Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Kentucky by County

Oral Cavity & Pharynx (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky 7 N/A 14.0 (13.6, 14.5) N/A 795 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.9, 1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.0 (11.9, 12.0) N/A 47,920 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.4)
Boone County 7 Urban 12.5 (10.1, 15.4) 61 (19, 72) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.4)
Bourbon County 7 Urban 16.2 (10.1, 24.9) 22 (2, 74) 5
*
*
Boyd County 7 Urban 14.7 (10.9, 19.6) 35 (5, 72) 10 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.4, 5.3)
Bullitt County 7 Urban 12.5 (9.6, 16.1) 63 (17, 74) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.7)
Campbell County 7 Urban 15.2 (12.1, 18.9) 31 (7, 67) 18 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.2, 4.9)
Carter County 7 Urban 13.4 (8.7, 20.1) 50 (5, 74) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.7, 3.9)
Christian County 7 Urban 18.2 (13.7, 23.5) 10 (2, 60) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.2, 5.0)
Clark County 7 Urban 8.8 (5.4, 13.8) 74 (29, 74) 4
*
*
Daviess County 7 Urban 13.8 (11.0, 17.1) 47 (12, 71) 18 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.2, 2.4)
Fayette County 7 Urban 12.8 (11.1, 14.6) 59 (28, 69) 44 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Gallatin County 7 Urban 35.8 (19.2, 60.8) 1 (1, 66) 3
*
*
Grant County 7 Urban 13.8 (8.3, 21.8) 46 (3, 74) 4
*
*
Greenup County 7 Urban 9.7 (6.2, 14.7) 73 (22, 74) 5 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.0, 4.8)
Hardin County 7 Urban 14.5 (11.6, 17.9) 38 (10, 69) 18 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.3, 7.1)
Henry County 7 Urban 15.3 (8.8, 25.4) 29 (2, 74) 3
*
*
Jefferson County 7 Urban 14.0 (13.0, 15.2) 44 (24, 58) 137 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.2, 2.3)
Jessamine County 7 Urban 14.8 (10.8, 19.9) 34 (5, 72) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.6, 6.8)
Kenton County 7 Urban 15.9 (13.4, 18.7) 23 (7, 57) 31 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.5)
Lawrence County 7 Urban 13.1 (7.3, 22.3) 55 (3, 74) 3
*
*
Livingston County 7 Urban 24.3 (13.8, 41.0) 2 (1, 72) 3
*
*
McCracken County 7 Urban 15.2 (11.8, 19.4) 30 (5, 69) 14 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.0, 4.0)
Meade County 7 Urban 13.2 (8.2, 20.2) 53 (4, 74) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.8, 7.2)
Nelson County 7 Urban 13.9 (9.9, 19.2) 45 (5, 74) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.5, 4.7)
Oldham County 7 Urban 17.4 (13.3, 22.4) 14 (2, 64) 13 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.1, 5.7)
Pendleton County 7 Urban 21.0 (12.5, 33.5) 5 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Scott County 7 Urban 10.7 (7.3, 15.1) 71 (19, 74) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.9, 6.1)
Shelby County 7 Urban 10.5 (7.2, 15.0) 72 (19, 74) 7
*
*
Spencer County 7 Urban 17.1 (10.5, 26.8) 16 (1, 74) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.8, 5.3)
Trigg County 7 Urban 20.0 (11.6, 32.7) 7 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Warren County 7 Urban 14.1 (11.4, 17.3) 42 (12, 69) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 2.1)
Woodford County 7 Urban 20.2 (13.9, 28.7) 6 (1, 66) 7
*
*
Adair County 7 Rural 14.2 (8.4, 22.9) 41 (2, 74) 4 stable stable trend -4.1 (-10.2, 1.4)
Anderson County 7 Rural 11.9 (7.2, 19.0) 67 (6, 74) 4
*
*
Barren County 7 Rural 13.6 (9.4, 19.1) 48 (6, 74) 7 rising rising trend 30.8 (5.6, 50.0)
Bath County 7 Rural 21.7 (12.4, 35.6) 4 (1, 73) 3
*
*
Bell County 7 Rural 12.5 (7.7, 19.5) 62 (6, 74) 4 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.5, 4.9)
Boyle County 7 Rural 17.6 (11.9, 25.2) 12 (2, 72) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.5, 3.8)
Breckinridge County 7 Rural 13.2 (7.9, 21.1) 54 (4, 74) 4
*
*
Calloway County 7 Rural 15.1 (10.3, 21.6) 32 (3, 73) 7 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.3, 6.1)
Casey County 7 Rural 15.7 (8.6, 26.5) 27 (1, 74) 3
*
*
Clay County 7 Rural 13.1 (7.5, 21.4) 56 (4, 74) 3
*
*
Floyd County 7 Rural 17.7 (12.5, 24.4) 11 (2, 69) 8 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.1, 6.5)
Franklin County 7 Rural 14.5 (10.6, 19.3) 39 (6, 73) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.4, 5.0)
Graves County 7 Rural 11.0 (7.1, 16.4) 69 (14, 74) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.7, 2.1)
Grayson County 7 Rural 16.8 (11.0, 24.7) 18 (2, 73) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.9, 4.9)
Harlan County 7 Rural 15.8 (10.0, 23.7) 25 (2, 74) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 3.6)
Harrison County 7 Rural 15.3 (9.2, 24.5) 28 (2, 74) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.2, 5.9)
