Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Colon & Rectum, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Louisiana 3,9 41.8 (40.7, 43.0) 1,107 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.8, 1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 35.5 (35.4, 35.7) 66,990 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.4)
Ascension Parish 7,9 26.8 (20.8, 34.0) 14 stable stable trend -9.2 (-27.3, 13.5)
Beauregard Parish 7,9 27.7 (18.3, 40.4) 6 stable stable trend 12.9 (-31.8, 86.9)
Lincoln Parish 7,9 30.3 (21.0, 42.4) 7 stable stable trend -22.2 (-40.4, 1.6)
Plaquemines Parish 7,9 31.7 (19.3, 49.3) 4 stable stable trend 2.1 (-42.8, 82.2)
Webster Parish 7,9 32.6 (23.8, 44.0) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-22.8, 32.7)
Bossier Parish 7,9 32.7 (26.8, 39.6) 21 stable stable trend -12.7 (-38.6, 24.0)
St. Charles Parish 7,9 36.0 (26.4, 48.0) 10 stable stable trend -15.7 (-39.8, 18.0)
Bienville Parish 7,9 36.0 (21.8, 57.4) 4 stable stable trend -3.9 (-61.9, 142.0)
La Salle Parish 7,9 36.3 (21.4, 58.8) 4 stable stable trend -17.1 (-51.0, 40.0)
LaFourche Parish 7,9 37.0 (30.2, 44.9) 21 stable stable trend 2.0 (-27.3, 43.2)
Jefferson Parish 7,9 37.0 (33.9, 40.5) 104 falling falling trend -10.1 (-18.7, -0.5)
Concordia Parish 7,9 37.1 (23.9, 55.6) 5 stable stable trend 6.8 (-35.6, 77.1)
Ouachita Parish 7,9 37.9 (32.4, 44.1) 34 stable stable trend -4.4 (-25.7, 23.0)
Claiborne Parish 7,9 38.3 (22.5, 61.7) 4 stable stable trend -17.2 (-37.7, 10.1)
West Carroll Parish 7,9 38.6 (21.5, 65.4) 3
*
*
Vernon Parish 7,9 39.1 (28.3, 52.6) 9 stable stable trend -3.0 (-30.2, 34.8)
St. Tammany Parish 7,9 39.3 (34.7, 44.3) 56 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.2, 7.5)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7,9 39.7 (36.1, 43.5) 95 falling falling trend -7.5 (-12.1, -2.7)
Orleans Parish 7,9 40.2 (36.3, 44.4) 81 stable stable trend -5.1 (-14.2, 5.1)
Washington Parish 7,9 40.6 (30.9, 52.6) 12 stable stable trend 7.6 (-12.1, 31.6)
Terrebonne Parish 7,9 40.7 (33.7, 48.7) 24 stable stable trend -2.5 (-17.9, 15.7)
St. James Parish 7,9 41.5 (27.4, 60.7) 6 stable stable trend -24.0 (-46.2, 7.4)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7,9 41.7 (30.5, 55.7) 10 stable stable trend -3.5 (-46.5, 74.0)
Tangipahoa Parish 7,9 41.8 (35.2, 49.3) 29 falling falling trend -8.4 (-12.0, -4.5)
Sabine Parish 7,9 42.6 (29.7, 59.8) 7 stable stable trend -9.2 (-40.6, 38.8)
Rapides Parish 7,9 42.6 (36.4, 49.6) 34 stable stable trend 4.7 (-15.2, 29.3)
Caddo Parish 7,9 43.8 (39.2, 48.7) 70 stable stable trend 3.7 (-5.7, 14.1)
Lafayette Parish 7,9 43.8 (38.5, 49.6) 51 stable stable trend 8.0 (-14.7, 36.7)
Livingston Parish 7,9 44.0 (37.1, 52.0) 29 stable stable trend -8.2 (-26.5, 14.7)
Franklin Parish 7,9 44.7 (30.3, 64.0) 7 rising rising trend 23.5 (3.7, 47.0)
Calcasieu Parish 7,9 44.9 (39.5, 50.9) 51 stable stable trend -0.6 (-15.3, 16.6)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7,9 45.0 (31.3, 63.3) 7 stable stable trend 6.5 (-0.6, 14.1)
De Soto Parish 7,9 45.0 (31.8, 62.2) 8 stable stable trend -10.2 (-28.3, 12.4)
Natchitoches Parish 7,9 45.4 (33.9, 59.7) 11 stable stable trend -17.6 (-44.0, 21.2)
Richland Parish 7,9 45.4 (30.4, 65.5) 6 stable stable trend -21.0 (-56.5, 43.2)
Union Parish 7,9 46.0 (31.5, 65.2) 7 stable stable trend 9.5 (-50.5, 142.2)
St. Bernard Parish 7,9 46.5 (32.8, 63.8) 8 stable stable trend -15.4 (-44.3, 28.4)
St. Mary Parish 7,9 46.7 (36.6, 58.8) 15 stable stable trend -5.9 (-24.7, 17.6)
Avoyelles Parish 7,9 46.7 (35.4, 60.7) 12 stable stable trend -3.4 (-27.3, 28.4)
Jackson Parish 7,9 47.0 (30.2, 70.7) 5 stable stable trend -11.7 (-36.4, 22.4)
Morehouse Parish 7,9 48.2 (35.4, 64.7) 10 stable stable trend -2.8 (-29.3, 33.6)
Madison Parish 7,9 48.2 (27.4, 79.0) 3
*
*
Allen Parish 7,9 48.7 (33.6, 68.6) 7 stable stable trend -9.7 (-32.7, 21.2)
St. Helena Parish 7,9 49.0 (28.1, 80.2) 3
*
*
Jefferson Davis Parish 7,9 49.3 (36.1, 65.9) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-6.0, 9.8)
Winn Parish 7,9 49.3 (30.3, 76.4) 4 rising rising trend 33.3 (0.8, 76.2)
Grant Parish 7,9 50.6 (33.5, 73.5) 6 stable stable trend 11.6 (-53.2, 166.1)
Iberville Parish 7,9 51.1 (37.5, 68.2) 10 stable stable trend -6.2 (-21.0, 11.4)
Acadia Parish 7,9 51.5 (41.5, 63.4) 19 stable stable trend -5.4 (-19.9, 11.7)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7,9 52.7 (36.6, 73.7) 7 stable stable trend 3.0 (-36.7, 67.6)
St. Landry Parish 7,9 53.5 (44.9, 63.5) 28 stable stable trend 12.6 (-8.3, 38.3)
St. Martin Parish 7,9 53.7 (42.2, 67.3) 16 stable stable trend -9.8 (-26.2, 10.4)
Iberia Parish 7,9 54.1 (44.5, 65.3) 23 stable stable trend 7.9 (-14.2, 35.8)
Vermilion Parish 7,9 55.6 (45.0, 68.1) 19 stable stable trend 7.9 (-7.5, 25.8)
East Feliciana Parish 7,9 58.3 (40.0, 82.8) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-21.8, 29.1)
Evangeline Parish 7,9 59.0 (44.5, 76.8) 11 stable stable trend 22.4 (-12.9, 72.0)
Assumption Parish 7,9 59.4 (42.3, 81.3) 8 stable stable trend -9.9 (-30.7, 17.2)
Catahoula Parish 7,9 68.4 (42.5, 105.7) 4 stable stable trend -33.4 (-56.0, 0.7)
East Carroll Parish 7,9 70.6 (40.3, 116.6) 3
*
*
Caldwell Parish 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cameron Parish 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River Parish 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tensas Parish 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
West Feliciana Parish 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/29/2016 11:32 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2015 submission.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top