Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 7 N/A 125.9 (123.6, 128.1) N/A 2,594 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.0, 6.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 113.2 (113.0, 113.4) N/A 224,883 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.7)
Benton County 7 Urban 105.7 (85.7, 129.5) 78 (23, 98) 20 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.5)
Black Hawk County 7 Urban 154.9 (142.6, 168.0) 11 (4, 37) 124 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.2)
Boone County 7 Urban 132.8 (109.8, 159.7) 38 (5, 85) 25 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.1, 10.6)
Bremer County 7 Urban 149.8 (124.6, 179.0) 14 (2, 73) 26 stable stable trend 9.3 (-0.3, 26.5)
Dallas County 7 Urban 121.3 (107.0, 136.9) 59 (21, 85) 55 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.3)
Dubuque County 7 Urban 114.7 (103.0, 127.4) 66 (33, 87) 74 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.9, 1.4)
Grundy County 7 Urban 142.9 (109.7, 184.2) 21 (2, 91) 13 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Guthrie County 7 Urban 88.6 (62.5, 124.1) 94 (30, 99) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -1.1)
Harrison County 7 Urban 158.9 (127.1, 197.5) 9 (1, 73) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Jasper County 7 Urban 96.0 (79.9, 114.8) 86 (49, 98) 26 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Johnson County 7 Urban 130.7 (118.6, 143.7) 42 (15, 70) 91 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Jones County 7 Urban 138.7 (113.8, 168.2) 29 (3, 84) 23 stable stable trend 7.2 (-1.6, 23.0)
Linn County 7 Urban 144.5 (135.5, 154.0) 18 (10, 45) 201 rising rising trend 10.0 (3.2, 21.2)
Madison County 7 Urban 145.4 (114.4, 183.0) 17 (1, 84) 16 rising rising trend 15.0 (2.3, 37.8)
Mills County 7 Urban 118.5 (91.1, 152.9) 62 (6, 98) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.2)
Polk County 7 Urban 109.7 (103.8, 115.8) 74 (53, 84) 280 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.2)
Pottawattamie County 7 Urban 111.8 (100.0, 124.8) 72 (38, 89) 69 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.3)
Scott County 7 Urban 126.3 (116.8, 136.4) 50 (23, 71) 140 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Story County 7 Urban 128.6 (113.8, 144.8) 46 (13, 78) 57 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Warren County 7 Urban 115.8 (99.7, 133.9) 65 (22, 91) 39 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.4, 0.0)
Washington County 7 Urban 79.6 (61.3, 102.3) 98 (64, 99) 13 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Woodbury County 7 Urban 137.3 (124.2, 151.6) 32 (10, 64) 85 stable stable trend 3.9 (-2.3, 14.6)
Adair County 7 Rural 108.4 (73.7, 156.7) 76 (5, 99) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.4)
Adams County 7 Rural 124.7 (73.2, 205.8) 53 (1, 99) 4
*
*
Allamakee County 7 Rural 77.9 (56.6, 106.1) 99 (58, 99) 9 falling falling trend -6.3 (-29.7, -2.8)
Appanoose County 7 Rural 136.5 (106.3, 174.4) 34 (2, 91) 14 stable stable trend 10.5 (-1.7, 44.5)
Audubon County 7 Rural 123.6 (84.0, 180.9) 56 (2, 99) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Buchanan County 7 Rural 170.8 (140.8, 205.9) 4 (1, 54) 24 rising rising trend 13.8 (0.6, 33.0)
Buena Vista County 7 Rural 166.7 (136.4, 202.1) 6 (1, 62) 22 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.8)
Butler County 7 Rural 123.8 (95.9, 158.6) 55 (5, 95) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-8.8, 12.1)
Calhoun County 7 Rural 139.3 (104.7, 183.5) 26 (2, 94) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Carroll County 7 Rural 141.3 (114.7, 172.9) 23 (2, 84) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Cass County 7 Rural 146.0 (114.6, 184.9) 16 (1, 85) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Cedar County 7 Rural 125.6 (100.5, 156.1) 52 (5, 94) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Cerro Gordo County 7 Rural 124.4 (107.5, 143.5) 54 (13, 86) 42 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Cherokee County 7 Rural 174.6 (138.6, 219.0) 3 (1, 68) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Chickasaw County 7 Rural 140.5 (108.5, 180.6) 24 (2, 89) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Clarke County 7 Rural 105.8 (72.4, 150.5) 77 (5, 99) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.4)
Clay County 7 Rural 168.4 (136.7, 206.2) 5 (1, 60) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
Clayton County 7 Rural 131.0 (105.7, 161.8) 41 (4, 91) 20 rising rising trend 9.0 (1.9, 20.3)
Clinton County 7 Rural 140.5 (122.8, 160.3) 25 (5, 67) 48 rising rising trend 10.6 (0.2, 26.0)
Crawford County 7 Rural 138.4 (109.6, 173.3) 31 (2, 91) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.5)
Davis County 7 Rural 91.4 (60.6, 133.9) 89 (18, 99) 6 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.5, 0.2)
Decatur County 7 Rural 89.2 (58.0, 134.1) 93 (18, 99) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 0.9)
Delaware County 7 Rural 130.2 (104.3, 161.6) 43 (4, 92) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 1.1)
Des Moines County 7 Rural 121.0 (103.3, 141.1) 60 (16, 88) 35 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Dickinson County 7 Rural 135.6 (111.3, 165.2) 35 (3, 85) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Emmet County 7 Rural 113.7 (81.7, 156.4) 67 (4, 99) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.2, -0.1)
Fayette County 7 Rural 113.2 (89.9, 141.5) 69 (14, 97) 17 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.8)
