Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 7 *** 28.1 (27.3, 28.9) N/A 1,010 rising rising trend 3.2 (3.0, 3.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 22.6 (22.5, 22.7) N/A 83,620 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 2.9)
Plymouth County 7 *** 49.8 (38.6, 63.3) 1 (1, 24) 15
*
*
Sioux County 7 *** 48.4 (38.1, 60.5) 2 (1, 28) 17 rising rising trend 5.3 (3.4, 7.2)
Howard County 7 *** 47.3 (29.9, 71.2) 3 (1, 65) 5
*
*
Delaware County 7 *** 47.0 (33.6, 64.0) 4 (1, 44) 9 rising rising trend 5.4 (3.3, 7.4)
Dickinson County 7 *** 46.7 (34.0, 62.8) 5 (1, 44) 11
*
*
Dubuque County 7 *** 43.8 (38.1, 50.0) 6 (1, 22) 47 stable stable trend -7.5 (-20.3, 7.4)
Winneshiek County 7 *** 43.6 (31.8, 58.6) 7 (1, 52) 11
*
*
Kossuth County 7 *** 43.1 (29.4, 60.9) 8 (1, 63) 8
*
*
Franklin County 7 *** 42.8 (27.8, 63.5) 9 (1, 68) 6
*
*
Cerro Gordo County 7 *** 42.6 (34.7, 51.8) 10 (1, 32) 24 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.2, 5.9)
Floyd County 7 *** 39.2 (26.9, 55.3) 11 (1, 68) 7
*
*
Jones County 7 *** 38.0 (27.2, 51.8) 12 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.7)
Jackson County 7 *** 37.6 (26.9, 51.4) 13 (1, 64) 9
*
*
Mitchell County 7 *** 36.9 (21.7, 58.5) 14 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Carroll County 7 *** 36.7 (26.3, 49.9) 15 (1, 65) 9
*
*
Chickasaw County 7 *** 36.2 (22.6, 55.1) 16 (1, 76) 5
*
*
Hancock County 7 *** 35.8 (22.7, 54.3) 17 (1, 75) 5
*
*
Worth County 7 *** 35.6 (19.6, 59.8) 18 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Bremer County 7 *** 35.0 (25.7, 46.6) 19 (2, 67) 10 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.2, 4.2)
Palo Alto County 7 *** 34.6 (20.8, 54.8) 20 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Fayette County 7 *** 34.1 (23.2, 48.3) 21 (1, 74) 8 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.1, 4.9)
Mills County 7 *** 33.3 (22.0, 48.6) 22 (1, 75) 6
*
*
Clay County 7 *** 32.5 (21.2, 47.5) 23 (2, 76) 6
*
*
Butler County 7 *** 32.3 (21.7, 46.7) 24 (2, 76) 7
*
*
Johnson County 7 *** 31.8 (27.5, 36.6) 25 (12, 53) 42 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.3, 3.5)
Woodbury County 7 *** 30.8 (26.2, 35.9) 26 (12, 57) 34 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.2, 4.4)
Marion County 7 *** 30.1 (22.6, 39.4) 27 (7, 71) 12 rising rising trend 4.1 (2.3, 6.0)
Calhoun County 7 *** 30.1 (16.9, 49.8) 28 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Grundy County 7 *** 29.8 (18.8, 45.3) 29 (2, 78) 5
*
*
Henry County 7 *** 29.6 (20.1, 42.1) 30 (3, 77) 7 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.4, 5.2)
Des Moines County 7 *** 28.9 (22.5, 36.7) 31 (11, 72) 15 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.9, 4.9)
Scott County 7 *** 28.7 (25.4, 32.4) 32 (19, 58) 56 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.3, 4.4)
Cherokee County 7 *** 28.7 (17.6, 45.0) 33 (3, 78) 5
*
*
Linn County 7 *** 28.6 (25.7, 31.9) 34 (20, 58) 70 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.6, 7.7)
Black Hawk County 7 *** 28.2 (24.2, 32.6) 35 (17, 64) 39 rising rising trend 2.7 (2.0, 3.5)
Jasper County 7 *** 28.2 (21.6, 36.3) 36 (11, 72) 13 rising rising trend 14.1 (1.7, 28.0)
Cedar County 7 *** 28.0 (19.0, 40.1) 37 (6, 77) 7
*
*
Allamakee County 7 *** 27.9 (17.3, 42.9) 38 (3, 78) 5
*
*
Sac County 7 *** 27.8 (16.9, 44.1) 39 (4, 78) 4 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.3, 4.6)
Marshall County 7 *** 27.7 (21.0, 35.9) 40 (10, 74) 13 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.0, 4.3)
Poweshiek County 7 *** 27.6 (18.3, 40.2) 41 (6, 78) 7
*
*
