Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 7 N/A 112.9 (110.7, 115.1) N/A 2,093 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 104.6 (104.4, 104.8) N/A 205,200 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.2, 0.2)
Adair County 7 Rural 101.9 (62.1, 157.1) 75 (1, 93) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.8)
Allamakee County 7 Rural 85.4 (57.9, 121.0) 91 (16, 93) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.7, 4.0)
Appanoose County 7 Rural 115.2 (81.0, 158.7) 45 (1, 93) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 2.9)
Buchanan County 7 Rural 78.0 (56.9, 104.2) 93 (37, 93) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.4)
Buena Vista County 7 Rural 85.9 (63.5, 113.3) 90 (23, 93) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.2)
Butler County 7 Rural 107.8 (77.6, 145.6) 64 (3, 93) 8 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.6, 4.4)
Calhoun County 7 Rural 128.2 (88.2, 179.8) 20 (1, 93) 7 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.7, 4.8)
Carroll County 7 Rural 110.0 (83.9, 141.4) 60 (5, 92) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 2.9)
Cass County 7 Rural 159.0 (119.7, 206.8) 3 (1, 79) 11 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.9, 4.9)
Cedar County 7 Rural 129.5 (100.7, 163.9) 18 (1, 88) 14 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.0, 3.4)
Cerro Gordo County 7 Rural 120.9 (101.5, 142.9) 36 (5, 82) 28 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.9, 2.5)
Cherokee County 7 Rural 138.6 (99.0, 188.5) 9 (1, 91) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.2)
Chickasaw County 7 Rural 137.0 (99.0, 184.4) 10 (1, 90) 9 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.8, 3.9)
Clarke County 7 Rural 143.2 (101.7, 195.5) 6 (1, 91) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 4.0)
Clay County 7 Rural 100.5 (73.5, 134.0) 78 (8, 93) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Clayton County 7 Rural 111.9 (82.6, 148.0) 54 (3, 93) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.4)
Clinton County 7 Rural 123.9 (105.4, 144.8) 31 (5, 78) 32 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.8, 1.9)
Crawford County 7 Rural 92.2 (66.4, 124.5) 87 (13, 93) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.5)
Davis County 7 Rural 125.0 (84.5, 177.3) 27 (1, 93) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.8)
Decatur County 7 Rural 116.3 (72.5, 175.6) 42 (1, 93) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.0, 3.4)
Delaware County 7 Rural 107.3 (79.2, 141.7) 65 (5, 93) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 2.7)
Des Moines County 7 Rural 114.5 (95.4, 136.2) 48 (8, 88) 25 stable stable trend 1.4 (0.0, 2.8)
Dickinson County 7 Rural 128.0 (96.8, 165.9) 22 (1, 90) 11 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.8, 3.7)
Emmet County 7 Rural 89.7 (56.8, 134.4) 88 (6, 93) 5 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.6, 4.4)
Fayette County 7 Rural 98.4 (72.9, 129.8) 82 (10, 93) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.0)
Floyd County 7 Rural 131.7 (98.8, 171.8) 13 (1, 90) 11 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.8, 3.6)
Franklin County 7 Rural 130.7 (91.0, 181.6) 14 (1, 92) 7 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.1, 3.8)
Fremont County 7 Rural 115.0 (71.0, 175.9) 46 (1, 93) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.5)
Greene County 7 Rural 103.9 (66.4, 154.4) 73 (1, 93) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.7, 4.6)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 123.4 (91.8, 162.1) 32 (1, 91) 10 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.6, 3.1)
Hancock County 7 Rural 126.5 (89.0, 174.3) 25 (1, 92) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.5, 1.5)
Hardin County 7 Rural 123.0 (92.8, 159.8) 34 (2, 90) 11 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.2, 3.6)
Henry County 7 Rural 100.8 (76.6, 130.1) 76 (9, 93) 12 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.3)
Howard County 7 Rural 144.2 (100.3, 200.0) 5 (1, 91) 7 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.6)
Humboldt County 7 Rural 118.2 (79.6, 168.5) 39 (1, 93) 6
*
*
Ida County 7 Rural 107.8 (64.9, 167.6) 63 (1, 93) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.8, 2.9)
Iowa County 7 Rural 111.0 (82.6, 145.9) 57 (4, 93) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Jackson County 7 Rural 128.5 (99.5, 163.3) 19 (1, 88) 13 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.6, 4.3)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 111.6 (82.0, 148.5) 55 (2, 93) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.1)
Keokuk County 7 Rural 163.8 (119.0, 219.7) 2 (1, 80) 9 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.6, 5.5)
Kossuth County 7 Rural 98.6 (68.9, 136.3) 81 (6, 93) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 1.9)
Lee County 7 Rural 130.3 (108.2, 155.5) 17 (2, 78) 25 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 3.0)
Louisa County 7 Rural 113.0 (78.7, 157.0) 51 (2, 93) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.6)
Lucas County 7 Rural 99.6 (62.2, 150.6) 79 (2, 93) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.7)
Lyon County 7 Rural 104.5 (72.7, 145.1) 72 (3, 93) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.9)
Mahaska County 7 Rural 106.5 (82.3, 135.4) 69 (6, 93) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Marion County 7 Rural 120.9 (99.6, 145.3) 37 (4, 85) 23 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.8)
