Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

Prostate (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name

Parish
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana 7 N/A 141.6 (139.6, 143.6) N/A 3,966 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.7, 6.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 113.2 (113.0, 113.4) N/A 224,883 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.7)
Acadia Parish 7 Urban 138.8 (120.9, 158.7) 35 (7, 58) 47 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Allen Parish 7 Rural 129.9 (103.8, 160.6) 44 (4, 64) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.8)
Ascension Parish 7 Urban 160.3 (146.2, 175.3) 13 (3, 35) 105 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.5, 9.8)
Assumption Parish 7 Urban 151.0 (124.3, 182.5) 21 (1, 59) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.8)
Avoyelles Parish 7 Rural 137.3 (117.2, 160.0) 37 (5, 61) 35 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Beauregard Parish 7 Rural 129.7 (108.5, 154.0) 46 (10, 63) 28 stable stable trend 6.2 (-2.7, 18.7)
Bienville Parish 7 Rural 169.6 (134.3, 212.7) 5 (1, 54) 16 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.5, 0.2)
Bossier Parish 7 Urban 121.3 (109.9, 133.7) 50 (30, 62) 86 falling falling trend -10.9 (-18.7, -4.4)
Caddo Parish 7 Urban 141.6 (132.9, 150.7) 31 (15, 45) 210 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.0)
Calcasieu Parish 7 Urban 136.2 (126.8, 146.1) 39 (20, 51) 167 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.5, 6.1)
Caldwell Parish 7 Rural 113.5 (78.3, 160.1) 57 (4, 64) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.8, 2.3)
Cameron Parish 7 Urban 111.5 (68.8, 173.9) 59 (2, 64) 4
*
*
Catahoula Parish 7 Rural 151.4 (111.3, 202.8) 20 (1, 64) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 3.2)
Claiborne Parish 7 Rural 139.5 (109.9, 175.8) 34 (2, 63) 16 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.9)
Concordia Parish 7 Rural 146.9 (117.6, 181.8) 26 (1, 62) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.9)
De Soto Parish 7 Urban 131.5 (108.2, 158.7) 42 (6, 63) 23 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.5, -2.5)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7 Urban 169.7 (162.2, 177.4) 4 (2, 17) 412 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.2, 5.9)
East Carroll Parish 7 Rural 157.9 (107.8, 224.0) 15 (1, 64) 7 stable stable trend -2.4 (-9.2, 3.6)
East Feliciana Parish 7 Urban 165.6 (137.1, 199.1) 8 (1, 50) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Evangeline Parish 7 Rural 95.9 (77.4, 117.7) 64 (43, 64) 19 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.6)
Franklin Parish 7 Rural 110.9 (86.1, 141.2) 60 (19, 64) 15 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.5, 0.6)
Grant Parish 7 Urban 116.7 (91.3, 147.2) 53 (11, 64) 15 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.0, 0.5)
Iberia Parish 7 Rural 160.5 (143.2, 179.5) 12 (2, 39) 68 rising rising trend 10.1 (6.9, 15.5)
Iberville Parish 7 Urban 184.6 (158.0, 214.7) 2 (1, 30) 36 falling falling trend -2.9 (-9.7, -0.9)
Jackson Parish 7 Rural 156.0 (123.9, 194.9) 17 (1, 60) 17 rising rising trend 7.7 (0.5, 24.6)
Jefferson Davis Parish 7 Urban 165.1 (140.3, 193.2) 9 (1, 47) 33 stable stable trend -1.4 (-9.7, 9.1)
Jefferson Parish 7 Urban 128.1 (122.2, 134.3) 47 (33, 54) 373 rising rising trend 7.4 (1.7, 11.1)
La Salle Parish 7 Rural 107.9 (78.9, 144.5) 63 (12, 64) 10 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.1, -0.3)
LaFourche Parish 7 Urban 118.9 (106.5, 132.5) 52 (31, 63) 70 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Lafayette Parish 7 Urban 149.5 (139.8, 159.7) 24 (8, 39) 193 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 3.0)
Lincoln Parish 7 Rural 145.5 (123.8, 170.0) 27 (3, 57) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.3)
Livingston Parish 7 Urban 116.5 (105.7, 128.2) 54 (37, 63) 90 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.1)
