Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Kentucky by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky 7 *** 104.1 (102.3, 105.9) N/A 2,721 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.5, -2.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 104.5 (104.3, 104.7) N/A 192,918 stable stable trend -0.4 (-5.5, 5.0)
Bell County 7 *** 59.2 (44.2, 78.2) 115 (80, 115) 11 falling falling trend -9.5 (-13.5, -5.2)
Crittenden County 7 *** 62.9 (39.0, 98.2) 114 (26, 115) 4 stable stable trend 68.8 (-1.9, 190.7)
McCreary County 7 *** 64.3 (44.8, 90.0) 113 (49, 115) 7 falling falling trend -10.9 (-15.7, -5.9)
Letcher County 7 *** 64.4 (47.3, 86.2) 112 (60, 115) 11 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.9, -1.7)
Metcalfe County 7 *** 64.9 (41.0, 99.5) 111 (28, 115) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.0, 2.5)
Butler County 7 *** 68.2 (45.6, 99.3) 110 (25, 115) 6 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.5, -0.9)
Hopkins County 7 *** 69.4 (56.5, 84.6) 109 (67, 115) 21 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.7, -2.8)
Morgan County 7 *** 69.6 (46.4, 101.1) 108 (23, 115) 6 stable stable trend -3.7 (-8.0, 0.8)
Pike County 7 *** 70.2 (58.4, 83.8) 107 (70, 115) 28 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.4, -3.2)
Jackson County 7 *** 71.3 (47.3, 104.1) 106 (18, 115) 6 stable stable trend -3.0 (-7.6, 1.9)
Owen County 7 *** 72.8 (46.5, 110.2) 105 (12, 115) 5 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.9, -1.7)
Clay County 7 *** 73.0 (52.7, 98.9) 104 (29, 115) 9 falling falling trend -16.1 (-28.7, -1.2)
Edmonson County 7 *** 74.4 (52.1, 105.2) 103 (16, 115) 7 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.9, 0.2)
Pendleton County 7 *** 75.3 (52.3, 106.1) 102 (15, 115) 7 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.5, 0.1)
Harrison County 7 *** 76.7 (55.3, 104.3) 101 (17, 115) 9 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.1, 0.6)
Knott County 7 *** 76.7 (53.1, 107.9) 100 (12, 115) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.9, 4.0)
Gallatin County 7 *** 76.8 (43.3, 126.5) 99 (2, 115) 4
*
*
Webster County 7 *** 78.7 (53.2, 112.9) 98 (5, 115) 7 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.9, -0.2)
Todd County 7 *** 78.7 (52.1, 114.7) 97 (7, 115) 6 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.9, 0.8)
Calloway County 7 *** 78.8 (62.9, 97.8) 96 (34, 115) 18 falling falling trend -5.3 (-7.6, -2.9)
Powell County 7 *** 82.4 (55.0, 119.5) 95 (3, 115) 6 stable stable trend -3.2 (-7.1, 0.7)
Wayne County 7 *** 82.6 (62.8, 107.5) 94 (16, 115) 12 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.1, 1.1)
Perry County 7 *** 83.3 (64.4, 106.3) 93 (17, 115) 14 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.6, -1.1)
Grayson County 7 *** 83.4 (64.7, 106.3) 92 (18, 114) 14 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.1, -2.1)
Carroll County 7 *** 84.0 (53.6, 125.8) 91 (2, 115) 5 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.4, 0.7)
Harlan County 7 *** 84.5 (65.6, 107.6) 90 (14, 115) 15 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.7, 0.4)
Estill County 7 *** 85.5 (60.2, 118.7) 89 (5, 115) 8 falling falling trend -5.6 (-9.3, -1.8)
Allen County 7 *** 85.6 (64.9, 111.4) 88 (12, 115) 12 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.1, -1.3)
Whitley County 7 *** 85.7 (68.3, 106.4) 87 (18, 113) 18 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.4)
Fleming County 7 *** 86.7 (61.8, 119.2) 86 (4, 115) 8 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.0, -0.5)
Knox County 7 *** 87.4 (69.3, 109.1) 85 (15, 113) 17 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.6, -0.5)
Warren County 7 *** 88.5 (78.1, 100.1) 84 (37, 104) 55 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.0, -2.3)
Rowan County 7 *** 88.9 (66.6, 116.6) 83 (7, 115) 11 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.5, -0.4)
Lee County 7 *** 90.0 (55.4, 141.1) 82 (1, 115) 4 stable stable trend -4.3 (-9.1, 0.8)
Montgomery County 7 *** 90.8 (70.6, 115.4) 81 (9, 113) 14 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.4, 0.9)
Graves County 7 *** 91.3 (75.1, 110.3) 80 (15, 109) 23 stable stable trend 12.1 (-9.9, 39.5)
Simpson County 7 *** 94.1 (70.1, 124.2) 79 (3, 114) 11 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.0, -1.2)
Campbell County 7 *** 94.4 (82.7, 107.4) 78 (22, 99) 50 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.6)
