Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 7 184.9 (179.7, 190.2) N/A 980 falling falling trend -3.6 (-3.8, -3.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 156.6 (156.1, 157.1) N/A 77,629 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.1, -2.5)
Monroe County 7 374.7 (250.2, 539.6) 1 (1, 60) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.7)
Sac County 7 314.6 (217.4, 440.1) 2 (1, 69) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-4.0, -0.1)
Howard County 7 302.2 (202.5, 434.4) 3 (1, 83) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.5, -0.1)
Tama County 7 279.2 (205.2, 371.3) 4 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.1)
Cherokee County 7 266.9 (184.1, 373.4) 5 (1, 85) 7 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.4)
Osceola County 7 259.9 (152.0, 415.1) 6 (1, 92) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.7, 0.7)
Calhoun County 7 258.1 (170.9, 373.9) 7 (1, 89) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.3)
Worth County 7 257.2 (153.7, 403.1) 8 (1, 92) 4 stable stable trend -2.5 (-16.0, 0.6)
Audubon County 7 255.6 (149.4, 407.9) 9 (1, 92) 4
*
*
Decatur County 7 255.6 (153.3, 399.0) 10 (1, 92) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.1)
Marion County 7 252.6 (197.7, 318.0) 11 (2, 72) 15 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Emmet County 7 249.2 (161.0, 368.7) 12 (1, 91) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.2)
Davis County 7 246.1 (147.5, 385.0) 13 (1, 92) 4 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.7, -0.7)
Monona County 7 245.0 (158.1, 361.7) 14 (1, 90) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.8)
Buena Vista County 7 244.8 (170.5, 339.8) 15 (1, 85) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.4, -1.5)
Lee County 7 240.2 (189.3, 300.3) 16 (2, 70) 16 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.9)
Allamakee County 7 238.9 (167.7, 329.9) 17 (1, 87) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.8)
Webster County 7 238.3 (188.8, 296.9) 18 (2, 71) 16 stable stable trend 3.1 (-4.6, 20.3)
Plymouth County 7 237.9 (177.9, 311.5) 19 (2, 80) 11 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.8, -1.5)
Madison County 7 237.5 (160.7, 338.1) 20 (1, 89) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.5)
Mills County 7 235.0 (156.3, 338.6) 21 (1, 90) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.6)
Cass County 7 234.8 (162.0, 328.6) 22 (1, 89) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.7)
Lyon County 7 234.0 (151.3, 345.9) 23 (1, 90) 5 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.7)
Hancock County 7 233.6 (153.4, 340.3) 24 (1, 90) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.7)
Muscatine County 7 233.4 (184.4, 291.3) 25 (3, 71) 16 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -1.0)
Fayette County 7 221.4 (162.1, 295.1) 26 (2, 87) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.4)
Chickasaw County 7 221.3 (144.3, 324.1) 27 (1, 91) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.2)
Poweshiek County 7 219.6 (158.2, 297.1) 28 (2, 88) 9 falling falling trend -6.6 (-21.9, -3.3)
Delaware County 7 218.9 (153.5, 302.9) 29 (2, 90) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.2, -0.3)
Harrison County 7 217.1 (144.8, 312.5) 30 (1, 91) 6 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.7)
Clay County 7 217.0 (152.1, 300.2) 31 (2, 89) 8 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.8)
Pottawattamie County 7 214.9 (183.1, 250.6) 32 (10, 67) 33 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.7)
Boone County 7 213.6 (157.1, 283.6) 33 (4, 88) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -1.0)
Pocahontas County 7 213.1 (123.4, 342.7) 34 (1, 92) 3 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.7)
Woodbury County 7 212.6 (180.7, 248.5) 35 (10, 67) 32 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Greene County 7 212.5 (130.9, 325.8) 36 (1, 92) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.5)
Clarke County 7 211.3 (122.1, 339.0) 37 (1, 92) 3
*
*
Louisa County 7 210.3 (129.3, 322.7) 38 (1, 92) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.5)
Marshall County 7 210.3 (165.4, 263.7) 39 (6, 82) 15 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.9)
Van Buren County 7 210.0 (119.7, 341.7) 40 (1, 92) 3
*
*
Jasper County 7 207.6 (162.3, 261.6) 41 (7, 84) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Buchanan County 7 204.9 (143.9, 282.9) 42 (3, 90) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.4, 0.5)
Appanoose County 7 203.7 (137.0, 292.0) 43 (3, 92) 6 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.8)
Franklin County 7 203.0 (125.1, 310.6) 44 (2, 92) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.1, 0.4)
Wright County 7 202.1 (132.7, 294.2) 45 (2, 92) 6 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.2, -1.8)
Clinton County 7 197.6 (158.6, 243.3) 46 (11, 84) 18 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.5)
Page County 7 196.3 (133.4, 278.2) 47 (4, 92) 6 falling falling trend -6.4 (-19.6, -2.5)
