Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Kentucky by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky 7 *** 574.4 (570.0, 578.8) N/A 13,939 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 488.5 (488.0, 489.0) N/A 843,303 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Breathitt County 7 *** 743.5 (654.5, 841.4) 1 (1, 54) 57 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.4, 4.2)
Marion County 7 *** 706.8 (633.6, 786.1) 2 (1, 59) 74 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.5)
Powell County 7 *** 701.0 (610.8, 800.9) 3 (1, 80) 48 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Lee County 7 *** 696.3 (586.0, 822.9) 4 (1, 102) 31 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.2, 3.5)
Bath County 7 *** 684.2 (599.1, 778.5) 5 (1, 82) 50 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3)
Lawrence County 7 *** 671.4 (595.9, 754.0) 6 (1, 86) 63 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.4, 6.9)
Floyd County 7 *** 665.7 (615.5, 719.0) 7 (1, 59) 144 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Estill County 7 *** 659.1 (581.3, 745.0) 8 (1, 98) 57 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Taylor County 7 *** 655.8 (596.0, 720.0) 9 (1, 81) 94 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Hart County 7 *** 655.2 (583.8, 733.0) 10 (1, 92) 68 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.0)
Owsley County 7 *** 654.8 (523.6, 811.3) 11 (1, 119) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.3, 2.7)
Garrard County 7 *** 654.2 (583.9, 731.0) 12 (1, 94) 69 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.7)
Carter County 7 *** 653.2 (597.6, 712.9) 13 (1, 76) 108 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Monroe County 7 *** 645.6 (559.4, 742.1) 14 (1, 112) 44 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.1)
Russell County 7 *** 644.4 (578.2, 716.6) 15 (1, 93) 74 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Knox County 7 *** 641.8 (588.7, 698.6) 16 (2, 87) 114 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Perry County 7 *** 641.8 (585.8, 702.0) 17 (2, 87) 104 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Mercer County 7 *** 639.6 (576.6, 707.9) 18 (1, 96) 83 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Wolfe County 7 *** 639.6 (533.8, 761.3) 19 (1, 117) 28 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.6)
Clinton County 7 *** 633.5 (549.0, 728.5) 20 (1, 114) 43 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Henry County 7 *** 632.6 (558.8, 713.8) 21 (1, 106) 60 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Nelson County 7 *** 628.8 (581.9, 678.5) 22 (3, 83) 149 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Montgomery County 7 *** 628.8 (571.0, 690.8) 23 (2, 97) 92 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.1)
Grayson County 7 *** 628.3 (571.6, 689.3) 24 (2, 101) 99 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Crittenden County 7 *** 624.4 (536.3, 723.8) 25 (1, 115) 39 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.1)
Spencer County 7 *** 623.6 (553.3, 700.7) 26 (1, 108) 65 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.0)
Lincoln County 7 *** 621.9 (564.9, 683.3) 27 (2, 100) 92 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Barren County 7 *** 620.7 (576.3, 667.8) 28 (4, 87) 153 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Magoffin County 7 *** 619.1 (539.7, 707.4) 29 (1, 113) 47 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Martin County 7 *** 619.0 (534.6, 713.0) 30 (1, 117) 42 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5)
Fleming County 7 *** 617.9 (544.0, 699.5) 31 (1, 113) 55 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.2)
Carroll County 7 *** 617.6 (529.0, 716.9) 32 (1, 117) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1)
McLean County 7 *** 617.0 (529.0, 716.5) 33 (1, 117) 37 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Johnson County 7 *** 615.4 (555.6, 680.0) 34 (3, 105) 85 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Harlan County 7 *** 615.2 (559.9, 674.6) 35 (3, 102) 100 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.5)
Hardin County 7 *** 614.6 (583.7, 646.6) 36 (9, 76) 320 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Washington County 7 *** 613.7 (532.4, 704.5) 37 (1, 117) 44 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.6)
