Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana 7 N/A 23.4 (22.8, 23.9) N/A 1,285 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 1.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.3 (17.2, 17.4) N/A 67,373 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Claiborne Parish 7 Rural 25.9 (16.8, 38.9) 23 (1, 60) 5 stable stable trend -33.3 (-62.4, 3.9)
Morehouse Parish 7 Urban 21.6 (14.7, 30.7) 49 (3, 60) 7 stable stable trend -13.0 (-39.8, 3.2)
Lincoln Parish 7 Rural 19.6 (14.2, 26.4) 56 (12, 60) 9 stable stable trend -6.8 (-20.1, 0.4)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7 Urban 21.7 (14.7, 31.3) 48 (3, 60) 7 falling falling trend -3.9 (-9.2, -0.9)
Orleans Parish 7 Urban 17.5 (15.7, 19.3) 60 (47, 60) 79 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.2, 0.9)
Calcasieu Parish 7 Urban 22.5 (19.9, 25.4) 42 (18, 56) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.4, 1.2)
St. Landry Parish 7 Rural 26.5 (21.9, 31.9) 18 (3, 52) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 1.6)
Rapides Parish 7 Urban 21.3 (18.1, 24.9) 51 (19, 59) 34 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 2.9)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7 Urban 30.2 (22.0, 40.6) 8 (1, 55) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.1, 4.6)
Natchitoches Parish 7 Rural 21.3 (15.4, 29.0) 50 (6, 60) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.0, 3.9)
Plaquemines Parish 7 Urban 22.2 (14.7, 32.2) 46 (3, 60) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.2, 5.5)
St. Charles Parish 7 Urban 23.4 (18.1, 29.8) 35 (5, 60) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 3.5)
St. Martin Parish 7 Urban 24.7 (19.4, 31.1) 32 (4, 58) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 3.0)
Ascension Parish 7 Urban 24.6 (20.8, 28.9) 33 (8, 54) 32 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.5)
Jackson Parish 7 Rural 23.4 (14.7, 35.8) 34 (2, 60) 5 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.4, 6.3)
Terrebonne Parish 7 Urban 26.2 (22.3, 30.7) 21 (5, 51) 33 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.2, 3.1)
East Feliciana Parish 7 Urban 20.2 (13.7, 29.4) 54 (6, 60) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.7, 5.4)
Iberia Parish 7 Rural 23.0 (18.5, 28.4) 37 (8, 59) 19 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.2)
Vernon Parish 7 Rural 18.4 (13.3, 24.9) 59 (18, 60) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 4.8)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7 Urban 22.2 (20.3, 24.2) 45 (24, 54) 110 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.9, 2.3)
St. Tammany Parish 7 Urban 23.3 (21.0, 25.9) 36 (17, 52) 78 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 3.2)
Jefferson Parish 7 Urban 22.6 (20.8, 24.6) 40 (23, 53) 125 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.8, 2.4)
Caddo Parish 7 Urban 20.6 (18.3, 23.1) 53 (29, 58) 63 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.8, 3.1)
LaFourche Parish 7 Urban 27.8 (23.5, 32.6) 12 (3, 47) 32 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.1, 4.0)
St. Helena Parish 7 Urban 22.3 (12.5, 37.5) 44 (2, 60) 3 stable stable trend 1.9 (-3.5, 8.9)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7 Urban 22.9 (17.2, 30.1) 38 (5, 60) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.1, 5.6)
Washington Parish 7 Rural 25.7 (19.8, 32.9) 26 (3, 58) 14 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 5.1)
