Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Kentucky by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky 7 *** 21.1 (20.5, 21.6) N/A 1,113 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 17.1 (17.0, 17.1) N/A 64,622 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Adair County 7 *** 22.6 (14.8, 33.5) 45 (2, 95) 6
*
*
Allen County 7 *** 18.8 (12.3, 27.9) 77 (7, 95) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 3.9)
Anderson County 7 *** 24.5 (16.5, 35.1) 27 (1, 94) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.1, 1.1)
Barren County 7 *** 23.5 (18.0, 30.2) 37 (5, 89) 13 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.7, 4.6)
Bath County 7 *** 26.9 (16.4, 41.9) 14 (1, 94) 4 stable stable trend 3.9 (-1.0, 9.1)
Bell County 7 *** 16.6 (10.9, 24.2) 87 (16, 95) 6
*
*
Boone County 7 *** 19.3 (16.1, 23.0) 74 (28, 90) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.3)
Bourbon County 7 *** 19.1 (12.2, 29.0) 76 (4, 95) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.4, 5.9)
Boyd County 7 *** 20.6 (15.7, 26.6) 65 (12, 92) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.6)
Boyle County 7 *** 15.2 (9.9, 22.4) 89 (26, 95) 6
*
*
Breckinridge County 7 *** 19.5 (12.7, 29.1) 70 (6, 95) 6
*
*
Bullitt County 7 *** 22.0 (17.8, 26.8) 51 (12, 87) 21 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.2, 3.7)
Butler County 7 *** 35.2 (22.8, 52.2) 2 (1, 84) 5
*
*
Calloway County 7 *** 16.8 (11.6, 23.5) 86 (21, 95) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.9, 3.7)
Campbell County 7 *** 17.5 (14.1, 21.4) 85 (36, 93) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.7)
Carter County 7 *** 23.1 (16.1, 32.1) 41 (3, 93) 8
*
*
Casey County 7 *** 23.2 (14.5, 35.6) 39 (2, 95) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.8, 3.8)
Christian County 7 *** 23.1 (18.0, 29.2) 40 (5, 88) 15 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.2, 6.5)
Clark County 7 *** 24.0 (17.6, 31.9) 34 (4, 90) 10 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.4, 5.5)
Clay County 7 *** 22.7 (14.6, 33.7) 44 (2, 95) 5 stable stable trend 5.0 (0.0, 10.3)
Clinton County 7 *** 28.7 (17.2, 45.7) 10 (1, 94) 4
*
*
Crittenden County 7 *** 26.4 (14.8, 44.2) 20 (1, 95) 3
*
*
Daviess County 7 *** 24.3 (20.4, 28.6) 29 (8, 74) 30 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.1, 4.4)
Edmonson County 7 *** 24.1 (14.4, 38.4) 33 (1, 95) 4 stable stable trend -16.4 (-31.9, 2.7)
Estill County 7 *** 21.6 (13.1, 34.1) 55 (2, 95) 4
*
*
Fayette County 7 *** 16.3 (14.4, 18.4) 88 (61, 93) 53 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Fleming County 7 *** 20.7 (12.5, 32.6) 64 (3, 95) 4
*
*
Floyd County 7 *** 27.2 (20.8, 35.2) 11 (2, 79) 13 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.3, 6.5)
Franklin County 7 *** 20.7 (15.8, 26.6) 63 (11, 92) 13 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.9, 5.7)
Garrard County 7 *** 23.7 (15.2, 35.6) 35 (2, 94) 5
*
*
Grant County 7 *** 23.5 (15.9, 33.6) 36 (2, 94) 6
*
*
Graves County 7 *** 25.7 (19.5, 33.3) 22 (3, 87) 12
*
*
Grayson County 7 *** 18.8 (12.7, 26.9) 78 (11, 95) 7 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.9, 8.3)
Green County 7 *** 24.2 (14.1, 39.5) 30 (1, 95) 4 rising rising trend 6.5 (1.1, 12.2)
Greenup County 7 *** 24.3 (18.2, 32.0) 28 (3, 88) 12 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.1, 5.5)
Hardin County 7 *** 25.2 (21.2, 29.8) 24 (6, 71) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.8)
Harlan County 7 *** 19.9 (13.6, 28.2) 66 (7, 95) 7 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.7, 7.1)
Harrison County 7 *** 19.7 (12.5, 30.0) 68 (5, 95) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.6, 4.9)
Hart County 7 *** 22.1 (14.1, 33.0) 48 (3, 95) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.5, 4.9)
Henderson County 7 *** 21.5 (16.3, 27.8) 58 (8, 91) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.2, 3.6)
Henry County 7 *** 30.2 (19.8, 44.4) 8 (1, 91) 6 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.8, 8.5)
Hopkins County 7 *** 17.6 (13.0, 23.3) 84 (23, 95) 10 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.4, 5.5)
Jefferson County 7 *** 20.8 (19.5, 22.2) 62 (35, 73) 190 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Jessamine County 7 *** 12.9 (9.0, 17.8) 94 (57, 95) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.9, 1.9)
Johnson County 7 *** 27.1 (19.3, 37.3) 12 (1, 88) 8 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.7, 7.2)
Kenton County 7 *** 21.5 (18.5, 24.8) 59 (20, 82) 38 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.1)
Knox County 7 *** 24.1 (17.5, 32.4) 32 (3, 91) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.8, 4.1)
Larue County 7 *** 34.8 (23.1, 50.6) 3 (1, 79) 6 stable stable trend 2.7 (-2.4, 8.0)
Laurel County 7 *** 23.3 (18.4, 29.1) 38 (7, 86) 16 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.8, 5.6)
Lawrence County 7 *** 24.7 (15.3, 37.9) 26 (1, 95) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.3, 3.9)