Hart County 7 Rural 14.1 (8.1, 23.1) 43 (2, 74) 4 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.1, 6.4)
Henderson County 7 Rural 12.3 (8.6, 17.3) 64 (9, 74) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.5, 3.1)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 11.9 (8.4, 16.6) 66 (12, 74) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.8, 5.1)
Johnson County 7 Rural 16.4 (10.4, 24.7) 20 (1, 74) 5
*
*
Knox County 7 Rural 14.3 (9.4, 21.0) 40 (4, 74) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.2, 2.5)
Laurel County 7 Rural 11.9 (8.6, 16.1) 65 (15, 74) 9 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 5.1)
Letcher County 7 Rural 11.5 (6.8, 18.7) 68 (8, 74) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.5, 7.3)
Lewis County 7 Rural 23.6 (14.3, 37.4) 3 (1, 71) 4
*
*
Lincoln County 7 Rural 16.6 (10.7, 24.8) 19 (2, 73) 5
*
*
Logan County 7 Rural 12.5 (8.0, 19.0) 60 (6, 74) 5 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.1, 5.3)
Madison County 7 Rural 15.9 (12.5, 19.8) 24 (5, 65) 16 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.7, 7.4)
Marion County 7 Rural 13.4 (7.7, 22.0) 51 (3, 74) 3
*
*
Marshall County 7 Rural 14.6 (10.0, 20.9) 36 (4, 74) 7 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.9, 5.4)
McCreary County 7 Rural 16.9 (9.9, 27.3) 17 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Mercer County 7 Rural 12.9 (7.6, 20.7) 58 (4, 74) 4 stable stable trend -9.9 (-41.3, 0.9)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 14.5 (9.4, 21.6) 37 (3, 74) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.0, 3.0)
Muhlenberg County 7 Rural 14.9 (10.1, 21.4) 33 (4, 73) 6 stable stable trend 2.9 (0.0, 6.7)
Ohio County 7 Rural 13.1 (8.1, 20.2) 57 (4, 74) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.4, 3.5)
Perry County 7 Rural 17.5 (11.9, 25.0) 13 (2, 72) 7 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.7, 7.3)
Pike County 7 Rural 13.4 (10.0, 17.7) 49 (9, 73) 11 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.8, 7.7)
Pulaski County 7 Rural 16.2 (12.5, 20.7) 21 (3, 66) 14 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.1, 4.0)
Rockcastle County 7 Rural 18.8 (11.0, 30.3) 8 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Rowan County 7 Rural 13.2 (7.7, 21.3) 52 (3, 74) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.6, 2.5)
Russell County 7 Rural 18.4 (11.0, 29.1) 9 (1, 74) 4
*
*
Taylor County 7 Rural 17.3 (11.3, 25.4) 15 (2, 73) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.3, 4.6)
Wayne County 7 Rural 10.8 (6.0, 18.3) 70 (7, 74) 3
*
*
Whitley County 7 Rural 15.7 (10.9, 22.1) 26 (2, 73) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.7)
Allen County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ballard County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bracken County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Breathitt County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carlisle County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crittenden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edmonson County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elliott County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Estill County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fleming County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garrard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knott County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Larue County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leslie County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Magoffin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McLean County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menifee County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Metcalfe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicholas County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owsley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Powell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Simpson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trimble County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wolfe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/14/2024 12:19 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Allen, Ballard, Bracken, Breathitt, Butler, Caldwell, Carlisle, Carroll, Clinton, Crittenden, Cumberland, Edmonson, Elliott, Estill, Fleming, Fulton, Garrard, Green, Hancock, Hickman, Jackson, Knott, Larue, Lee, Leslie, Lyon, Magoffin, Martin, Mason, McLean, Menifee, Metcalfe, Monroe, Morgan, Nicholas, Owen, Owsley, Powell, Robertson, Simpson, Todd, Trimble, Union, Washington, Webster, Wolfe

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top