Floyd County 7 Rural 132.2 (104.9, 165.6) 39 (3, 91) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Franklin County 7 Rural 96.2 (67.2, 135.3) 85 (17, 99) 8 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.4, -0.1)
Fremont County 7 Rural 160.0 (115.6, 219.3) 8 (1, 91) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.9)
Greene County 7 Rural 138.5 (101.8, 186.5) 30 (1, 95) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 82.8 (60.6, 111.7) 97 (52, 99) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Hancock County 7 Rural 112.3 (83.5, 150.0) 71 (9, 99) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Hardin County 7 Rural 102.2 (79.1, 131.2) 82 (21, 99) 14 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Henry County 7 Rural 104.4 (81.6, 132.3) 80 (19, 99) 15 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.0)
Howard County 7 Rural 127.7 (94.1, 171.5) 47 (2, 97) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.3)
Humboldt County 7 Rural 134.6 (99.3, 180.4) 36 (2, 96) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.8)
Ida County 7 Rural 230.9 (174.3, 302.3) 1 (1, 33) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.9)
Iowa County 7 Rural 108.4 (82.7, 140.4) 75 (11, 98) 13 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Jackson County 7 Rural 112.5 (90.0, 140.0) 70 (15, 97) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Jefferson County 7 Rural 100.2 (77.3, 129.3) 84 (20, 99) 15 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Keokuk County 7 Rural 87.1 (60.6, 123.6) 95 (29, 99) 7 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.7)
Kossuth County 7 Rural 95.5 (72.4, 125.2) 87 (30, 99) 12 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.8)
Lee County 7 Rural 117.7 (99.3, 139.0) 63 (17, 92) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Louisa County 7 Rural 87.1 (60.7, 122.6) 96 (28, 99) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.3)
Lucas County 7 Rural 89.4 (61.1, 129.0) 92 (23, 99) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.5)
Lyon County 7 Rural 122.3 (89.2, 164.4) 58 (3, 99) 9 falling falling trend -6.1 (-23.0, -1.6)
Mahaska County 7 Rural 103.6 (80.7, 131.4) 81 (21, 99) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Marion County 7 Rural 105.3 (87.1, 126.6) 79 (30, 97) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Marshall County 7 Rural 138.9 (119.6, 160.7) 28 (5, 72) 38 stable stable trend 9.0 (-2.1, 21.2)
Mitchell County 7 Rural 146.4 (110.5, 192.0) 15 (1, 89) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.4)
Monona County 7 Rural 149.9 (111.9, 199.4) 13 (1, 91) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.7)
Monroe County 7 Rural 126.6 (87.9, 179.1) 49 (2, 98) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.2)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 116.5 (84.0, 159.2) 64 (5, 99) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 3.1)
Muscatine County 7 Rural 133.4 (114.7, 154.6) 37 (7, 80) 38 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
O'Brien County 7 Rural 126.0 (97.6, 161.3) 51 (4, 96) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-17.0, 10.8)
Osceola County 7 Rural 89.7 (56.3, 139.5) 91 (13, 99) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.6)
Page County 7 Rural 119.2 (93.1, 151.6) 61 (9, 96) 15 falling falling trend -3.3 (-13.1, -1.4)
Palo Alto County 7 Rural 187.6 (142.8, 243.7) 2 (1, 62) 13 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.0)
Plymouth County 7 Rural 142.9 (118.5, 171.3) 20 (3, 77) 25 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.2, 14.6)
Pocahontas County 7 Rural 142.9 (102.9, 197.0) 19 (1, 96) 9 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.7)
Poweshiek County 7 Rural 100.3 (77.2, 129.2) 83 (23, 99) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 10.1)
Ringgold County 7 Rural 132.1 (85.9, 199.9) 40 (1, 99) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.5, 21.5)
Sac County 7 Rural 141.9 (106.1, 187.8) 22 (2, 92) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.2)
Shelby County 7 Rural 137.0 (105.1, 177.3) 33 (2, 91) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Sioux County 7 Rural 160.3 (136.2, 187.6) 7 (1, 58) 33 stable stable trend 4.0 (-11.0, 20.4)
Tama County 7 Rural 139.0 (110.3, 173.6) 27 (2, 85) 17 stable stable trend 13.6 (-2.3, 31.7)
Taylor County 7 Rural 155.6 (110.3, 217.1) 10 (1, 94) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.3)
Union County 7 Rural 122.5 (92.1, 161.4) 57 (4, 98) 11 stable stable trend 11.5 (-2.0, 32.9)
Van Buren County 7 Rural 91.7 (59.9, 137.6) 88 (12, 99) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.1, -1.0)
Wapello County 7 Rural 109.9 (91.6, 131.2) 73 (24, 95) 27 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.6)
Wayne County 7 Rural 113.3 (76.1, 166.2) 68 (3, 99) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.5, -0.5)
Webster County 7 Rural 130.0 (110.6, 152.1) 44 (7, 84) 34 stable stable trend 11.8 (-0.1, 26.3)
Winnebago County 7 Rural 129.2 (95.9, 172.2) 45 (3, 96) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.6)
Winneshiek County 7 Rural 154.7 (128.4, 185.8) 12 (1, 66) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.9)
Worth County 7 Rural 126.8 (88.2, 179.3) 48 (2, 99) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.3)
Wright County 7 Rural 90.6 (66.2, 122.6) 90 (35, 99) 10 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/10/2024 2:59 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top