Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Kentucky by County

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky 7 N/A 19.6 (19.0, 20.1) N/A 1,072 falling falling trend -0.7 (-3.0, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 71,542 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
Bell County 7 Rural 11.4 (6.9, 18.2) 83 (39, 83) 4 falling falling trend -12.8 (-36.6, -2.2)
Casey County 7 Rural 12.5 (7.0, 21.4) 82 (15, 83) 3 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.6, 0.1)
Wayne County 7 Rural 13.4 (7.8, 21.9) 81 (12, 83) 4 stable stable trend -40.7 (-71.7, 3.4)
Laurel County 7 Rural 14.0 (10.5, 18.4) 80 (38, 83) 11 falling falling trend -4.8 (-11.3, -2.1)
Warren County 7 Urban 14.6 (11.8, 17.8) 79 (43, 83) 19 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.0, 1.0)
Rowan County 7 Rural 14.7 (8.5, 23.7) 78 (7, 83) 4
*
*
Allen County 7 Urban 14.9 (8.9, 23.7) 77 (7, 83) 4
*
*
Spencer County 7 Urban 15.2 (8.6, 25.1) 76 (6, 83) 3
*
*
Henderson County 7 Rural 15.3 (11.0, 20.8) 75 (21, 83) 9 falling falling trend -23.1 (-36.1, -7.9)
Mason County 7 Rural 15.6 (9.0, 25.4) 74 (6, 83) 4
*
*
Clay County 7 Rural 15.9 (9.3, 25.7) 73 (5, 83) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.1, 1.2)
Letcher County 7 Rural 16.3 (10.4, 24.7) 72 (6, 83) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.3)
Calloway County 7 Rural 16.5 (11.6, 23.1) 71 (10, 83) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 1.1)
Fleming County 7 Rural 16.6 (9.3, 27.7) 70 (3, 83) 3
*
*
Henry County 7 Urban 16.6 (9.5, 27.5) 69 (3, 83) 3 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.7, 2.0)
Simpson County 7 Rural 17.0 (10.3, 26.6) 68 (4, 83) 4
*
*
Harlan County 7 Rural 17.0 (11.5, 24.5) 67 (7, 83) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.6, 4.8)
Russell County 7 Rural 17.5 (10.9, 27.2) 66 (4, 83) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.5, 2.4)
Johnson County 7 Rural 17.7 (11.3, 26.5) 65 (4, 83) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.2, 3.0)
Pendleton County 7 Urban 18.0 (10.5, 29.3) 64 (2, 83) 4
*
*
Ohio County 7 Rural 18.1 (11.9, 26.6) 63 (5, 83) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.7, 4.3)
Rockcastle County 7 Rural 18.1 (10.8, 28.9) 62 (2, 83) 4
*
*
Montgomery County 7 Rural 18.1 (12.0, 26.2) 61 (5, 83) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.1, 1.4)
Muhlenberg County 7 Rural 18.2 (12.9, 25.3) 60 (7, 82) 8 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.5, 0.3)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 18.7 (13.9, 24.8) 59 (6, 82) 11 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.5)
Breckinridge County 7 Rural 18.7 (12.1, 28.1) 58 (3, 83) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.3, 4.9)
Christian County 7 Urban 18.9 (14.4, 24.2) 57 (9, 80) 13 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.4, 3.9)
Barren County 7 Rural 18.9 (14.1, 24.8) 56 (8, 81) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.7, 4.3)
Carter County 7 Urban 18.9 (12.8, 27.1) 55 (3, 83) 7 falling falling trend -14.2 (-22.6, -8.5)
McCracken County 7 Urban 19.0 (15.1, 23.6) 54 (11, 79) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Boyd County 7 Urban 19.0 (14.6, 24.5) 53 (9, 80) 13 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.5)
Scott County 7 Urban 19.3 (14.2, 25.6) 52 (6, 82) 10 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.7, 6.2)
Trigg County 7 Urban 19.3 (11.5, 31.2) 51 (2, 83) 4
*
*
Jefferson County 7 Urban 19.4 (18.1, 20.7) 50 (29, 64) 179 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.7, 0.1)
Shelby County 7 Urban 19.4 (14.6, 25.3) 49 (6, 80) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 4.2)
Graves County 7 Rural 19.4 (13.9, 26.5) 48 (4, 82) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.5, 1.8)
Daviess County 7 Urban 19.5 (16.1, 23.5) 47 (10, 77) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.4)
Taylor County 7 Rural 19.5 (13.2, 28.0) 46 (3, 83) 7
*
*
Pike County 7 Rural 19.5 (15.2, 24.8) 45 (8, 79) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 2.8)
Hardin County 7 Urban 19.5 (16.1, 23.5) 44 (12, 76) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.5)
Lewis County 7 Rural 19.6 (11.2, 32.5) 43 (1, 83) 3 stable stable trend 3.9 (-0.8, 10.0)
Meade County 7 Urban 19.7 (13.5, 28.0) 42 (3, 82) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.7, 5.4)
Franklin County 7 Rural 19.9 (15.1, 25.7) 41 (6, 80) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 1.8)
Perry County 7 Rural 20.0 (13.6, 28.4) 40 (3, 83) 7 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.5, 5.5)
Fayette County 7 Urban 20.2 (18.1, 22.5) 39 (17, 66) 69 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.8)
Adair County 7 Rural 20.3 (12.4, 31.5) 38 (1, 83) 5
*
*
Bourbon County 7 Urban 20.5 (13.7, 29.8) 37 (2, 83) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.8)
