Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana 7 N/A 296.2 (285.0, 307.6) N/A 564 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) § 1 N/A 350.0 (349.2, 350.8) N/A 155,866 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.7, -0.5)
St. Charles Parish 7 Urban 523.7 (403.5, 667.3) 1 (1, 6) 14 falling falling trend -4.4 (-15.3, -0.8)
St. Mary Parish 7 Rural 504.5 (378.4, 656.5) 2 (1, 7) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 1.1)
St. Bernard Parish 7 Urban 483.9 (391.9, 590.4) 3 (1, 6) 20 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.6, -0.9)
Jefferson Parish 7 Urban 383.8 (361.1, 407.5) 4 (3, 7) 219 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.2)
Orleans Parish 7 Urban 382.1 (341.5, 426.0) 5 (3, 7) 68 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Vernon Parish 7 Rural 356.7 (235.3, 512.2) 6 (1, 18) 7 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.8, 1.5)
Bossier Parish 7 Urban 320.6 (250.4, 403.1) 7 (3, 14) 17 stable stable trend -3.1 (-5.6, 0.0)
Livingston Parish 7 Urban 260.3 (187.9, 349.5) 8 (5, 20) 10
*
*
Iberia Parish 7 Rural 258.9 (165.7, 382.2) 9 (4, 21) 5
*
*
East Baton Rouge Parish 7 Urban 249.0 (211.3, 291.1) 10 (7, 18) 34 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.3)
Terrebonne Parish 7 Urban 243.7 (170.9, 335.0) 11 (6, 21) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.9, 2.5)
Calcasieu Parish 7 Urban 237.3 (181.0, 304.6) 12 (6, 20) 14 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.7, 0.7)
St. Landry Parish 7 Rural 227.1 (128.9, 367.9) 13 (5, 22) 3
*
*
Lafayette Parish 7 Urban 212.0 (165.0, 267.4) 14 (8, 21) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.8, 4.7)
St. Tammany Parish 7 Urban 209.9 (175.8, 248.3) 15 (9, 21) 28 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.9, -1.3)
Ascension Parish 7 Urban 209.2 (150.4, 282.0) 16 (7, 22) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 3.0)
Ouachita Parish 7 Urban 206.6 (131.8, 305.6) 17 (7, 22) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.0, 2.0)
LaFourche Parish 7 Urban 205.6 (133.7, 300.5) 18 (7, 22) 6 stable stable trend -2.5 (-6.7, 3.4)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7 Urban 201.4 (124.7, 305.8) 19 (6, 22) 5 stable stable trend -4.7 (-10.5, 1.6)
Tangipahoa Parish 7 Urban 174.1 (115.4, 250.3) 20 (9, 22) 7
*
*
Caddo Parish 7 Urban 172.3 (125.9, 229.8) 21 (10, 22) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 3.5)
Rapides Parish 7 Urban 112.5 (67.0, 175.8) 22 (18, 22) 4
*
*
Acadia Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Allen Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Assumption Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Avoyelles Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Beauregard Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bienville Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cameron Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Catahoula Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concordia Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
De Soto Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
East Carroll Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
East Feliciana Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Evangeline Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iberville Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morehouse Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Natchitoches Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Plaquemines Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pointe Coupee Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richland Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Helena Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. James Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Martin Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tensas Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermilion Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Baton Rouge Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Carroll Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Feliciana Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winn Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/16/2025 5:34 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.
NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top