Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

Black (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana 7 *** 491.5 (486.3, 496.8) N/A 7,283 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 444.9 (444.0, 445.9) N/A 187,408 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
De Soto Parish 7 *** 617.0 (552.4, 687.2) 1 (1, 26) 72 stable stable trend -3.8 (-16.5, 10.7)
East Carroll Parish 7 *** 588.1 (492.1, 697.4) 2 (1, 56) 28 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.8)
Plaquemines Parish 7 *** 581.5 (488.5, 687.0) 3 (1, 55) 29 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.1)
Iberville Parish 7 *** 570.5 (519.0, 625.8) 4 (1, 38) 95 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
West Feliciana Parish 7 *** 565.8 (487.0, 654.8) 5 (1, 56) 44 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.6, 2.4)
Terrebonne Parish 7 *** 546.8 (500.1, 596.7) 6 (1, 46) 110 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
St. Landry Parish 7 *** 546.4 (511.5, 583.1) 7 (2, 37) 193 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Assumption Parish 7 *** 545.7 (470.2, 630.1) 8 (1, 58) 41 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Livingston Parish 7 *** 544.1 (461.0, 636.9) 9 (1, 60) 35 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
Claiborne Parish 7 *** 538.3 (471.1, 612.7) 10 (1, 55) 48 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.5, 3.8)
St. Bernard Parish 7 *** 534.6 (446.0, 634.2) 11 (1, 61) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.9, 2.3)
Morehouse Parish 7 *** 532.9 (475.0, 595.9) 12 (1, 54) 67 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.7)
Washington Parish 7 *** 532.0 (480.4, 587.7) 13 (1, 52) 85 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7 *** 531.3 (467.5, 601.2) 14 (1, 58) 54 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
St. Tammany Parish 7 *** 530.9 (492.2, 571.8) 15 (3, 48) 154 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Acadia Parish 7 *** 529.9 (469.5, 595.8) 16 (1, 55) 59 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
East Feliciana Parish 7 *** 526.1 (461.6, 597.4) 17 (1, 58) 52 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
LaFourche Parish 7 *** 520.0 (461.4, 583.8) 18 (1, 57) 61 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Calcasieu Parish 7 *** 518.7 (489.6, 549.0) 19 (5, 46) 256 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Vermilion Parish 7 *** 517.9 (446.9, 596.6) 20 (1, 60) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Catahoula Parish 7 *** 512.5 (398.4, 648.9) 21 (1, 63) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.0, 1.6)
Jefferson Parish 7 *** 512.2 (492.1, 532.9) 22 (11, 44) 561 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Union Parish 7 *** 511.9 (434.2, 599.7) 23 (1, 62) 33 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 2.5)
Rapides Parish 7 *** 511.2 (479.6, 544.3) 24 (7, 51) 210 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Avoyelles Parish 7 *** 507.4 (450.9, 569.0) 25 (3, 59) 61 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Richland Parish 7 *** 506.5 (434.5, 587.1) 26 (1, 61) 38 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.1)
St. Charles Parish 7 *** 506.4 (452.1, 565.3) 27 (3, 58) 69 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Evangeline Parish 7 *** 505.6 (440.4, 577.7) 28 (2, 61) 45 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Natchitoches Parish 7 *** 505.3 (454.0, 560.7) 29 (3, 58) 74 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
St. Martin Parish 7 *** 505.1 (456.1, 557.9) 30 (4, 57) 83 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Iberia Parish 7 *** 503.0 (460.3, 548.6) 31 (6, 56) 110 stable stable trend 4.6 (-9.6, 21.1)
Madison Parish 7 *** 502.9 (425.5, 589.9) 32 (1, 62) 32 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.0)
Bienville Parish 7 *** 501.9 (430.6, 582.2) 33 (1, 61) 38 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Webster Parish 7 *** 501.6 (453.0, 554.1) 34 (4, 58) 80 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Red River Parish 7 *** 500.9 (406.2, 612.2) 35 (1, 63) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.6)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7 *** 497.3 (482.2, 512.8) 36 (19, 48) 902 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Ouachita Parish 7 *** 495.2 (465.9, 525.8) 37 (13, 54) 238 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Lafayette Parish 7 *** 494.5 (466.3, 524.0) 38 (12, 54) 255 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
St. James Parish 7 *** 494.3 (438.0, 556.0) 39 (4, 60) 62 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Caldwell Parish 7 *** 494.1 (359.5, 664.3) 40 (1, 63) 9 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.2, -0.4)
Vernon Parish 7 *** 492.2 (404.2, 592.5) 41 (1, 63) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.8)
Caddo Parish 7 *** 490.1 (472.2, 508.5) 42 (21, 51) 605 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
St. Helena Parish 7 *** 486.6 (410.4, 573.2) 43 (2, 63) 31 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.1, 3.2)
St. Mary Parish 7 *** 483.5 (438.1, 532.5) 44 (8, 60) 90 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Tangipahoa Parish 7 *** 483.4 (448.6, 520.2) 45 (13, 58) 158 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Allen Parish 7 *** 480.3 (399.9, 572.0) 46 (2, 63) 26 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.4)
Jackson Parish 7 *** 479.2 (399.4, 570.8) 47 (2, 63) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5)
Franklin Parish 7 *** 477.9 (404.5, 560.6) 48 (3, 63) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Lincoln Parish 7 *** 473.5 (424.0, 527.1) 49 (9, 61) 70 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.3)
Bossier Parish 7 *** 470.7 (431.9, 512.0) 50 (14, 60) 119 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7 *** 458.7 (417.6, 502.5) 51 (19, 62) 106 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Beauregard Parish 7 *** 453.6 (369.7, 550.8) 52 (3, 63) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.3)
Sabine Parish 7 *** 450.8 (358.9, 558.8) 53 (2, 63) 18 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.7)
Orleans Parish 7 *** 447.8 (436.0, 459.9) 54 (44, 59) 1,186 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.5)
Winn Parish 7 *** 447.4 (361.1, 548.0) 55 (2, 63) 20 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.0, 0.1)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7 *** 440.5 (381.5, 506.5) 56 (15, 63) 44 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
La Salle Parish 7 *** 436.2 (300.6, 611.2) 57 (1, 63) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.3, 0.8)
Ascension Parish 7 *** 432.0 (393.4, 473.3) 58 (35, 63) 105 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3)
West Carroll Parish 7 *** 429.0 (303.9, 589.0) 59 (1, 63) 8 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.8, 0.5)
Jefferson Davis Parish 7 *** 427.1 (353.5, 511.7) 60 (12, 63) 25 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.8)
Tensas Parish 7 *** 415.7 (320.0, 533.3) 61 (4, 63) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.5)
Concordia Parish 7 *** 393.2 (333.8, 460.1) 62 (37, 63) 33 stable stable trend -11.1 (-21.7, 0.9)
Grant Parish 7 *** 386.9 (287.8, 508.6) 63 (8, 63) 11 stable stable trend -2.9 (-5.9, 0.2)
Cameron Parish 7 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2021 11:59 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top