Hardin County 7 *** 27.4 (17.9, 40.4) 42 (6, 78) 7
*
*
Guthrie County 7 *** 27.4 (16.8, 43.3) 43 (4, 78) 4
*
*
Dallas County 7 *** 27.3 (22.5, 33.0) 44 (17, 70) 22 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.3)
Hamilton County 7 *** 27.1 (16.4, 42.1) 45 (3, 78) 4 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.2, 7.5)
Benton County 7 *** 27.1 (19.5, 36.8) 46 (9, 76) 9
*
*
Clinton County 7 *** 26.8 (21.1, 33.8) 47 (15, 73) 16 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.4, 3.8)
Union County 7 *** 26.8 (16.5, 41.7) 48 (5, 78) 4
*
*
Boone County 7 *** 26.3 (19.0, 35.6) 49 (12, 76) 9 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.1, 4.1)
Greene County 7 *** 26.2 (14.0, 45.3) 50 (3, 78) 3
*
*
Monona County 7 *** 26.2 (14.3, 45.0) 51 (2, 78) 4
*
*
Pottawattamie County 7 *** 26.1 (21.8, 30.9) 52 (21, 70) 29 rising rising trend 3.9 (2.5, 5.4)
Cass County 7 *** 26.0 (15.3, 41.3) 53 (5, 78) 4
*
*
Webster County 7 *** 25.9 (19.5, 33.8) 54 (15, 76) 12 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.5, 4.7)
Story County 7 *** 25.7 (20.8, 31.3) 55 (20, 73) 21 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.1, 2.7)
Lyon County 7 *** 24.5 (13.9, 40.2) 56 (5, 78) 4
*
*
Shelby County 7 *** 24.4 (14.5, 39.4) 57 (6, 78) 4
*
*
Humboldt County 7 *** 24.4 (14.3, 40.1) 58 (7, 78) 4
*
*
Muscatine County 7 *** 24.3 (18.4, 31.7) 59 (17, 77) 12 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.8, 4.2)
Polk County 7 *** 23.0 (21.1, 25.0) 60 (43, 70) 111 rising rising trend 2.4 (1.8, 3.0)
Winnebago County 7 *** 22.8 (12.1, 39.3) 61 (7, 78) 3
*
*
Appanoose County 7 *** 22.7 (13.3, 36.7) 62 (9, 78) 4
*
*
Warren County 7 *** 22.6 (17.3, 29.1) 63 (24, 77) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.5)
Lee County 7 *** 22.2 (16.0, 30.1) 64 (22, 78) 9 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.8, 4.7)
Page County 7 *** 22.2 (14.0, 34.1) 65 (14, 78) 5
*
*
Crawford County 7 *** 22.1 (13.9, 33.6) 66 (15, 78) 5
*
*
O'Brien County 7 *** 22.1 (13.0, 35.3) 67 (10, 78) 4 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.9, 6.5)
Iowa County 7 *** 22.1 (13.3, 34.7) 68 (12, 78) 4
*
*
Harrison County 7 *** 22.0 (12.7, 35.8) 69 (10, 78) 4 rising rising trend 4.6 (2.3, 6.9)
Washington County 7 *** 21.9 (14.2, 32.4) 70 (16, 78) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.1, 4.3)
Clayton County 7 *** 20.0 (12.6, 30.5) 71 (20, 78) 5
*
*
Tama County 7 *** 19.7 (11.8, 31.2) 72 (16, 78) 4
*
*
Jefferson County 7 *** 19.6 (11.7, 31.3) 73 (18, 78) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.8, 4.3)
Buena Vista County 7 *** 19.4 (11.7, 30.2) 74 (19, 78) 4
*
*
Mahaska County 7 *** 18.0 (11.3, 27.2) 75 (29, 78) 5
*
*
Wapello County 7 *** 17.8 (12.4, 24.8) 76 (38, 78) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.7)
Madison County 7 *** 17.3 (9.9, 28.3) 77 (26, 78) 3
*
*
Buchanan County 7 *** 16.3 (9.8, 25.7) 78 (34, 78) 4
*
*
Adair County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Adams County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davis County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Emmet County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fremont County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ida County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keokuk County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Louisa County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lucas County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wright County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/01/2021 2:25 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top