Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Kentucky by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Kentucky 7 122.7 (120.8, 124.6) N/A 3,328 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.6, 1.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 105.2 (105.0, 105.5) N/A 202,435 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
Wayne County 7 152.2 (122.4, 187.2) 18 (1, 96) 18 stable stable trend 11.9 (-0.1, 28.0)
Floyd County 7 176.9 (152.7, 203.8) 1 (1, 42) 39 rising rising trend 6.5 (1.7, 17.5)
Green County 7 168.7 (126.2, 221.1) 4 (1, 102) 11 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.1, 9.7)
Owen County 7 143.7 (105.4, 191.6) 27 (1, 115) 9 rising rising trend 4.8 (2.1, 7.9)
Monroe County 7 166.4 (123.3, 219.4) 5 (1, 109) 10 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.0, 8.5)
Daviess County 7 112.7 (100.9, 125.5) 90 (42, 111) 67 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.8, 8.8)
Lewis County 7 160.3 (123.2, 204.9) 8 (1, 106) 13 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.0, 6.1)
Morgan County 7 114.0 (84.7, 150.5) 87 (6, 118) 10 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.4, 6.6)
Rockcastle County 7 157.2 (124.0, 196.6) 12 (1, 106) 16 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.9, 6.1)
Cumberland County 7 171.4 (115.1, 245.2) 3 (1, 115) 6 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.4, 6.7)
Hart County 7 151.9 (120.6, 188.7) 19 (1, 104) 16 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.1, 5.4)
Boyle County 7 110.6 (89.4, 135.2) 94 (20, 117) 19 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.1, 4.9)
Livingston County 7 152.8 (107.2, 211.0) 17 (1, 115) 7 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.6, 8.1)
Taylor County 7 159.7 (131.0, 192.5) 9 (1, 88) 22 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.1, 6.0)
Lincoln County 7 155.0 (127.2, 187.0) 13 (1, 88) 22 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.5, 5.1)
Marion County 7 157.5 (126.5, 193.7) 11 (1, 99) 18 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.7, 5.0)
Estill County 7 130.3 (97.7, 170.3) 48 (1, 117) 11 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.6, 6.1)
Bath County 7 145.3 (108.6, 190.2) 26 (1, 112) 11 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.1, 5.1)
Owsley County 7 158.3 (97.7, 242.6) 10 (1, 118) 4 stable stable trend 2.4 (-2.0, 7.3)
Crittenden County 7 93.9 (59.4, 140.8) 112 (10, 118) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.2, 6.1)
Washington County 7 113.4 (80.8, 154.5) 88 (5, 118) 8 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.1, 4.6)
Adair County 7 146.4 (115.4, 183.0) 23 (1, 108) 16 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.3, 4.4)
Whitley County 7 138.2 (116.4, 162.9) 31 (4, 101) 29 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.2, 3.8)
Hancock County 7 86.4 (54.0, 130.7) 116 (18, 118) 4 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.3, 7.5)
Knott County 7 134.4 (101.8, 174.1) 41 (1, 115) 12 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.1, 4.9)
Larue County 7 137.6 (104.4, 178.0) 35 (1, 113) 12 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 5.1)
McLean County 7 121.5 (82.9, 171.7) 69 (1, 118) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.8, 4.8)
Perry County 7 161.9 (135.1, 192.4) 7 (1, 75) 26 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.3, 3.5)
Clark County 7 152.8 (130.6, 177.8) 16 (1, 77) 34 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.6, 3.2)
Harlan County 7 147.2 (121.3, 177.0) 22 (1, 95) 23 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 4.0)
Lee County 7 132.7 (88.5, 191.4) 43 (1, 118) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.8, 7.6)
Lyon County 7 146.2 (100.6, 206.6) 24 (1, 117) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.2, 6.0)
Russell County 7 154.5 (121.9, 193.1) 14 (1, 105) 16 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.4, 6.3)
Metcalfe County 7 118.3 (81.7, 165.3) 78 (2, 118) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.3, 5.9)
Ohio County 7 120.1 (96.0, 148.3) 70 (10, 115) 17 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.7)
Graves County 7 121.5 (101.5, 144.2) 68 (14, 113) 26 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.1, 4.6)
Henderson County 7 110.2 (93.1, 129.4) 96 (32, 116) 30 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.2, 3.2)
