Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 7 114.2 (112.0, 116.4) N/A 2,095 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.9, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 105.2 (105.0, 105.5) N/A 202,435 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
Polk County 7 103.9 (98.9, 109.1) 73 (51, 81) 330 stable stable trend 0.3 (0.0, 0.7)
Linn County 7 125.6 (117.4, 134.2) 35 (16, 59) 175 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.0, 2.3)
Scott County 7 114.6 (105.7, 124.1) 53 (26, 74) 122 stable stable trend -2.6 (-8.4, 0.7)
Johnson County 7 127.7 (117.2, 139.0) 27 (11, 60) 114 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.1, 2.3)
Black Hawk County 7 112.7 (101.9, 124.3) 59 (23, 80) 82 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.6, 1.7)
Woodbury County 7 125.3 (113.0, 138.6) 36 (10, 66) 76 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.6, 2.2)
Dallas County 7 110.6 (99.2, 122.9) 64 (26, 84) 70 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.9)
Dubuque County 7 123.6 (110.6, 137.7) 38 (11, 71) 67 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.4, 1.9)
Pottawattamie County 7 114.6 (102.1, 128.0) 54 (18, 78) 62 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.6, 1.7)
Story County 7 91.1 (78.9, 104.5) 90 (55, 94) 43 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 0.8)
Warren County 7 102.5 (87.2, 119.6) 76 (28, 91) 32 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Clinton County 7 120.5 (102.2, 141.0) 41 (8, 83) 31 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.7, 1.9)
Muscatine County 7 119.0 (100.7, 139.6) 44 (10, 85) 30 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.4, 2.0)
Cerro Gordo County 7 131.7 (111.3, 154.8) 20 (3, 75) 30 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.0, 2.8)
Jasper County 7 114.6 (95.4, 136.6) 52 (11, 89) 25 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.5, 2.8)
Lee County 7 127.0 (105.3, 151.8) 30 (4, 82) 24 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.1)
Des Moines County 7 105.9 (87.7, 126.8) 71 (17, 92) 24 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.3, 2.9)
Wapello County 7 111.8 (92.0, 134.5) 60 (11, 91) 23 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0)
Marion County 7 117.6 (96.6, 141.6) 48 (8, 89) 22 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.9)
Sioux County 7 114.7 (93.8, 138.6) 51 (11, 90) 22 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.8, 3.3)
Webster County 7 108.2 (88.4, 130.9) 67 (15, 93) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Benton County 7 141.1 (115.1, 171.1) 10 (1, 75) 21 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.5, 3.6)
Plymouth County 7 141.9 (115.6, 172.3) 9 (1, 74) 20 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.7, 3.5)
Marshall County 7 84.7 (68.2, 103.8) 93 (50, 94) 19 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 1.8)
Boone County 7 103.2 (81.9, 128.3) 75 (18, 94) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Washington County 7 132.5 (104.7, 165.0) 18 (1, 86) 16 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 3.7)
Jackson County 7 152.4 (120.3, 190.4) 4 (1, 76) 16 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.2, 4.5)
Bremer County 7 99.3 (77.3, 125.5) 80 (18, 94) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7)
Carroll County 7 129.0 (100.3, 163.2) 25 (2, 89) 14 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.1, 3.2)
Tama County 7 148.4 (115.2, 187.9) 5 (1, 79) 14 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.7, 11.7)
Winneshiek County 7 139.1 (107.7, 176.4) 13 (1, 87) 14 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.9, 5.1)
Cedar County 7 124.6 (96.3, 158.5) 37 (2, 90) 13 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.3, 3.8)
Henry County 7 114.0 (87.9, 145.4) 56 (5, 93) 13 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.6)
Delaware County 7 142.3 (109.2, 182.0) 8 (1, 82) 13 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.2, 3.2)
Mahaska County 7 100.5 (77.1, 128.5) 78 (13, 94) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Jones County 7 103.8 (79.3, 133.4) 74 (11, 94) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Hardin County 7 128.5 (97.5, 166.2) 26 (2, 91) 12 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.1, 4.0)
Fayette County 7 108.7 (81.7, 141.6) 66 (7, 94) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.2)
Floyd County 7 132.1 (99.1, 172.4) 19 (1, 90) 11 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.1, 3.8)
Dickinson County 7 119.4 (89.3, 156.3) 43 (2, 93) 11 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.8, 4.0)
Mills County 7 118.9 (88.8, 155.9) 45 (2, 93) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 3.0)
Harrison County 7 130.9 (97.6, 171.8) 21 (1, 91) 10 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.1, 4.2)
Iowa County 7 116.4 (86.9, 152.7) 50 (4, 93) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.6)
Buchanan County 7 87.6 (65.2, 115.1) 92 (29, 94) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.5)
Hamilton County 7 125.9 (93.7, 165.5) 32 (1, 92) 10 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.4, 3.3)