Lewis County 7 *** 94.5 (68.4, 128.5) 77 (2, 114) 9 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.5, 2.4)
Casey County 7 *** 94.6 (69.5, 126.7) 76 (2, 114) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.6)
McLean County 7 *** 96.0 (65.0, 138.3) 75 (1, 115) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.1, 3.2)
Bracken County 7 *** 96.2 (61.3, 145.1) 74 (1, 115) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.3)
Livingston County 7 *** 96.2 (66.4, 137.6) 73 (1, 115) 7 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.9, -0.9)
Trigg County 7 *** 96.3 (73.2, 126.3) 72 (4, 113) 12 stable stable trend 8.6 (-4.7, 23.7)
Nicholas County 7 *** 96.3 (59.8, 148.7) 71 (1, 115) 4 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.7, -0.4)
Madison County 7 *** 96.5 (83.7, 110.8) 70 (17, 99) 43 falling falling trend -5.6 (-7.2, -3.9)
Meade County 7 *** 96.7 (75.8, 121.8) 69 (4, 110) 16 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.2, 0.9)
Hart County 7 *** 96.7 (71.7, 128.1) 68 (2, 113) 11 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.6, 0.4)
Mason County 7 *** 96.8 (71.8, 128.3) 67 (2, 113) 11 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.3, 0.1)
Anderson County 7 *** 97.1 (71.9, 128.4) 66 (2, 113) 11 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.2, 0.0)
Clark County 7 *** 97.4 (79.5, 118.3) 65 (5, 107) 22 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.1, -3.1)
Muhlenberg County 7 *** 97.6 (78.9, 119.7) 64 (6, 107) 20 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.4, -1.6)
Greenup County 7 *** 97.9 (81.2, 117.5) 63 (9, 104) 25 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.3, -0.9)
Boyd County 7 *** 98.1 (83.1, 115.2) 62 (11, 100) 32 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.2, -1.6)
Logan County 7 *** 98.1 (78.6, 121.4) 61 (5, 109) 18 falling falling trend -7.3 (-13.4, -0.8)
Cumberland County 7 *** 98.1 (64.3, 147.4) 60 (1, 115) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.1, 1.2)
Grant County 7 *** 98.3 (73.8, 128.1) 59 (2, 111) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.3)
Breathitt County 7 *** 98.4 (69.4, 136.4) 58 (1, 114) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.3, 1.8)
Ohio County 7 *** 98.4 (76.8, 124.6) 57 (3, 110) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.5)
Breckinridge County 7 *** 98.6 (76.1, 126.2) 56 (2, 110) 14 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.7)
Leslie County 7 *** 98.7 (68.5, 139.2) 55 (1, 115) 7 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.8, 1.6)
Carter County 7 *** 98.8 (79.0, 122.5) 54 (5, 107) 18 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.5)
Boone County 7 *** 99.3 (88.5, 111.2) 53 (19, 93) 67 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -0.8)
Henderson County 7 *** 99.4 (83.2, 118.2) 52 (6, 101) 28 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.3, -0.1)
Kenton County 7 *** 99.7 (90.1, 110.0) 51 (19, 87) 87 stable stable trend 3.2 (-4.2, 11.2)
Lincoln County 7 *** 100.2 (79.3, 125.5) 50 (3, 109) 16 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.3)
Barren County 7 *** 100.4 (83.9, 119.4) 49 (6, 103) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.2)
Bath County 7 *** 101.1 (71.4, 139.9) 48 (1, 114) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.4, 2.1)
Rockcastle County 7 *** 101.3 (76.0, 133.2) 47 (2, 112) 11 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.1, 0.6)
Ballard County 7 *** 101.3 (67.6, 148.2) 46 (1, 115) 6 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.8, 1.9)
Mercer County 7 *** 102.7 (79.7, 130.8) 45 (2, 108) 15 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.7, 0.3)
Pulaski County 7 *** 102.7 (89.3, 117.8) 44 (8, 93) 44 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.3, -0.8)
Bourbon County 7 *** 102.9 (79.2, 132.0) 43 (2, 110) 13 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 1.5)
Marshall County 7 *** 103.0 (85.7, 123.5) 42 (4, 97) 26 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.7)
Franklin County 7 *** 103.2 (87.3, 121.3) 41 (6, 97) 32 stable stable trend 10.5 (-1.9, 24.6)
Shelby County 7 *** 103.7 (86.1, 124.0) 40 (5, 98) 27 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.6)
Caldwell County 7 *** 104.0 (76.3, 140.0) 39 (1, 111) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.4, 4.3)
Christian County 7 *** 104.7 (88.8, 122.4) 38 (6, 95) 32 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.6, -2.3)
