Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 7 *** 107.7 (105.6, 109.8) N/A 2,061 stable stable trend 3.3 (-0.9, 7.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 104.5 (104.3, 104.7) N/A 192,918 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.5, 5.0)
Greene County 7 *** 177.2 (134.6, 231.1) 1 (1, 48) 12 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.7)
Dickinson County 7 *** 176.1 (146.6, 211.0) 2 (1, 27) 27 stable stable trend 8.1 (-0.3, 17.2)
Carroll County 7 *** 166.0 (136.9, 200.2) 3 (1, 35) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Palo Alto County 7 *** 159.5 (119.7, 210.4) 4 (1, 67) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Emmet County 7 *** 156.5 (118.3, 205.0) 5 (1, 64) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Adams County 7 *** 155.6 (96.2, 243.9) 6 (1, 96) 5
*
*
Audubon County 7 *** 154.7 (108.6, 218.8) 7 (1, 85) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Ida County 7 *** 152.9 (109.4, 210.9) 8 (1, 81) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.6)
Clay County 7 *** 145.4 (115.6, 181.5) 9 (1, 63) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Lyon County 7 *** 144.6 (107.6, 190.8) 10 (1, 83) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Cass County 7 *** 142.7 (112.0, 180.8) 11 (1, 69) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Pocahontas County 7 *** 139.5 (99.2, 194.3) 12 (1, 88) 8 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Hamilton County 7 *** 139.1 (109.0, 175.9) 13 (1, 76) 15 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.3)
Boone County 7 *** 139.1 (114.9, 167.2) 14 (2, 61) 25 stable stable trend 4.0 (-2.3, 10.6)
Story County 7 *** 138.5 (122.2, 156.3) 15 (3, 45) 55 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Sac County 7 *** 134.1 (98.6, 180.3) 16 (1, 88) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Plymouth County 7 *** 133.0 (109.1, 161.0) 17 (2, 70) 23 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3)
Montgomery County 7 *** 132.4 (97.6, 177.4) 18 (1, 87) 10 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.3)
Crawford County 7 *** 129.6 (100.7, 164.7) 19 (2, 83) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Sioux County 7 *** 129.3 (107.2, 154.7) 20 (3, 69) 25 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.1)
Jackson County 7 *** 128.5 (103.7, 158.4) 21 (3, 77) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Hardin County 7 *** 128.5 (101.5, 161.3) 22 (2, 81) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Grundy County 7 *** 127.7 (95.9, 167.9) 23 (1, 89) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Black Hawk County 7 *** 127.0 (115.8, 139.0) 24 (9, 47) 99 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.7)
Cherokee County 7 *** 126.8 (96.2, 166.0) 25 (1, 88) 12 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Shelby County 7 *** 126.6 (96.1, 165.7) 26 (2, 87) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Buena Vista County 7 *** 126.5 (98.6, 160.0) 27 (2, 86) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.4)
Dubuque County 7 *** 126.2 (113.6, 140.0) 28 (8, 55) 76 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.5)
Hancock County 7 *** 126.0 (93.7, 167.6) 29 (2, 90) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Davis County 7 *** 122.6 (84.8, 172.9) 30 (1, 96) 7
*
*
Cerro Gordo County 7 *** 119.8 (102.7, 139.2) 31 (8, 73) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Marion County 7 *** 118.8 (98.5, 142.2) 32 (6, 80) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Scott County 7 *** 118.5 (108.8, 128.9) 33 (17, 58) 117 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
O'Brien County 7 *** 118.0 (90.3, 152.7) 34 (3, 90) 13 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.4)
Fremont County 7 *** 117.5 (80.2, 169.6) 35 (1, 97) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Marshall County 7 *** 117.4 (99.5, 137.9) 36 (8, 77) 31 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Mills County 7 *** 116.6 (88.9, 151.2) 37 (4, 91) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Monona County 7 *** 114.3 (82.2, 157.8) 38 (2, 95) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Des Moines County 7 *** 114.1 (96.6, 134.2) 39 (12, 80) 31 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Bremer County 7 *** 113.6 (91.7, 139.7) 40 (7, 87) 19 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Calhoun County 7 *** 113.1 (82.2, 153.9) 41 (3, 95) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
Harrison County 7 *** 112.9 (85.5, 147.5) 42 (3, 93) 12 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Cedar County 7 *** 112.2 (87.9, 142.1) 43 (7, 91) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Franklin County 7 *** 111.5 (80.4, 152.4) 44 (3, 95) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Delaware County 7 *** 108.2 (83.5, 138.9) 45 (6, 93) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
Johnson County 7 *** 108.2 (96.6, 120.8) 46 (22, 76) 69 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Kossuth County 7 *** 107.8 (83.3, 138.8) 47 (8, 93) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.3)
Mitchell County 7 *** 107.1 (76.7, 147.4) 48 (4, 97) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Woodbury County 7 *** 107.1 (95.2, 120.1) 49 (22, 78) 62 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Muscatine County 7 *** 106.6 (89.2, 126.6) 50 (15, 86) 28 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Webster County 7 *** 105.6 (88.1, 125.9) 51 (13, 87) 27 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.5)