Jessamine County 7 Urban 20.6 (15.7, 26.5) 36 (5, 79) 13 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.6)
Kenton County 7 Urban 20.6 (17.8, 23.9) 35 (11, 68) 39 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Whitley County 7 Rural 20.7 (15.1, 27.8) 34 (4, 80) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.6, 5.5)
McCreary County 7 Rural 20.9 (12.8, 32.4) 33 (1, 83) 4
*
*
Woodford County 7 Urban 20.9 (14.7, 29.1) 32 (2, 82) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.1, 3.0)
Campbell County 7 Urban 21.3 (17.6, 25.6) 31 (6, 72) 25 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.4)
Mercer County 7 Rural 21.5 (14.5, 30.8) 30 (2, 81) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 4.8)
Marshall County 7 Rural 21.5 (15.7, 28.9) 29 (3, 79) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.5, 2.7)
Boone County 7 Urban 21.5 (18.2, 25.3) 28 (8, 68) 31 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 2.0)
Oldham County 7 Urban 22.2 (17.5, 27.7) 27 (3, 73) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 2.1)
Nelson County 7 Urban 22.2 (16.8, 28.9) 26 (2, 77) 12 stable stable trend -2.1 (-14.3, 1.0)
Boyle County 7 Rural 22.4 (16.1, 30.5) 25 (2, 79) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.1, 4.3)
Pulaski County 7 Rural 22.4 (18.0, 27.6) 24 (4, 69) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.6)
Green County 7 Rural 22.5 (12.3, 38.1) 23 (1, 83) 3
*
*
Greenup County 7 Urban 22.5 (17.2, 29.2) 22 (2, 76) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.6)
Butler County 7 Urban 22.6 (13.2, 36.8) 21 (1, 83) 4
*
*
Grayson County 7 Rural 22.7 (15.7, 31.8) 20 (1, 81) 7 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.8, 8.6)
Madison County 7 Rural 22.7 (18.6, 27.5) 19 (3, 68) 23 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.5, 8.7)
Edmonson County 7 Urban 22.9 (13.7, 36.6) 18 (1, 83) 4
*
*
Clark County 7 Urban 23.1 (17.3, 30.4) 17 (2, 75) 11 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 5.3)
Bullitt County 7 Urban 23.7 (19.5, 28.5) 16 (3, 64) 24 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.9)
Harrison County 7 Rural 24.2 (16.2, 35.1) 15 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.3, 7.8)
Logan County 7 Rural 24.3 (17.2, 33.5) 14 (1, 78) 8 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.0, 4.8)
Marion County 7 Rural 24.4 (16.1, 35.6) 13 (1, 81) 6 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.8, 6.5)
Estill County 7 Rural 24.6 (15.0, 38.4) 12 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.0, 4.9)
Floyd County 7 Rural 25.5 (19.1, 33.4) 11 (1, 71) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.1, 2.9)
Bath County 7 Rural 25.6 (15.3, 40.4) 10 (1, 82) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.7, 3.6)
Lawrence County 7 Urban 25.9 (16.7, 38.6) 9 (1, 82) 5 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.8, 5.3)
Anderson County 7 Rural 26.2 (18.3, 36.4) 8 (1, 75) 8
*
*
Hart County 7 Rural 26.2 (17.4, 38.0) 7 (1, 80) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.7, 5.5)
Lincoln County 7 Rural 26.5 (18.9, 36.4) 6 (1, 72) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.1, 5.9)
McLean County 7 Urban 27.1 (15.4, 44.9) 5 (1, 83) 3
*
*
Knox County 7 Rural 27.9 (20.6, 37.0) 4 (1, 63) 10 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.3, 5.6)
Grant County 7 Urban 28.6 (20.1, 39.6) 3 (1, 71) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.6)
Owen County 7 Rural 31.2 (19.2, 48.3) 2 (1, 79) 4
*
*
Martin County 7 Rural 34.4 (22.0, 51.7) 1 (1, 69) 5
*
*
Ballard County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bracken County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Breathitt County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carlisle County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crittenden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cumberland County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elliott County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garrard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knott County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Larue County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leslie County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Livingston County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Magoffin County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menifee County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Metcalfe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicholas County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owsley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Powell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trimble County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wolfe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/13/2024 3:49 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top