Poweshiek County 7 104.0 (76.7, 137.6) 72 (9, 94) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Clay County 7 111.2 (82.2, 146.9) 61 (4, 94) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.0)
Cass County 7 143.0 (105.4, 189.4) 6 (1, 88) 10 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.0, 5.6)
Keokuk County 7 173.4 (127.3, 230.5) 2 (1, 74) 9 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.0, 5.8)
Madison County 7 94.1 (69.0, 125.5) 86 (15, 94) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.7, 1.9)
Buena Vista County 7 82.9 (60.4, 110.6) 94 (34, 94) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.2)
Jefferson County 7 96.2 (69.9, 129.1) 83 (12, 94) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.0)
Page County 7 101.2 (73.7, 135.6) 77 (10, 94) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 4.1)
Clayton County 7 98.7 (71.6, 132.6) 81 (9, 94) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.3)
O'Brien County 7 121.1 (87.9, 162.3) 40 (2, 94) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 2.9)
Crawford County 7 91.5 (66.1, 123.1) 89 (20, 94) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.4)
Clarke County 7 159.8 (114.9, 215.8) 3 (1, 86) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.3, 4.5)
Butler County 7 106.1 (76.1, 143.9) 70 (5, 94) 8 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.7, 4.7)
Palo Alto County 7 178.6 (127.9, 242.1) 1 (1, 75) 8 stable stable trend 5.0 (-30.0, 28.2)
Chickasaw County 7 125.9 (89.8, 171.5) 33 (1, 94) 8 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.7, 4.1)
Wright County 7 126.2 (90.1, 171.5) 31 (1, 93) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.1)
Cherokee County 7 137.3 (97.0, 188.2) 16 (1, 93) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 3.6)
Kossuth County 7 108.1 (76.3, 148.2) 68 (4, 94) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.1)
Montgomery County 7 142.6 (100.7, 195.7) 7 (1, 92) 8 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.5, 3.7)
Union County 7 113.3 (80.1, 155.5) 57 (3, 94) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.7, 4.1)
Franklin County 7 137.7 (96.8, 189.6) 15 (1, 93) 7 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.4, 4.2)
Mitchell County 7 141.1 (99.0, 194.2) 11 (1, 92) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (0.0, 4.9)
Guthrie County 7 127.2 (88.9, 176.1) 29 (1, 94) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.2)
Hancock County 7 125.8 (88.1, 174.1) 34 (1, 94) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-8.9, 1.8)
Allamakee County 7 100.5 (69.8, 139.6) 79 (6, 94) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.5, 4.5)
Calhoun County 7 140.7 (97.8, 195.5) 12 (1, 93) 7 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.1, 5.3)
Louisa County 7 111.1 (77.3, 154.3) 62 (3, 94) 7 rising rising trend 16.3 (2.1, 34.2)
Shelby County 7 117.0 (80.7, 163.6) 49 (2, 94) 7 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.5, 4.4)
Howard County 7 134.0 (91.5, 188.9) 17 (1, 94) 6 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.2, 3.5)
Appanoose County 7 96.0 (65.1, 136.1) 84 (9, 94) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 2.8)
Lyon County 7 95.5 (64.8, 135.2) 85 (9, 94) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.4)
Emmet County 7 122.9 (82.8, 175.0) 39 (1, 94) 6 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.1, 4.9)
Greene County 7 127.7 (85.9, 182.3) 28 (1, 94) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.6, 4.9)
Grundy County 7 89.0 (60.0, 126.9) 91 (14, 94) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.2)
Davis County 7 118.3 (78.8, 169.7) 46 (1, 94) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.8, 3.5)
Humboldt County 7 114.3 (76.3, 164.1) 55 (1, 94) 6
*
*
Worth County 7 138.6 (92.6, 199.3) 14 (1, 93) 6 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.7, 5.3)
Sac County 7 113.0 (74.1, 164.5) 58 (1, 94) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.0)
Monroe County 7 120.4 (78.5, 176.4) 42 (1, 94) 5 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.5, 5.3)
Winnebago County 7 93.5 (60.8, 137.1) 87 (7, 94) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 2.7)
Decatur County 7 130.1 (83.8, 191.5) 23 (1, 94) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.2, 3.7)
Lucas County 7 109.0 (68.9, 163.0) 65 (1, 94) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.2)
Monona County 7 106.9 (67.6, 160.2) 69 (1, 94) 5 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.1, 5.3)
Fremont County 7 117.7 (73.6, 178.2) 47 (1, 94) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 1.7)
Ida County 7 129.7 (81.1, 195.5) 24 (1, 94) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.3)
Pocahontas County 7 130.3 (80.5, 198.5) 22 (1, 94) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.2)
Adair County 7 97.1 (57.4, 153.3) 82 (2, 94) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.8, 4.0)
Van Buren County 7 93.3 (55.2, 147.4) 88 (3, 94) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 3.1)
Wayne County 7 110.7 (65.1, 174.6) 63 (1, 94) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.6)
Adams County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 7:09 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2022 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top