Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Louisiana by Parish

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
Parish
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Louisiana 7 N/A 18.9 (18.4, 19.5) N/A 1,019 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.5, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 18.5 (18.4, 18.6) N/A 71,542 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.5)
Jefferson Parish 7 Urban 20.2 (18.5, 22.0) 15 (7, 36) 110 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7 Urban 19.0 (17.2, 20.9) 29 (10, 41) 90 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.3)
St. Tammany Parish 7 Urban 22.0 (19.7, 24.5) 10 (2, 31) 72 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Orleans Parish 7 Urban 16.1 (14.4, 18.0) 44 (26, 50) 70 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Caddo Parish 7 Urban 18.0 (15.8, 20.3) 34 (12, 47) 54 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Lafayette Parish 7 Urban 19.6 (17.2, 22.3) 23 (6, 43) 50 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Calcasieu Parish 7 Urban 19.2 (16.7, 21.9) 27 (6, 45) 46 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Livingston Parish 7 Urban 21.7 (18.4, 25.5) 11 (2, 40) 31 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.4)
Ouachita Parish 7 Urban 17.1 (14.4, 20.1) 39 (12, 49) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 0.9)
Rapides Parish 7 Urban 18.4 (15.5, 21.8) 32 (7, 48) 29 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.7)
Tangipahoa Parish 7 Urban 19.1 (16.0, 22.7) 28 (5, 47) 28 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.8)
Terrebonne Parish 7 Urban 20.5 (17.0, 24.5) 14 (2, 44) 25 stable stable trend -11.5 (-27.9, 2.5)
LaFourche Parish 7 Urban 21.7 (18.0, 26.0) 12 (1, 42) 25 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.1)
Bossier Parish 7 Urban 17.2 (14.3, 20.6) 38 (11, 50) 25 stable stable trend -1.7 (-14.8, 0.4)
Ascension Parish 7 Urban 17.3 (14.1, 21.0) 37 (9, 50) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.8)
St. Landry Parish 7 Rural 19.4 (15.6, 24.0) 25 (3, 48) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.6)
Iberia Parish 7 Rural 19.5 (15.2, 24.5) 24 (2, 49) 15 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.1, 4.0)
St. Mary Parish 7 Rural 22.0 (16.9, 28.2) 9 (1, 46) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Vermilion Parish 7 Urban 19.9 (15.3, 25.5) 20 (2, 49) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.2)
Acadia Parish 7 Urban 18.2 (13.9, 23.5) 33 (3, 50) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.2, 1.8)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7 Urban 25.2 (19.0, 32.8) 2 (1, 42) 12 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.9, 5.5)
Washington Parish 7 Rural 20.1 (15.1, 26.3) 16 (1, 49) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
St. Martin Parish 7 Urban 18.9 (14.2, 24.7) 30 (2, 50) 12 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.3, 4.6)
Beauregard Parish 7 Rural 24.3 (18.0, 32.2) 3 (1, 46) 10 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.3, 8.0)
St. Charles Parish 7 Urban 17.3 (12.8, 23.0) 35 (3, 51) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.5)
Avoyelles Parish 7 Rural 20.0 (14.7, 26.6) 17 (1, 50) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.9, 3.1)
Evangeline Parish 7 Rural 25.8 (19.0, 34.3) 1 (1, 42) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.7)
Webster Parish 7 Rural 19.4 (14.1, 26.1) 26 (1, 50) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.6, 3.5)
De Soto Parish 7 Urban 22.6 (16.1, 31.0) 6 (1, 49) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 4.6)
St. Bernard Parish 7 Urban 19.9 (14.1, 27.2) 22 (1, 51) 8 falling falling trend -8.3 (-21.6, -2.8)
Lincoln Parish 7 Rural 15.9 (11.2, 21.9) 47 (5, 51) 8 stable stable trend 7.5 (-1.7, 28.2)
Natchitoches Parish 7 Rural 16.4 (11.4, 23.0) 42 (3, 51) 7
*
*
Vernon Parish 7 Rural 14.8 (10.3, 20.6) 48 (8, 51) 7 stable stable trend -28.9 (-57.9, 0.2)
Jefferson Davis Parish 7 Urban 16.7 (11.4, 23.7) 41 (3, 51) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.8, 2.6)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7 Urban 22.2 (14.7, 32.4) 8 (1, 51) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.8, 4.6)
Sabine Parish 7 Rural 21.4 (14.4, 30.9) 13 (1, 51) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-5.3, 3.6)
Allen Parish 7 Rural 23.3 (15.7, 33.4) 5 (1, 50) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.4, 3.9)
Iberville Parish 7 Urban 16.0 (10.6, 23.3) 45 (3, 51) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.5, 3.7)
Grant Parish 7 Urban 22.4 (14.9, 32.6) 7 (1, 51) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 3.1)
Morehouse Parish 7 Urban 14.1 (9.3, 20.9) 49 (9, 51) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.6, 1.7)
St. James Parish 7 Urban 19.9 (12.9, 29.7) 18 (1, 51) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.5, 4.6)
Union Parish 7 Urban 19.9 (12.6, 30.1) 21 (1, 51) 5 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.2, 6.9)
Assumption Parish 7 Urban 19.9 (12.8, 29.9) 19 (1, 51) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.3, 2.7)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7 Urban 16.4 (10.3, 24.8) 43 (2, 51) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.1, 2.4)
Winn Parish 7 Rural 24.1 (14.6, 37.7) 4 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Plaquemines Parish 7 Urban 17.3 (10.5, 26.8) 36 (1, 51) 4 falling falling trend -13.2 (-30.2, -5.6)
West Feliciana Parish 7 Urban 18.7 (11.1, 30.2) 31 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Jackson Parish 7 Rural 15.9 (9.4, 26.1) 46 (1, 51) 4
*
*
Richland Parish 7 Urban 13.0 (7.5, 21.2) 51 (7, 51) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.4, -0.4)
Concordia Parish 7 Rural 13.6 (7.8, 22.3) 50 (6, 51) 3
*
*
La Salle Parish 7 Rural 16.8 (9.5, 28.0) 40 (1, 51) 3
*
*
Bienville Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Caldwell Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cameron Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Catahoula Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
East Carroll Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
East Feliciana Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
St. Helena Parish 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tensas Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Carroll Parish 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/06/2024 4:14 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Bienville, Caldwell, Cameron, Catahoula, Claiborne, East Carroll, East Feliciana, Franklin, Madison, Red River, St. Helena, Tensas, West Carroll

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top