Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Kentucky by County

Thyroid (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky 7 N/A 13.7 (13.2, 14.2) N/A 655 falling falling trend -6.2 (-9.3, -4.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 12.9 (12.9, 13.0) N/A 44,379 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.9)
Calloway County 7 Rural 7.9 (4.4, 13.1) 65 (36, 66) 3
*
*
Casey County 7 Rural 18.8 (10.3, 31.2) 20 (1, 66) 3
*
*
Lawrence County 7 Urban 18.7 (10.4, 31.0) 21 (1, 66) 3
*
*
Martin County 7 Rural 26.3 (14.8, 43.5) 4 (1, 62) 3
*
*
Muhlenberg County 7 Rural 9.1 (5.0, 15.1) 63 (27, 66) 3
*
*
Rockcastle County 7 Rural 16.4 (9.0, 27.7) 31 (2, 66) 3
*
*
Mercer County 7 Rural 14.3 (8.0, 23.7) 41 (4, 66) 3
*
*
Russell County 7 Rural 20.8 (11.7, 33.8) 16 (1, 66) 3
*
*
Allen County 7 Urban 17.9 (10.3, 28.8) 23 (1, 66) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.8, 7.9)
Bell County 7 Rural 13.7 (7.9, 22.2) 49 (7, 66) 4 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.1, 9.3)
Bourbon County 7 Urban 15.2 (8.7, 24.6) 40 (3, 66) 4
*
*
Grant County 7 Urban 15.2 (8.9, 24.1) 39 (4, 66) 4
*
*
Spencer County 7 Urban 17.4 (10.0, 28.2) 27 (2, 66) 4
*
*
Meade County 7 Urban 13.1 (7.8, 20.6) 51 (8, 66) 4
*
*
Adair County 7 Rural 16.2 (9.4, 26.2) 34 (2, 66) 4
*
*
Clay County 7 Rural 17.5 (10.5, 27.4) 25 (2, 66) 4
*
*
Graves County 7 Rural 10.7 (6.3, 16.7) 57 (22, 66) 4 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.1, 7.6)
Knott County 7 Rural 24.3 (14.2, 38.9) 5 (1, 63) 4
*
*
Larue County 7 Urban 27.4 (16.4, 42.9) 2 (1, 57) 4
*
*
Harlan County 7 Rural 14.1 (8.4, 22.0) 45 (6, 66) 4 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.2, 7.8)
Harrison County 7 Rural 22.1 (13.2, 34.5) 9 (1, 63) 4 rising rising trend 5.7 (0.4, 13.2)
Grayson County 7 Rural 14.3 (8.8, 22.1) 43 (5, 66) 4
*
*
Henderson County 7 Rural 9.8 (6.0, 15.0) 61 (28, 66) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.0, 7.0)
Woodford County 7 Urban 15.6 (9.4, 24.2) 38 (3, 66) 4
*
*
Barren County 7 Rural 10.1 (6.3, 15.4) 59 (26, 66) 5 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.3, 5.8)
Hart County 7 Rural 21.1 (13.0, 32.3) 13 (1, 64) 5
*
*
Powell County 7 Rural 33.7 (21.0, 51.2) 1 (1, 42) 5
*
*
Rowan County 7 Rural 17.7 (10.9, 27.1) 24 (2, 65) 5
*
*
Boyle County 7 Rural 14.3 (9.1, 21.5) 42 (7, 66) 5 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.3, 8.9)
Christian County 7 Urban 8.5 (5.4, 12.7) 64 (37, 66) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.0, 4.1)
Wayne County 7 Rural 23.4 (14.6, 35.4) 7 (1, 61) 5
*
*
Carter County 7 Urban 16.8 (10.7, 25.1) 29 (3, 64) 5
*
*
Johnson County 7 Rural 18.9 (12.1, 28.3) 19 (2, 63) 5 stable stable trend -36.8 (-57.9, 0.9)
Marshall County 7 Rural 14.1 (8.9, 21.2) 44 (7, 66) 5
*
*
Letcher County 7 Rural 24.3 (15.7, 35.9) 6 (1, 54) 6 stable stable trend -15.8 (-41.9, 5.0)
Knox County 7 Rural 18.5 (12.2, 26.8) 22 (2, 63) 6 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.1, 9.6)
Scott County 7 Urban 9.7 (6.5, 14.1) 62 (32, 66) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.4, 3.9)
Taylor County 7 Rural 21.7 (14.2, 31.7) 11 (1, 58) 6
*
*
Hopkins County 7 Rural 12.1 (8.0, 17.6) 55 (16, 66) 6 rising rising trend 6.6 (3.0, 11.9)
Nelson County 7 Urban 12.7 (8.5, 18.3) 54 (15, 66) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.3, 7.6)
Perry County 7 Rural 19.4 (12.8, 28.3) 18 (1, 62) 6 stable stable trend -22.8 (-45.7, 6.0)
Montgomery County 7 Rural 21.1 (14.1, 30.3) 12 (1, 58) 6
*
*
Greenup County 7 Urban 16.9 (11.3, 24.3) 28 (3, 63) 6
*
*
Shelby County 7 Urban 14.0 (9.7, 19.6) 47 (12, 65) 7 falling falling trend -10.3 (-22.5, -3.1)
Campbell County 7 Urban 7.7 (5.4, 10.8) 66 (50, 66) 7 falling falling trend -6.5 (-13.3, -2.8)
Lincoln County 7 Rural 26.7 (18.4, 37.5) 3 (1, 41) 7
*
*
Whitley County 7 Rural 20.8 (14.5, 28.8) 15 (1, 55) 8 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.0, 5.8)
Boyd County 7 Urban 16.3 (11.5, 22.4) 32 (5, 62) 8 falling falling trend -6.9 (-17.2, -2.1)
Floyd County 7 Rural 22.0 (15.6, 30.1) 10 (1, 52) 8
*
*
Clark County 7 Urban 22.5 (16.1, 30.7) 8 (1, 49) 9
