Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Kentucky by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky 7 N/A 28.2 (27.5, 28.9) N/A 1,487 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.7, 2.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 22.7 (22.6, 22.8) N/A 86,630 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.5)
Adair County 7 Rural 17.8 (10.7, 28.0) 95 (25, 99) 4 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.2, 6.1)
Allen County 7 Urban 29.5 (20.2, 41.8) 36 (2, 97) 7 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.2, 10.2)
Anderson County 7 Rural 21.1 (14.2, 30.5) 82 (16, 99) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.0, 4.1)
Barren County 7 Rural 27.5 (21.4, 34.8) 54 (10, 92) 15 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.6, 6.4)
Bath County 7 Rural 33.4 (21.7, 49.7) 22 (1, 97) 5
*
*
Bell County 7 Rural 21.1 (14.6, 29.7) 83 (24, 99) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.7, 4.3)
Boone County 7 Urban 34.0 (29.8, 38.6) 21 (6, 52) 50 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.2, 5.5)
Bourbon County 7 Urban 28.3 (19.0, 40.5) 48 (3, 98) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.7)
Boyd County 7 Urban 28.6 (22.7, 35.7) 42 (8, 88) 18 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.8, 3.5)
Boyle County 7 Rural 21.3 (15.2, 29.3) 81 (26, 99) 8 stable stable trend -11.1 (-35.1, 0.0)
Breathitt County 7 Rural 23.1 (13.8, 36.9) 75 (5, 99) 4
*
*
Breckinridge County 7 Rural 28.7 (19.5, 40.8) 41 (2, 98) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.0, 4.2)
Bullitt County 7 Urban 36.3 (30.9, 42.3) 15 (3, 51) 35 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.5, 5.7)
Butler County 7 Urban 30.3 (19.5, 45.6) 33 (2, 98) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.3, 3.3)
Caldwell County 7 Rural 17.3 (10.2, 28.5) 97 (33, 99) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.6, 5.3)
Calloway County 7 Rural 36.2 (28.2, 45.8) 16 (1, 71) 16 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.4, 5.3)
Campbell County 7 Urban 33.3 (28.5, 38.8) 23 (5, 63) 37 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.6, 4.6)
Carroll County 7 Rural 39.9 (24.9, 60.8) 5 (1, 92) 5 rising rising trend 23.1 (0.8, 42.8)
Carter County 7 Urban 28.6 (20.4, 38.9) 43 (4, 97) 9 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.4, 6.2)
Casey County 7 Rural 24.7 (15.7, 37.2) 69 (5, 99) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 3.9)
Christian County 7 Urban 23.6 (18.5, 29.7) 73 (24, 97) 15 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.3, 5.7)
Clark County 7 Urban 29.2 (22.3, 37.6) 38 (6, 91) 13 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.1, 3.7)
Clay County 7 Rural 14.9 (8.8, 23.9) 99 (50, 99) 4 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.8, 6.4)
Clinton County 7 Rural 39.9 (25.3, 60.7) 6 (1, 95) 5
*
*
Daviess County 7 Urban 38.1 (33.2, 43.5) 9 (2, 39) 47 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.7, 5.2)
Estill County 7 Rural 20.2 (11.3, 33.6) 91 (9, 99) 3 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.5, 5.7)
Fayette County 7 Urban 28.6 (26.0, 31.3) 44 (24, 68) 95 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.4)
Fleming County 7 Rural 29.3 (18.6, 44.0) 37 (2, 98) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.9, 6.0)
Floyd County 7 Rural 23.5 (17.4, 31.2) 74 (18, 98) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.3, 4.7)
Franklin County 7 Rural 32.0 (25.7, 39.3) 27 (5, 78) 20 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.4, 5.9)
Garrard County 7 Rural 33.2 (23.2, 46.5) 24 (1, 93) 8
*
*
Grant County 7 Urban 28.5 (19.9, 39.5) 45 (4, 98) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.3, 7.1)