Henry County 7 *** 104.7 (77.7, 138.9) 37 (1, 111) 11 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.5, -1.3)
Carlisle County 7 *** 105.0 (61.1, 171.8) 36 (1, 115) 4
*
*
Green County 7 *** 105.7 (75.6, 145.5) 35 (1, 112) 9 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.1, 0.7)
Magoffin County 7 *** 105.9 (75.8, 144.9) 34 (1, 113) 9 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.5, -0.6)
Adair County 7 *** 106.4 (81.9, 136.5) 33 (1, 108) 13 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.2, 0.2)
Fulton County 7 *** 107.7 (66.3, 167.4) 32 (1, 115) 4
*
*
Laurel County 7 *** 108.4 (93.2, 125.5) 31 (5, 90) 39 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -0.8)
Bullitt County 7 *** 108.4 (95.1, 123.1) 30 (7, 81) 52 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -0.9)
Scott County 7 *** 108.5 (90.1, 129.5) 29 (2, 95) 27 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.9, -1.6)
Russell County 7 *** 110.0 (85.3, 140.6) 28 (1, 106) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.5, 2.7)
Woodford County 7 *** 110.7 (88.3, 137.5) 27 (1, 97) 19 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.1, -2.6)
Clinton County 7 *** 111.4 (78.6, 154.7) 26 (1, 111) 8 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.8, -0.3)
Union County 7 *** 112.5 (81.7, 151.6) 25 (1, 109) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 3.1)
Lawrence County 7 *** 113.0 (84.2, 149.1) 24 (1, 107) 11 rising rising trend 8.1 (3.3, 13.0)
Fayette County 7 *** 113.5 (105.7, 121.7) 23 (9, 55) 169 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.8, -2.7)
Floyd County 7 *** 113.5 (94.3, 135.7) 22 (1, 88) 27 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.1)
Jessamine County 7 *** 113.5 (96.5, 132.8) 21 (2, 85) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.3)
Wolfe County 7 *** 113.7 (71.4, 173.2) 20 (1, 115) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.6, 1.7)
Larue County 7 *** 114.2 (83.8, 152.5) 19 (1, 109) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.5)
McCracken County 7 *** 116.0 (101.7, 131.9) 18 (2, 68) 50 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.8, -0.3)
Boyle County 7 *** 116.9 (95.4, 142.0) 17 (1, 90) 21 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.3)
Nelson County 7 *** 118.5 (100.2, 139.3) 16 (1, 78) 32 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.7, -2.7)
Hardin County 7 *** 118.7 (105.7, 132.7) 15 (2, 60) 66 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.7, -2.2)
Martin County 7 *** 119.6 (84.1, 165.2) 14 (1, 110) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.1, 2.0)
Monroe County 7 *** 119.8 (85.9, 164.0) 13 (1, 109) 9 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.1, 2.2)
Lyon County 7 *** 120.1 (85.7, 167.0) 12 (1, 109) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-3.0, 7.5)
Washington County 7 *** 120.1 (87.4, 162.2) 11 (1, 108) 9 stable stable trend -3.0 (-5.8, 0.0)
Taylor County 7 *** 120.5 (97.0, 148.3) 10 (1, 89) 19 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.2, -0.2)
Johnson County 7 *** 120.7 (96.1, 150.1) 9 (1, 90) 18 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.8, 2.0)
Trimble County 7 *** 121.5 (82.0, 174.4) 8 (1, 112) 7 stable stable trend -3.7 (-9.3, 2.2)
Daviess County 7 *** 122.9 (110.4, 136.4) 7 (2, 49) 74 falling falling trend -5.2 (-8.3, -2.1)
Garrard County 7 *** 123.9 (95.9, 158.3) 6 (1, 97) 14 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.7, 0.4)
Jefferson County 7 *** 126.4 (121.5, 131.4) 5 (3, 23) 540 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.1, -1.8)
Hancock County 7 *** 127.9 (87.7, 181.6) 4 (1, 107) 7 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.0, 8.3)
Spencer County 7 *** 132.3 (102.4, 168.9) 3 (1, 83) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.5, 2.4)
Oldham County 7 *** 132.9 (114.7, 153.2) 2 (1, 47) 46 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.5)
Marion County 7 *** 143.8 (112.7, 181.0) 1 (1, 68) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 1.8)
Elliott County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menifee County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owsley County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/30/2021 2:13 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2019 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2019 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top