Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Maryland by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Maryland 6 132.7 (130.9, 134.5) N/A 4,657 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.9, 6.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 109.9 (109.7, 110.2) N/A 211,245 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.8, 4.6)
Allegany County 6 125.4 (111.9, 140.3) 11 (3, 22) 64 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.1)
Anne Arundel County 6 113.9 (108.7, 119.3) 19 (14, 23) 382 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.6, 8.3)
Baltimore City 6 142.6 (136.5, 149.0) 4 (2, 9) 440 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.5, 7.9)
Baltimore County 6 136.0 (131.4, 140.8) 6 (3, 12) 681 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Calvert County 6 119.7 (107.0, 133.6) 17 (6, 23) 70 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.5, 0.0)
Caroline County 6 124.1 (103.5, 147.8) 16 (2, 24) 27 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.8)
Carroll County 6 130.6 (121.1, 140.8) 8 (3, 17) 148 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Cecil County 6 113.4 (101.9, 126.0) 20 (10, 24) 76 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.9)
Charles County 6 160.0 (147.5, 173.2) 1 (1, 5) 134 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.5)
Dorchester County 6 133.8 (113.4, 157.3) 7 (1, 22) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.8)
Frederick County 6 112.1 (104.3, 120.5) 21 (13, 24) 162 stable stable trend 2.9 (-3.8, 10.2)
Garrett County 6 97.3 (79.5, 118.5) 24 (13, 24) 22 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.3, -0.8)
Harford County 6 124.3 (116.4, 132.6) 14 (6, 20) 198 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.8, -2.2)
Howard County 6 129.9 (122.3, 137.8) 9 (5, 17) 238 stable stable trend 10.6 (-1.0, 23.5)
Kent County 6 124.8 (101.7, 153.1) 13 (1, 24) 21 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.2)
Montgomery County 6 117.5 (113.5, 121.5) 18 (12, 21) 700 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.1, 6.0)
Prince Georges County 6 153.1 (147.9, 158.4) 2 (1, 4) 719 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.0)
Queen Annes County 6 128.9 (112.6, 147.2) 10 (3, 22) 47 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.2, 0.4)
Somerset County 6 125.1 (101.6, 152.8) 12 (1, 24) 21 stable stable trend 11.4 (-16.1, 47.8)
St. Marys County 6 103.1 (91.9, 115.3) 23 (16, 24) 65 stable stable trend 7.6 (-3.0, 19.4)
Talbot County 6 144.1 (125.1, 165.7) 3 (1, 17) 47 stable stable trend 17.4 (-2.1, 40.9)
Washington County 6 105.2 (96.1, 114.9) 22 (16, 24) 103 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.9, -1.7)
Wicomico County 6 138.9 (125.3, 153.6) 5 (1, 16) 81 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.2)
Worcester County 6 124.2 (110.1, 140.0) 15 (4, 22) 60 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 1.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/27/2023 6:55 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top