Breckinridge County 7 *** 612.0 (551.6, 677.8) 38 (3, 109) 82 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Union County 7 *** 610.2 (531.1, 697.9) 39 (1, 117) 48 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Lewis County 7 *** 602.6 (531.1, 682.0) 40 (2, 114) 54 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.2)
Laurel County 7 *** 598.6 (560.8, 638.2) 41 (12, 92) 203 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Nicholas County 7 *** 597.4 (497.4, 712.8) 42 (1, 120) 26 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.6)
Bracken County 7 *** 597.4 (502.8, 705.5) 43 (1, 119) 30 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Grant County 7 *** 596.9 (532.1, 667.3) 44 (3, 115) 71 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Daviess County 7 *** 593.9 (565.0, 623.9) 45 (18, 92) 332 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.8, 7.4)
Casey County 7 *** 593.3 (524.1, 669.5) 46 (4, 117) 57 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.2)
Marshall County 7 *** 592.1 (545.9, 641.7) 47 (9, 107) 129 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Anderson County 7 *** 591.6 (528.2, 660.6) 48 (4, 116) 69 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Gallatin County 7 *** 590.9 (482.7, 715.5) 49 (1, 120) 26 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.1)
Boyd County 7 *** 590.8 (552.1, 631.6) 50 (11, 99) 183 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Ohio County 7 *** 590.2 (534.1, 650.8) 51 (7, 113) 86 falling falling trend -5.8 (-9.9, -1.6)
Pike County 7 *** 589.4 (553.2, 627.5) 52 (16, 101) 216 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Clay County 7 *** 589.3 (524.9, 659.5) 53 (5, 115) 67 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.5, -1.1)
Fulton County 7 *** 589.1 (483.2, 712.6) 54 (1, 120) 23 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Carlisle County 7 *** 588.0 (470.6, 727.9) 55 (1, 120) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 2.1)
Henderson County 7 *** 586.4 (544.4, 630.8) 56 (12, 104) 156 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Pulaski County 7 *** 586.1 (551.7, 622.3) 57 (16, 100) 231 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Rockcastle County 7 *** 585.7 (518.2, 659.9) 58 (4, 116) 59 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Letcher County 7 *** 585.0 (528.0, 647.0) 59 (7, 114) 85 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Jefferson County 7 *** 583.4 (572.6, 594.5) 60 (38, 77) 2,331 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
McCracken County 7 *** 582.7 (548.9, 618.2) 61 (18, 102) 235 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Metcalfe County 7 *** 581.6 (497.5, 676.7) 62 (2, 119) 36 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Franklin County 7 *** 577.1 (536.8, 619.8) 63 (18, 109) 163 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Robertson County 7 *** 575.2 (407.2, 795.0) 64 (1, 120) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.0, 6.5)
McCreary County 7 *** 574.6 (507.3, 648.6) 65 (5, 118) 58 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Greenup County 7 *** 572.4 (528.7, 619.1) 66 (16, 113) 133 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Oldham County 7 *** 571.9 (533.2, 612.7) 67 (23, 111) 194 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Butler County 7 *** 571.4 (496.0, 655.6) 68 (5, 119) 45 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.5)
Muhlenberg County 7 *** 570.1 (522.1, 621.4) 69 (17, 115) 110 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Logan County 7 *** 569.4 (518.1, 624.7) 70 (14, 116) 96 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Whitley County 7 *** 568.5 (520.9, 619.4) 71 (16, 114) 112 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Clark County 7 *** 566.5 (520.5, 615.6) 72 (18, 114) 119 falling falling trend -11.6 (-17.6, -5.1)
Woodford County 7 *** 565.2 (510.2, 624.8) 73 (11, 117) 86 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Owen County 7 *** 564.9 (481.8, 658.9) 74 (4, 120) 38 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Bullitt County 7 *** 564.8 (531.9, 599.3) 75 (29, 109) 244 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Pendleton County 7 *** 564.3 (492.3, 644.2) 76 (6, 119) 48 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Harrison County 7 *** 562.1 (498.0, 632.4) 77 (9, 119) 61 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Webster County 7 *** 560.0 (486.0, 642.5) 78 (6, 120) 45 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Rowan County 7 *** 559.8 (498.7, 626.5) 79 (11, 119) 64 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.5, -0.9)