Trimble County 7 130.0 (89.6, 182.4) 50 (1, 118) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.1, 6.9)
Bullitt County 7 137.7 (123.7, 152.7) 34 (10, 81) 72 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.1, 2.9)
Calloway County 7 122.7 (102.0, 146.2) 63 (13, 111) 26 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.4, 4.5)
Hopkins County 7 114.3 (96.8, 134.0) 85 (28, 114) 30 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 3.5)
Breathitt County 7 147.8 (112.4, 190.9) 21 (1, 111) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.2)
Caldwell County 7 104.2 (73.5, 143.3) 103 (10, 118) 8 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.6)
Grayson County 7 120.0 (96.8, 147.0) 71 (11, 115) 19 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.4)
Logan County 7 141.3 (116.0, 170.4) 29 (2, 103) 22 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.2)
Lawrence County 7 132.7 (101.4, 170.5) 42 (2, 115) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.9, 4.5)
Martin County 7 118.8 (86.4, 159.6) 76 (3, 118) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.0, 4.6)
Pendleton County 7 135.1 (102.3, 175.0) 37 (1, 115) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.2)
Todd County 7 110.2 (78.5, 150.0) 95 (8, 118) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.1, 5.9)
Webster County 7 104.2 (74.7, 141.3) 104 (8, 118) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 3.9)
Greenup County 7 138.8 (117.0, 163.6) 30 (4, 100) 29 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 2.9)
Harrison County 7 135.2 (105.7, 170.2) 36 (1, 114) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 3.8)
Jefferson County 7 119.7 (115.3, 124.3) 73 (49, 87) 563 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.6, 2.6)
Mercer County 7 126.3 (99.5, 158.0) 54 (4, 115) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.7)
Nelson County 7 138.2 (119.3, 159.1) 33 (6, 95) 39 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.8)
Carlisle County 7 122.7 (70.0, 198.7) 62 (1, 118) 3 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.2, 6.7)
Clinton County 7 109.6 (74.3, 155.5) 98 (5, 118) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.7, 4.9)
Hardin County 7 129.8 (117.9, 142.5) 51 (18, 89) 88 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.4, 1.6)
Kenton County 7 122.0 (112.6, 131.9) 66 (36, 95) 126 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.3, 1.8)
Leslie County 7 117.6 (82.2, 163.2) 81 (2, 118) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.2, 5.2)
Boone County 7 109.9 (100.2, 120.2) 97 (52, 109) 95 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.3, 1.6)
McCracken County 7 122.4 (107.1, 139.2) 64 (22, 105) 47 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.1)
Butler County 7 165.8 (127.3, 212.2) 6 (1, 100) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.4, 4.1)
Letcher County 7 149.5 (121.1, 182.4) 20 (1, 100) 19 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.4)
Woodford County 7 121.6 (98.3, 148.8) 67 (10, 116) 19 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.1)
Boyd County 7 131.3 (113.1, 151.6) 46 (11, 100) 37 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.2)
Franklin County 7 111.5 (95.4, 129.5) 92 (33, 114) 35 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.6)
Jessamine County 7 124.4 (108.0, 142.6) 59 (18, 104) 42 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 2.0)
Madison County 7 124.2 (111.2, 138.3) 60 (22, 100) 68 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Spencer County 7 129.1 (102.5, 160.8) 53 (5, 113) 16 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.9)
Allen County 7 117.2 (91.8, 147.3) 83 (12, 116) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.2)
Barren County 7 118.2 (100.3, 138.4) 79 (22, 112) 31 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.5)
Clay County 7 118.5 (93.7, 147.9) 77 (8, 116) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 2.8)
Edmonson County 7 119.6 (86.4, 161.5) 74 (3, 118) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 4.0)
Johnson County 7 131.8 (106.0, 162.0) 45 (4, 112) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.9)
Fleming County 7 122.3 (91.2, 160.4) 65 (5, 118) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.4, 3.4)
Jackson County 7 130.1 (97.4, 170.4) 49 (2, 117) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.6)
