Warrick County 6,10 139.4 (122.6, 158.0) 52 stable stable trend 2.9 (-12.6, 21.1)
Martin County 6,10 138.8 (100.3, 188.1) 9 stable stable trend -7.1 (-22.9, 12.0)
Shelby County 6,10 133.5 (114.4, 155.1) 36 stable stable trend -4.9 (-20.7, 14.0)
Vigo County 6,10 133.1 (120.1, 147.1) 83 stable stable trend 2.2 (-5.9, 11.1)
Knox County 6,10 133.1 (112.7, 156.3) 33 stable stable trend -2.6 (-14.4, 10.7)
Hendricks County 6,10 133.0 (121.8, 145.0) 107 stable stable trend 3.3 (-9.2, 17.6)
Rush County 6,10 132.3 (102.1, 169.1) 14 stable stable trend 13.3 (-5.2, 35.5)
Floyd County 6,10 132.3 (117.6, 148.4) 62 stable stable trend -2.7 (-11.7, 7.3)
Morgan County 6,10 132.2 (116.8, 149.2) 56 stable stable trend 3.9 (-12.6, 23.5)
Hamilton County 6,10 131.1 (122.6, 140.0) 187 stable stable trend 2.7 (-7.6, 14.2)
Tipton County 6,10 129.6 (100.5, 165.5) 14 stable stable trend 9.6 (-7.7, 30.1)
Jackson County 6,10 128.8 (109.4, 150.8) 33 stable stable trend -8.3 (-22.4, 8.4)
Washington County 6,10 128.0 (104.6, 155.3) 22 stable stable trend -9.6 (-36.1, 28.0)
Ohio County 6,10 127.9 (81.4, 193.6) 5 stable stable trend -5.6 (-46.4, 66.2)
Huntington County 6,10 127.9 (107.5, 151.2) 30 stable stable trend 6.1 (-17.7, 36.8)
Warren County 6,10 127.5 (89.6, 177.9) 8 stable stable trend 11.9 (-16.0, 49.2)
Lake County 6,10 127.2 (121.4, 133.2) 380 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.8, 7.5)
Marion County 6,10 126.7 (122.2, 131.3) 617 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.6, 5.5)
Fountain County 6,10 126.5 (98.7, 160.3) 15 stable stable trend 5.1 (-22.4, 42.4)
DeKalb County 6,10 126.4 (107.2, 148.1) 32 stable stable trend -3.7 (-35.4, 43.5)
Porter County 6,10 125.3 (115.3, 135.9) 123 stable stable trend -3.2 (-12.6, 7.2)
Perry County 6,10 124.7 (97.6, 157.7) 16 stable stable trend 11.0 (-17.7, 49.8)
Harrison County 6,10 124.2 (104.6, 146.5) 30 stable stable trend 1.3 (-17.4, 24.1)
Jasper County 6,10 123.7 (102.1, 148.8) 24 stable stable trend -3.6 (-19.1, 14.8)
Pike County 6,10 123.4 (91.6, 163.7) 11 stable stable trend -4.9 (-39.8, 50.1)
Monroe County 6,10 123.0 (110.9, 136.0) 80 stable stable trend 3.1 (-10.9, 19.2)
Jay County 6,10 122.6 (97.3, 152.9) 17 stable stable trend -9.3 (-32.1, 21.2)
Bartholomew County 6,10 122.4 (108.4, 137.8) 57 stable stable trend 3.7 (-10.4, 20.1)
Tippecanoe County 6,10 122.4 (111.3, 134.2) 94 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.9, -0.6)
Allen County 6,10 122.3 (115.4, 129.6) 244 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.3, 4.3)
Kosciusko County 6,10 121.7 (107.4, 137.5) 55 stable stable trend 2.1 (-16.0, 23.9)
Hancock County 6,10 121.5 (106.8, 137.7) 52 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.9, 6.2)
Dearborn County 6,10 121.4 (104.0, 141.1) 36 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.9, 6.1)
St. Joseph County 6,10 121.3 (113.5, 129.6) 188 falling falling trend -6.9 (-10.6, -3.1)
Putnam County 6,10 119.8 (99.3, 143.5) 25 stable stable trend 1.7 (-6.5, 10.6)
Fulton County 6,10 119.6 (94.3, 150.2) 16 stable stable trend 3.1 (-24.4, 40.6)
Newton County 6,10 119.4 (89.0, 157.6) 11 stable stable trend 25.8 (-8.8, 73.4)
Randolph County 6,10 119.3 (96.7, 146.1) 20 stable stable trend 2.5 (-12.4, 19.8)
Clark County 6,10 118.5 (107.1, 130.9) 82 stable stable trend 7.4 (-5.9, 22.6)
Clay County 6,10 117.6 (94.9, 144.3) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-29.2, 38.2)
Johnson County 6,10 117.5 (107.0, 128.9) 94 stable stable trend -4.8 (-11.7, 2.5)
Scott County 6,10 116.5 (92.5, 145.0) 17 stable stable trend -6.2 (-36.7, 39.0)
Grant County 6,10 116.4 (102.5, 131.8) 55 stable stable trend -8.2 (-22.9, 9.3)
Noble County 6,10 116.2 (98.3, 136.5) 32 stable stable trend -6.3 (-20.5, 10.3)
Cass County 6,10 115.4 (96.3, 137.4) 27 stable stable trend 5.7 (-5.3, 18.0)