Adair County 7 *** 558.7 (496.7, 626.6) 80 (11, 119) 63 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Bourbon County 7 *** 558.4 (499.6, 622.6) 81 (12, 118) 69 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Simpson County 7 *** 558.2 (492.6, 630.3) 82 (9, 119) 56 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Shelby County 7 *** 558.0 (515.0, 603.7) 83 (27, 116) 137 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Leslie County 7 *** 557.7 (475.9, 650.3) 84 (4, 120) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Green County 7 *** 557.1 (481.1, 642.8) 85 (4, 120) 41 stable stable trend -6.1 (-15.1, 3.7)
Trimble County 7 *** 554.4 (466.0, 655.7) 86 (3, 120) 30 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.1)
Ballard County 7 *** 553.0 (465.9, 652.9) 87 (3, 120) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Livingston County 7 *** 552.9 (472.1, 645.2) 88 (4, 120) 37 falling falling trend -5.4 (-10.2, -0.3)
Meade County 7 *** 552.8 (499.3, 610.7) 89 (15, 118) 86 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Graves County 7 *** 550.6 (507.0, 597.1) 90 (23, 116) 124 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Madison County 7 *** 549.6 (517.0, 583.7) 91 (38, 114) 228 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8)
Bell County 7 *** 548.6 (497.7, 603.4) 92 (19, 119) 92 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Kenton County 7 *** 548.3 (524.9, 572.5) 93 (51, 110) 451 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Larue County 7 *** 545.3 (474.0, 624.7) 94 (10, 120) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Campbell County 7 *** 543.7 (513.9, 574.9) 95 (46, 115) 267 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Wayne County 7 *** 542.4 (486.8, 603.2) 96 (21, 119) 75 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Todd County 7 *** 541.9 (465.6, 627.6) 97 (9, 120) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.4)
Jessamine County 7 *** 538.3 (499.0, 580.0) 98 (38, 117) 146 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Morgan County 7 *** 533.3 (461.4, 613.4) 99 (14, 120) 42 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.0)
Caldwell County 7 *** 531.8 (461.6, 610.5) 100 (14, 120) 44 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.1)
Boyle County 7 *** 531.0 (482.8, 582.8) 101 (34, 119) 92 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Fayette County 7 *** 528.5 (511.1, 546.3) 102 (75, 114) 754 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Scott County 7 *** 528.1 (484.2, 574.8) 103 (41, 119) 122 falling falling trend -7.2 (-11.5, -2.7)
Christian County 7 *** 523.0 (486.0, 561.9) 104 (54, 119) 154 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Cumberland County 7 *** 521.6 (433.5, 624.7) 105 (6, 120) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.3)
Calloway County 7 *** 521.4 (477.9, 568.0) 106 (44, 119) 112 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Hopkins County 7 *** 520.7 (482.2, 561.5) 107 (50, 119) 144 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Jackson County 7 *** 519.7 (447.7, 600.4) 108 (15, 120) 42 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.3)
Warren County 7 *** 519.5 (492.3, 547.7) 109 (72, 118) 295 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Menifee County 7 *** 518.3 (419.2, 635.4) 110 (4, 120) 22 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.9)
Knott County 7 *** 517.4 (449.7, 592.7) 111 (19, 120) 48 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Mason County 7 *** 515.1 (453.2, 583.6) 112 (28, 120) 53 falling falling trend -6.6 (-9.7, -3.3)
Boone County 7 *** 511.2 (484.6, 538.7) 113 (77, 118) 310 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.6)
Edmonson County 7 *** 511.1 (442.1, 589.0) 114 (28, 120) 42 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Lyon County 7 *** 510.7 (434.9, 598.5) 115 (21, 120) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.7)
Hancock County 7 *** 503.0 (418.3, 600.9) 116 (13, 120) 28 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.1, 3.5)
Trigg County 7 *** 501.4 (438.7, 571.5) 117 (31, 120) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Hickman County 7 *** 496.6 (394.8, 621.0) 118 (7, 120) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.7)
Allen County 7 *** 478.2 (424.7, 537.0) 119 (64, 120) 62 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Elliott County 7 *** 430.3 (350.4, 523.9) 120 (51, 120) 22 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/18/2021 9:36 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top