Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Name
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana 7 2,037.2 (2,022.2, 2,052.4) N/A 14,473 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 1,944.4 (1,942.6, 1,946.1) N/A 971,828 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.8, 0.1)
Acadia Parish 7 2,140.2 (2,008.9, 2,278.0) 16 (2, 48) 201 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.2)
Allen Parish 7 2,065.7 (1,863.9, 2,283.4) 28 (1, 60) 78 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.1)
Ascension Parish 7 2,105.4 (1,997.7, 2,217.4) 21 (4, 48) 305 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.7, 4.7)
Assumption Parish 7 2,037.9 (1,839.3, 2,252.0) 34 (2, 61) 79 stable stable trend 0.3 (-8.5, 7.0)
Avoyelles Parish 7 2,108.6 (1,955.4, 2,270.7) 20 (2, 54) 143 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Beauregard Parish 7 2,115.0 (1,948.1, 2,292.4) 19 (1, 55) 122 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.7)
Bienville Parish 7 2,015.5 (1,783.7, 2,269.0) 38 (1, 63) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.2)
Bossier Parish 7 2,045.8 (1,952.7, 2,142.2) 32 (10, 52) 369 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Caddo Parish 7 2,001.9 (1,940.4, 2,064.9) 43 (22, 52) 822 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.6, 3.9)
Calcasieu Parish 7 2,166.9 (2,091.6, 2,244.1) 13 (3, 33) 642 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.3, 4.5)
Caldwell Parish 7 2,287.6 (1,978.8, 2,631.1) 3 (1, 57) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Cameron Parish 7 1,908.6 (1,567.5, 2,301.9) 52 (1, 64) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.5)
Catahoula Parish 7 2,095.6 (1,792.9, 2,435.4) 24 (1, 63) 35 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 2.0)
Claiborne Parish 7 1,812.1 (1,602.1, 2,041.8) 56 (15, 64) 55 falling falling trend -2.0 (-7.9, -0.6)
Concordia Parish 7 1,823.3 (1,624.6, 2,039.5) 55 (18, 64) 63 falling falling trend -2.0 (-7.5, -0.3)
De Soto Parish 7 2,206.8 (2,022.0, 2,404.1) 7 (1, 50) 107 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7 2,030.2 (1,979.4, 2,082.0) 35 (21, 49) 1,260 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
East Carroll Parish 7 2,255.3 (1,857.5, 2,713.6) 5 (1, 63) 23 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.8, 2.6)
East Feliciana Parish 7 2,060.8 (1,849.6, 2,290.3) 29 (1, 61) 72 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 1.0)
Evangeline Parish 7 2,025.8 (1,854.5, 2,208.9) 37 (3, 59) 104 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Franklin Parish 7 2,104.3 (1,895.5, 2,329.7) 22 (1, 59) 75 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Grant Parish 7 1,996.8 (1,782.9, 2,229.4) 46 (2, 63) 65 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Iberia Parish 7 2,298.6 (2,168.9, 2,434.1) 1 (1, 24) 240 stable stable trend 4.5 (-1.9, 9.5)
Iberville Parish 7 2,295.1 (2,110.6, 2,491.5) 2 (1, 44) 117 stable stable trend 3.9 (-2.5, 11.3)
Jackson Parish 7 1,883.7 (1,675.5, 2,110.6) 54 (9, 64) 60 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Jefferson Davis Parish 7 2,210.6 (2,030.6, 2,402.3) 6 (1, 51) 112 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Jefferson Parish 7 1,986.1 (1,940.1, 2,033.0) 47 (27, 53) 1,457 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
La Salle Parish 7 1,760.9 (1,534.4, 2,011.6) 60 (18, 64) 44 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
LaFourche Parish 7 2,000.0 (1,899.3, 2,104.6) 45 (14, 55) 300 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.8, -0.2)
