Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 7 No 43.2 (42.3, 44.2) N/A 1,653 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 Yes 38.0 (37.9, 38.1) N/A 143,200 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Osceola County 7 No 73.6 (49.3, 106.8) 1 (1, 86) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.4)
Monroe County 7 No 67.0 (46.4, 94.5) 2 (1, 81) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Palo Alto County 7 No 65.1 (43.8, 93.1) 3 (1, 93) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Emmet County 7 No 63.4 (46.3, 85.8) 4 (1, 81) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Decatur County 7 No 63.3 (40.7, 93.9) 5 (1, 97) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Monona County 7 No 62.1 (43.8, 86.5) 6 (1, 92) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Sac County 7 No 60.0 (41.8, 84.1) 7 (1, 94) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.4)
Van Buren County 7 No 59.9 (40.9, 86.0) 8 (1, 94) 7
*
*
Montgomery County 7 No 57.8 (41.2, 79.6) 9 (1, 94) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.3)
Madison County 7 No 55.4 (41.3, 73.0) 10 (1, 89) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Henry County 7 No 55.3 (42.5, 71.0) 11 (1, 85) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Jackson County 7 No 54.4 (42.2, 69.4) 12 (1, 85) 15 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Pocahontas County 7 No 53.1 (34.2, 80.1) 13 (1, 98) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.3)
Cass County 7 No 53.0 (39.3, 70.5) 14 (1, 93) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Hardin County 7 No 52.6 (40.6, 67.6) 15 (1, 89) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.6)
Davis County 7 No 52.2 (33.0, 78.4) 16 (1, 98) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Humboldt County 7 No 51.7 (35.0, 74.3) 17 (1, 97) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.3)
Muscatine County 7 No 51.6 (43.1, 61.3) 18 (3, 75) 27 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Woodbury County 7 No 51.5 (45.7, 57.9) 19 (6, 58) 59 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Tama County 7 No 51.4 (39.3, 66.4) 20 (2, 91) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Lyon County 7 No 51.3 (36.0, 71.3) 21 (1, 97) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Marion County 7 No 50.4 (40.8, 61.6) 22 (4, 85) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Pottawattamie County 7 No 50.1 (44.3, 56.4) 23 (7, 62) 57 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.6)
Union County 7 No 49.9 (34.2, 70.4) 24 (1, 98) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Keokuk County 7 No 49.9 (34.0, 71.3) 25 (1, 97) 7 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Guthrie County 7 No 49.5 (35.1, 68.8) 26 (1, 97) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Mills County 7 No 49.4 (35.8, 66.9) 27 (1, 97) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Lee County 7 No 48.0 (39.2, 58.4) 28 (6, 89) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Webster County 7 No 47.7 (39.2, 57.6) 29 (5, 88) 24 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.8, -1.8)
Delaware County 7 No 47.7 (35.8, 62.6) 30 (3, 95) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Kossuth County 7 No 47.4 (34.4, 64.1) 31 (2, 97) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Boone County 7 No 47.2 (37.1, 59.3) 32 (4, 93) 16 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Harrison County 7 No 47.2 (34.3, 63.8) 33 (2, 96) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Adair County 7 No 47.1 (31.5, 69.7) 34 (1, 98) 6
*
*
Fayette County 7 No 47.0 (36.3, 60.2) 35 (4, 94) 14 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Mahaska County 7 No 46.9 (35.9, 60.3) 36 (4, 94) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Jasper County 7 No 46.4 (38.3, 56.0) 37 (7, 88) 24 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Howard County 7 No 46.3 (31.7, 66.5) 38 (2, 98) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Grundy County 7 No 46.2 (31.9, 65.0) 39 (2, 98) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Buena Vista County 7 No 46.1 (34.4, 60.7) 40 (3, 96) 11 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.1)
Clinton County 7 No 46.1 (38.8, 54.5) 41 (9, 87) 30 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Buchanan County 7 No 45.8 (34.5, 59.7) 42 (4, 96) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.0)
Wapello County 7 No 45.7 (37.2, 55.8) 43 (7, 91) 21 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Iowa County 7 No 45.2 (33.1, 60.6) 44 (4, 97) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Shelby County 7 No 45.0 (32.5, 61.9) 45 (2, 97) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Appanoose County 7 No 44.8 (31.8, 61.9) 46 (2, 98) 9 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
O'Brien County 7 No 44.8 (32.4, 60.9) 47 (2, 97) 10 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Calhoun County 7 No 44.6 (30.2, 64.5) 48 (2, 98) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Plymouth County 7 No 44.6 (34.6, 56.8) 49 (6, 96) 15 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.4)