Leslie County 7 *** 21.8 (12.3, 36.8) 52 (1, 95) 3 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.4, 8.4)
Letcher County 7 *** 29.9 (21.7, 40.6) 9 (1, 78) 9 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.7, 5.8)
Lewis County 7 *** 18.5 (10.6, 30.5) 80 (5, 95) 3
*
*
Lincoln County 7 *** 19.3 (12.6, 28.5) 73 (7, 95) 5
*
*
Livingston County 7 *** 31.7 (18.3, 51.6) 6 (1, 94) 4 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.0, 6.0)
Logan County 7 *** 19.4 (13.2, 27.5) 72 (8, 95) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.5, 5.6)
Lyon County 7 *** 27.0 (14.8, 46.9) 13 (1, 95) 3
*
*
Madison County 7 *** 17.9 (14.2, 22.3) 83 (30, 94) 17 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.1, 5.0)
Magoffin County 7 *** 22.6 (12.5, 37.7) 46 (1, 95) 3 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.2, 6.1)
Marion County 7 *** 14.5 (8.7, 23.2) 92 (20, 95) 4
*
*
Marshall County 7 *** 21.2 (15.3, 28.9) 60 (7, 93) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.5, 5.9)
Martin County 7 *** 25.2 (14.7, 40.8) 25 (1, 95) 4
*
*
Mason County 7 *** 26.6 (17.5, 39.0) 18 (1, 94) 6
*
*
McCracken County 7 *** 21.6 (17.2, 26.8) 56 (12, 88) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.8, 3.7)
McCreary County 7 *** 26.7 (17.5, 39.2) 17 (1, 93) 6
*
*
McLean County 7 *** 36.3 (21.9, 57.0) 1 (1, 88) 4
*
*
Meade County 7 *** 26.8 (19.1, 36.5) 15 (1, 89) 9 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.7, 5.5)
Mercer County 7 *** 26.0 (18.1, 36.5) 21 (1, 90) 8 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.6, 6.8)
Monroe County 7 *** 26.6 (14.6, 44.4) 19 (1, 95) 3
*
*
Montgomery County 7 *** 19.2 (12.9, 27.5) 75 (8, 95) 6 rising rising trend 5.6 (0.9, 10.4)
Muhlenberg County 7 *** 26.7 (19.9, 35.4) 16 (1, 85) 11 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.2, 7.6)
Nelson County 7 *** 19.5 (14.4, 25.8) 71 (13, 94) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.1)
Ohio County 7 *** 21.5 (14.4, 31.0) 57 (4, 94) 6 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.3, 6.4)
Oldham County 7 *** 22.0 (17.2, 27.8) 50 (9, 89) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.5)
Owen County 7 *** 25.3 (14.0, 42.5) 23 (1, 95) 3
*
*
Pendleton County 7 *** 34.6 (22.7, 50.7) 4 (1, 88) 6 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.7, 9.1)
Perry County 7 *** 19.7 (13.3, 28.3) 67 (8, 95) 6
*
*
Pike County 7 *** 22.2 (17.6, 27.8) 47 (10, 89) 17 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.0, 6.2)
Powell County 7 *** 31.9 (19.2, 49.6) 5 (1, 92) 4
*
*
Pulaski County 7 *** 21.8 (17.3, 27.1) 54 (10, 88) 18 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.2, 4.7)
Rockcastle County 7 *** 31.2 (20.9, 45.0) 7 (1, 90) 6
*
*
Rowan County 7 *** 12.8 (7.2, 21.2) 95 (28, 95) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.2, 3.3)
Russell County 7 *** 15.2 (9.0, 24.4) 90 (17, 95) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.2)
Scott County 7 *** 20.9 (15.6, 27.3) 61 (9, 93) 11 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.9, 6.0)
Shelby County 7 *** 24.1 (18.5, 30.9) 31 (5, 86) 13 rising rising trend 4.9 (1.6, 8.4)
Simpson County 7 *** 21.8 (13.7, 33.2) 53 (3, 95) 5 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.4, 8.2)
Spencer County 7 *** 22.8 (14.5, 34.4) 42 (2, 95) 5
*
*
Taylor County 7 *** 18.0 (11.6, 26.6) 82 (10, 95) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.4, 3.6)
Trigg County 7 *** 14.2 (7.8, 24.7) 93 (19, 95) 3
*
*
Union County 7 *** 22.7 (13.5, 36.1) 43 (1, 95) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.4, 5.7)
Warren County 7 *** 19.6 (16.3, 23.5) 69 (23, 90) 25 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 4.4)
Wayne County 7 *** 14.5 (8.7, 23.2) 91 (23, 95) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.9, 4.8)
Webster County 7 *** 22.1 (13.3, 34.9) 49 (2, 95) 4
*
*
Whitley County 7 *** 18.2 (12.5, 25.6) 81 (14, 95) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.5)
Woodford County 7 *** 18.5 (12.6, 26.4) 79 (12, 95) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.9, 6.5)
Ballard County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bracken County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Breathitt County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carlisle County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elliott County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knott County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menifee County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Metcalfe County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicholas County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owsley County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trimble County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wolfe County 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2021 11:11 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top