Livingston Parish 7 Urban 25.3 (21.8, 29.2) 27 (7, 52) 39 stable stable trend 2.1 (0.0, 4.6)
Winn Parish 7 Rural 22.1 (13.2, 35.2) 47 (2, 60) 4 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.2, 7.7)
St. Bernard Parish 7 Urban 28.2 (21.1, 36.8) 10 (1, 57) 12 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.1, 5.2)
Iberville Parish 7 Urban 29.9 (22.5, 39.2) 9 (1, 54) 12 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.1, 5.9)
Lafayette Parish 7 Urban 26.3 (23.5, 29.3) 20 (8, 44) 69 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.3, 4.2)
Tangipahoa Parish 7 Urban 24.7 (21.2, 28.6) 31 (8, 54) 37 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.8, 4.8)
Ouachita Parish 7 Urban 22.7 (19.6, 26.1) 39 (15, 56) 42 rising rising trend 2.7 (1.0, 4.7)
Jefferson Davis Parish 7 Urban 27.4 (20.4, 36.3) 13 (1, 58) 11 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.1, 5.9)
St. Mary Parish 7 Rural 24.9 (19.5, 31.3) 30 (4, 58) 16 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.3, 7.1)
Sabine Parish 7 Rural 27.3 (18.9, 38.3) 14 (1, 60) 8 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.6, 5.8)
Acadia Parish 7 Urban 26.9 (21.5, 33.2) 16 (3, 54) 19 rising rising trend 3.1 (0.1, 6.7)
Avoyelles Parish 7 Rural 27.3 (20.9, 35.0) 15 (2, 57) 13 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.0, 5.7)
Bienville Parish 7 Rural 28.0 (17.7, 42.5) 11 (1, 60) 5 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.2, 7.5)
Richland Parish 7 Urban 25.8 (17.0, 37.6) 25 (1, 60) 6 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.8, 7.2)
Franklin Parish 7 Rural 26.7 (18.1, 38.2) 17 (1, 60) 7 rising rising trend 3.9 (0.7, 8.1)
Union Parish 7 Urban 32.5 (23.0, 44.9) 2 (1, 56) 9 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.8, 8.3)
Vermilion Parish 7 Urban 31.0 (25.3, 37.7) 6 (1, 40) 22 rising rising trend 4.0 (2.0, 6.4)
Beauregard Parish 7 Rural 26.2 (19.6, 34.5) 22 (2, 58) 11 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.1, 8.5)
Evangeline Parish 7 Rural 31.1 (23.1, 40.9) 5 (1, 53) 11 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.1, 8.2)
Allen Parish 7 Rural 32.3 (23.3, 43.8) 3 (1, 54) 9 rising rising trend 4.6 (1.6, 8.8)
Bossier Parish 7 Urban 22.6 (19.2, 26.5) 41 (12, 58) 32 rising rising trend 7.7 (0.3, 19.7)
Assumption Parish 7 Urban 32.1 (23.2, 43.7) 4 (1, 55) 9 rising rising trend 10.0 (1.1, 35.5)
Caldwell Parish 7 Rural 25.9 (14.4, 43.3) 24 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Cameron Parish 7 Urban 49.8 (28.1, 82.3) 1 (1, 56) 3
*
*
Concordia Parish 7 Rural 19.7 (12.0, 30.5) 55 (5, 60) 4
*
*
De Soto Parish 7 Urban 24.9 (17.8, 34.0) 29 (2, 60) 9
*
*
Grant Parish 7 Urban 18.5 (11.5, 28.2) 58 (7, 60) 4
*
*
La Salle Parish 7 Rural 26.4 (16.2, 40.8) 19 (1, 60) 4
*
*
Madison Parish 7 Rural 30.7 (17.6, 49.9) 7 (1, 60) 3
*
*
St. James Parish 7 Urban 21.0 (14.1, 30.6) 52 (4, 60) 6
*
*
Webster Parish 7 Rural 22.5 (17.0, 29.3) 43 (6, 60) 12
*
*
West Carroll Parish 7 Rural 25.2 (13.9, 42.4) 28 (1, 60) 3
*
*
West Feliciana Parish 7 Urban 18.6 (11.1, 29.9) 57 (6, 60) 4
*
*
Catahoula Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
East Carroll Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tensas Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/05/2024 2:07 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Catahoula, East Carroll, Red River, Tensas

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top