Marshall County 7 Rural 84.2 (68.0, 102.9) 92 (49, 93) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-11.4, 0.6)
Mitchell County 7 Rural 166.3 (120.6, 222.9) 1 (1, 78) 9 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.5, 5.2)
Monona County 7 Rural 118.0 (76.9, 172.6) 40 (1, 93) 5 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.2, 4.9)
Monroe County 7 Rural 125.9 (82.1, 184.1) 26 (1, 93) 5 stable stable trend 2.4 (0.0, 5.2)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 130.6 (91.3, 180.8) 16 (1, 92) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (0.0, 3.3)
Muscatine County 7 Rural 110.8 (93.2, 130.6) 58 (13, 88) 28 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 1.9)
O'Brien County 7 Rural 131.9 (97.5, 174.2) 11 (1, 90) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.2)
Page County 7 Rural 115.6 (86.3, 152.0) 43 (2, 93) 10 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.1, 3.9)
Palo Alto County 7 Rural 127.6 (85.8, 181.9) 24 (1, 93) 6 stable stable trend -23.2 (-54.7, 2.3)
Plymouth County 7 Rural 139.1 (113.4, 168.9) 8 (1, 75) 20 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.8, 3.3)
Pocahontas County 7 Rural 111.2 (66.9, 173.0) 56 (1, 93) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.2)
Poweshiek County 7 Rural 97.7 (71.5, 130.2) 83 (8, 93) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-12.6, 0.3)
Sac County 7 Rural 124.7 (83.9, 177.9) 28 (1, 93) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.4)
Shelby County 7 Rural 105.8 (71.7, 150.2) 70 (2, 93) 6 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 4.3)
Sioux County 7 Rural 112.4 (92.0, 135.7) 53 (8, 89) 22 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.7, 3.0)
Tama County 7 Rural 142.9 (110.4, 181.8) 7 (1, 79) 13 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.5, 9.6)
Union County 7 Rural 127.7 (92.3, 172.0) 23 (1, 92) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.4, 4.0)
Wapello County 7 Rural 112.5 (92.9, 135.0) 52 (8, 90) 23 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Wayne County 7 Rural 96.4 (54.6, 156.2) 85 (1, 93) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.2)
Webster County 7 Rural 100.8 (81.8, 122.7) 77 (18, 93) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Winnebago County 7 Rural 109.3 (74.0, 155.1) 61 (2, 93) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.7)
Winneshiek County 7 Rural 130.6 (100.4, 166.8) 15 (1, 87) 13 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.5, 4.6)
Worth County 7 Rural 114.8 (73.4, 171.0) 47 (1, 93) 5 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.4, 5.1)
Wright County 7 Rural 103.2 (71.4, 143.9) 74 (2, 93) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.8)
Benton County 7 Urban 145.0 (118.6, 175.6) 4 (1, 66) 21 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.7, 3.4)
Black Hawk County 7 Urban 107.9 (97.4, 119.3) 62 (27, 83) 78 stable stable trend -5.3 (-13.8, 0.7)
Boone County 7 Urban 106.9 (85.4, 132.3) 67 (11, 91) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Bremer County 7 Urban 98.8 (76.8, 125.0) 80 (14, 93) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Dallas County 7 Urban 110.3 (99.3, 122.1) 59 (22, 81) 74 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 1.0)
Dubuque County 7 Urban 124.2 (111.2, 138.3) 29 (8, 68) 68 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.4, 1.8)
Grundy County 7 Urban 89.6 (60.8, 127.0) 89 (11, 93) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.7)
Guthrie County 7 Urban 117.3 (80.6, 164.9) 41 (1, 93) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.8)
Harrison County 7 Urban 131.9 (98.9, 172.1) 12 (1, 89) 11 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.0, 3.8)
Jasper County 7 Urban 113.7 (94.8, 135.2) 49 (9, 88) 26 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.6, 3.0)
Johnson County 7 Urban 124.2 (113.8, 135.3) 30 (11, 62) 111 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.1, 2.2)
Jones County 7 Urban 96.5 (73.2, 124.8) 84 (14, 93) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Linn County 7 Urban 123.0 (114.9, 131.5) 33 (15, 57) 173 rising rising trend 1.5 (1.0, 2.1)
Madison County 7 Urban 115.6 (87.9, 149.4) 44 (3, 92) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.3)
Mills County 7 Urban 119.0 (88.4, 156.8) 38 (2, 92) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.9)
Polk County 7 Urban 106.8 (101.8, 112.1) 68 (42, 77) 341 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.8)
Pottawattamie County 7 Urban 107.2 (95.2, 120.3) 66 (25, 85) 58 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.6)
Scott County 7 Urban 113.1 (104.2, 122.5) 50 (22, 75) 121 stable stable trend -1.8 (-7.9, 0.7)
Story County 7 Urban 94.5 (82.2, 108.1) 86 (42, 92) 45 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8)
Warren County 7 Urban 104.8 (89.5, 122.0) 71 (20, 90) 33 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Washington County 7 Urban 128.0 (101.1, 159.6) 21 (1, 87) 16 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.2, 3.4)
Woodbury County 7 Urban 121.1 (109.1, 133.9) 35 (12, 70) 76 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.6, 2.0)
Adams County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/09/2024 8:50 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Adams, Audubon, Osceola, Ringgold, Taylor, Van Buren

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top