Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Kentucky by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky 7 268.8 (266.6, 271.0) N/A 12,447 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.3, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 225.0 (224.8, 225.3) N/A 726,500 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.2, 0.0)
Adair County 7 307.2 (271.6, 346.3) 23 (2, 97) 62 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.5)
Allen County 7 266.6 (235.8, 300.5) 70 (12, 116) 59 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Anderson County 7 247.8 (219.9, 278.5) 104 (29, 119) 61 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Ballard County 7 220.5 (175.1, 274.9) 115 (32, 120) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 1.8)
Barren County 7 267.8 (246.1, 290.8) 68 (26, 111) 124 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Bath County 7 336.0 (291.0, 386.3) 6 (1, 76) 44 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.9)
Bell County 7 261.5 (234.0, 291.5) 84 (19, 117) 73 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8)
Boone County 7 246.2 (234.3, 258.6) 107 (68, 114) 335 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 1.0)
Bourbon County 7 268.1 (236.9, 302.5) 67 (11, 117) 59 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Boyd County 7 282.3 (261.1, 305.0) 49 (15, 103) 145 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Boyle County 7 272.0 (245.4, 300.9) 57 (15, 113) 83 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.1, 2.2)
Bracken County 7 285.6 (236.4, 342.5) 45 (1, 118) 26 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 4.2)
Breathitt County 7 317.6 (275.9, 364.4) 14 (1, 97) 46 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.2)
Breckinridge County 7 254.8 (223.9, 289.2) 95 (23, 119) 56 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Bullitt County 7 274.3 (258.4, 291.0) 54 (28, 98) 240 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.1, 1.4)
Butler County 7 314.9 (271.1, 364.0) 18 (1, 107) 41 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.5)
Caldwell County 7 254.2 (215.8, 297.9) 96 (11, 120) 35 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0)
Calloway County 7 262.3 (237.8, 288.6) 83 (24, 116) 94 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.2)
Campbell County 7 262.6 (247.9, 278.0) 82 (39, 108) 265 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9)
Carlisle County 7 251.8 (188.8, 330.1) 99 (1, 120) 12 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.9, 4.1)
Carroll County 7 300.7 (255.6, 351.9) 29 (1, 111) 35 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.7)
Carter County 7 303.8 (274.5, 335.7) 25 (3, 87) 87 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.7)
Casey County 7 255.0 (220.5, 293.7) 94 (16, 119) 43 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.4)
Christian County 7 273.2 (253.1, 294.3) 56 (22, 106) 147 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 1.6)
Clark County 7 296.0 (270.8, 323.0) 32 (6, 91) 111 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Clay County 7 296.1 (263.7, 331.6) 31 (5, 99) 64 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.1)
Clinton County 7 264.4 (221.0, 314.5) 76 (5, 120) 30 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 4.1)
Crittenden County 7 206.3 (165.2, 255.2) 118 (45, 120) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.0)
Cumberland County 7 317.1 (255.9, 389.5) 15 (1, 116) 22 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 3.7)
Daviess County 7 269.8 (255.2, 284.9) 64 (34, 103) 282 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.3, 1.6)
Edmonson County 7 258.1 (219.2, 302.5) 90 (10, 119) 36 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.1)
Elliott County 7 201.4 (158.2, 253.9) 120 (50, 120) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.2)
Estill County 7 303.3 (263.9, 347.3) 27 (2, 102) 47 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.6)
Fayette County 7 245.0 (237.0, 253.3) 109 (82, 112) 745 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Fleming County 7 300.8 (261.7, 344.3) 28 (1, 110) 47 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.8)
Floyd County 7 352.2 (324.8, 381.4) 4 (1, 27) 136 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.9, 9.1)
Franklin County 7 250.8 (231.5, 271.4) 102 (42, 116) 137 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Fulton County 7 264.5 (206.0, 335.2) 75 (2, 120) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.6)