Graves County 7 Rural 31.8 (24.6, 40.4) 29 (3, 84) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 3.9)
Grayson County 7 Rural 27.1 (19.6, 36.7) 55 (6, 97) 9 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.5, 7.0)
Green County 7 Rural 41.8 (27.1, 61.8) 3 (1, 90) 6
*
*
Greenup County 7 Urban 25.0 (18.7, 32.8) 67 (13, 97) 12 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.1, 3.6)
Hardin County 7 Urban 26.3 (22.3, 30.8) 60 (24, 86) 32 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.0, 5.0)
Harlan County 7 Rural 17.1 (11.4, 24.8) 98 (42, 99) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 3.9)
Harrison County 7 Rural 24.0 (15.5, 35.7) 70 (7, 99) 5
*
*
Hart County 7 Rural 26.8 (17.3, 39.6) 56 (4, 99) 6
*
*
Henderson County 7 Rural 19.8 (14.8, 26.0) 94 (41, 99) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.2)
Henry County 7 Urban 28.9 (19.2, 42.1) 40 (2, 98) 6 stable stable trend -4.0 (-33.6, 3.2)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 20.0 (15.1, 26.1) 92 (41, 99) 12 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.2, 6.5)
Jackson County 7 Rural 24.8 (14.9, 39.2) 68 (3, 99) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 3.1)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 26.3 (24.8, 27.9) 59 (40, 73) 245 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.8, 7.6)
Jessamine County 7 Urban 33.0 (26.6, 40.6) 25 (3, 74) 19 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.9, 4.8)
Johnson County 7 Rural 29.6 (20.9, 40.8) 35 (3, 95) 8 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.9, 6.7)
Kenton County 7 Urban 29.1 (25.6, 32.9) 39 (17, 73) 53 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.8, 5.1)
Knott County 7 Rural 28.3 (17.1, 44.1) 47 (2, 99) 5
*
*
Knox County 7 Rural 27.6 (20.4, 36.5) 53 (7, 95) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.1, 4.7)
Larue County 7 Urban 17.8 (10.0, 29.4) 96 (21, 99) 3
*
*
Laurel County 7 Rural 26.2 (21.1, 32.2) 61 (18, 91) 20 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.9, 5.2)
Lawrence County 7 Urban 22.9 (14.3, 35.1) 76 (9, 99) 5
*
*
Leslie County 7 Rural 29.6 (17.0, 48.2) 34 (1, 99) 4
*
*
Letcher County 7 Rural 20.7 (13.5, 30.5) 87 (23, 99) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 3.3)
Lewis County 7 Rural 25.7 (15.0, 41.1) 64 (2, 99) 4
*
*
Lincoln County 7 Rural 34.1 (24.5, 46.1) 20 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.2, 6.2)
Livingston County 7 Urban 37.0 (21.5, 59.5) 12 (1, 98) 4 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.8, 8.9)
Logan County 7 Rural 19.8 (13.3, 28.5) 93 (23, 99) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.4, 5.0)
Lyon County 7 Rural 23.7 (13.3, 41.2) 72 (3, 99) 3
*
*
Madison County 7 Rural 31.1 (26.1, 36.8) 30 (7, 75) 29 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.6, 4.8)
Magoffin County 7 Rural 23.8 (13.4, 39.3) 71 (3, 99) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 2.8)
Marion County 7 Rural 46.5 (34.4, 61.6) 2 (1, 50) 11
*
*
Marshall County 7 Rural 37.3 (29.4, 46.9) 11 (1, 69) 17 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.4, 5.9)
Mason County 7 Rural 25.6 (16.7, 37.7) 65 (4, 99) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.4, 14.0)
McCracken County 7 Urban 39.7 (33.8, 46.5) 7 (1, 39) 35 rising rising trend 20.8 (3.2, 40.3)
Meade County 7 Urban 25.1 (17.8, 34.3) 66 (11, 98) 8
*
*
Mercer County 7 Rural 25.9 (18.0, 36.3) 62 (6, 98) 8 stable stable trend -20.2 (-35.5, 0.6)
Metcalfe County 7 Rural 36.8 (22.8, 56.6) 13 (1, 97) 5
*
*
Monroe County 7 Rural 35.4 (21.4, 55.1) 17 (1, 98) 4
*
*
Montgomery County 7 Rural 26.5 (19.2, 35.8) 58 (8, 97) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.8, 3.4)
Morgan County 7 Rural 20.9 (12.1, 34.1) 84 (9, 99) 4
*
*
Muhlenberg County 7 Rural 22.0 (15.9, 29.9) 78 (22, 99) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.2, 6.1)
