Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 7 21.2 (20.6, 21.9) N/A 817 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 19.0 (18.9, 19.0) N/A 71,841 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Polk County 7 20.5 (18.7, 22.4) 51 (28, 66) 99 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Linn County 7 20.4 (18.0, 23.1) 52 (23, 70) 52 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Scott County 7 18.9 (16.3, 21.9) 68 (29, 75) 39 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Black Hawk County 7 19.7 (16.6, 23.2) 59 (21, 74) 31 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Johnson County 7 22.4 (18.9, 26.5) 39 (12, 69) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.4)
Pottawattamie County 7 23.5 (19.6, 28.0) 32 (9, 66) 27 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 1.8)
Dubuque County 7 20.4 (16.8, 24.5) 53 (18, 74) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1)
Woodbury County 7 19.1 (15.6, 23.1) 67 (21, 76) 22 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.8)
Story County 7 22.6 (18.3, 27.7) 36 (9, 71) 20 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.7)
Cerro Gordo County 7 23.7 (18.3, 30.3) 31 (5, 73) 15 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.2, 3.2)
Clinton County 7 21.2 (16.3, 27.3) 45 (9, 75) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Dallas County 7 16.5 (12.7, 21.0) 75 (32, 78) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
Muscatine County 7 24.2 (18.4, 31.3) 26 (4, 73) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.8)
Des Moines County 7 20.7 (15.6, 27.2) 50 (10, 77) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4)
Warren County 7 19.6 (14.9, 25.5) 61 (12, 77) 12 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.4)
Marshall County 7 21.4 (16.0, 28.2) 44 (7, 76) 11 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.1)
Wapello County 7 23.1 (17.3, 30.4) 33 (5, 75) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.4)
Jasper County 7 20.8 (15.4, 27.7) 49 (8, 77) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Sioux County 7 24.2 (17.8, 32.3) 25 (3, 74) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.0)
Benton County 7 25.9 (18.7, 35.2) 18 (2, 73) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.4)
Lee County 7 19.6 (13.9, 26.8) 62 (10, 78) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Marion County 7 19.7 (14.1, 26.8) 60 (10, 78) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Webster County 7 17.3 (12.2, 23.9) 73 (17, 78) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Boone County 7 22.6 (16.1, 31.3) 35 (4, 77) 8
*
*
Clayton County 7 27.0 (19.2, 37.6) 13 (1, 73) 8 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.6, 3.6)
Washington County 7 25.2 (17.4, 35.5) 20 (2, 76) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.0)
Dickinson County 7 28.2 (18.8, 40.9) 10 (1, 75) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 2.8)
Plymouth County 7 20.3 (14.0, 28.7) 55 (7, 78) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.2)
Carroll County 7 26.3 (17.6, 37.8) 16 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.7)
Tama County 7 26.6 (18.2, 38.2) 15 (1, 76) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.0)
Buchanan County 7 24.0 (16.4, 34.3) 29 (2, 77) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.6)
Henry County 7 25.0 (16.9, 35.7) 22 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.5)
Bremer County 7 17.8 (11.9, 25.8) 72 (12, 78) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.4)
Clay County 7 24.9 (16.5, 36.5) 23 (2, 77) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.8)
Butler County 7 25.5 (16.7, 38.0) 19 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.3)
Fayette County 7 21.8 (14.2, 32.3) 43 (3, 78) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.2)
Jefferson County 7 20.9 (13.4, 31.7) 48 (4, 78) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.5)
Page County 7 24.2 (15.7, 36.2) 27 (2, 78) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.1, 4.8)
Cass County 7 26.2 (16.6, 39.9) 17 (1, 77) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.3)
Delaware County 7 20.3 (13.3, 30.4) 54 (5, 78) 5 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.4)
Mahaska County 7 18.4 (12.0, 27.3) 70 (8, 78) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.0)
O'Brien County 7 25.2 (16.1, 38.2) 21 (1, 78) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 2.8)
Hardin County 7 20.9 (13.2, 31.9) 47 (3, 78) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.2, 4.2)
Kossuth County 7 21.8 (13.8, 33.5) 41 (3, 78) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.1)
Cedar County 7 19.8 (12.6, 29.9) 58 (5, 78) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.3)
Cherokee County 7 29.1 (17.7, 45.8) 8 (1, 77) 5
*
*
Harrison County 7 27.1 (17.1, 41.2) 12 (1, 78) 5
*
*
Mitchell County 7 32.8 (20.2, 51.0) 4 (1, 74) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.9, 3.5)
Floyd County 7 21.8 (13.5, 33.8) 42 (2, 78) 5
*
*
Iowa County 7 21.1 (13.3, 32.2) 46 (3, 78) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.5)
Poweshiek County 7 19.1 (11.8, 29.7) 66 (6, 78) 5
*
*
Franklin County 7 26.9 (16.4, 42.5) 14 (1, 78) 4 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.3, 4.8)
Hancock County 7 28.5 (17.2, 45.2) 9 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Jackson County 7 14.6 (9.1, 22.9) 77 (23, 78) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.5)
Montgomery County 7 31.8 (19.4, 50.0) 6 (1, 77) 4
*
*
Winneshiek County 7 14.7 (8.9, 23.5) 76 (18, 78) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.5)
Buena Vista County 7 18.1 (11.0, 28.1) 71 (7, 78) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 2.1)
Chickasaw County 7 22.6 (13.7, 35.9) 38 (2, 78) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 2.9)
Crawford County 7 19.4 (11.9, 30.3) 64 (5, 78) 4
*
*
Jones County 7 13.5 (8.3, 21.4) 78 (27, 78) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.3)
Allamakee County 7 22.0 (12.8, 35.6) 40 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Greene County 7 31.5 (18.3, 51.1) 7 (1, 77) 4
*
*
Guthrie County 7 24.0 (14.2, 39.1) 28 (1, 78) 4
*
*
Lyon County 7 27.9 (16.7, 44.1) 11 (1, 77) 4
*
*
Mills County 7 19.9 (11.9, 31.8) 57 (3, 78) 4
*
*
Palo Alto County 7 34.1 (19.9, 55.0) 3 (1, 76) 4
*
*
Wright County 7 20.1 (12.1, 32.3) 56 (3, 78) 4
*
*
Decatur County 7 35.6 (20.7, 57.9) 2 (1, 77) 4
*
*
Fremont County 7 37.0 (21.1, 61.3) 1 (1, 75) 4
*
*
Hamilton County 7 17.1 (10.2, 27.6) 74 (9, 78) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.8)
Madison County 7 19.2 (11.4, 30.7) 65 (5, 78) 4
*
*
Grundy County 7 19.5 (11.5, 32.0) 63 (4, 78) 4
*
*
Adair County 7 32.3 (18.1, 54.6) 5 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Appanoose County 7 18.5 (10.3, 31.4) 69 (4, 78) 3
*
*
Emmet County 7 22.6 (12.9, 38.0) 37 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Howard County 7 24.0 (13.8, 40.0) 30 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Sac County 7 24.6 (13.9, 41.3) 24 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Lucas County 7 23.0 (13.0, 39.2) 34 (1, 78) 3
*
*
Adams County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davis County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humboldt County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ida County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keokuk County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Louisa County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monona County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winnebago County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/27/2022 1:37 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2021 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top