Breckinridge County 7 125.1 (97.6, 157.9) 57 (5, 116) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 2.9)
Knox County 7 154.1 (129.9, 181.4) 15 (1, 82) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.6)
Marshall County 7 124.0 (101.8, 149.6) 61 (11, 113) 22 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.4)
Rowan County 7 124.7 (98.1, 156.0) 58 (6, 115) 16 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.8)
Anderson County 7 108.9 (86.2, 135.8) 99 (21, 117) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.9)
Pulaski County 7 129.4 (113.8, 146.6) 52 (15, 99) 50 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.4)
Fayette County 7 114.0 (107.4, 120.8) 86 (54, 101) 231 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Oldham County 7 132.2 (117.6, 148.1) 44 (13, 90) 61 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Shelby County 7 91.4 (77.0, 107.8) 115 (73, 118) 28 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Warren County 7 119.2 (108.5, 130.7) 75 (32, 103) 93 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Bell County 7 125.3 (101.5, 152.9) 56 (8, 113) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.3, 2.2)
Campbell County 7 111.7 (99.6, 124.9) 91 (44, 111) 63 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Christian County 7 105.9 (91.1, 122.3) 100 (46, 116) 40 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.1)
Elliott County 7 94.4 (59.5, 142.9) 111 (8, 118) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.8, 3.7)
Ballard County 7 118.1 (77.6, 172.3) 80 (1, 118) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.8, 3.4)
Carroll County 7 119.8 (84.7, 164.4) 72 (2, 118) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.0, 2.6)
Gallatin County 7 80.6 (50.3, 122.3) 118 (28, 118) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.4, 4.0)
Grant County 7 117.6 (94.7, 144.2) 82 (11, 115) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.0)
Union County 7 104.6 (75.7, 140.8) 101 (13, 118) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.4, 2.3)
Muhlenberg County 7 94.7 (75.9, 116.8) 109 (50, 118) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.1)
Montgomery County 7 111.2 (90.4, 135.4) 93 (21, 117) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Nicholas County 7 135.0 (90.9, 193.1) 38 (1, 118) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.7, 2.6)
Trigg County 7 94.6 (66.4, 130.7) 110 (23, 118) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.1, 3.2)
Henry County 7 114.4 (86.1, 149.1) 84 (8, 118) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.5, 2.4)
Wolfe County 7 138.2 (91.8, 199.5) 32 (1, 118) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.1, 2.8)
Casey County 7 93.0 (67.1, 125.4) 113 (21, 118) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.8, 1.5)
Scott County 7 104.5 (90.5, 120.1) 102 (49, 116) 40 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.0)
McCreary County 7 85.3 (63.0, 112.8) 117 (57, 118) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.7)
Bourbon County 7 103.4 (79.0, 132.8) 105 (23, 118) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.3)
Simpson County 7 92.3 (68.4, 121.8) 114 (37, 118) 10 stable stable trend -3.7 (-26.6, 1.7)
Carter County 7 135.0 (110.5, 163.3) 39 (3, 107) 21 stable stable trend -5.8 (-21.7, 3.7)
Pike County 7 145.8 (128.5, 164.7) 25 (3, 73) 52 stable stable trend -6.0 (-12.5, 0.6)
Bracken County 7 131.1 (90.0, 184.3) 47 (1, 118) 7 stable stable trend -6.7 (-35.7, 1.0)
Mason County 7 97.3 (71.7, 128.8) 107 (27, 118) 10 stable stable trend -8.2 (-33.6, 0.2)
Powell County 7 173.1 (133.8, 220.2) 2 (1, 96) 13 stable stable trend -9.5 (-19.8, 3.1)
Laurel County 7 112.8 (98.2, 128.9) 89 (33, 112) 43 falling falling trend -10.8 (-18.3, -4.2)
Meade County 7 101.8 (82.2, 124.7) 106 (36, 118) 19 falling falling trend -11.4 (-24.4, -3.1)
Magoffin County 7 94.7 (66.2, 131.5) 108 (18, 118) 7 falling falling trend -16.7 (-37.9, -2.6)
Garrard County 7 142.9 (111.8, 179.9) 28 (1, 111) 15 stable stable trend -21.3 (-41.4, 1.0)
Menifee County 7 125.7 (79.3, 189.4) 55 (1, 118) 5 stable stable trend -27.2 (-62.7, 6.7)
Fulton County 7 134.9 (83.9, 204.5) 40 (1, 118) 4
*
*
Hickman County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 7:10 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Hickman, Robertson

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top