Orange County 6,10 115.4 (90.7, 145.4) 16 stable stable trend -4.2 (-30.0, 31.1)
Delaware County 6,10 114.9 (103.5, 127.3) 80 falling falling trend -12.3 (-20.7, -3.0)
Wells County 6,10 114.6 (92.4, 140.8) 20 stable stable trend 0.7 (-6.8, 8.8)
Madison County 6,10 114.3 (103.9, 125.4) 94 stable stable trend -1.6 (-10.5, 8.1)
Spencer County 6,10 113.5 (88.3, 144.1) 15 stable stable trend 9.1 (-32.1, 75.2)
Clinton County 6,10 113.1 (92.6, 136.9) 22 stable stable trend 5.6 (-20.8, 40.7)
Elkhart County 6,10 112.9 (104.0, 122.5) 122 stable stable trend -0.2 (-8.5, 8.9)
Gibson County 6,10 112.7 (93.0, 135.6) 24 stable stable trend 5.6 (-8.9, 22.5)
LaPorte County 6,10 112.1 (101.1, 124.2) 79 stable stable trend -1.3 (-22.1, 25.0)
Dubois County 6,10 111.8 (94.1, 132.1) 29 stable stable trend -1.8 (-22.5, 24.5)
Jennings County 6,10 111.7 (89.7, 137.8) 18 stable stable trend -7.9 (-34.0, 28.5)
Pulaski County 6,10 111.5 (82.1, 149.1) 10 stable stable trend 5.6 (-12.3, 27.0)
Wayne County 6,10 111.3 (97.6, 126.4) 52 stable stable trend -3.4 (-22.7, 20.7)
Vanderburgh County 6,10 110.8 (101.8, 120.3) 122 stable stable trend -3.3 (-18.9, 15.3)
Whitley County 6,10 109.8 (89.9, 133.0) 23 stable stable trend -2.6 (-17.5, 15.0)
Posey County 6,10 108.8 (87.3, 134.3) 19 stable stable trend 4.7 (-20.4, 37.6)
Henry County 6,10 108.7 (92.7, 126.8) 36 stable stable trend -7.7 (-30.5, 22.5)
Montgomery County 6,10 108.5 (90.4, 129.5) 26 stable stable trend 2.5 (-8.7, 15.1)
Marshall County 6,10 108.4 (91.7, 127.4) 32 stable stable trend 1.7 (-11.8, 17.3)
Howard County 6,10 108.0 (95.7, 121.6) 60 stable stable trend -1.1 (-14.5, 14.5)
Lawrence County 6,10 107.2 (91.0, 125.5) 33 stable stable trend -3.3 (-19.0, 15.5)
Vermillion County 6,10 105.0 (79.7, 136.8) 12 stable stable trend -18.3 (-34.5, 1.8)
Blackford County 6,10 104.9 (76.7, 141.3) 10 stable stable trend -4.4 (-38.5, 48.6)
LaGrange County 6,10 104.4 (84.0, 128.1) 19 stable stable trend 3.5 (-10.5, 19.7)
White County 6,10 104.3 (82.4, 130.7) 17 stable stable trend 16.2 (-11.0, 51.8)
Starke County 6,10 103.7 (81.3, 130.8) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-24.3, 30.2)
Adams County 6,10 103.4 (83.8, 126.2) 21 stable stable trend 4.0 (-18.1, 32.1)
Union County 6,10 102.1 (64.7, 154.8) 5 stable stable trend -11.1 (-32.8, 17.6)
Wabash County 6,10 101.7 (83.4, 123.2) 24 stable stable trend -3.7 (-14.2, 8.1)
Ripley County 6,10 101.4 (81.3, 125.1) 18 stable stable trend -12.5 (-25.3, 2.3)
Parke County 6,10 100.9 (76.3, 131.5) 12 stable stable trend 5.1 (-10.4, 23.3)
Franklin County 6,10 100.6 (78.1, 127.9) 14 stable stable trend 19.7 (-1.7, 45.8)
Steuben County 6,10 99.7 (81.5, 121.2) 22 stable stable trend -4.7 (-26.4, 23.5)
Greene County 6,10 97.8 (80.3, 118.5) 22 stable stable trend 14.7 (-1.0, 32.8)
Jefferson County 6,10 96.7 (78.3, 118.2) 20 stable stable trend -1.0 (-22.3, 26.1)
Owen County 6,10 96.6 (74.2, 124.2) 13 stable stable trend -2.8 (-38.5, 53.6)
Sullivan County 6,10 95.3 (72.7, 123.4) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-24.0, 32.4)
Carroll County 6,10 93.7 (71.7, 120.9) 13 stable stable trend -2.7 (-33.7, 42.8)
Brown County 6,10 90.3 (66.4, 121.4) 11 stable stable trend -6.4 (-30.0, 25.2)
Miami County 6,10 88.2 (71.2, 108.4) 19 stable stable trend -13.4 (-27.7, 3.8)
Switzerland County 6,10 88.1 (57.8, 129.3) 6 stable stable trend 5.6 (-37.0, 77.1)
Fayette County 6,10 83.9 (64.4, 107.9) 13 stable stable trend -9.7 (-21.0, 3.3)
Daviess County 6,10 82.6 (64.6, 104.1) 15 stable stable trend -12.0 (-28.2, 8.0)
Benton County 6,10 82.2 (52.0, 124.9) 5 stable stable trend 26.8 (-19.9, 100.7)
Decatur County 6,10 81.6 (62.7, 104.6) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-26.8, 40.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/28/2016 6:19 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top