Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana 6,10 *** 18.0 (17.6, 18.5) 1,327 stable stable trend 2.4 (-1.2, 6.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 16.4 (16.3, 16.4) 58,599 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.6, 0.9)
Adams County 6,10 *** 13.2 (8.6, 19.4) 5 stable stable trend -15.7 (-57.7, 67.9)
Allen County 6,10 *** 14.6 (12.9, 16.4) 56 stable stable trend 7.6 (-3.8, 20.3)
Bartholomew County 6,10 *** 16.2 (12.6, 20.6) 14 stable stable trend 7.7 (-4.7, 21.7)
Benton County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County 6,10 *** 22.1 (13.1, 35.6) 4
*
*
Boone County 6,10 *** 15.7 (11.6, 20.8) 10 stable stable trend -3.2 (-39.7, 55.5)
Brown County 6,10 *** 17.0 (10.0, 27.9) 4 stable stable trend -11.4 (-38.7, 28.0)
Carroll County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County 6,10 *** 14.0 (9.6, 19.8) 7 stable stable trend 12.6 (-43.2, 123.1)
Clark County 6,10 *** 22.3 (18.8, 26.4) 29 stable stable trend 1.0 (-5.1, 7.4)
Clay County 6,10 *** 16.1 (10.5, 23.9) 5 stable stable trend 22.0 (-16.2, 77.7)
Clinton County 6,10 *** 23.0 (16.6, 31.1) 9 stable stable trend 11.3 (-33.2, 85.6)
Crawford County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County 6,10 *** 22.8 (16.3, 31.2) 8 stable stable trend -14.6 (-31.0, 5.6)
DeKalb County 6,10 *** 15.3 (10.7, 21.2) 8 stable stable trend 8.6 (-22.7, 52.5)
Dearborn County 6,10 *** 18.8 (14.1, 24.6) 11 stable stable trend 10.9 (-24.3, 62.5)
Decatur County 6,10 *** 15.0 (9.5, 22.8) 5 stable stable trend 29.0 (-25.0, 121.7)
Delaware County 6,10 *** 16.5 (13.5, 20.0) 22 stable stable trend 3.5 (-15.5, 26.7)
Dubois County 6,10 *** 21.2 (15.8, 28.0) 11 stable stable trend 5.6 (-31.4, 62.6)
Elkhart County 6,10 *** 19.5 (16.8, 22.4) 40 stable stable trend -5.5 (-19.0, 10.3)
Fayette County 6,10 *** 17.8 (11.5, 26.6) 5 stable stable trend -4.1 (-39.7, 52.4)
Floyd County 6,10 *** 22.8 (18.4, 28.0) 19 stable stable trend -1.9 (-22.8, 24.6)
Fountain County 6,10 *** 14.4 (8.1, 24.1) 3
*
*
Franklin County 6,10 *** 17.7 (11.3, 26.6) 5 stable stable trend -17.5 (-40.9, 15.3)
Fulton County 6,10 *** 13.9 (8.2, 22.4) 4 stable stable trend 16.8 (-28.2, 90.1)
Gibson County 6,10 *** 22.5 (16.3, 30.5) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-27.5, 33.7)
Grant County 6,10 *** 20.0 (16.0, 24.8) 18 stable stable trend 3.0 (-26.7, 44.8)
Greene County 6,10 *** 18.2 (13.1, 25.0) 8 stable stable trend 1.9 (-37.3, 65.5)
Hamilton County 6,10 *** 14.7 (12.7, 16.9) 41 stable stable trend 5.1 (-8.0, 20.0)
Hancock County 6,10 *** 18.3 (14.4, 23.0) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-25.3, 32.3)
Harrison County 6,10 *** 18.3 (13.0, 25.1) 8 stable stable trend 13.6 (-22.8, 67.2)
Hendricks County 6,10 *** 16.7 (14.0, 19.8) 28 stable stable trend 6.1 (-8.8, 23.5)
Henry County 6,10 *** 19.7 (15.0, 25.6) 12 stable stable trend -3.7 (-30.7, 33.9)
Howard County 6,10 *** 18.3 (14.8, 22.5) 20 stable stable trend 3.3 (-24.6, 41.7)
Huntington County 6,10 *** 13.5 (8.9, 19.8) 6 stable stable trend 9.6 (-0.8, 21.2)
Jackson County 6,10 *** 21.4 (16.1, 28.0) 11 stable stable trend -5.1 (-10.7, 0.9)
Jasper County 6,10 *** 14.8 (9.9, 21.4) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-47.8, 98.0)
Jay County 6,10 *** 18.0 (11.4, 27.1) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-21.9, 30.3)
Jefferson County 6,10 *** 21.1 (15.2, 28.7) 9 stable stable trend 2.8 (-22.2, 35.9)
Jennings County 6,10 *** 15.2 (9.6, 22.9) 5 stable stable trend -13.6 (-60.5, 89.3)
Johnson County 6,10 *** 18.4 (15.5, 21.7) 30 stable stable trend -10.0 (-34.5, 23.7)
Knox County 6,10 *** 20.9 (15.1, 28.3) 9 stable stable trend -6.6 (-18.5, 6.9)
Kosciusko County 6,10 *** 18.3 (14.4, 22.9) 16 stable stable trend -15.2 (-43.1, 26.6)
LaGrange County 6,10 *** 12.0 (7.3, 18.4) 4 stable stable trend -32.6 (-59.6, 12.2)
LaPorte County 6,10 *** 19.2 (15.9, 22.9) 26 stable stable trend 5.1 (-18.9, 36.3)
