Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

Prostate, 2011-2015

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa 3,8 *** 108.0 (105.8, 110.2) 1,982 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.6, -3.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 *** 109.0 (108.8, 109.2) 190,639 falling falling trend -7.3 (-13.0, -1.1)
Adair County 7,8 *** 82.8 (52.8, 127.1) 5 stable stable trend -21.6 (-39.4, 1.4)
Adams County 7 ***
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Allamakee County 7,8 *** 104.0 (79.1, 135.6) 12 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Appanoose County 7,8 *** 70.9 (49.1, 100.9) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.0)
Audubon County 7,8 *** 142.2 (98.3, 203.8) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
Benton County 7,8 *** 82.0 (63.7, 104.5) 14 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.1, -2.0)
Black Hawk County 7,8 *** 121.3 (110.2, 133.3) 91 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.1, -1.9)
Boone County 7,8 *** 116.7 (94.5, 142.9) 20 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Bremer County 7,8 *** 103.6 (82.4, 129.1) 17 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.9, -2.2)
Buchanan County 7,8 *** 83.2 (62.3, 109.4) 11 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.6, -2.3)
Buena Vista County 7,8 *** 130.2 (101.6, 164.6) 15 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.1)
Butler County 7,8 *** 114.6 (87.9, 148.0) 13 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.6, -2.5)
Calhoun County 7,8 *** 116.1 (85.0, 156.8) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Carroll County 7,8 *** 147.3 (119.5, 180.2) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Cass County 7,8 *** 135.9 (105.4, 173.8) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Cedar County 7,8 *** 128.8 (102.2, 161.0) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Cerro Gordo County 7,8 *** 116.9 (100.2, 136.1) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Cherokee County 7,8 *** 146.0 (112.7, 187.9) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Chickasaw County 7,8 *** 109.7 (80.0, 148.1) 9 falling falling trend -10.0 (-16.2, -3.3)
Clarke County 7,8 *** 97.9 (65.6, 142.0) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.8, -0.2)
Clay County 7,8 *** 139.5 (110.3, 174.9) 16 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Clayton County 7,8 *** 92.4 (70.5, 120.0) 12 falling falling trend -6.3 (-8.9, -3.8)
Clinton County 7,8 *** 97.5 (82.8, 114.3) 32 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.5)
Crawford County 7,8 *** 170.9 (136.8, 211.3) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Dallas County 7,8 *** 97.1 (82.3, 113.8) 32 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.5)
Davis County 7 *** 137.7 (97.0, 191.0) 8
*
*
Decatur County 7,8 *** 117.9 (80.2, 169.3) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.2)
Delaware County 7,8 *** 93.4 (70.1, 122.8) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Des Moines County 7,8 *** 100.7 (84.4, 119.6) 28 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.3)
Dickinson County 7,8 *** 149.2 (121.9, 182.1) 22 rising rising trend 15.9 (1.2, 32.8)
Dubuque County 7,8 *** 124.5 (111.8, 138.3) 72 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Emmet County 7,8 *** 154.4 (115.6, 203.6) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Fayette County 7,8 *** 109.3 (86.5, 137.0) 16 stable stable trend 7.4 (-17.2, 39.1)
Floyd County 7,8 *** 104.2 (79.4, 135.4) 12 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.7)
Franklin County 7,8 *** 112.5 (80.3, 154.7) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.9, -0.1)
Fremont County 7,8 *** 86.7 (54.6, 134.0) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.5)
Greene County 7,8 *** 148.6 (109.7, 198.8) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 2.8)
Grundy County 7,8 *** 129.0 (96.9, 169.6) 11 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Guthrie County 7,8 *** 73.7 (49.8, 107.1) 6 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.2, -0.5)
Hamilton County 7,8 *** 151.8 (119.5, 190.9) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Hancock County 7,8 *** 129.1 (96.2, 171.2) 11 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.6, -0.6)
Hardin County 7,8 *** 150.8 (120.6, 187.1) 18 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.4, 7.9)
Harrison County 7,8 *** 66.0 (45.1, 94.3) 7 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.0)
Henry County 7,8 *** 109.8 (85.3, 139.6) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Howard County 7,8 *** 81.0 (53.5, 119.6) 6 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -0.8)
Humboldt County 7,8 *** 104.1 (72.7, 146.3) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.4)
Ida County 7,8 *** 166.4 (120.8, 226.4) 9 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Iowa County 7,8 *** 110.8 (84.0, 144.1) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.9)
