Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Kentucky by County

Colon & Rectum, 2010-2014

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 39.9?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky 3,8 No 42.4 (41.3, 43.6) 1,155 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 Yes 34.8 (34.7, 34.9) 66,668 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.3)
Harrison County 7,8 Yes 27.5 (16.5, 44.2) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-9.1, 6.0)
Rowan County 7,8 Yes 30.3 (18.3, 47.5) 4 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.6, -0.1)
Casey County 7,8 Yes 31.6 (18.0, 52.2) 3 stable stable trend -5.8 (-12.4, 1.4)
Trigg County 7 Yes 32.9 (19.6, 53.6) 4
*
*
Lincoln County 7,8 Yes 33.0 (21.5, 48.8) 5 stable stable trend -3.0 (-8.6, 2.9)
Calloway County 7,8 Yes 33.5 (23.7, 46.5) 8 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.3, -1.7)
Marshall County 7,8 Yes 34.1 (24.5, 47.0) 9 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.0, -0.1)
Lewis County 7,8 Yes 34.2 (19.3, 57.2) 3 stable stable trend -4.3 (-8.6, 0.2)
Caldwell County 7,8 Yes 34.9 (19.7, 58.7) 3 stable stable trend -1.7 (-7.3, 4.3)
Jessamine County 7,8 Yes 35.1 (25.8, 46.7) 10 falling falling trend -5.0 (-8.6, -1.2)
Fayette County 7,8 Yes 35.2 (31.2, 39.7) 56 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.8)
McCracken County 7,8 Yes 35.6 (28.4, 44.4) 18 stable stable trend 4.4 (-3.8, 13.3)
Hopkins County 7,8 Yes 35.7 (27.3, 46.2) 12 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.9, 1.4)
Adair County 7,8 Yes 35.8 (22.6, 54.8) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.1, 5.4)
Warren County 7,8 Yes 35.9 (29.4, 43.3) 22 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.5, 0.1)
Madison County 7,8 Yes 36.0 (28.5, 45.0) 16 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.6, -0.3)
Scott County 7,8 Yes 36.3 (26.2, 48.9) 9 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.1, -0.8)
Hart County 7,8 Yes 36.7 (22.7, 56.8) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.8, 2.4)
Oldham County 7,8 Yes 36.8 (27.2, 48.8) 11 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.2, 1.7)
Graves County 7,8 Yes 36.9 (27.1, 49.3) 10 falling falling trend -5.7 (-8.8, -2.5)
Boone County 7,8 Yes 38.3 (31.5, 46.0) 23 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.0, 0.5)
Meade County 7,8 Yes 38.4 (24.9, 56.4) 5 stable stable trend -3.1 (-9.3, 3.4)
Kenton County 7,8 Yes 38.6 (33.0, 44.8) 35 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.8, -2.1)
Daviess County 7,8 Yes 38.9 (32.3, 46.6) 25 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.7, 1.1)
Rockcastle County 7,8 Yes 39.0 (23.6, 61.1) 4 stable stable trend -4.2 (-10.4, 2.5)
Henry County 7,8 Yes 39.0 (23.1, 62.4) 4 stable stable trend -2.7 (-8.0, 3.0)
Nelson County 7,8 Yes 39.5 (29.3, 52.3) 10 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.5, -0.2)
Morgan County 7,8 Yes 39.5 (22.4, 66.1) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-9.7, 10.0)
Bell County 7,8 Yes 39.7 (27.9, 55.1) 8 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.9, 2.2)
Bourbon County 7,8 Yes 39.8 (26.1, 58.8) 6 stable stable trend -5.6 (-11.5, 0.7)
Boyle County 7,8 No 40.1 (28.5, 55.3) 8 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 1.4)
Pulaski County 7,8 No 40.2 (32.3, 49.8) 18 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.3, -2.1)
Barren County 7,8 No 40.7 (31.0, 52.8) 12 falling falling trend -6.5 (-11.4, -1.3)
Breckinridge County 7,8 No 40.9 (26.6, 60.9) 6 stable stable trend -0.0 (-5.7, 6.1)
Washington County 7 No 41.0 (24.4, 66.2) 4
*
*
Franklin County 7,8 No 41.0 (31.4, 52.8) 13 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.1)
McCreary County 7,8 No 41.3 (25.0, 64.6) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.4, 5.0)
Russell County 7,8 No 41.3 (26.7, 62.0) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.0, 4.6)
Allen County 7,8 No 41.8 (27.0, 62.1) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-7.0, 4.1)
Jefferson County 7,8 No 42.2 (39.6, 44.9) 207 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.4)
Clay County 7,8 No 42.3 (27.4, 62.7) 5 stable stable trend -2.6 (-8.6, 3.7)
Knox County 7,8 No 42.4 (30.2, 58.0) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.2, 1.8)
Hardin County 7,8 No 42.5 (35.3, 50.8) 25 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.5, -0.7)
Perry County 7,8 No 42.9 (30.1, 59.7) 8 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.5, 1.3)
Christian County 7,8 No 43.7 (34.4, 54.7) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.5, 3.8)
Union County 7,8 No 43.7 (26.4, 68.9) 4 stable stable trend -3.2 (-8.8, 2.7)
Monroe County 7 No 44.3 (25.3, 73.7) 3
*
*
Campbell County 7,8 No 45.3 (37.7, 54.1) 26 falling falling trend -6.1 (-10.4, -1.6)
Woodford County 7,8 No 45.3 (31.6, 63.5) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.2, 5.9)
Knott County 7,8 No 45.6 (29.3, 68.7) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.2, 3.7)
Logan County 7,8 No 45.7 (32.1, 63.3) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.8, 4.4)
Clinton County 7,8 No 45.7 (26.0, 76.3) 3 stable stable trend 1.2 (-5.6, 8.6)
Spencer County 7,8 No 45.9 (27.3, 72.3) 4 falling falling trend -6.6 (-10.1, -3.0)
Mercer County 7,8 No 45.9 (31.7, 65.0) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.9, 3.7)
Bullitt County 7,8 No 45.9 (36.9, 56.5) 19 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.7, 5.7)
Boyd County 7,8 No 46.3 (36.4, 58.2) 16 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.3, -0.3)