Gallatin County 7 216.7 (176.6, 263.9) 117 (40, 120) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.8)
Garrard County 7 287.0 (252.1, 325.7) 44 (4, 112) 56 stable stable trend -1.0 (-10.0, 0.7)
Grant County 7 284.9 (255.7, 316.6) 47 (8, 109) 74 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.4)
Graves County 7 255.3 (232.1, 280.3) 93 (31, 116) 98 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Grayson County 7 270.3 (242.5, 300.6) 62 (16, 113) 76 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.0)
Green County 7 307.2 (261.0, 359.8) 22 (1, 110) 36 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.5, 4.2)
Greenup County 7 273.9 (249.2, 300.5) 55 (17, 109) 101 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Hancock County 7 204.0 (163.2, 252.4) 119 (47, 120) 19 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 4.8)
Hardin County 7 268.3 (254.4, 282.8) 66 (34, 103) 297 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Harlan County 7 319.5 (289.2, 352.2) 13 (2, 69) 92 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.5, 2.9)
Harrison County 7 291.6 (257.6, 329.1) 41 (3, 109) 61 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.6)
Hart County 7 275.3 (241.6, 312.7) 52 (7, 114) 55 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.2, 2.8)
Henderson County 7 253.3 (232.8, 275.2) 97 (40, 116) 126 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.2)
Henry County 7 266.5 (232.2, 304.8) 71 (13, 118) 49 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.7)
Hickman County 7 264.3 (197.2, 348.7) 78 (1, 120) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.1)
Hopkins County 7 256.5 (235.7, 278.7) 91 (33, 115) 126 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Jackson County 7 296.5 (256.6, 341.1) 30 (2, 112) 44 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Jefferson County 7 260.0 (254.8, 265.3) 86 (64, 98) 2,071 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.2)
Jessamine County 7 264.4 (244.8, 285.3) 77 (29, 112) 144 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Johnson County 7 291.4 (260.5, 325.2) 42 (4, 107) 71 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.2)
Kenton County 7 262.8 (251.7, 274.3) 81 (47, 104) 452 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Knott County 7 270.1 (233.3, 311.5) 63 (7, 117) 44 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.6)
Knox County 7 332.2 (303.3, 363.2) 8 (1, 43) 105 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.7)
Larue County 7 241.2 (205.3, 281.8) 110 (25, 120) 36 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.8)
Laurel County 7 269.3 (251.1, 288.5) 65 (28, 107) 175 falling falling trend -6.4 (-10.6, -2.6)
Lawrence County 7 315.4 (276.8, 358.1) 17 (1, 94) 54 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.3, 2.7)
Lee County 7 294.5 (241.9, 356.3) 36 (1, 118) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.3, 3.5)
Leslie County 7 265.6 (223.4, 314.3) 74 (6, 120) 32 falling falling trend -12.8 (-22.4, -3.3)
Letcher County 7 306.5 (274.1, 341.9) 24 (1, 95) 74 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.5)
Lewis County 7 336.5 (293.5, 384.4) 5 (1, 73) 50 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.5, 3.7)
Lincoln County 7 323.0 (291.1, 357.7) 9 (1, 68) 83 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.3, 2.3)
Livingston County 7 295.2 (245.4, 352.9) 35 (1, 117) 30 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.6, 4.3)
Logan County 7 293.0 (263.9, 324.5) 37 (4, 99) 83 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.6)
Lyon County 7 267.7 (218.0, 326.7) 69 (3, 120) 24 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.1)
Madison County 7 263.1 (247.5, 279.5) 80 (36, 109) 225 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.9)
Magoffin County 7 247.0 (210.1, 289.1) 105 (22, 120) 35 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.8)
Marion County 7 292.1 (257.8, 329.9) 39 (3, 109) 58 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.6)
Marshall County 7 271.3 (245.5, 299.4) 59 (18, 112) 92 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.2)
Martin County 7 295.9 (253.2, 344.5) 33 (2, 113) 36 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.6, 3.9)
Mason County 7 259.9 (226.7, 297.0) 87 (18, 118) 48 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
McCracken County 7 271.5 (253.5, 290.5) 58 (25, 106) 190 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.9)