*
*
Oldham County 7 Urban 12.7 (9.2, 17.3) 52 (18, 65) 9 stable stable trend -3.2 (-15.7, 1.5)
Franklin County 7 Rural 16.4 (12.0, 22.0) 30 (6, 60) 10
*
*
Jessamine County 7 Urban 20.6 (15.5, 26.9) 17 (2, 49) 11 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.8, 5.4)
Pike County 7 Rural 17.4 (13.0, 22.9) 26 (5, 56) 11 stable stable trend -1.2 (-16.2, 3.4)
Pulaski County 7 Rural 16.0 (12.0, 20.9) 35 (8, 60) 12 stable stable trend -2.3 (-21.4, 1.7)
Bullitt County 7 Urban 14.0 (10.6, 18.1) 46 (16, 63) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.3, 7.0)
McCracken County 7 Urban 16.3 (12.3, 21.1) 33 (8, 59) 12 rising rising trend 5.8 (3.7, 8.6)
Boone County 7 Urban 10.4 (8.1, 13.2) 58 (39, 66) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-12.0, 1.5)
Laurel County 7 Rural 20.9 (16.2, 26.6) 14 (2, 45) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-19.3, 5.5)
Madison County 7 Rural 15.6 (12.1, 19.8) 37 (12, 59) 14 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 3.9)
Daviess County 7 Urban 13.6 (10.6, 17.2) 50 (20, 62) 15 rising rising trend 6.3 (3.1, 10.9)
Warren County 7 Urban 12.7 (10.0, 15.9) 53 (25, 63) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 3.2)
Hardin County 7 Urban 16.0 (12.8, 19.7) 36 (11, 56) 18 stable stable trend -4.3 (-18.4, 1.0)
Kenton County 7 Urban 14.0 (11.6, 16.7) 48 (22, 58) 25 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.8, 8.3)
Fayette County 7 Urban 11.8 (10.2, 13.7) 56 (37, 62) 38 stable stable trend -8.3 (-21.8, 0.1)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 9.8 (8.9, 10.8) 60 (52, 65) 83 falling falling trend -11.5 (-24.7, -5.0)
Anderson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ballard County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bath County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bracken County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Breathitt County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Breckinridge County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Butler County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carlisle County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crittenden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edmonson County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elliott County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Estill County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fleming County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garrard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Green County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leslie County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Livingston County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Magoffin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCreary County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McLean County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menifee County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Metcalfe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicholas County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owsley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pendleton County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Simpson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trigg County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trimble County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wolfe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/20/2024 8:02 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Anderson, Ballard, Bath, Bracken, Breathitt, Breckinridge, Butler, Caldwell, Carlisle, Carroll, Clinton, Crittenden, Cumberland, Edmonson, Elliott, Estill, Fleming, Fulton, Gallatin, Garrard, Green, Hancock, Henry, Hickman, Jackson, Lee, Leslie, Lewis, Livingston, Logan, Lyon, Magoffin, Marion, Mason, McCreary, McLean, Menifee, Metcalfe, Monroe, Morgan, Nicholas, Ohio, Owen, Owsley, Pendleton, Robertson, Simpson, Todd, Trigg, Trimble, Union, Washington, Webster, Wolfe

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top