Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Cancer Sites, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 3,8 *** 108.3 (106.1, 110.4) 2,013 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.9, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 102.8 (102.6, 103.0) 204,831 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
Butler County 7,8 *** 154.4 (118.7, 197.3) 13 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.3, 4.7)
Monona County 7,8 *** 153.6 (106.7, 213.9) 7 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.4, 4.3)
Dickinson County 7,8 *** 150.6 (116.9, 191.1) 14 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.4, 4.5)
Floyd County 7,8 *** 149.9 (116.4, 189.9) 14 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.4, 4.4)
Adams County 7 *** 149.4 (85.0, 243.4) 3
*
*
Cedar County 7,8 *** 149.2 (118.6, 185.4) 17 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.9, 4.3)
Palo Alto County 7,8 *** 146.1 (101.5, 203.1) 7 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.8, 5.4)
Franklin County 7,8 *** 136.9 (97.6, 186.6) 8 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.3, 3.5)
Decatur County 7,8 *** 135.0 (88.7, 195.9) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.0, 3.5)
Tama County 7,8 *** 131.9 (102.4, 167.4) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.4)
Calhoun County 7,8 *** 129.7 (90.1, 180.6) 7 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.0, 5.1)
Worth County 7,8 *** 129.2 (85.6, 187.3) 6 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.4, 4.7)
Taylor County 7 *** 127.4 (78.4, 194.8) 4
*
*
Harrison County 7,8 *** 127.1 (94.7, 166.9) 10 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.6, 3.8)
Dubuque County 7,8 *** 126.7 (113.8, 140.6) 72 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.8)
Iowa County 7,8 *** 126.3 (95.9, 163.2) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.5)
Chickasaw County 7,8 *** 125.9 (90.7, 170.1) 9 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.8, 4.5)
Montgomery County 7,8 *** 124.3 (86.8, 172.4) 7 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.2, 3.8)
Jones County 7,8 *** 123.6 (97.4, 154.8) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.4)
Linn County 7,8 *** 122.7 (114.6, 131.3) 170 rising rising trend 1.8 (1.2, 2.5)
Hardin County 7,8 *** 122.7 (92.7, 159.1) 11 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.1, 4.1)
Clayton County 7,8 *** 122.3 (92.6, 158.3) 12 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 2.8)
Cerro Gordo County 7,8 *** 121.7 (102.9, 143.0) 30 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.8, 2.5)
Scott County 7,8 *** 121.2 (112.0, 131.0) 130 rising rising trend 1.7 (1.1, 2.2)
Jackson County 7,8 *** 120.2 (93.4, 152.4) 14 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.9, 4.2)
Carroll County 7,8 *** 118.7 (92.0, 150.6) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.7)
Muscatine County 7,8 *** 117.9 (100.1, 137.9) 31 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.2)
Lee County 7,8 *** 117.3 (97.3, 140.1) 25 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 2.9)
Des Moines County 7,8 *** 117.0 (98.0, 138.4) 27 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.3)
Black Hawk County 7,8 *** 116.2 (105.3, 127.9) 86 rising rising trend 1.6 (1.0, 2.2)
Osceola County 7,8 *** 116.2 (70.8, 179.5) 4 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.9, 6.1)
Plymouth County 7,8 *** 115.9 (92.2, 143.8) 17 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.8, 3.6)
Mitchell County 7,8 *** 115.5 (78.6, 163.1) 6 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.5, 4.0)
Guthrie County 7,8 *** 115.1 (79.8, 160.8) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.7)
Johnson County 7,8 *** 114.8 (104.5, 125.9) 96 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.9, 2.1)
Hancock County 7,8 *** 114.3 (79.3, 159.3) 7 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.1, 4.4)
Woodbury County 7,8 *** 114.1 (102.4, 126.7) 70 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.5)
Clay County 7,8 *** 113.4 (84.8, 148.4) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
Bremer County 7,8 *** 112.9 (89.0, 141.1) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.2, 2.5)
Clarke County 7,8 *** 112.7 (75.8, 160.8) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.6)
Hamilton County 7,8 *** 112.4 (83.5, 148.1) 10 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.2)
Fremont County 7,8 *** 112.0 (69.1, 171.3) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.4)
Jefferson County 7,8 *** 111.2 (81.8, 147.5) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 2.9)
Washington County 7,8 *** 111.2 (86.6, 140.4) 14 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.4, 3.7)
Emmet County 7,8 *** 110.8 (74.5, 158.3) 6 stable stable trend 2.0 (0.0, 3.9)
Kossuth County 7,8 *** 110.4 (79.6, 149.0) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.0)
Fayette County 7,8 *** 110.4 (84.3, 141.8) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Mills County 7,8 *** 109.6 (80.8, 145.2) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
