Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2009-2013

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Louisiana 3,9 71.4 (70.3, 72.5) 3,486 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 62.4 (62.3, 62.6) 214,614 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.0, -2.0)
Acadia Parish 7,9 79.6 (70.2, 89.9) 53 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.7, 8.4)
Allen Parish 7,9 71.2 (57.6, 87.1) 19 stable stable trend -2.2 (-15.6, 13.3)
Ascension Parish 7,9 68.6 (60.9, 77.0) 63 stable stable trend -8.1 (-16.9, 1.7)
Assumption Parish 7,9 77.8 (63.4, 94.7) 21 stable stable trend 3.3 (-7.1, 14.9)
Avoyelles Parish 7,9 85.2 (74.0, 97.7) 42 stable stable trend -3.7 (-11.7, 5.0)
Beauregard Parish 7,9 76.4 (64.5, 89.9) 30 stable stable trend 3.9 (-10.7, 20.9)
Bienville Parish 7,9 82.0 (65.1, 102.6) 16 stable stable trend -4.7 (-21.2, 15.2)
Bossier Parish 7,9 75.3 (68.4, 82.6) 91 stable stable trend -1.0 (-11.6, 11.0)
Caddo Parish 7,9 69.0 (64.7, 73.4) 201 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.3, 3.6)
Calcasieu Parish 7,9 68.4 (63.4, 73.6) 145 stable stable trend -2.0 (-10.3, 6.9)
Caldwell Parish 7,9 95.2 (72.5, 123.2) 12 stable stable trend 7.0 (-7.1, 23.2)
Cameron Parish 7,9 64.1 (41.3, 95.6) 5 stable stable trend -10.2 (-34.3, 23.0)
Catahoula Parish 7,9 93.0 (70.5, 120.8) 12 stable stable trend 9.3 (-8.8, 31.0)
Claiborne Parish 7,9 69.5 (54.6, 87.6) 15 stable stable trend -9.0 (-17.3, 0.2)
Concordia Parish 7,9 76.7 (61.9, 94.2) 19 stable stable trend -2.5 (-26.8, 29.8)
De Soto Parish 7,9 80.7 (67.5, 95.8) 27 stable stable trend -9.1 (-33.5, 24.1)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7,9 56.4 (53.2, 59.8) 240 stable stable trend -3.9 (-11.9, 4.7)
East Carroll Parish 7,9 98.0 (69.9, 133.9) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-34.1, 50.0)
East Feliciana Parish 7,9 61.1 (47.6, 77.4) 15 stable stable trend 0.7 (-22.6, 31.0)
Evangeline Parish 7,9 81.8 (69.1, 96.1) 30 stable stable trend 2.2 (-14.0, 21.4)
Franklin Parish 7,9 77.2 (62.9, 94.0) 21 stable stable trend -2.1 (-23.4, 25.2)
Grant Parish 7,9 100.8 (83.2, 121.0) 24 stable stable trend -9.2 (-27.7, 13.9)
Iberia Parish 7,9 78.2 (69.5, 87.7) 60 stable stable trend -4.0 (-18.5, 13.2)
Iberville Parish 7,9 92.2 (78.7, 107.5) 34 stable stable trend 2.2 (-7.3, 12.8)
Jackson Parish 7,9 80.5 (64.3, 99.9) 18 stable stable trend -12.9 (-33.4, 13.8)
Jefferson Davis Parish 7,9 81.8 (69.4, 96.0) 31 stable stable trend -5.3 (-18.5, 10.0)
Jefferson Parish 7,9 67.4 (64.1, 70.7) 340 stable stable trend -2.7 (-11.7, 7.2)
La Salle Parish 7,9 87.6 (69.3, 109.4) 16 falling falling trend -5.6 (-9.2, -1.8)
LaFourche Parish 7,9 70.9 (63.8, 78.7) 73 stable stable trend -13.1 (-24.6, 0.2)
Lafayette Parish 7,9 69.9 (64.8, 75.3) 145 stable stable trend 1.3 (-8.4, 12.1)
Lincoln Parish 7,9 60.7 (50.7, 72.1) 27 stable stable trend -11.2 (-25.6, 5.9)
Livingston Parish 7,9 81.6 (74.3, 89.4) 98 stable stable trend 5.8 (-5.1, 18.1)
Madison Parish 7,9 66.7 (47.9, 90.4) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-22.6, 29.0)
Morehouse Parish 7,9 76.1 (63.5, 90.6) 27 stable stable trend 3.1 (-4.9, 11.9)