Nelson County 7 Urban 48.2 (39.9, 57.8) 1 (1, 22) 25 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.7, 5.0)
Ohio County 7 Rural 20.7 (13.6, 30.3) 85 (19, 99) 6 stable stable trend -3.2 (-22.1, 1.9)
Oldham County 7 Urban 37.8 (31.6, 44.8) 10 (1, 50) 28 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.2, 5.6)
Owen County 7 Rural 22.6 (12.5, 38.1) 77 (4, 99) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.8, 4.1)
Pendleton County 7 Urban 28.2 (18.1, 42.1) 49 (2, 99) 5
*
*
Perry County 7 Rural 20.7 (14.2, 29.3) 86 (23, 99) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.7, 6.3)
Pike County 7 Rural 20.5 (15.9, 26.0) 89 (41, 99) 15 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.1, 3.0)
Pulaski County 7 Rural 27.8 (22.9, 33.7) 51 (15, 87) 24 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)
Rockcastle County 7 Rural 30.6 (20.3, 44.6) 31 (1, 98) 6 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.3, 8.4)
Rowan County 7 Rural 25.8 (17.0, 37.5) 63 (4, 99) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 4.6)
Russell County 7 Rural 30.5 (21.4, 42.6) 32 (2, 96) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.6, 3.4)
Scott County 7 Urban 36.7 (29.7, 44.8) 14 (2, 61) 20 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.7, 5.1)
Shelby County 7 Urban 31.9 (25.4, 39.5) 28 (4, 84) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.8)
Simpson County 7 Rural 27.8 (18.6, 40.0) 52 (2, 98) 6 stable stable trend 3.1 (0.0, 7.1)
Spencer County 7 Urban 34.8 (24.5, 48.3) 18 (1, 91) 8 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.0, 8.2)
Taylor County 7 Rural 40.1 (30.1, 52.4) 4 (1, 68) 12 rising rising trend 4.4 (0.2, 9.7)
Todd County 7 Rural 26.8 (15.6, 43.0) 57 (2, 99) 4
*
*
Trigg County 7 Urban 20.6 (12.6, 32.5) 88 (15, 99) 5 stable stable trend -15.5 (-43.5, 2.6)
Trimble County 7 Rural 39.2 (22.8, 63.0) 8 (1, 98) 4 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.0, 9.2)
Union County 7 Rural 21.8 (13.1, 34.7) 80 (8, 99) 4
*
*
Warren County 7 Urban 28.4 (24.4, 32.9) 46 (15, 77) 37 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 4.0)
Washington County 7 Rural 32.8 (20.4, 50.3) 26 (1, 99) 5
*
*
Wayne County 7 Rural 21.9 (14.2, 32.5) 79 (14, 99) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.8)
Webster County 7 Rural 20.2 (11.2, 34.0) 90 (7, 99) 3
*
*
Whitley County 7 Rural 28.1 (21.0, 36.9) 50 (7, 94) 11 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.8, 8.1)
Woodford County 7 Urban 34.4 (25.6, 45.3) 19 (1, 86) 11 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.2, 6.3)
Ballard County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bracken County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carlisle County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crittenden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edmonson County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elliott County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCreary County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McLean County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menifee County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicholas County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owsley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Powell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wolfe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/07/2024 10:33 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Ballard, Bracken, Carlisle, Crittenden, Cumberland, Edmonson, Elliott, Fulton, Gallatin, Hancock, Hickman, Lee, Martin, McCreary, McLean, Menifee, Nicholas, Owsley, Powell, Robertson, Wolfe

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top