Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

Colon & Rectum, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 3,8 No 44.9 (43.9, 45.8) 1,681 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.9, -2.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 39.2 (39.1, 39.3) 139,950 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Polk County 7,8 No 43.8 (41.0, 46.7) 190 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Linn County 7,8 Yes 37.7 (34.2, 41.4) 89 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.6, -3.2)
Scott County 7,8 No 41.6 (37.5, 46.0) 79 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.6, -2.0)
Woodbury County 7,8 No 51.4 (45.6, 57.9) 57 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Black Hawk County 7,8 Yes 37.6 (33.2, 42.4) 56 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.1, -2.4)
Dubuque County 7,8 No 46.1 (40.7, 52.0) 55 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3)
Pottawattamie County 7,8 No 45.7 (40.1, 51.8) 50 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.5)
Johnson County 7,8 Yes 39.2 (34.1, 44.8) 44 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Cerro Gordo County 7,8 No 52.5 (44.5, 61.8) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Clinton County 7,8 No 49.2 (41.7, 57.8) 32 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Story County 7,8 Yes 38.1 (32.1, 45.0) 30 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Muscatine County 7,8 No 52.4 (43.7, 62.4) 26 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Jasper County 7,8 No 51.8 (43.2, 61.9) 26 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Warren County 7,8 No 45.1 (37.5, 53.9) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Lee County 7,8 No 48.2 (39.8, 58.0) 25 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Wapello County 7,8 No 50.9 (42.0, 61.2) 24 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Des Moines County 7,8 No 43.4 (35.8, 52.4) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.7)
Marshall County 7,8 No 41.1 (33.7, 49.7) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Dallas County 7,8 Yes 31.9 (26.2, 38.4) 23 stable stable trend 5.1 (-13.9, 28.4)
Marion County 7,8 No 51.9 (42.4, 63.0) 22 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Webster County 7,8 No 41.1 (33.5, 50.2) 21 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.1)
Carroll County 7,8 No 50.2 (39.1, 63.8) 16 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.8)
Fayette County 7,8 No 52.2 (41.1, 65.8) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Jackson County 7,8 No 54.5 (42.8, 68.9) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Henry County 7,8 No 56.9 (44.5, 71.9) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.7)
Mahaska County 7,8 No 51.8 (40.5, 65.6) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Plymouth County 7,8 No 46.9 (36.5, 59.4) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
Hardin County 7,8 No 55.6 (42.9, 71.4) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Dickinson County 7,8 No 52.3 (40.0, 67.6) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.7)
Jones County 7,8 No 47.2 (36.7, 60.1) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3)
Sioux County 7,8 Yes 33.9 (26.0, 43.4) 14 falling falling trend -8.5 (-13.6, -3.0)
Cass County 7,8 No 64.9 (49.4, 84.2) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
Washington County 7,8 No 42.8 (32.9, 55.1) 13 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Boone County 7,8 Yes 39.4 (30.1, 50.8) 13 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.8)
Tama County 7,8 No 48.2 (36.8, 62.4) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.5)
Page County 7,8 No 54.1 (41.1, 70.3) 13 falling falling trend -7.3 (-12.2, -2.2)
O'Brien County 7,8 No 56.3 (42.3, 73.9) 12 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.5)
Shelby County 7,8 No 62.9 (47.6, 82.5) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Kossuth County 7,8 No 45.5 (34.2, 60.1) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Poweshiek County 7,8 No 43.5 (32.6, 57.3) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.1)
Winneshiek County 7,8 No 41.9 (31.5, 55.1) 12 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.2, -1.6)
Clayton County 7,8 No 43.5 (32.3, 57.8) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Harrison County 7,8 No 53.4 (39.6, 70.9) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.1)
Iowa County 7,8 No 48.3 (35.7, 64.2) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Clay County 7,8 No 43.5 (31.9, 58.5) 10 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Floyd County 7,8 No 42.2 (31.1, 56.4) 10 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.6)
Bremer County 7,8 Yes 29.3 (21.6, 39.2) 10 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.7)
Buena Vista County 7,8 Yes 39.8 (29.3, 53.1) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.7)
