Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

Prostate (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana 7 138.1 (136.1, 140.1) N/A 3,817 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.1, 7.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) N/A 212,734 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
Acadia Parish 7 133.0 (116.0, 151.8) 38 (9, 58) 47 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Allen Parish 7 110.8 (88.1, 137.7) 58 (16, 64) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.9)
Ascension Parish 7 154.1 (140.4, 168.8) 12 (3, 37) 101 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.7, 10.7)
Assumption Parish 7 133.7 (108.9, 163.2) 36 (4, 62) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 2.0)
Avoyelles Parish 7 138.0 (117.8, 160.8) 33 (5, 58) 35 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.2, -0.1)
Beauregard Parish 7 120.0 (100.0, 143.0) 50 (13, 63) 26 stable stable trend 9.9 (-2.4, 18.3)
Bienville Parish 7 164.6 (130.2, 206.6) 9 (1, 55) 16 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.5)
Bossier Parish 7 126.8 (114.9, 139.5) 44 (20, 57) 88 rising rising trend 9.2 (1.8, 20.3)
Caddo Parish 7 141.3 (132.7, 150.4) 30 (12, 42) 210 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Calcasieu Parish 7 140.8 (131.0, 151.1) 31 (10, 45) 162 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.5, 8.5)
Caldwell Parish 7 138.4 (99.9, 187.7) 32 (1, 64) 9 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.7, 17.3)
Cameron Parish 7 110.8 (72.1, 165.3) 57 (2, 64) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.8, 2.3)
Catahoula Parish 7 121.7 (86.4, 168.1) 49 (2, 64) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.4, 2.4)
Claiborne Parish 7 143.5 (114.0, 179.2) 24 (1, 61) 17 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.6)
Concordia Parish 7 144.3 (115.2, 178.9) 20 (2, 62) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.5)
De Soto Parish 7 131.0 (108.0, 158.0) 39 (6, 62) 24 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.1, -2.9)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7 173.8 (166.1, 181.7) 4 (1, 12) 410 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.3, 8.8)
East Carroll Parish 7 192.3 (136.8, 264.3) 1 (1, 57) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-9.0, 4.5)
East Feliciana Parish 7 165.4 (136.8, 198.9) 7 (1, 48) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Evangeline Parish 7 96.8 (78.2, 118.6) 63 (37, 64) 20 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.2)
Franklin Parish 7 130.1 (102.5, 163.2) 41 (4, 64) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 1.1)
Grant Parish 7 113.2 (88.4, 143.1) 55 (12, 64) 15 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.4, 1.2)
Iberia Parish 7 142.0 (125.7, 159.8) 28 (6, 53) 59 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.2)
Iberville Parish 7 183.9 (157.9, 213.2) 2 (1, 30) 38 falling falling trend -3.3 (-13.2, -0.9)
Jackson Parish 7 148.3 (117.2, 185.7) 15 (1, 60) 16 rising rising trend 18.6 (3.2, 29.1)
Jefferson Davis Parish 7 154.0 (129.7, 181.7) 13 (1, 53) 29 rising rising trend 18.8 (2.0, 30.1)
Jefferson Parish 7 124.3 (118.4, 130.5) 48 (33, 55) 352 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.2, 6.4)
La Salle Parish 7 99.2 (72.1, 133.5) 61 (16, 64) 9 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.8, -0.6)
LaFourche Parish 7 114.0 (101.8, 127.2) 54 (34, 63) 67 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.7)
Lafayette Parish 7 144.7 (135.1, 154.8) 19 (8, 41) 183 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 3.8)
Lincoln Parish 7 141.6 (120.0, 166.0) 29 (4, 57) 32 stable stable trend 13.2 (-0.5, 25.0)
Livingston Parish 7 107.7 (97.2, 119.1) 59 (43, 64) 81 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.3, 0.2)
Madison Parish 7 161.7 (119.2, 215.1) 10 (1, 62) 10 rising rising trend 20.0 (2.9, 44.0)
Morehouse Parish 7 165.5 (138.1, 197.1) 6 (1, 47) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.9)
Natchitoches Parish 7 130.6 (110.4, 153.8) 40 (8, 61) 30 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.5, -0.3)
Orleans Parish 7 143.1 (135.9, 150.6) 26 (11, 40) 324 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Ouachita Parish 7 154.2 (142.2, 167.0) 11 (4, 34) 128 rising rising trend 9.2 (3.9, 18.8)
Plaquemines Parish 7 135.7 (108.3, 168.3) 35 (2, 63) 18 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7 133.5 (108.9, 162.7) 37 (4, 62) 22 rising rising trend 8.2 (2.0, 23.4)
Rapides Parish 7 129.2 (117.8, 141.4) 42 (17, 56) 99 falling falling trend -2.5 (-7.1, -1.1)
Red River Parish 7 119.9 (81.5, 171.9) 51 (2, 64) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.9, 2.8)
Richland Parish 7 128.1 (102.0, 159.6) 43 (5, 64) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Sabine Parish 7 125.3 (103.0, 151.6) 47 (9, 63) 23 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.2, -1.1)
St. Bernard Parish 7 97.3 (80.0, 117.3) 62 (41, 64) 25 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.4)
St. Charles Parish 7 143.1 (124.3, 164.1) 25 (4, 54) 46 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.5)
St. Helena Parish 7 180.4 (138.9, 232.2) 3 (1, 53) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.6)
St. James Parish 7 143.9 (116.1, 176.9) 22 (2, 60) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.3)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7 143.9 (123.5, 167.0) 21 (4, 55) 38 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.0, 1.0)
St. Landry Parish 7 148.6 (133.5, 165.1) 14 (4, 46) 75 rising rising trend 14.9 (5.5, 23.2)
St. Martin Parish 7 145.4 (127.0, 165.9) 18 (4, 51) 48 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
St. Mary Parish 7 126.6 (109.6, 145.8) 46 (12, 61) 42 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.3)
St. Tammany Parish 7 126.7 (119.1, 134.7) 45 (27, 54) 220 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.2)
Tangipahoa Parish 7 145.8 (133.3, 159.3) 17 (7, 44) 108 rising rising trend 10.3 (4.5, 18.3)
Tensas Parish 7 146.3 (97.7, 218.5) 16 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.3, 2.9)
Terrebonne Parish 7 114.8 (102.9, 127.8) 53 (33, 62) 72 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.8)
Union Parish 7 112.1 (90.5, 138.1) 56 (15, 64) 20 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.2, 0.3)
Vermilion Parish 7 142.6 (125.1, 162.1) 27 (5, 53) 50 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.6)
Vernon Parish 7 104.1 (85.8, 125.0) 60 (33, 64) 23 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.0, 1.5)
Washington Parish 7 117.1 (100.3, 136.1) 52 (23, 63) 37 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.2, -1.1)
Webster Parish 7 143.5 (123.4, 166.3) 23 (3, 55) 38 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.2, -1.2)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7 172.9 (143.2, 207.2) 5 (1, 46) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.5)
West Carroll Parish 7 137.0 (102.2, 181.1) 34 (1, 64) 11 stable stable trend 15.3 (-1.2, 46.4)
West Feliciana Parish 7 164.8 (131.8, 204.5) 8 (1, 54) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 3.0)
Winn Parish 7 94.8 (69.6, 127.2) 64 (24, 64) 10 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.3, -2.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/22/2024 9:49 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2022 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top