Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Maryland by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Maryland 6 N/A 24.5 (24.0, 25.0) N/A 1,791 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.7, 2.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 22.7 (22.6, 22.8) N/A 86,630 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.5)
Worcester County 6 Rural 52.9 (45.5, 61.3) 1 (1, 4) 47 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.3, 12.5)
Queen Annes County 6 Urban 46.9 (39.4, 55.6) 2 (1, 7) 31 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 4.6)
Kent County 6 Rural 41.7 (30.7, 55.8) 3 (1, 16) 12 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.5, 10.2)
Carroll County 6 Urban 41.4 (37.5, 45.7) 4 (2, 8) 88 stable stable trend -6.3 (-15.1, 2.5)
Calvert County 6 Urban 41.1 (35.7, 47.1) 5 (2, 9) 45 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 4.0)
Harford County 6 Urban 39.6 (36.4, 42.9) 6 (2, 9) 126 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.7, 3.6)
Talbot County 6 Rural 37.5 (30.9, 45.4) 7 (2, 15) 27 falling falling trend -10.2 (-20.4, -3.7)
Anne Arundel County 6 Urban 36.3 (34.3, 38.5) 8 (5, 10) 244 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.4, 2.9)
Cecil County 6 Urban 35.0 (30.3, 40.2) 9 (4, 15) 43 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.6, 5.3)
Somerset County 6 Urban 29.9 (21.5, 40.7) 10 (3, 21) 9 stable stable trend 1.5 (-2.1, 5.4)
Allegany County 6 Rural 29.8 (24.8, 35.7) 11 (7, 19) 27 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.1, 9.2)
Frederick County 6 Urban 29.8 (27.1, 32.7) 12 (9, 18) 93 rising rising trend 4.3 (2.0, 11.2)
Washington County 6 Urban 29.1 (25.7, 32.9) 13 (9, 19) 56 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.6, 12.2)
Howard County 6 Urban 28.8 (26.4, 31.4) 14 (10, 18) 109 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Baltimore County 6 Urban 28.8 (27.4, 30.4) 15 (10, 18) 309 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.8, 2.6)
Wicomico County 6 Urban 28.8 (24.5, 33.7) 16 (8, 19) 34 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.1)
Garrett County 6 Rural 28.5 (21.3, 37.5) 17 (6, 21) 12 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.6, 8.1)
St. Marys County 6 Urban 24.2 (20.3, 28.7) 18 (12, 21) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.3)
Dorchester County 6 Rural 23.0 (17.0, 30.7) 19 (10, 22) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.0, 4.0)
Caroline County 6 Rural 20.8 (14.9, 28.4) 20 (12, 22) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.3, 3.6)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 20.5 (19.4, 21.7) 21 (18, 21) 262 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Charles County 6 Urban 15.3 (12.9, 18.2) 22 (21, 22) 29 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.8, 4.9)
Baltimore City 6 Urban 10.9 (9.8, 12.2) 23 (23, 23) 72 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.7, 3.5)
Prince Georges County 6 Urban 5.6 (5.0, 6.3) 24 (24, 24) 57 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/09/2024 9:31 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top