Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 7 115.0 (112.8, 117.2) N/A 2,111 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.9, 1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 106.5 (106.3, 106.7) N/A 208,914 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Pocahontas County 7 97.7 (55.7, 158.1) 82 (2, 95) 3 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 3.0)
Wayne County 7 109.5 (63.5, 174.5) 66 (1, 95) 3 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.6)
Taylor County 7 120.0 (71.9, 186.9) 44 (1, 95) 4
*
*
Adair County 7 112.3 (69.4, 171.6) 57 (1, 95) 4
*
*
Ida County 7 120.6 (74.4, 184.0) 43 (1, 95) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.3)
Van Buren County 7 106.7 (65.9, 163.1) 68 (1, 95) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.8)
Lucas County 7 103.6 (64.7, 156.3) 75 (2, 95) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.9)
Monona County 7 99.1 (61.9, 150.0) 80 (3, 95) 4 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.5, 4.8)
Decatur County 7 123.8 (79.0, 183.8) 39 (1, 95) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.3)
Fremont County 7 131.4 (84.1, 195.4) 26 (1, 95) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.0)
Grundy County 7 76.0 (49.6, 111.3) 94 (33, 95) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.0)
Monroe County 7 118.3 (77.0, 173.6) 47 (1, 95) 5 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.5, 5.0)
Sac County 7 102.3 (66.5, 150.1) 77 (3, 95) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.7)
Winnebago County 7 94.0 (61.1, 137.7) 87 (9, 95) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.6)
Appanoose County 7 83.7 (55.0, 121.6) 93 (17, 95) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Humboldt County 7 105.9 (69.5, 154.1) 69 (3, 95) 5
*
*
Davis County 7 118.5 (79.0, 170.2) 45 (1, 95) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.2)
Greene County 7 123.1 (82.2, 176.8) 40 (1, 95) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.3, 4.4)
Worth County 7 136.6 (91.3, 196.5) 12 (1, 95) 6 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.8, 4.6)
Guthrie County 7 105.1 (70.8, 150.2) 70 (5, 95) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.0)
Lyon County 7 94.6 (64.1, 134.0) 86 (9, 95) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.0)
Howard County 7 133.6 (91.2, 188.4) 19 (1, 95) 6 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.4)
Mitchell County 7 129.9 (89.7, 181.2) 31 (1, 94) 7 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.3, 4.4)
Shelby County 7 115.9 (79.9, 162.1) 50 (2, 95) 7 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.8, 4.1)
Emmet County 7 142.7 (99.3, 198.1) 8 (1, 93) 7 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.9, 4.9)
Louisa County 7 110.5 (76.9, 153.6) 63 (3, 95) 7 stable stable trend 16.3 (-4.5, 41.6)
Montgomery County 7 131.5 (91.4, 182.9) 24 (1, 94) 7 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.6, 3.6)
Cherokee County 7 131.0 (91.5, 181.2) 28 (1, 94) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.3)
Hancock County 7 124.4 (87.0, 172.2) 38 (1, 94) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.1)
Union County 7 108.2 (75.7, 149.7) 67 (4, 95) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.4, 3.7)
Calhoun County 7 152.1 (107.4, 208.6) 6 (1, 91) 8 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.0, 5.3)
Franklin County 7 140.3 (99.2, 192.5) 9 (1, 94) 8 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.6, 3.6)
Allamakee County 7 110.5 (78.4, 151.1) 62 (3, 95) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.4, 4.5)
Kossuth County 7 113.6 (80.9, 154.5) 54 (2, 95) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Palo Alto County 7 173.4 (123.6, 235.8) 1 (1, 81) 8 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.0, 5.3)
Wright County 7 126.2 (90.1, 171.5) 35 (1, 94) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 2.9)
Buena Vista County 7 74.5 (53.3, 101.1) 95 (50, 95) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Chickasaw County 7 129.8 (92.9, 176.1) 32 (1, 94) 8 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.6, 4.1)
Clayton County 7 93.0 (66.6, 126.2) 88 (16, 95) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
Clarke County 7 159.5 (114.7, 215.5) 4 (1, 88) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.1, 4.1)
Jefferson County 7 89.7 (64.3, 121.7) 91 (18, 95) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.7)
Crawford County 7 91.0 (65.7, 122.4) 90 (15, 95) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.0)
O'Brien County 7 115.9 (83.8, 156.0) 49 (2, 95) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.7)
Keokuk County 7 172.0 (125.8, 229.3) 2 (1, 76) 9 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.0, 5.4)
Iowa County 7 103.2 (75.7, 137.2) 76 (9, 95) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Page County 7 110.1 (81.4, 145.8) 64 (4, 94) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (0.0, 3.5)
Poweshiek County 7 101.4 (74.6, 134.5) 79 (9, 95) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Butler County 7 128.4 (95.2, 169.2) 34 (1, 93) 10 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.0, 4.2)
