Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Maryland by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Maryland 6 N/A 485.7 (482.3, 489.1) N/A 16,644 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 481.1 (480.6, 481.5) N/A 888,315 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.0, 0.0)
Worcester County 6 Rural 536.6 (504.7, 570.5) 10 (2, 17) 243 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Wicomico County 6 Urban 582.0 (553.3, 611.9) 2 (1, 8) 331 falling falling trend -1.4 (-5.1, -0.5)
Washington County 6 Urban 476.4 (456.6, 496.8) 20 (14, 21) 457 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Talbot County 6 Rural 504.9 (467.9, 544.7) 15 (4, 20) 164 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
St. Marys County 6 Urban 510.7 (484.9, 537.5) 14 (6, 19) 314 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Somerset County 6 Urban 570.9 (516.7, 629.5) 3 (1, 16) 88 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Queen Annes County 6 Urban 514.9 (480.3, 551.6) 13 (4, 20) 179 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Prince Georges County 6 Urban 428.8 (420.1, 437.7) 22 (21, 23) 2,039 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 412.9 (405.4, 420.6) 24 (23, 24) 2,421 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.3, 3.8)
Kent County 6 Rural 559.7 (504.2, 620.5) 4 (1, 17) 87 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Howard County 6 Urban 440.2 (426.0, 454.8) 21 (20, 23) 779 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Harford County 6 Urban 541.6 (524.4, 559.2) 7 (3, 13) 818 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Garrett County 6 Rural 425.9 (386.5, 468.7) 23 (19, 24) 94 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Frederick County 6 Urban 479.1 (462.8, 495.9) 19 (14, 21) 700 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 1.2)
Dorchester County 6 Rural 537.5 (494.3, 584.0) 9 (1, 19) 126 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Charles County 6 Urban 481.4 (459.4, 504.2) 18 (13, 21) 402 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Cecil County 6 Urban 535.3 (508.7, 562.9) 11 (2, 16) 337 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Carroll County 6 Urban 548.9 (528.5, 569.9) 5 (2, 13) 590 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Caroline County 6 Rural 504.4 (460.3, 551.8) 16 (3, 21) 104 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Calvert County 6 Urban 538.8 (510.3, 568.5) 8 (2, 16) 293 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.8, 8.5)
Baltimore County 6 Urban 519.9 (510.7, 529.3) 12 (9, 16) 2,552 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Baltimore City 6 Urban 546.1 (533.6, 558.7) 6 (3, 12) 1,596 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Anne Arundel County 6 Urban 491.5 (480.4, 502.8) 17 (13, 20) 1,593 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Allegany County 6 Rural 583.1 (552.1, 615.5) 1 (1, 8) 276 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/14/2024 12:56 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top