Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Louisiana 7 45.1 (44.3, 45.9) N/A 2,429 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 37.7 (37.6, 37.7) N/A 143,166 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Grant Parish 7 58.2 (45.5, 73.5) 7 (1, 54) 15 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.3, 4.6)
West Carroll Parish 7 61.4 (44.9, 82.7) 5 (1, 59) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.8, 4.1)
Jefferson Parish 7 41.0 (38.5, 43.5) 51 (37, 59) 224 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.8, 4.0)
Madison Parish 7 56.6 (39.4, 79.1) 9 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.7, 4.7)
Allen Parish 7 55.5 (43.9, 69.3) 14 (1, 56) 16 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Franklin Parish 7 55.9 (43.3, 71.2) 13 (1, 59) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.4)
St. Landry Parish 7 64.2 (57.1, 72.0) 2 (1, 20) 63 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Union Parish 7 46.4 (35.5, 59.9) 41 (4, 61) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.2, 3.4)
Iberia Parish 7 51.4 (44.4, 59.2) 23 (5, 50) 41 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Richland Parish 7 48.7 (37.0, 63.2) 32 (2, 61) 13 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.8, 2.9)
Natchitoches Parish 7 58.3 (48.5, 69.7) 6 (1, 45) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
East Feliciana Parish 7 47.8 (36.5, 61.8) 37 (3, 61) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 2.7)
Concordia Parish 7 44.7 (33.1, 59.1) 43 (3, 61) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.4)
LaFourche Parish 7 47.7 (42.2, 53.9) 38 (11, 55) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Morehouse Parish 7 67.4 (55.0, 82.0) 1 (1, 31) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 2.0)
St. Martin Parish 7 56.6 (48.2, 66.0) 10 (1, 45) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
East Carroll Parish 7 51.2 (31.5, 79.3) 24 (1, 61) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 2.8)
Evangeline Parish 7 55.9 (45.7, 67.9) 12 (1, 49) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.3)
Jefferson Davis Parish 7 48.8 (39.1, 60.2) 30 (4, 61) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Vernon Parish 7 53.8 (44.5, 64.4) 16 (1, 53) 24 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5)
St. Charles Parish 7 38.6 (31.6, 46.8) 58 (22, 61) 22 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
St. Helena Parish 7 53.2 (35.7, 76.5) 18 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.9, 2.7)
St. James Parish 7 62.6 (49.2, 78.5) 4 (1, 46) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.5)
Vermilion Parish 7 48.7 (41.7, 56.7) 31 (7, 57) 35 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Catahoula Parish 7 57.1 (38.9, 81.3) 8 (1, 61) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.8, 1.9)
Ouachita Parish 7 45.9 (41.4, 50.8) 42 (16, 56) 80 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Calcasieu Parish 7 46.9 (42.9, 51.2) 40 (15, 50) 107 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.4)
Claiborne Parish 7 54.0 (40.8, 70.5) 15 (1, 60) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.4)
Iberville Parish 7 42.3 (33.7, 52.5) 46 (11, 61) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.7, 1.5)
Beauregard Parish 7 49.8 (40.7, 60.3) 25 (4, 59) 22 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
La Salle Parish 7 64.1 (48.4, 83.4) 3 (1, 54) 12 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.8, 1.2)
Winn Parish 7 53.8 (39.4, 72.0) 17 (1, 61) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.2)
Caddo Parish 7 47.8 (44.3, 51.6) 36 (15, 47) 142 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Caldwell Parish 7 49.1 (32.9, 70.9) 27 (1, 61) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.2)
Jackson Parish 7 51.7 (38.6, 68.2) 20 (1, 61) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3)
Terrebonne Parish 7 49.1 (43.6, 55.1) 26 (9, 51) 61 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Acadia Parish 7 51.6 (44.3, 59.8) 21 (4, 52) 38 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.9)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7 42.3 (34.3, 51.7) 45 (11, 61) 21 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
St. Mary Parish 7 48.7 (41.0, 57.4) 33 (6, 58) 30 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Assumption Parish 7 51.5 (40.3, 65.0) 22 (1, 61) 15 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7 47.5 (36.8, 60.6) 39 (3, 61) 15 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.1)
West Feliciana Parish 7 42.7 (30.6, 58.7) 44 (4, 61) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.1, 1.3)
Rapides Parish 7 48.0 (43.2, 53.2) 35 (13, 51) 76 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.9)
Avoyelles Parish 7 56.4 (47.3, 66.7) 11 (1, 46) 29 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.4)
Lafayette Parish 7 42.0 (38.4, 45.8) 49 (29, 59) 107 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.1)
Plaquemines Parish 7 38.4 (28.4, 50.9) 59 (15, 61) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.1, 0.1)
St. Bernard Parish 7 41.5 (33.1, 51.3) 50 (13, 61) 18 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.1, 0.0)
Washington Parish 7 48.0 (40.2, 57.0) 34 (7, 59) 29 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.4)
Bienville Parish 7 48.8 (35.2, 66.4) 29 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.6, 0.1)
Orleans Parish 7 42.1 (39.3, 45.0) 48 (32, 58) 184 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.7)
Bossier Parish 7 42.2 (37.4, 47.5) 47 (24, 60) 57 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
St. Tammany Parish 7 40.3 (37.1, 43.7) 54 (36, 60) 124 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.8)
Tangipahoa Parish 7 40.3 (35.6, 45.4) 55 (29, 61) 57 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.7)
Webster Parish 7 48.9 (40.8, 58.3) 28 (5, 59) 27 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.0)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7 39.4 (36.8, 42.1) 56 (40, 60) 184 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.5, -2.3)
Sabine Parish 7 40.8 (31.5, 52.2) 52 (10, 61) 14 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.7)
Ascension Parish 7 37.5 (32.8, 42.8) 60 (36, 61) 47 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.5, -1.6)
Livingston Parish 7 40.7 (36.1, 45.7) 53 (29, 61) 60 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.7)
Lincoln Parish 7 38.6 (30.7, 48.0) 57 (20, 61) 17 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.6)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7 36.6 (27.1, 48.4) 61 (17, 61) 10 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.9, -1.7)
De Soto Parish 7 52.1 (41.6, 64.6) 19 (1, 60) 18 falling falling trend -21.9 (-37.8, -2.1)
Cameron Parish 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River Parish 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tensas Parish 7
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2022 6:55 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Cameron, Red River, Tensas

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top