Natchitoches Parish 7,9 66.0 (55.6, 77.9) 29 stable stable trend -6.9 (-31.1, 25.8)
Orleans Parish 7,9 67.6 (63.7, 71.6) 242 stable stable trend -2.2 (-8.7, 4.8)
Ouachita Parish 7,9 78.3 (72.2, 84.7) 126 stable stable trend -2.6 (-7.0, 2.0)
Plaquemines Parish 7,9 70.4 (55.9, 87.6) 17 stable stable trend 6.6 (-29.2, 60.4)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7,9 53.5 (42.5, 66.8) 17 stable stable trend 1.3 (-27.1, 40.8)
Rapides Parish 7,9 68.9 (63.0, 75.2) 103 stable stable trend 2.1 (-12.0, 18.5)
Red River Parish 7,9 57.9 (39.2, 82.9) 6 stable stable trend -3.8 (-38.6, 50.6)
Richland Parish 7,9 79.0 (64.0, 96.7) 19 stable stable trend -1.5 (-11.0, 9.0)
Sabine Parish 7,9 66.5 (54.6, 80.4) 23 falling falling trend -10.5 (-18.1, -2.2)
St. Bernard Parish 7,9 97.4 (82.5, 114.1) 33 stable stable trend -2.7 (-10.0, 5.2)
St. Charles Parish 7,9 71.2 (60.9, 82.8) 36 stable stable trend -6.7 (-22.0, 11.4)
St. Helena Parish 7,9 64.3 (46.8, 86.7) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-20.5, 19.1)
St. James Parish 7,9 58.0 (45.2, 73.5) 14 stable stable trend 3.7 (-13.6, 24.6)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7,9 61.6 (51.3, 73.3) 27 stable stable trend -12.4 (-34.6, 17.2)
St. Landry Parish 7,9 80.3 (72.3, 88.9) 76 stable stable trend -1.0 (-11.2, 10.4)
St. Martin Parish 7,9 75.1 (65.0, 86.3) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-15.9, 18.2)
St. Mary Parish 7,9 66.6 (57.6, 76.7) 40 stable stable trend -13.2 (-27.8, 4.3)
St. Tammany Parish 7,9 67.3 (62.9, 72.0) 179 stable stable trend -1.9 (-8.8, 5.5)
Tangipahoa Parish 7,9 79.3 (72.3, 86.8) 100 stable stable trend 2.3 (-11.2, 17.7)
Tensas Parish 7,9 58.5 (35.4, 92.7) 4 stable stable trend -15.2 (-29.9, 2.6)
Terrebonne Parish 7,9 76.2 (69.0, 84.0) 86 stable stable trend 1.6 (-10.8, 15.6)
Union Parish 7,9 78.9 (65.3, 94.9) 24 stable stable trend -3.2 (-17.0, 12.9)
Vermilion Parish 7,9 77.5 (68.0, 88.0) 49 stable stable trend -4.1 (-13.1, 5.9)
Vernon Parish 7,9 91.7 (79.1, 105.7) 39 stable stable trend 6.7 (-9.5, 25.8)
Washington Parish 7,9 92.0 (81.1, 104.0) 53 stable stable trend -1.1 (-11.2, 10.2)
Webster Parish 7,9 86.3 (75.3, 98.4) 46 stable stable trend -1.5 (-15.8, 15.3)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7,9 71.5 (56.9, 88.6) 18 stable stable trend 1.8 (-10.9, 16.2)
West Carroll Parish 7,9 78.5 (59.5, 102.0) 12 stable stable trend -5.4 (-24.7, 18.8)
West Feliciana Parish 7,9 80.1 (61.5, 102.9) 14 stable stable trend 16.3 (-18.8, 66.6)
Winn Parish 7,9 80.3 (62.9, 101.4) 15 stable stable trend -7.7 (-23.4, 11.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/31/2016 9:52 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2015 data submission and SEER November 2015 submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics.
3 Source: SEER November 2015 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2015 submission.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2015 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2014 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2015 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top