Jackson County 7,8 *** 130.4 (104.7, 161.3) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Jasper County 7,8 *** 86.4 (70.3, 105.2) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Jefferson County 7,8 *** 85.9 (62.8, 115.6) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Johnson County 7,8 *** 113.4 (101.0, 126.8) 67 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Jones County 7,8 *** 81.0 (61.3, 105.8) 12 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.3)
Keokuk County 7,8 *** 66.3 (42.6, 100.3) 5 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.0)
Kossuth County 7,8 *** 96.9 (73.6, 126.6) 12 stable stable trend 16.0 (-6.7, 44.2)
Lee County 7,8 *** 98.5 (81.4, 118.5) 24 falling falling trend -22.0 (-38.8, -0.5)
Linn County 7,8 *** 88.8 (81.2, 96.9) 105 falling falling trend -8.3 (-12.2, -4.2)
Louisa County 7,8 *** 88.4 (59.7, 127.0) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.3)
Lucas County 7,8 *** 104.4 (71.8, 148.9) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.8)
Lyon County 7,8 *** 127.6 (92.8, 171.8) 9 falling falling trend -16.5 (-29.1, -1.6)
Madison County 7,8 *** 83.9 (60.2, 114.6) 9 falling falling trend -5.8 (-8.2, -3.4)
Mahaska County 7,8 *** 103.3 (80.5, 131.0) 14 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Marion County 7,8 *** 111.4 (91.6, 134.5) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Marshall County 7,8 *** 110.0 (92.6, 129.9) 29 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Mills County 7,8 *** 109.9 (81.5, 145.8) 11 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.8)
Mitchell County 7,8 *** 108.1 (77.6, 148.3) 8 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.6)
Monona County 7,8 *** 95.0 (66.4, 134.7) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.8)
Monroe County 7,8 *** 66.9 (40.0, 107.5) 4 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.7, 0.0)
Montgomery County 7,8 *** 106.2 (76.1, 146.3) 8 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.3)
Muscatine County 7,8 *** 108.3 (90.3, 129.0) 27 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.0)
O'Brien County 7,8 *** 129.1 (99.5, 165.8) 13 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.3)
Osceola County 7,8 *** 114.1 (73.3, 172.1) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.2)
Page County 7,8 *** 108.9 (83.2, 140.9) 12 falling falling trend -6.4 (-10.8, -1.8)
Palo Alto County 7,8 *** 118.1 (83.4, 164.2) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.6)
Plymouth County 7,8 *** 144.0 (118.9, 173.3) 24 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.2)
Pocahontas County 7,8 *** 123.5 (86.2, 175.2) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.6, -0.8)
Polk County 7,8 *** 102.4 (96.2, 109.0) 215 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Pottawattamie County 7,8 *** 96.0 (84.6, 108.5) 54 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Poweshiek County 7,8 *** 78.8 (58.5, 104.8) 10 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.5)
Ringgold County 7,8 *** 76.8 (43.7, 131.3) 3 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.0, -0.2)
Sac County 7,8 *** 98.6 (69.0, 138.8) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.4)
Scott County 7,8 *** 122.2 (112.1, 133.0) 115 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Shelby County 7,8 *** 93.4 (66.7, 128.8) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Sioux County 7,8 *** 117.1 (95.9, 141.8) 22 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.1, -1.5)
Story County 7,8 *** 145.0 (127.9, 163.7) 54 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Tama County 7,8 *** 105.0 (80.3, 135.8) 13 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.5)
Taylor County 7,8 *** 82.7 (50.1, 132.1) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.7)
Union County 7,8 *** 79.8 (54.5, 114.1) 7 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -1.9)
Van Buren County 7,8 *** 53.5 (30.4, 90.8) 3 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.9, -0.3)
Wapello County 7,8 *** 82.2 (66.0, 101.6) 18 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Warren County 7,8 *** 98.1 (82.0, 116.5) 28 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Washington County 7,8 *** 104.2 (81.3, 132.0) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Wayne County 7,8 *** 102.1 (65.1, 155.8) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.5)
Webster County 7,8 *** 117.6 (98.9, 139.2) 29 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.5)
Winnebago County 7,8 *** 93.5 (64.1, 133.4) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.2)
Winneshiek County 7,8 *** 104.1 (81.2, 132.4) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Woodbury County 7,8 *** 107.2 (95.1, 120.5) 59 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.6)
Worth County 7,8 *** 77.5 (48.3, 120.8) 4 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.4)
Wright County 7,8 *** 83.3 (59.4, 115.1) 8 stable stable trend -13.2 (-24.5, 0.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/16/2019 11:21 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2017 data submission and SEER November 2017 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2017 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2017 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2017 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2017 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top