Lake County 6,10 *** 20.0 (18.4, 21.8) 113 stable stable trend 1.7 (-7.3, 11.6)
Lawrence County 6,10 *** 16.5 (12.1, 22.1) 10 stable stable trend -3.4 (-15.8, 10.9)
Madison County 6,10 *** 18.6 (15.6, 21.9) 29 stable stable trend -3.7 (-19.1, 14.7)
Marion County 6,10 *** 17.2 (16.0, 18.5) 157 stable stable trend 4.5 (-1.7, 11.1)
Marshall County 6,10 *** 15.9 (11.4, 21.6) 9 stable stable trend -3.6 (-25.9, 25.4)
Martin County 6,10 *** 30.9 (18.9, 48.4) 4 stable stable trend 9.1 (-31.3, 73.2)
Miami County 6,10 *** 17.9 (12.7, 24.6) 8 stable stable trend 6.9 (-19.1, 41.2)
Monroe County 6,10 *** 16.2 (13.2, 19.8) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-19.2, 23.3)
Montgomery County 6,10 *** 15.2 (10.5, 21.3) 7 stable stable trend 23.6 (-16.1, 82.3)
Morgan County 6,10 *** 21.3 (17.0, 26.5) 18 stable stable trend 9.0 (-10.4, 32.7)
Newton County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County 6,10 *** 13.2 (9.2, 18.6) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-19.7, 23.4)
Ohio County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County 6,10 *** 20.0 (12.9, 29.9) 5 stable stable trend -4.2 (-35.9, 43.1)
Owen County 6,10 *** 29.3 (20.7, 40.7) 8 stable stable trend 3.0 (-40.2, 77.4)
Parke County 6,10 *** 20.2 (12.2, 31.7) 4 stable stable trend -6.2 (-43.3, 54.9)
Perry County 6,10 *** 15.2 (8.8, 24.6) 4 falling falling trend -23.0 (-38.0, -4.3)
Pike County 6,10 *** 27.6 (16.9, 42.9) 4 stable stable trend 49.6 (-6.7, 139.9)
Porter County 6,10 *** 18.6 (15.9, 21.7) 36 stable stable trend 1.4 (-9.2, 13.1)
Posey County 6,10 *** 25.7 (17.7, 36.0) 7 stable stable trend -5.5 (-34.8, 37.0)
Pulaski County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6,10 *** 22.7 (16.8, 30.2) 10 stable stable trend 36.4 (-23.2, 142.2)
Randolph County 6,10 *** 14.3 (8.9, 22.0) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-12.2, 11.8)
Ripley County 6,10 *** 20.3 (14.0, 28.5) 7 stable stable trend 11.8 (-37.3, 99.2)
Rush County 6,10 *** 23.3 (14.5, 35.5) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-37.9, 65.8)
Scott County 6,10 *** 25.1 (17.3, 35.3) 7 stable stable trend -4.6 (-43.2, 60.1)
Shelby County 6,10 *** 23.1 (17.6, 29.8) 12 stable stable trend -4.0 (-30.2, 32.0)
Spencer County 6,10 *** 19.8 (13.2, 29.0) 6 stable stable trend 25.2 (-30.8, 126.4)
St. Joseph County 6,10 *** 16.7 (14.6, 19.0) 50 stable stable trend 1.0 (-10.8, 14.3)
Starke County 6,10 *** 21.9 (14.6, 31.7) 6 stable stable trend 21.7 (-16.5, 77.4)
Steuben County 6,10 *** 11.8 (7.6, 17.7) 5 stable stable trend 22.8 (-11.1, 69.7)
Sullivan County 6,10 *** 19.1 (12.1, 28.8) 5 stable stable trend 10.0 (-25.2, 61.7)
Switzerland County 6,10 *** 25.8 (14.9, 42.3) 3
*
*
Tippecanoe County 6,10 *** 17.3 (14.4, 20.6) 27 stable stable trend -1.3 (-13.4, 12.4)
Tipton County 6,10 *** 23.1 (14.1, 36.0) 4 stable stable trend 39.8 (-41.3, 232.9)
Union County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vanderburgh County 6,10 *** 20.3 (17.6, 23.3) 44 stable stable trend 14.4 (-8.6, 43.2)
Vermillion County 6,10 *** 29.0 (19.2, 42.2) 6 stable stable trend -10.0 (-60.6, 105.3)
Vigo County 6,10 *** 17.6 (14.3, 21.4) 21 stable stable trend 7.6 (-18.6, 42.2)
Wabash County 6,10 *** 17.4 (12.2, 24.3) 8 stable stable trend -3.9 (-22.0, 18.4)
Warren County 6,10 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warrick County 6,10 *** 19.6 (15.2, 24.9) 15 stable stable trend -2.0 (-28.4, 34.2)
Washington County 6,10 *** 23.3 (16.3, 32.3) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (-9.6, 14.7)
Wayne County 6,10 *** 18.7 (14.8, 23.4) 16 stable stable trend 2.9 (-5.5, 12.1)
Wells County 6,10 *** 20.7 (14.3, 29.0) 7 stable stable trend -6.2 (-22.5, 13.5)
White County 6,10 *** 14.3 (8.8, 22.2) 5 stable stable trend 2.2 (-8.9, 14.7)
Whitley County 6,10 *** 17.9 (12.4, 25.1) 7 stable stable trend -8.6 (-38.6, 35.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/21/2019 10:49 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top