Hancock County 7 No 44.4 (31.2, 62.4) 50 (3, 98) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Fremont County 7 No 44.2 (27.7, 68.7) 51 (1, 98) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -0.9)
Washington County 7 No 44.0 (33.5, 57.0) 52 (4, 96) 13 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.0)
Des Moines County 7 No 43.6 (35.8, 52.8) 53 (10, 93) 24 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Carroll County 7 No 43.2 (32.8, 56.1) 54 (6, 96) 14 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.4)
Cerro Gordo County 7 No 43.2 (35.8, 51.7) 55 (12, 92) 27 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Cherokee County 7 No 43.0 (30.3, 60.2) 56 (4, 98) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Worth County 7 No 42.8 (26.3, 66.8) 57 (2, 98) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.7)
Black Hawk County 7 No 42.4 (37.8, 47.6) 58 (24, 87) 64 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Clayton County 7 No 41.9 (31.6, 55.2) 59 (7, 97) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.4)
Dickinson County 7 No 41.9 (30.4, 56.9) 60 (5, 98) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Allamakee County 7 No 41.9 (29.7, 58.0) 61 (4, 98) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.6)
Crawford County 7 No 41.6 (30.5, 55.9) 62 (6, 98) 10 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Page County 7 No 41.6 (30.4, 56.1) 63 (5, 98) 10 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.8, -1.8)
Benton County 7 No 41.4 (31.5, 53.4) 64 (8, 97) 13 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.5)
Lucas County 7 No 41.2 (26.8, 61.8) 65 (3, 98) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Greene County 7 No 41.1 (27.1, 61.1) 66 (4, 98) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Dubuque County 7 No 41.1 (36.0, 46.7) 67 (26, 89) 50 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.6)
Polk County 7 No 40.8 (38.2, 43.5) 68 (41, 83) 195 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
Clay County 7 No 40.7 (29.3, 55.3) 69 (7, 98) 10 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.1)
Scott County 7 No 40.6 (36.6, 44.9) 70 (35, 90) 80 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
Louisa County 7 No 40.5 (27.1, 58.8) 71 (4, 98) 6 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.5)
Marshall County 7 No 40.2 (32.6, 49.1) 72 (15, 96) 21 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Wayne County 7 Yes 39.9 (23.4, 65.1) 73 (2, 98) 4
*
*
Jones County 7 Yes 39.5 (30.0, 51.6) 74 (11, 98) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Hamilton County 7 Yes 39.0 (27.3, 54.4) 75 (7, 98) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Wright County 7 Yes 38.5 (26.2, 55.1) 76 (6, 98) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.1)
Ringgold County 7 Yes 38.4 (20.3, 68.2) 77 (1, 98) 3
*
*
Johnson County 7 Yes 38.4 (33.6, 43.6) 78 (37, 95) 49 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Butler County 7 Yes 38.2 (27.0, 53.1) 79 (9, 98) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Linn County 7 Yes 38.1 (34.7, 41.8) 80 (47, 91) 96 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.0, -2.8)
Warren County 7 Yes 37.9 (31.0, 46.0) 81 (28, 97) 22 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.2)
Sioux County 7 Yes 37.4 (28.9, 47.6) 82 (16, 98) 14 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.3)
Cedar County 7 Yes 37.2 (26.8, 50.6) 83 (9, 98) 9 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -1.9)
Story County 7 Yes 36.9 (31.2, 43.5) 84 (37, 97) 31 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Winneshiek County 7 Yes 36.7 (26.4, 49.9) 85 (12, 98) 10 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.0, -2.2)
Ida County 7 Yes 36.2 (21.4, 58.8) 86 (4, 98) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.1)
Franklin County 7 Yes 36.1 (22.9, 54.8) 87 (5, 98) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1)
Taylor County 7 Yes 35.6 (19.9, 60.4) 88 (2, 98) 4 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.5)
Mitchell County 7 Yes 35.6 (22.9, 53.5) 89 (8, 98) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.5)
Poweshiek County 7 Yes 35.3 (25.9, 47.5) 90 (20, 98) 10 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.9)
Bremer County 7 Yes 34.7 (26.1, 45.5) 91 (22, 98) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Dallas County 7 Yes 34.5 (28.9, 40.9) 92 (46, 98) 27 stable stable trend 2.2 (-4.4, 9.3)
Audubon County 7 Yes 34.3 (18.8, 60.1) 93 (3, 98) 4 falling falling trend -7.2 (-11.9, -2.3)
Clarke County 7 Yes 33.7 (20.3, 53.3) 94 (8, 98) 4
*
*
Floyd County 7 Yes 33.1 (23.3, 46.1) 95 (23, 98) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.3)
Winnebago County 7 Yes 32.7 (19.3, 51.9) 96 (7, 98) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
Jefferson County 7 Yes 32.0 (22.1, 45.2) 97 (25, 98) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Chickasaw County 7 Yes 29.5 (19.2, 44.1) 98 (27, 98) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.8)
Adams County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2021 1:30 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top