Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

Colon & Rectum, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Iowa 3,8 39.7 (38.4, 41.0) 821 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.6, -2.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 35.5 (35.4, 35.7) 66,990 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.4)
Bremer County 7,8 21.0 (12.2, 34.5) 4 falling falling trend -33.5 (-54.8, -2.3)
Winneshiek County 7,8 25.0 (15.1, 40.2) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.3, 1.8)
Benton County 7,8 26.5 (16.9, 40.3) 5 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.3, 0.0)
Delaware County 7,8 27.7 (16.0, 45.7) 3 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.9, 1.0)
Sioux County 7,8 27.8 (18.1, 41.0) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.3)
Jefferson County 7,8 29.5 (16.7, 49.7) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.7)
Boone County 7,8 29.5 (18.8, 44.3) 6 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.6, -1.1)
Butler County 7 30.2 (17.2, 50.5) 4
*
*
Dallas County 7,8 31.2 (23.4, 40.9) 11 falling falling trend -10.0 (-16.2, -3.4)
Webster County 7,8 31.5 (22.6, 43.1) 9 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.9, -1.6)
O'Brien County 7 31.7 (18.5, 52.6) 4
*
*
Story County 7,8 32.8 (25.3, 41.9) 14 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.4)
Johnson County 7,8 34.3 (27.7, 42.0) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Buchanan County 7,8 34.3 (21.8, 51.9) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.3)
Tama County 7,8 35.0 (22.5, 53.0) 6 falling falling trend -10.1 (-17.9, -1.5)
Washington County 7,8 35.2 (23.7, 51.3) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.4)
Linn County 7,8 35.3 (30.8, 40.3) 46 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4)
Winnebago County 7,8 35.6 (19.4, 62.0) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.7)
Black Hawk County 7,8 35.8 (30.0, 42.5) 29 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Grundy County 7,8 36.1 (20.6, 60.4) 3 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.3)
Lyon County 7,8 36.2 (20.3, 61.5) 3 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.1)
Clayton County 7,8 36.3 (23.0, 55.8) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.2, 0.3)
Crawford County 7,8 36.5 (23.0, 56.2) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.5, 0.6)
Union County 7,8 36.8 (21.9, 59.9) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.0)
Guthrie County 7,8 37.1 (21.5, 62.7) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.6)
Polk County 7,8 37.1 (33.6, 40.9) 87 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Hardin County 7,8 37.1 (23.8, 56.6) 6 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.8, -0.5)
Des Moines County 7,8 37.5 (28.0, 49.6) 11 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Warren County 7,8 37.7 (28.3, 49.4) 11 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.2)
Scott County 7,8 37.7 (32.6, 43.5) 41 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.0, -2.0)
Mills County 7,8 37.8 (21.2, 62.7) 3 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.4, 0.8)
Kossuth County 7,8 37.9 (23.7, 59.1) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.1)
Buena Vista County 7,8 38.3 (24.6, 57.5) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.8, 0.5)
Chickasaw County 7,8 39.2 (23.5, 63.6) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.9, 1.7)
Iowa County 7,8 39.3 (24.7, 60.5) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.6)
Allamakee County 7,8 39.3 (24.4, 61.9) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.3, 0.6)
Cerro Gordo County 7,8 39.3 (30.0, 51.0) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Dubuque County 7,8 39.7 (33.0, 47.6) 26 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.4)
Mitchell County 7,8 40.4 (24.2, 66.3) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.6, 3.8)
Woodbury County 7,8 41.0 (34.1, 48.9) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Franklin County 7,8 41.5 (24.9, 68.0) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 2.2)
Clay County 7,8 42.3 (27.0, 64.0) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.1)
Pottawattamie County 7,8 42.5 (35.3, 50.8) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Clinton County 7,8 42.6 (33.2, 54.0) 15 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Carroll County 7,8 42.7 (29.1, 61.2) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.5)
Madison County 7 43.0 (26.2, 67.2) 4
*
*
Cedar County 7,8 43.3 (28.0, 64.6) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.6)
Hamilton County 7,8 43.6 (27.9, 66.2) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.1, 1.9)
Floyd County 7,8 43.8 (29.0, 64.8) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.0)
Lee County 7,8 43.8 (33.4, 57.0) 13 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Wapello County 7,8 44.6 (33.6, 58.5) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Emmet County 7,8 44.9 (27.0, 73.1) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.7, 1.3)
Page County 7,8 45.0 (30.0, 66.8) 6 falling falling trend -14.5 (-25.8, -1.4)
Sac County 7,8 45.1 (25.7, 75.8) 4 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.8, -0.1)
Jasper County 7,8 45.8 (34.8, 59.6) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Montgomery County 7,8 45.9 (26.4, 75.9) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.6)
Hancock County 7,8 45.9 (27.0, 74.8) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.8)
Henry County 7,8 46.0 (30.9, 66.5) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.1)
Calhoun County 7,8 46.0 (27.9, 75.1) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 2.1)
Marshall County 7,8 46.4 (35.2, 60.2) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.7)
Jones County 7,8 47.3 (33.1, 66.7) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.9)
Greene County 7,8 47.5 (27.0, 80.0) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.3, 2.6)
Shelby County 7,8 48.5 (31.5, 74.1) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.9)
Mahaska County 7,8 49.5 (34.2, 69.7) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 2.1)
Jackson County 7,8 49.5 (34.4, 70.0) 7 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.1, -0.4)
Keokuk County 7,8 50.5 (31.7, 79.1) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Dickinson County 7,8 51.3 (36.1, 72.6) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.2)
Plymouth County 7,8 51.5 (37.6, 69.6) 10 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.8, -0.8)
Muscatine County 7,8 52.0 (40.1, 66.5) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.8)
Wright County 7,8 52.6 (35.2, 77.8) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.9)
Cherokee County 7,8 53.1 (34.2, 80.8) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.7)
Poweshiek County 7,8 53.7 (38.0, 74.8) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.7)
Appanoose County 7,8 54.7 (34.6, 83.3) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.9)
Humboldt County 7,8 55.3 (33.6, 88.1) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.5, 2.1)
Decatur County 7 55.6 (32.4, 91.9) 4
*
*
Cass County 7,8 55.6 (37.8, 80.7) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.3)
Fayette County 7,8 56.4 (40.6, 77.3) 9 stable stable trend -0.0 (-2.1, 2.1)
Marion County 7,8 58.8 (45.1, 75.6) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.3)
Lucas County 7 60.7 (38.3, 94.6) 5
*
*
Clarke County 7 63.3 (39.4, 98.5) 5
*
*
Harrison County 7,8 64.1 (43.9, 91.5) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.1, 2.5)
Adair County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Adams County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davis County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fremont County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ida County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Louisa County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monona County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Palo Alto County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2016 7:32 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2015 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top