Lafayette Parish 7 2,067.4 (1,995.5, 2,141.2) 27 (11, 48) 652 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Lincoln Parish 7 1,750.0 (1,606.7, 1,902.7) 61 (41, 64) 112 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Livingston Parish 7 2,028.3 (1,934.7, 2,125.2) 36 (13, 54) 371 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Madison Parish 7 1,748.7 (1,470.0, 2,065.7) 62 (8, 64) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.2)
Morehouse Parish 7 2,098.6 (1,916.4, 2,293.7) 23 (1, 58) 100 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Natchitoches Parish 7 2,060.4 (1,905.5, 2,224.6) 30 (2, 57) 133 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Orleans Parish 7 1,781.7 (1,731.8, 1,832.7) 59 (51, 64) 1,020 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Ouachita Parish 7 2,188.9 (2,102.5, 2,278.0) 9 (2, 32) 493 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Plaquemines Parish 7 2,005.9 (1,787.2, 2,244.0) 40 (1, 63) 62 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7 1,795.0 (1,621.5, 1,982.1) 58 (27, 64) 80 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Rapides Parish 7 1,957.2 (1,873.0, 2,044.1) 49 (24, 57) 413 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Red River Parish 7 1,681.7 (1,406.9, 1,994.4) 64 (18, 64) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Richland Parish 7 2,053.0 (1,844.6, 2,278.7) 31 (1, 61) 72 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Sabine Parish 7 1,927.3 (1,755.7, 2,111.2) 51 (9, 63) 94 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
St. Bernard Parish 7 1,953.8 (1,784.2, 2,135.4) 50 (8, 63) 104 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.2)
St. Charles Parish 7 2,167.3 (2,011.3, 2,332.2) 12 (1, 51) 150 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
St. Helena Parish 7 2,002.4 (1,732.9, 2,302.2) 42 (1, 64) 40 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.2)
St. James Parish 7 2,168.0 (1,956.9, 2,395.9) 11 (1, 55) 79 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7 1,893.6 (1,738.0, 2,059.6) 53 (15, 63) 115 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
St. Landry Parish 7 2,199.7 (2,086.8, 2,317.1) 8 (1, 36) 291 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.7, 3.2)
St. Martin Parish 7 2,164.4 (2,020.4, 2,316.1) 14 (1, 48) 174 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
St. Mary Parish 7 2,085.8 (1,947.2, 2,231.7) 26 (3, 55) 171 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
St. Tammany Parish 7 2,140.6 (2,077.9, 2,204.8) 15 (5, 35) 920 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Tangipahoa Parish 7 2,001.8 (1,910.7, 2,096.3) 44 (17, 55) 381 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Tensas Parish 7 1,684.5 (1,354.2, 2,071.8) 63 (7, 64) 19 stable stable trend -3.5 (-22.7, 2.1)
Terrebonne Parish 7 2,269.5 (2,163.7, 2,379.0) 4 (1, 25) 355 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.1, 1.0)
Union Parish 7 2,005.4 (1,823.7, 2,200.3) 41 (3, 62) 91 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Vermilion Parish 7 2,129.9 (1,996.5, 2,269.8) 17 (2, 50) 193 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Vernon Parish 7 2,181.4 (2,013.9, 2,359.1) 10 (1, 51) 128 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.5)
Washington Parish 7 2,014.4 (1,878.9, 2,157.3) 39 (6, 57) 168 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Webster Parish 7 2,086.2 (1,942.9, 2,237.3) 25 (2, 54) 158 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7 2,038.0 (1,830.9, 2,262.2) 33 (1, 61) 73 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
West Carroll Parish 7 2,129.5 (1,859.2, 2,428.0) 18 (1, 61) 45 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
West Feliciana Parish 7 1,959.4 (1,707.3, 2,239.0) 48 (1, 64) 46 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.9)
Winn Parish 7 1,805.5 (1,582.4, 2,051.3) 57 (13, 64) 48 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/20/2024 3:30 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top