Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Maryland by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Maryland 6 N/A 446.8 (444.6, 449.0) N/A 33,374 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 444.4 (444.1, 444.7) N/A 1,744,459 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Anne Arundel County 6 Urban 457.4 (450.2, 464.8) 17 (14, 19) 3,173 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
Baltimore City 6 Urban 479.2 (471.6, 486.9) 13 (7, 16) 3,230 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Baltimore County 6 Urban 479.9 (473.9, 485.9) 11 (7, 16) 5,234 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.4)
Calvert County 6 Urban 480.5 (462.0, 499.5) 10 (3, 17) 547 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.8, 6.4)
Carroll County 6 Urban 493.3 (480.0, 506.9) 7 (2, 14) 1,115 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.3)
Cecil County 6 Urban 499.0 (481.2, 517.3) 5 (2, 14) 645 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.4, 0.2)
Charles County 6 Urban 439.1 (425.2, 453.3) 20 (17, 21) 806 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Frederick County 6 Urban 444.0 (433.4, 454.9) 19 (16, 20) 1,392 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 3.5)
Harford County 6 Urban 495.2 (484.2, 506.5) 6 (2, 12) 1,619 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.0, -0.2)
Howard County 6 Urban 415.0 (405.7, 424.5) 21 (21, 22) 1,561 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 394.2 (389.2, 399.2) 23 (22, 24) 5,034 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 3.4)
Prince Georges County 6 Urban 391.2 (385.7, 396.7) 24 (22, 24) 4,218 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Queen Annes County 6 Urban 479.8 (456.0, 504.6) 12 (2, 19) 334 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Somerset County 6 Urban 504.2 (468.5, 542.2) 3 (1, 17) 158 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
St. Marys County 6 Urban 472.6 (455.3, 490.5) 16 (6, 18) 592 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Washington County 6 Urban 454.6 (441.1, 468.3) 18 (13, 20) 911 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Wicomico County 6 Urban 509.0 (490.7, 527.8) 2 (1, 10) 626 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Allegany County 6 Rural 535.4 (514.3, 557.3) 1 (1, 4) 526 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
Caroline County 6 Rural 484.5 (454.7, 515.8) 9 (2, 19) 210 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
Dorchester County 6 Rural 492.5 (463.3, 523.3) 8 (1, 18) 240 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Garrett County 6 Rural 403.6 (376.2, 432.8) 22 (19, 24) 181 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Kent County 6 Rural 474.4 (437.7, 513.7) 14 (2, 20) 154 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Talbot County 6 Rural 472.8 (447.0, 500.0) 15 (3, 20) 321 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Worcester County 6 Rural 500.3 (477.9, 523.7) 4 (1, 15) 461 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/07/2024 10:58 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top