Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Louisiana 7 *** 64.6 (63.6, 65.6) N/A 3,537 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 57.3 (57.1, 57.4) N/A 222,811 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
East Carroll Parish 7 *** 101.7 (73.0, 138.4) 1 (1, 57) 8 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.2, 5.2)
Red River Parish 7 *** 85.4 (63.8, 113.0) 4 (1, 62) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.7, 4.0)
Caldwell Parish 7 *** 99.7 (76.7, 128.1) 2 (1, 45) 13 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Catahoula Parish 7 *** 74.6 (54.7, 99.8) 19 (1, 64) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 3.2)
West Carroll Parish 7 *** 90.8 (70.4, 115.8) 3 (1, 55) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.7, 3.6)
Terrebonne Parish 7 *** 80.4 (73.4, 87.9) 8 (3, 33) 100 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.1)
La Salle Parish 7 *** 84.0 (66.3, 105.3) 7 (1, 58) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.0)
Union Parish 7 *** 80.0 (66.5, 95.7) 10 (1, 54) 27 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.5)
Vernon Parish 7 *** 84.8 (73.1, 97.7) 6 (1, 40) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Morehouse Parish 7 *** 79.1 (66.2, 94.0) 11 (1, 54) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
LaFourche Parish 7 *** 66.4 (59.8, 73.5) 42 (14, 58) 77 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.1)
Allen Parish 7 *** 64.9 (52.5, 79.5) 44 (5, 64) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Concordia Parish 7 *** 68.4 (54.8, 84.6) 36 (3, 64) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.1)
St. James Parish 7 *** 61.3 (48.8, 76.2) 51 (9, 64) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.5)
Acadia Parish 7 *** 76.1 (67.2, 85.8) 16 (3, 49) 55 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Beauregard Parish 7 *** 72.2 (61.3, 84.6) 28 (4, 58) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Claiborne Parish 7 *** 71.2 (56.2, 89.4) 32 (2, 64) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.8)
East Feliciana Parish 7 *** 74.5 (60.2, 91.6) 20 (2, 61) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.4, 1.9)
St. Landry Parish 7 *** 76.3 (68.8, 84.5) 15 (3, 43) 78 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Evangeline Parish 7 *** 74.1 (62.5, 87.3) 22 (3, 58) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Livingston Parish 7 *** 72.7 (66.4, 79.3) 25 (7, 47) 106 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Franklin Parish 7 *** 69.9 (56.3, 86.1) 33 (3, 63) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.9)
Jackson Parish 7 *** 84.8 (68.3, 104.5) 5 (1, 52) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Ouachita Parish 7 *** 71.9 (66.3, 77.8) 29 (10, 47) 127 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Tangipahoa Parish 7 *** 63.8 (57.9, 70.0) 46 (22, 60) 92 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Madison Parish 7 *** 65.1 (46.6, 88.8) 43 (2, 64) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.9, 1.8)
Plaquemines Parish 7 *** 72.9 (58.6, 89.8) 24 (2, 62) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.7, 1.6)
Avoyelles Parish 7 *** 74.7 (64.5, 86.2) 18 (3, 54) 40 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Bienville Parish 7 *** 67.3 (52.6, 85.6) 39 (3, 64) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.7, 1.4)
Caddo Parish 7 *** 69.3 (65.1, 73.6) 34 (17, 48) 217 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Jefferson Davis Parish 7 *** 77.2 (65.3, 90.7) 13 (2, 54) 31 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Natchitoches Parish 7 *** 61.1 (51.2, 72.5) 52 (15, 64) 28 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
St. Mary Parish 7 *** 71.4 (62.4, 81.4) 31 (6, 58) 47 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7 *** 74.1 (60.5, 89.9) 21 (2, 61) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
Bossier Parish 7 *** 63.1 (57.2, 69.4) 49 (23, 61) 87 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
De Soto Parish 7 *** 63.4 (52.1, 76.5) 48 (9, 64) 23 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.5)
Grant Parish 7 *** 75.4 (61.1, 92.1) 17 (1, 61) 20 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Webster Parish 7 *** 72.4 (62.7, 83.3) 27 (4, 58) 41 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Assumption Parish 7 *** 68.0 (55.0, 83.5) 37 (3, 64) 19 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.4)
Richland Parish 7 *** 79.1 (64.3, 96.5) 12 (1, 57) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
St. Martin Parish 7 *** 71.6 (62.3, 81.9) 30 (5, 56) 45 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Iberia Parish 7 *** 68.9 (61.1, 77.5) 35 (9, 58) 58 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Tensas Parish 7 *** 72.6 (48.8, 107.4) 26 (1, 64) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.7, 1.0)
Washington Parish 7 *** 67.8 (58.9, 77.9) 38 (8, 60) 43 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
West Feliciana Parish 7 *** 73.2 (56.9, 93.4) 23 (1, 64) 15 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.6, 1.0)
Calcasieu Parish 7 *** 66.4 (61.7, 71.3) 41 (20, 55) 155 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7 *** 50.6 (47.7, 53.7) 64 (57, 64) 239 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.3)
Rapides Parish 7 *** 61.9 (56.6, 67.7) 50 (27, 61) 101 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
St. Tammany Parish 7 *** 60.9 (57.0, 64.9) 53 (36, 60) 192 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.2)
Orleans Parish 7 *** 54.6 (51.5, 57.9) 60 (51, 64) 243 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Winn Parish 7 *** 64.6 (50.0, 82.8) 45 (4, 64) 13 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.3, 0.2)
Jefferson Parish 7 *** 60.1 (57.2, 63.2) 55 (40, 60) 332 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7 *** 59.3 (49.7, 70.2) 57 (20, 64) 29 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.1)
Lincoln Parish 7 *** 54.5 (45.5, 64.9) 61 (30, 64) 26 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.3)
St. Helena Parish 7 *** 60.3 (44.2, 81.4) 54 (4, 64) 9 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.4)
Lafayette Parish 7 *** 58.4 (54.0, 62.9) 58 (39, 62) 142 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.4)
Vermilion Parish 7 *** 66.8 (58.5, 76.0) 40 (10, 60) 48 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.4)
Ascension Parish 7 *** 63.6 (56.9, 70.8) 47 (20, 62) 72 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.6)
St. Charles Parish 7 *** 52.4 (44.0, 62.0) 62 (38, 64) 29 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.8)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7 *** 52.0 (41.3, 65.0) 63 (29, 64) 17 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.1)
Sabine Parish 7 *** 60.0 (48.6, 73.4) 56 (13, 64) 20 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.5, -1.8)
Cameron Parish 7 *** 56.7 (36.6, 84.9) 59 (3, 64) 5 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.1, -1.9)
Iberville Parish 7 *** 76.6 (64.8, 90.0) 14 (2, 55) 31 falling falling trend -5.8 (-10.1, -1.2)
St. Bernard Parish 7 *** 80.3 (68.5, 93.6) 9 (1, 49) 36 falling falling trend -16.5 (-26.5, -5.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/06/2022 12:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top