McCreary County 7 248.8 (216.8, 284.4) 103 (23, 120) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.6)
McLean County 7 293.0 (245.3, 347.9) 38 (1, 116) 30 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.5, 3.3)
Meade County 7 246.5 (221.8, 273.3) 106 (41, 118) 79 stable stable trend -2.9 (-10.0, 0.4)
Menifee County 7 238.7 (187.1, 301.2) 111 (4, 120) 17 falling falling trend -9.2 (-21.5, -3.2)
Mercer County 7 303.3 (271.4, 338.2) 26 (2, 97) 76 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.1, 3.1)
Metcalfe County 7 283.4 (238.7, 334.7) 48 (2, 117) 32 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.0, 3.9)
Monroe County 7 332.9 (284.1, 388.1) 7 (1, 94) 38 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.1, 5.6)
Montgomery County 7 265.8 (239.4, 294.5) 73 (19, 115) 78 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.2)
Morgan County 7 265.9 (228.6, 308.1) 72 (7, 119) 39 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.5, 5.3)
Muhlenberg County 7 245.3 (221.2, 271.6) 108 (39, 119) 82 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Nelson County 7 274.6 (253.2, 297.5) 53 (18, 108) 132 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Nicholas County 7 290.0 (237.0, 352.2) 43 (1, 119) 23 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 4.4)
Ohio County 7 255.5 (226.9, 286.9) 92 (23, 118) 63 stable stable trend -2.8 (-11.2, 0.7)
Oldham County 7 270.5 (253.2, 288.7) 61 (27, 105) 191 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Owen County 7 291.8 (247.6, 342.1) 40 (2, 114) 35 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.9, 3.1)
Owsley County 7 354.2 (279.7, 444.0) 3 (1, 112) 17 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.2, 4.2)
Pendleton County 7 285.3 (247.7, 327.3) 46 (4, 114) 47 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.5)
Perry County 7 322.6 (292.3, 355.4) 11 (1, 64) 92 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.2)
Pike County 7 311.3 (291.4, 332.3) 20 (5, 54) 204 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.7, 1.5)
Powell County 7 375.3 (327.5, 428.4) 1 (1, 32) 48 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.6, 3.5)
Pulaski County 7 281.8 (263.5, 301.1) 50 (18, 95) 196 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Robertson County 7 354.3 (240.8, 504.7) 2 (1, 120) 7 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.3, 5.7)
Rockcastle County 7 315.7 (278.3, 357.0) 16 (1, 91) 58 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.5, 3.4)
Rowan County 7 270.9 (239.0, 306.0) 60 (9, 115) 57 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Russell County 7 310.4 (273.7, 351.0) 21 (1, 95) 59 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.3)
Scott County 7 231.7 (214.0, 250.6) 112 (80, 119) 129 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Shelby County 7 223.4 (205.1, 242.9) 114 (87, 120) 117 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Simpson County 7 251.7 (220.3, 286.6) 100 (23, 119) 51 stable stable trend 5.2 (-0.4, 9.9)
Spencer County 7 277.8 (246.4, 312.5) 51 (9, 112) 62 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.7)
Taylor County 7 321.4 (288.8, 356.7) 12 (1, 73) 80 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.4, 3.4)
Todd County 7 253.2 (213.9, 297.8) 98 (14, 120) 32 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.6)
Trigg County 7 219.3 (185.9, 257.4) 116 (52, 120) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Trimble County 7 264.2 (217.2, 319.0) 79 (5, 120) 25 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.9, 5.3)
Union County 7 228.7 (193.8, 268.4) 113 (37, 120) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Warren County 7 258.6 (245.5, 272.3) 88 (47, 108) 304 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 2.7)
Washington County 7 261.3 (221.9, 306.3) 85 (7, 119) 35 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.6, 4.2)
Wayne County 7 295.6 (262.2, 332.3) 34 (4, 101) 65 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.0)
Webster County 7 251.2 (213.9, 293.5) 101 (13, 120) 36 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 2.7)
Whitley County 7 323.0 (296.0, 351.8) 10 (2, 55) 114 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.8, 2.7)
Wolfe County 7 312.5 (256.9, 377.5) 19 (1, 114) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Woodford County 7 258.3 (231.2, 287.8) 89 (22, 117) 75 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2024 9:05 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top