Clay County 7 113.1 (83.9, 149.0) 56 (4, 94) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Madison County 7 101.9 (75.6, 134.4) 78 (8, 95) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Buchanan County 7 91.3 (68.3, 119.3) 89 (22, 95) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
Cass County 7 159.7 (119.9, 208.2) 3 (1, 75) 11 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.4, 5.0)
Harrison County 7 136.3 (102.2, 177.9) 13 (1, 91) 11 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.3, 3.9)
Hamilton County 7 135.7 (102.1, 176.5) 15 (1, 89) 11 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.5, 3.0)
Fayette County 7 112.2 (84.7, 145.5) 58 (6, 94) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0)
Floyd County 7 139.5 (105.9, 180.0) 10 (1, 87) 12 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.1, 3.7)
Mills County 7 131.9 (100.2, 170.6) 22 (1, 89) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.5)
Mahaska County 7 94.6 (72.1, 121.7) 85 (19, 95) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Delaware County 7 135.9 (103.7, 174.5) 14 (1, 88) 12 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.1)
Hardin County 7 133.7 (102.1, 171.8) 18 (1, 88) 12 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.3, 3.7)
Dickinson County 7 139.2 (106.6, 178.7) 11 (1, 88) 12 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.8, 3.7)
Jones County 7 112.2 (86.7, 142.8) 59 (6, 94) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Winneshiek County 7 131.4 (101.3, 167.5) 25 (1, 89) 13 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.4, 4.3)
Bremer County 7 97.0 (75.2, 123.1) 83 (21, 95) 14 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Cedar County 7 131.8 (102.7, 166.6) 23 (1, 89) 14 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.3, 3.6)
Tama County 7 144.9 (112.7, 183.3) 7 (1, 81) 14 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 2.7)
Henry County 7 122.3 (95.4, 154.4) 41 (3, 91) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.5)
Carroll County 7 135.7 (106.2, 170.5) 16 (1, 86) 15 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.1)
Washington County 7 133.7 (106.0, 166.2) 17 (1, 85) 16 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.4)
Boone County 7 105.1 (83.5, 130.5) 72 (13, 94) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Jackson County 7 158.2 (125.5, 196.5) 5 (1, 66) 16 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.3, 4.2)
Plymouth County 7 132.9 (107.4, 162.5) 21 (2, 83) 19 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.8, 3.2)
Webster County 7 95.8 (77.4, 117.1) 84 (30, 95) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Benton County 7 131.2 (106.3, 160.2) 27 (2, 83) 19 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.7, 3.4)
Marion County 7 110.0 (89.8, 133.3) 65 (12, 92) 21 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Sioux County 7 113.3 (92.5, 137.0) 55 (10, 91) 22 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.8, 3.1)
Marshall County 7 97.9 (80.3, 118.0) 81 (29, 94) 22 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.7)
Wapello County 7 111.9 (92.1, 134.6) 61 (12, 91) 23 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.7)
Jasper County 7 115.7 (96.3, 137.8) 51 (10, 88) 25 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.6, 2.5)
Des Moines County 7 112.1 (93.4, 133.4) 60 (13, 92) 25 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.5)
Lee County 7 133.2 (111.1, 158.3) 20 (2, 75) 26 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.6, 2.7)
Muscatine County 7 113.9 (96.1, 133.9) 53 (12, 87) 29 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.4, 2.0)
Cerro Gordo County 7 130.9 (110.6, 153.7) 29 (3, 76) 30 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.1, 2.7)
Clinton County 7 121.1 (102.8, 141.6) 42 (8, 85) 31 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.8, 1.8)
Warren County 7 105.1 (89.5, 122.6) 71 (25, 91) 33 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Story County 7 89.6 (77.4, 103.0) 92 (57, 94) 42 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8)
Dallas County 7 105.0 (93.8, 117.3) 73 (37, 87) 64 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Pottawattamie County 7 118.0 (105.4, 131.6) 48 (18, 77) 64 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.6, 1.6)
Dubuque County 7 125.1 (112.1, 139.2) 37 (10, 70) 68 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.4, 1.8)
Woodbury County 7 130.1 (117.5, 143.5) 30 (9, 62) 80 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.7, 2.0)
Black Hawk County 7 118.5 (107.5, 130.4) 46 (18, 77) 87 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.6, 1.7)
Johnson County 7 125.8 (115.2, 137.0) 36 (14, 63) 111 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.1, 2.2)
Scott County 7 114.3 (105.3, 123.7) 52 (27, 75) 122 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.6, 1.6)
Linn County 7 129.3 (120.9, 138.0) 33 (12, 53) 179 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.1, 2.1)
Polk County 7 104.3 (99.3, 109.5) 74 (52, 82) 328 stable stable trend 0.3 (0.0, 0.6)
Adams County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/04/2023 1:24 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2021 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top