Ohio County 7,8 No 46.5 (32.6, 65.0) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.8, 7.4)
Bath County 7,8 No 46.6 (26.8, 75.9) 3 falling falling trend -11.7 (-19.3, -3.5)
Clark County 7,8 No 46.6 (35.2, 61.0) 11 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.5, 0.7)
Whitley County 7,8 No 46.8 (34.4, 62.3) 10 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.9, 1.6)
Mason County 7,8 No 47.4 (31.3, 69.5) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.9, 6.4)
Metcalfe County 7 No 47.4 (26.2, 80.0) 3
*
*
Greenup County 7,8 No 48.2 (37.0, 62.0) 13 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.4)
Carter County 7,8 No 48.2 (34.3, 66.1) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.7, 2.2)
Shelby County 7,8 No 48.2 (36.7, 62.3) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.5, 3.7)
Taylor County 7,8 No 48.4 (34.6, 66.3) 8 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.8, 7.5)
Laurel County 7,8 No 48.4 (38.6, 60.1) 17 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.6, 0.7)
Simpson County 7,8 No 48.6 (32.4, 70.7) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-6.4, 7.3)
Jackson County 7,8 No 48.7 (29.5, 76.6) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-4.6, 6.7)
Wayne County 7,8 No 48.9 (33.6, 69.3) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.7, 4.5)
Henderson County 7,8 No 49.1 (38.4, 62.1) 15 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.0, 0.2)
Larue County 7,8 No 49.5 (30.2, 77.1) 4 stable stable trend -3.6 (-9.6, 2.7)
Letcher County 7,8 No 49.7 (34.5, 69.6) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.7, 1.9)
Marion County 7,8 No 49.7 (33.0, 72.3) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.5, 5.0)
Butler County 7 No 50.5 (30.5, 79.5) 4
*
*
Martin County 7,8 No 50.7 (30.2, 81.1) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-10.5, 4.4)
Floyd County 7,8 No 50.9 (39.0, 65.5) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 2.4)
Green County 7,8 No 51.0 (29.5, 83.0) 4 stable stable trend 2.4 (-4.3, 9.5)
Edmonson County 7 No 51.6 (32.4, 79.6) 5
*
*
Pike County 7,8 No 52.1 (42.5, 63.4) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 1.0)
Harlan County 7,8 No 52.4 (38.7, 69.7) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.9, 2.4)
Muhlenberg County 7,8 No 53.0 (40.0, 69.3) 12 stable stable trend 1.4 (-2.0, 5.0)
Grayson County 7,8 No 53.1 (38.1, 72.4) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.1, 4.7)
Todd County 7,8 No 53.2 (32.2, 83.3) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.0, 6.0)
Grant County 7,8 No 55.6 (38.8, 77.2) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.9, 3.5)
Johnson County 7,8 No 55.8 (39.8, 76.4) 8 stable stable trend 1.6 (-3.2, 6.7)
Montgomery County 7,8 No 55.9 (40.8, 75.0) 9 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.1, 7.9)
Cumberland County 7 No 56.0 (31.8, 95.3) 3
*
*
Garrard County 7,8 No 56.6 (38.1, 81.5) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.5, 6.8)
Powell County 7,8 No 59.6 (37.6, 90.7) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.7, 5.0)
Lawrence County 7,8 No 60.0 (39.2, 88.2) 5 stable stable trend 2.3 (-4.7, 9.7)
Pendleton County 7,8 No 60.1 (39.3, 88.8) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-6.2, 9.6)
Fleming County 7,8 No 60.2 (40.0, 87.8) 6 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.6, 2.9)
Anderson County 7,8 No 60.5 (42.5, 83.8) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.5, 5.3)
Magoffin County 7,8 No 60.8 (38.0, 92.8) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-7.0, 6.2)
Estill County 7,8 No 63.0 (40.7, 93.4) 5 rising rising trend 8.4 (0.6, 16.9)
Breathitt County 7,8 No 63.7 (41.8, 93.8) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.6, 7.7)
McLean County 7,8 No 63.7 (39.7, 98.8) 4 stable stable trend 1.7 (-5.1, 9.0)
Bracken County 7 No 80.7 (49.6, 125.1) 4
*
*
Ballard County 7,8 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carlisle County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crittenden County 7,8 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Elliott County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County 7,8 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gallatin County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hickman County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leslie County 7,8 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Livingston County 7,8 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County 7,8 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menifee County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicholas County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owen County 7,8 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owsley County 7,8 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trimble County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7,8 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wolfe County 7 *
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/22/2017 7:44 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2016 data submission and SEER November 2016 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2016 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2016 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2016 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2015 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2016 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top