Fayette County 7 *** 105.4 (83.0, 132.9) 52 (9, 93) 16 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.6, -2.0)
Henry County 7 *** 104.3 (80.8, 133.0) 53 (9, 94) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Page County 7 *** 104.1 (79.1, 135.4) 54 (7, 96) 12 falling falling trend -5.3 (-8.1, -2.5)
Chickasaw County 7 *** 103.4 (75.0, 140.3) 55 (6, 97) 9 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Clarke County 7 *** 102.5 (69.9, 146.7) 56 (5, 99) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.1)
Clinton County 7 *** 100.4 (85.4, 117.5) 57 (22, 87) 33 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.5)
Butler County 7 *** 99.9 (75.1, 131.5) 58 (11, 97) 11 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.1, -2.4)
Humboldt County 7 *** 99.6 (69.0, 141.1) 59 (6, 98) 7 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.3)
Osceola County 7 *** 99.6 (63.4, 152.5) 60 (3, 99) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.8)
Floyd County 7 *** 99.0 (75.2, 129.1) 61 (11, 97) 12 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.0)
Jones County 7 *** 98.9 (77.1, 125.6) 62 (14, 95) 14 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.7)
Dallas County 7 *** 98.5 (84.3, 114.4) 63 (27, 89) 36 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
Buchanan County 7 *** 98.4 (76.1, 125.8) 64 (13, 96) 14 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -1.7)
Tama County 7 *** 98.2 (74.5, 127.9) 65 (13, 97) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Lee County 7 *** 97.5 (80.4, 117.5) 66 (19, 94) 24 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Polk County 7 *** 97.3 (91.5, 103.5) 67 (46, 80) 222 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.6)
Clayton County 7 *** 96.9 (74.9, 124.5) 68 (15, 97) 14 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.4, -3.4)
Louisa County 7 *** 94.4 (64.6, 134.1) 69 (6, 99) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.8)
Mahaska County 7 *** 94.2 (72.7, 120.5) 70 (16, 97) 14 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7)
Winneshiek County 7 *** 93.8 (72.5, 120.4) 71 (15, 97) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.3)
Pottawattamie County 7 *** 92.6 (81.8, 104.6) 72 (39, 89) 55 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Taylor County 7 *** 91.6 (58.4, 140.8) 73 (5, 99) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.2)
Linn County 7 *** 90.7 (83.2, 98.7) 74 (52, 88) 113 stable stable trend 8.6 (-11.4, 33.1)
Wayne County 7 *** 89.2 (55.0, 140.3) 75 (5, 99) 4 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.1)
Warren County 7 *** 88.4 (73.6, 105.4) 76 (37, 96) 26 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Washington County 7 *** 87.7 (67.2, 113.1) 77 (23, 98) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.3)
Winnebago County 7 *** 87.7 (59.1, 126.8) 78 (12, 99) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.3)
Monroe County 7 *** 85.1 (54.1, 129.9) 79 (9, 99) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.2)
Allamakee County 7 *** 84.9 (61.7, 115.2) 80 (20, 99) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.8)
Madison County 7 *** 84.5 (61.4, 114.4) 81 (23, 99) 9 falling falling trend -5.2 (-7.4, -3.0)
Appanoose County 7 *** 84.3 (60.5, 116.3) 82 (22, 99) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.4, -1.0)
Iowa County 7 *** 83.8 (60.5, 113.8) 83 (19, 99) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Jasper County 7 *** 81.7 (66.2, 99.9) 84 (43, 98) 20 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Ringgold County 7 *** 80.2 (46.4, 135.3) 85 (6, 99) 3 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.0, -0.2)
Wapello County 7 *** 80.0 (64.1, 99.0) 86 (47, 98) 18 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Benton County 7 *** 79.3 (61.8, 100.9) 87 (40, 99) 14 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.8, -2.2)
Union County 7 *** 78.8 (54.2, 112.1) 88 (25, 99) 7 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.8, -2.1)
Worth County 7 *** 78.1 (48.6, 121.9) 89 (14, 99) 4 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.2)
Guthrie County 7 *** 77.5 (52.2, 112.8) 90 (23, 99) 6 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -0.9)
Poweshiek County 7 *** 76.6 (56.7, 102.4) 91 (41, 99) 10 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.3)
Decatur County 7 *** 76.1 (46.8, 119.6) 92 (13, 99) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.4)
Lucas County 7 *** 76.1 (48.7, 115.7) 93 (21, 99) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.2)
Howard County 7 *** 71.8 (45.7, 109.3) 94 (24, 99) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.4)
Jefferson County 7 *** 70.7 (51.0, 96.6) 95 (41, 99) 10 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -0.9)
Keokuk County 7 *** 65.6 (42.6, 98.7) 96 (46, 99) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.5)
Van Buren County 7 *** 60.8 (35.8, 100.2) 97 (44, 99) 4 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.8, -0.8)
Wright County 7 *** 60.8 (40.7, 89.0) 98 (59, 99) 6 falling falling trend -10.3 (-16.5, -3.6)
Adair County 7 *** 56.7 (32.1, 96.6) 99 (48, 99) 3 falling falling trend -20.7 (-32.1, -7.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/16/2021 7:58 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top