Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Maryland by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Maryland 6 16.0 (15.6, 16.4) N/A 1,141 rising rising trend 2.6 (1.0, 4.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 17.3 (17.3, 17.4) N/A 66,203 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Somerset County 6 18.6 (12.0, 27.6) 11 (1, 24) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.1, 2.1)
Howard County 6 12.8 (11.2, 14.6) 23 (18, 24) 47 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Talbot County 6 13.2 (9.4, 18.3) 22 (9, 24) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.9, 3.1)
Calvert County 6 16.8 (13.4, 20.8) 19 (3, 23) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.0, 2.7)
Montgomery County 6 11.3 (10.4, 12.2) 24 (22, 24) 138 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Frederick County 6 16.9 (14.8, 19.2) 18 (6, 21) 51 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Queen Annes County 6 17.7 (13.4, 23.1) 15 (1, 23) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.9, 3.5)
Anne Arundel County 6 14.6 (13.3, 16.0) 20 (15, 23) 98 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Baltimore County 6 17.8 (16.6, 19.1) 14 (6, 18) 181 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.7)
Allegany County 6 20.7 (16.5, 25.6) 2 (1, 19) 19 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 3.8)
Carroll County 6 18.0 (15.4, 20.8) 13 (3, 20) 39 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.0, 3.3)
Charles County 6 16.9 (14.2, 20.0) 17 (4, 22) 30 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.9, 3.4)
Harford County 6 19.5 (17.3, 21.9) 6 (2, 17) 60 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.2)
Wicomico County 6 19.1 (15.6, 23.1) 9 (1, 21) 22 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.8, 3.7)
Prince Georges County 6 14.4 (13.3, 15.5) 21 (16, 23) 146 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.3, 2.8)
Baltimore City 6 19.4 (17.9, 21.0) 7 (2, 16) 129 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.6, 2.7)
Worcester County 6 18.5 (14.1, 23.9) 12 (1, 23) 16 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 4.8)
Dorchester County 6 26.6 (20.1, 34.7) 1 (1, 14) 13 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.7, 6.1)
Washington County 6 20.1 (17.2, 23.3) 3 (1, 17) 38 rising rising trend 2.3 (1.0, 3.7)
Cecil County 6 20.0 (16.5, 24.0) 4 (1, 19) 25 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.6, 5.0)
Garrett County 6 19.5 (13.8, 27.1) 5 (1, 23) 9 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.2, 6.7)
Kent County 6 18.9 (12.2, 28.5) 10 (1, 24) 6 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.0, 8.2)
Caroline County 6 17.2 (11.6, 24.7) 16 (1, 24) 6 stable stable trend 3.6 (-1.4, 8.8)
St. Marys County 6 19.3 (15.9, 23.3) 8 (1, 20) 23 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.1, 7.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/29/2022 5:07 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top