Benton County 7,8 Yes 31.9 (23.5, 42.5) 10 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.6, -1.9)
Cedar County 7,8 No 41.9 (30.7, 56.2) 10 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -1.1)
Appanoose County 7,8 No 52.5 (38.3, 70.9) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Guthrie County 7,8 No 54.3 (39.8, 73.6) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Allamakee County 7,8 No 44.7 (32.3, 60.9) 9 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.1, 0.1)
Buchanan County 7,8 Yes 38.2 (27.9, 51.2) 9 falling falling trend -5.8 (-8.8, -2.8)
Monona County 7,8 No 62.6 (45.1, 86.0) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Wright County 7,8 No 44.4 (32.1, 60.7) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.0)
Crawford County 7,8 No 40.6 (29.5, 54.8) 9 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Grundy County 7,8 No 51.1 (37.0, 69.4) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Jefferson County 7,8 No 40.5 (28.7, 55.8) 9 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.9, -1.6)
Sac County 7,8 No 55.6 (39.5, 77.0) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.7)
Union County 7,8 No 55.4 (39.8, 75.5) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Butler County 7,8 Yes 39.5 (27.8, 54.8) 9 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.3)
Delaware County 7,8 Yes 36.6 (26.2, 50.1) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.1)
Humboldt County 7,8 No 63.6 (45.0, 88.0) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.3)
Keokuk County 7,8 No 50.4 (36.3, 69.3) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.1)
Hamilton County 7,8 No 40.2 (28.5, 55.4) 8 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Hancock County 7,8 No 49.9 (35.2, 69.4) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Lyon County 7,8 No 52.9 (37.8, 72.6) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Mills County 7,8 No 47.9 (34.1, 65.8) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.8, 0.3)
Cherokee County 7,8 No 40.1 (28.1, 56.5) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 1.0)
Emmet County 7,8 No 48.7 (34.4, 67.9) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Franklin County 7,8 No 51.4 (36.3, 71.5) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Montgomery County 7,8 No 47.7 (33.3, 67.1) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.7)
Calhoun County 7,8 No 50.9 (35.3, 71.8) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Greene County 7,8 No 50.7 (35.2, 71.8) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7)
Winnebago County 7,8 No 50.7 (35.0, 71.7) 8 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.6)
Madison County 7,8 Yes 38.4 (26.8, 53.7) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.1)
Monroe County 7,8 No 64.5 (44.7, 90.9) 7 stable stable trend -0.0 (-2.3, 2.3)
Adair County 7 No 55.5 (38.4, 79.5) 7
*
*
Chickasaw County 7,8 No 40.4 (28.1, 56.9) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Decatur County 7,8 No 64.5 (43.8, 92.3) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Mitchell County 7,8 Yes 37.7 (25.8, 54.2) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.4)
Pocahontas County 7,8 No 63.2 (42.4, 91.9) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.5)
Palo Alto County 7,8 No 47.9 (31.9, 69.8) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Ida County 7,8 No 52.6 (34.6, 78.1) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.6)
Lucas County 7,8 No 46.1 (30.8, 67.5) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.6)
Van Buren County 7 No 51.1 (34.3, 74.8) 6
*
*
Osceola County 7,8 No 67.5 (43.8, 100.2) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 3.4)
Audubon County 7,8 No 55.5 (35.8, 84.5) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.6)
Howard County 7,8 No 44.8 (28.7, 67.0) 6 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.4)
Taylor County 7,8 No 57.1 (37.0, 85.8) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.6)
Worth County 7,8 No 53.7 (34.9, 79.9) 6 stable stable trend -0.0 (-2.7, 2.7)
Clarke County 7,8 No 42.3 (27.6, 62.8) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 3.7)
Adams County 7,8 No 82.4 (52.7, 125.7) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.8, 4.9)
Louisa County 7,8 Yes 32.5 (20.7, 49.1) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.2, -1.7)
Davis County 7,8 No 43.4 (26.4, 67.4) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.2)
Wayne County 7,8 No 45.0 (26.4, 72.6) 4 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.0, -0.3)
Fremont County 7,8 No 40.3 (24.0, 64.7) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.7)
Ringgold County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/25/2018 5:37 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2017 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2017 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2017 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top