Montgomery County 7 195.6 (120.9, 299.7) 48 (2, 92) 4 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.2, -0.6)
Wapello County 7 193.7 (147.0, 250.5) 49 (8, 90) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Shelby County 7 193.7 (123.7, 288.2) 50 (3, 92) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.1)
Mitchell County 7 193.3 (120.3, 294.3) 51 (2, 92) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.5, 0.4)
Crawford County 7 190.0 (125.7, 275.3) 52 (4, 92) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-4.0, -0.3)
Palo Alto County 7 188.1 (111.1, 297.8) 53 (2, 92) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -1.4)
Bremer County 7 186.1 (135.9, 248.8) 54 (7, 91) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.7, -1.1)
Clayton County 7 182.8 (129.4, 251.0) 55 (8, 92) 8 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.3)
Floyd County 7 181.6 (123.0, 258.1) 56 (5, 92) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.6)
Jackson County 7 179.9 (126.1, 248.8) 57 (8, 92) 7 falling falling trend -3.5 (-21.7, -1.8)
Lucas County 7 179.8 (104.4, 288.9) 58 (2, 92) 3 falling falling trend -7.5 (-42.2, -2.6)
Guthrie County 7 179.7 (110.6, 275.5) 59 (3, 92) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.0)
Humboldt County 7 179.4 (105.5, 284.9) 60 (2, 92) 4 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.3, -2.3)
Des Moines County 7 177.4 (138.2, 224.3) 61 (15, 90) 14 falling falling trend -4.4 (-21.7, -2.9)
Polk County 7 177.2 (162.2, 193.2) 62 (37, 76) 107 falling falling trend -3.8 (-8.1, -2.8)
Black Hawk County 7 176.2 (151.4, 203.9) 63 (29, 85) 37 falling falling trend -4.2 (-15.4, -3.0)
Story County 7 172.4 (140.3, 209.6) 64 (22, 89) 21 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.7)
Iowa County 7 172.0 (111.3, 253.5) 65 (6, 92) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.4)
Sioux County 7 171.0 (125.1, 228.1) 66 (15, 92) 10 falling falling trend -7.7 (-17.0, -4.9)
Jefferson County 7 169.3 (112.2, 244.8) 67 (9, 92) 6 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.8)
Benton County 7 168.6 (120.0, 230.3) 68 (14, 92) 8 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.2, -2.5)
Hardin County 7 167.3 (113.9, 237.1) 69 (9, 92) 7 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.4)
Keokuk County 7 166.3 (98.9, 262.3) 70 (6, 92) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -1.0)
Dallas County 7 165.1 (131.8, 204.2) 71 (26, 90) 17 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.8, 14.9)
Winnebago County 7 163.0 (96.6, 257.8) 72 (5, 92) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 0.8)
Scott County 7 160.7 (139.9, 183.9) 73 (43, 87) 44 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.2, -3.1)
Mahaska County 7 158.6 (107.2, 225.8) 74 (13, 92) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.9, -0.3)
Butler County 7 158.2 (102.7, 233.0) 75 (13, 92) 5 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.3)
Jones County 7 156.8 (108.1, 220.1) 76 (17, 92) 7 falling falling trend -4.9 (-28.0, -2.6)
Dubuque County 7 155.7 (130.2, 184.8) 77 (39, 90) 27 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.9, -2.4)
Union County 7 154.8 (92.7, 242.2) 78 (8, 92) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.8)
O'Brien County 7 153.9 (97.1, 232.2) 79 (10, 92) 5 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.2, -2.1)
Kossuth County 7 152.1 (100.2, 221.5) 80 (13, 92) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.7, -1.1)
Hamilton County 7 151.5 (94.9, 229.0) 81 (12, 92) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.7)
Carroll County 7 149.4 (102.6, 210.7) 82 (18, 92) 7 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.5, -2.6)
Linn County 7 148.6 (130.9, 168.1) 83 (53, 89) 52 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.1, -3.8)
Henry County 7 145.3 (95.3, 212.0) 84 (19, 92) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.8)
Grundy County 7 144.4 (87.8, 224.6) 85 (11, 92) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 0.3)
Warren County 7 142.2 (106.8, 185.6) 86 (37, 92) 11 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -0.9)
Johnson County 7 139.7 (115.0, 168.1) 87 (51, 92) 23 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
Cedar County 7 139.6 (90.2, 206.3) 88 (20, 92) 5 falling falling trend -4.1 (-25.3, -1.9)
Winneshiek County 7 138.2 (91.9, 199.6) 89 (24, 92) 6 falling falling trend -6.7 (-12.6, -4.4)
Cerro Gordo County 7 136.1 (104.3, 174.6) 90 (43, 92) 13 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.9)
Dickinson County 7 121.2 (79.4, 177.4) 91 (41, 92) 5 falling falling trend -14.7 (-34.8, -5.2)
Washington County 7 117.3 (76.7, 172.2) 92 (43, 92) 5 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.5, -2.1)
Adair County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Adams County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fremont County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ida County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/04/2024 1:22 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2022 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top