Madison Parish 7 Rural 167.1 (123.7, 221.8) 6 (1, 62) 10 rising rising trend 9.9 (0.9, 32.2)
Morehouse Parish 7 Urban 164.0 (137.1, 195.0) 10 (1, 49) 28 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5)
Natchitoches Parish 7 Rural 129.9 (109.4, 153.4) 43 (10, 63) 29 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.3)
Orleans Parish 7 Urban 149.4 (142.1, 157.1) 25 (11, 36) 338 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Ouachita Parish 7 Urban 149.6 (138.0, 161.9) 23 (8, 41) 130 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Plaquemines Parish 7 Urban 141.0 (113.4, 173.6) 32 (2, 62) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.0)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7 Urban 144.3 (118.2, 175.2) 29 (2, 61) 23 rising rising trend 6.2 (1.4, 17.9)
Rapides Parish 7 Urban 131.7 (120.3, 144.0) 41 (20, 57) 102 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Red River Parish 7 Rural 126.3 (85.0, 182.7) 48 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.8, 2.6)
Richland Parish 7 Urban 136.9 (109.2, 170.1) 38 (3, 63) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Sabine Parish 7 Rural 119.6 (97.5, 146.1) 51 (14, 64) 21 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.2, -1.2)
St. Bernard Parish 7 Urban 109.0 (90.2, 130.8) 61 (28, 64) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.2)
St. Charles Parish 7 Urban 139.7 (121.4, 160.1) 33 (8, 58) 47 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.1)
St. Helena Parish 7 Urban 166.7 (127.9, 215.2) 7 (1, 60) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 3.1)
St. James Parish 7 Urban 152.5 (123.7, 186.5) 19 (1, 60) 21 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.2)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7 Urban 145.0 (124.4, 168.3) 28 (4, 57) 39 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
St. Landry Parish 7 Rural 152.5 (137.2, 169.0) 18 (4, 45) 78 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
St. Martin Parish 7 Urban 159.3 (140.0, 180.7) 14 (1, 43) 53 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 9.0)
St. Mary Parish 7 Rural 129.8 (112.6, 149.1) 45 (14, 62) 44 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.8)
St. Tammany Parish 7 Urban 132.6 (124.9, 140.7) 40 (26, 52) 237 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.9, 11.6)
Tangipahoa Parish 7 Urban 162.1 (148.9, 176.2) 11 (2, 32) 121 rising rising trend 8.4 (4.5, 14.8)
Tensas Parish 7 Rural 142.1 (95.2, 213.2) 30 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.7, 1.9)
Terrebonne Parish 7 Urban 113.7 (101.9, 126.4) 56 (38, 64) 74 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Union Parish 7 Urban 116.0 (94.0, 142.6) 55 (18, 64) 20 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.8, -0.3)
Vermilion Parish 7 Urban 156.2 (137.5, 176.8) 16 (2, 47) 54 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Vernon Parish 7 Rural 108.8 (90.4, 129.8) 62 (31, 64) 25 stable stable trend 6.2 (-7.1, 26.8)
Washington Parish 7 Rural 125.4 (108.0, 145.0) 49 (16, 63) 39 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -1.2)
Webster Parish 7 Rural 150.1 (129.2, 173.8) 22 (3, 53) 38 stable stable trend 4.9 (-14.8, 24.1)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7 Urban 170.9 (142.0, 204.2) 3 (1, 48) 27 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.8)
West Carroll Parish 7 Rural 137.9 (102.3, 183.8) 36 (1, 64) 10 stable stable trend 9.0 (-17.5, 41.9)
West Feliciana Parish 7 Urban 199.3 (163.6, 241.5) 1 (1, 26) 24 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.1, 4.5)
Winn Parish 7 Rural 111.8 (83.9, 146.9) 58 (12, 64) 11 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.6, -1.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 5:05 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
7 Source: SEER November 2023 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top