Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 3,8 *** 53.0 (51.6, 54.5) 1,075 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.5, 4.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 52.6 (52.5, 52.8) 101,519 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Polk County 7,8 *** 62.9 (58.3, 67.7) 147 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.2)
Linn County 7,8 *** 55.0 (49.4, 61.1) 72 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.2)
Scott County 7,8 *** 59.3 (52.7, 66.5) 61 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Black Hawk County 7,8 *** 62.2 (54.5, 70.7) 50 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Pottawattamie County 7,8 *** 64.3 (55.6, 74.0) 40 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.3, 1.9)
Woodbury County 7,8 *** 63.1 (54.4, 72.8) 39 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.5, 3.0)
Dubuque County 7,8 *** 52.0 (44.3, 60.9) 33 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Johnson County 7,8 *** 40.1 (33.0, 48.1) 24 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.5, 1.4)
Des Moines County 7,8 *** 70.3 (57.3, 85.7) 22 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 2.7)
Clinton County 7,8 *** 58.5 (47.3, 71.8) 20 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.5)
Story County 7,8 *** 47.9 (38.8, 58.6) 20 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.0, 4.4)
Cerro Gordo County 7,8 *** 49.9 (40.0, 61.9) 18 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Warren County 7,8 *** 61.3 (49.1, 75.8) 18 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.1, 3.7)
Wapello County 7,8 *** 65.4 (52.1, 81.5) 17 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.0, 4.3)
Lee County 7,8 *** 64.3 (51.1, 80.4) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Dallas County 7,8 *** 47.3 (37.5, 58.9) 17 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 2.9)
Webster County 7,8 *** 57.8 (45.6, 72.7) 16 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.4)
Jasper County 7,8 *** 53.6 (41.6, 68.4) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Marshall County 7,8 *** 50.3 (39.0, 64.1) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Muscatine County 7,8 *** 48.0 (36.8, 61.7) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.4)
Marion County 7 *** 52.3 (39.7, 68.1) 12
*
*
Page County 7,8 *** 86.3 (64.1, 115.0) 11 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.3, 4.5)
Boone County 7,8 *** 60.1 (44.6, 79.6) 11 stable stable trend 2.1 (0.0, 4.2)
Benton County 7,8 *** 57.2 (42.2, 76.3) 10 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.1, 3.1)
Dickinson County 7,8 *** 55.5 (40.6, 76.1) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 3.2)
Jones County 7,8 *** 66.9 (48.6, 90.5) 10 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.8, 6.0)
Mahaska County 7,8 *** 60.0 (43.5, 81.3) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 3.0)
Buchanan County 7,8 *** 59.3 (42.4, 81.4) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.9, 3.3)
Carroll County 7,8 *** 46.6 (33.0, 65.0) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.7)
Harrison County 7,8 *** 76.0 (54.4, 104.6) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 2.9)
Henry County 7,8 *** 59.2 (41.6, 82.4) 8 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.5, 4.8)
Plymouth County 7,8 *** 44.1 (30.9, 61.5) 8 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.8, 5.5)
Washington County 7,8 *** 47.5 (33.3, 66.4) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.1)
Cedar County 7 *** 57.4 (40.2, 80.3) 8
*
*
Clayton County 7,8 *** 52.8 (36.3, 75.4) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.6, 5.7)
Fayette County 7,8 *** 44.8 (31.1, 63.6) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.3, 3.7)
Cass County 7,8 *** 57.0 (39.1, 82.2) 7 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.4, 4.5)
Hardin County 7,8 *** 46.3 (31.0, 67.7) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.3, 4.2)
Tama County 7,8 *** 51.4 (34.9, 73.9) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.8, 4.0)
Appanoose County 7,8 *** 56.2 (38.1, 81.9) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 3.7)
Jackson County 7,8 *** 45.1 (30.2, 65.4) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 3.0)
Union County 7,8 *** 65.9 (44.6, 95.2) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 3.0)
Bremer County 7,8 *** 34.8 (23.5, 50.3) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.0)
Buena Vista County 7,8 *** 45.3 (30.1, 66.0) 6 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.3, 6.5)
Butler County 7,8 *** 50.5 (32.8, 75.4) 6 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.2, 5.6)
Clay County 7,8 *** 46.2 (30.2, 68.7) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.8)
Sioux County 7 *** 29.4 (19.2, 43.1) 6
*
*
Iowa County 7,8 *** 48.5 (31.9, 71.7) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 3.5)
Montgomery County 7,8 *** 62.8 (41.0, 94.3) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.2, 4.3)
Shelby County 7 *** 57.7 (37.9, 86.1) 6
*
*
Mills County 7,8 *** 57.3 (37.3, 85.0) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 2.9)
Wright County 7,8 *** 49.6 (31.5, 76.1) 5 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.2, 5.2)
Floyd County 7,8 *** 43.6 (27.9, 66.0) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.9)
Jefferson County 7 *** 37.6 (23.9, 58.3) 5
*
*
Sac County 7,8 *** 55.7 (35.7, 86.0) 5 stable stable trend 2.7 (0.0, 5.4)
Clarke County 7 *** 76.0 (48.9, 114.4) 5
*
*
Emmet County 7 *** 66.6 (42.0, 102.2) 5
*
*
Greene County 7 *** 56.4 (35.2, 88.8) 5
*
*
Hamilton County 7,8 *** 42.9 (26.7, 66.1) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)
Poweshiek County 7,8 *** 34.2 (21.0, 53.6) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.7, 5.4)
Crawford County 7 *** 37.8 (23.2, 58.9) 4
*
*
Delaware County 7,8 *** 36.9 (22.8, 57.4) 4 stable stable trend -20.1 (-36.2, 0.1)
Howard County 7 *** 58.7 (36.0, 92.6) 4
*
*
Winnebago County 7 *** 56.5 (34.3, 89.2) 4
*
*
Chickasaw County 7 *** 43.5 (26.5, 69.2) 4
*
*
Grundy County 7 *** 42.5 (25.9, 67.6) 4
*
*
Hancock County 7,8 *** 48.6 (29.9, 77.1) 4 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.3, 4.9)
Allamakee County 7 *** 34.1 (20.6, 55.2) 4
*
*
Humboldt County 7,8 *** 44.1 (26.4, 72.4) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 4.2)
Madison County 7,8 *** 37.3 (22.6, 59.1) 4 stable stable trend -0.0 (-3.3, 3.3)
Monona County 7 *** 46.8 (27.6, 78.0) 4
*
*
Guthrie County 7 *** 44.1 (26.2, 72.3) 4
*
*
Ida County 7 *** 56.3 (33.3, 94.2) 4
*
*
Van Buren County 7 *** 62.8 (37.0, 103.0) 4
*
*
Cherokee County 7,8 *** 32.1 (18.5, 54.7) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.0, 2.4)
Keokuk County 7 *** 40.2 (22.8, 68.0) 3
*
*
Louisa County 7 *** 43.3 (25.0, 71.3) 3
*
*
Lyon County 7 *** 44.1 (24.9, 73.1) 3
*
*
Adair County 7 *** 47.8 (26.0, 84.5) 3
*
*
Kossuth County 7,8 *** 24.6 (13.9, 42.5) 3 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 3.4)
Palo Alto County 7,8 *** 45.1 (25.2, 77.0) 3 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.4, 5.0)
Adams County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davis County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fremont County 7,8 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lucas County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 7,8 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
O'Brien County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winneshiek County 7,8 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/23/2017 8:23 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2016 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2016 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2016 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top