O'Brien County 7,8 *** 109.0 (78.0, 147.8) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.5)
Clinton County 7,8 *** 108.9 (92.3, 127.7) 31 stable stable trend -4.7 (-9.7, 0.7)
Humboldt County 7 *** 107.0 (71.4, 154.1) 6
*
*
Sioux County 7,8 *** 107.0 (86.9, 130.1) 21 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.2, 3.2)
Winnebago County 7,8 *** 106.7 (72.3, 151.6) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 3.3)
Buchanan County 7,8 *** 105.8 (81.5, 134.9) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Cass County 7,8 *** 105.8 (75.1, 144.8) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (0.0, 3.6)
Marshall County 7,8 *** 104.9 (86.9, 125.3) 24 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.4, 1.9)
Pottawattamie County 7,8 *** 104.8 (93.1, 117.5) 59 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.4)
Delaware County 7,8 *** 104.4 (77.9, 136.9) 11 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.1)
Warren County 7,8 *** 104.2 (88.4, 121.9) 31 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.3, 1.8)
Sac County 7,8 *** 103.7 (68.7, 150.3) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 3.7)
Wright County 7,8 *** 103.0 (71.6, 143.2) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.0)
Howard County 7,8 *** 101.4 (65.8, 148.8) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.4, 3.8)
Polk County 7,8 *** 100.5 (95.4, 105.7) 304 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.7)
Lyon County 7,8 *** 100.3 (69.3, 140.0) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.0)
Boone County 7,8 *** 99.8 (78.8, 124.6) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Wapello County 7,8 *** 98.9 (80.6, 120.2) 20 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.0)
Benton County 7,8 *** 97.8 (77.2, 122.2) 16 stable stable trend 1.6 (0.0, 3.3)
Jasper County 7,8 *** 97.3 (79.8, 117.4) 22 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.4, 3.5)
Page County 7,8 *** 96.7 (69.9, 130.3) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.5, 3.6)
Marion County 7,8 *** 96.6 (77.9, 118.3) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Henry County 7,8 *** 95.2 (72.1, 123.2) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
Keokuk County 7,8 *** 94.2 (61.9, 137.1) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.3)
Shelby County 7,8 *** 92.9 (62.7, 132.7) 6 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.1, 4.3)
Story County 7,8 *** 92.3 (79.9, 106.0) 45 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.4)
Monroe County 7,8 *** 91.7 (56.6, 140.2) 4 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.0, 5.9)
Crawford County 7,8 *** 90.6 (65.7, 121.5) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.6)
Davis County 7 *** 90.4 (56.2, 136.9) 4
*
*
Greene County 7,8 *** 90.2 (56.2, 136.9) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 3.6)
Webster County 7,8 *** 90.2 (72.8, 110.3) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Pocahontas County 7,8 *** 89.4 (51.6, 144.0) 3 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.7)
Poweshiek County 7,8 *** 89.1 (64.7, 119.6) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.4)
Madison County 7,8 *** 88.8 (64.6, 119.2) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.2)
Winneshiek County 7,8 *** 86.1 (63.0, 114.7) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.0)
Van Buren County 7,8 *** 86.0 (50.7, 136.3) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.6)
Cherokee County 7,8 *** 85.9 (56.3, 125.4) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 1.0)
Union County 7,8 *** 85.9 (57.8, 122.6) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.2)
Dallas County 7,8 *** 83.0 (72.3, 94.8) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4)
Mahaska County 7,8 *** 81.5 (61.0, 106.7) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
Allamakee County 7,8 *** 81.5 (55.1, 115.9) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.6, 5.1)
Lucas County 7,8 *** 79.6 (47.6, 124.6) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Appanoose County 7,8 *** 77.2 (50.7, 112.5) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.2)
Adair County 7 *** 73.9 (42.0, 121.0) 3
*
*
Grundy County 7,8 *** 72.3 (47.5, 105.4) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 2.7)
Louisa County 7,8 *** 66.8 (42.6, 99.7) 5 falling falling trend -6.9 (-11.8, -1.7)
Buena Vista County 7,8 *** 62.0 (43.4, 85.6) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Audubon County 7 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ida County 7,8 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County 7 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7,8 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/24/2019 4:35 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2017 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2017 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2017 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top