Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 6 16.4 (16.1, 16.7) N/A 2,056 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 17.2 (17.1, 17.2) N/A 65,490 rising rising trend 1.2 (1.0, 1.7)
Iosco County 6 9.1 (5.8, 14.4) 73 (46, 73) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-6.1, 5.3)
Houghton County 6 10.7 (6.3, 17.1) 72 (15, 73) 4 stable stable trend -2.7 (-8.1, 2.6)
Marquette County 6 11.4 (8.5, 15.2) 71 (36, 73) 11 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.1, 1.8)
Cheboygan County 6 12.1 (7.7, 18.7) 70 (13, 73) 6 falling falling trend -8.3 (-28.5, -1.8)
Antrim County 6 12.4 (7.8, 19.5) 69 (11, 73) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-5.9, 9.0)
St. Joseph County 6 12.6 (9.2, 17.0) 68 (21, 73) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.1, 4.3)
Branch County 6 13.1 (9.2, 18.2) 67 (13, 73) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.8, 6.5)
Livingston County 6 13.3 (11.3, 15.5) 66 (37, 72) 34 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.1)
Charlevoix County 6 13.9 (8.5, 21.7) 65 (4, 73) 5 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.2, 6.1)
Monroe County 6 14.0 (11.7, 16.7) 64 (23, 71) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.9, 3.5)
Cass County 6 14.1 (10.3, 18.9) 63 (13, 73) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.1, 3.0)
Ottawa County 6 14.3 (12.4, 16.3) 62 (30, 69) 45 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.8)
Ogemaw County 6 14.3 (8.7, 22.7) 61 (3, 73) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-4.2, 8.3)
Otsego County 6 14.3 (8.8, 22.2) 60 (3, 73) 5 stable stable trend -24.0 (-42.6, 2.9)
Emmet County 6 14.3 (10.1, 20.1) 59 (9, 73) 8 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.9, 9.1)
Grand Traverse County 6 14.6 (11.6, 18.1) 58 (15, 72) 19 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.2, 2.5)
Ionia County 6 14.7 (11.0, 19.3) 57 (10, 73) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.8)
Clinton County 6 15.0 (11.7, 19.0) 56 (12, 72) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.8, 3.5)
Oakland County 6 15.0 (14.2, 15.9) 55 (37, 63) 241 falling falling trend -2.0 (-6.8, -0.6)
Washtenaw County 6 15.1 (13.4, 17.1) 54 (24, 67) 57 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.3)
Midland County 6 15.3 (12.0, 19.2) 53 (11, 71) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.5)
Crawford County 6 15.7 (9.0, 26.8) 52 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-6.6, 6.5)
Gogebic County 6 16.0 (8.9, 27.1) 51 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Alcona County 6 16.0 (9.9, 28.6) 50 (2, 73) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-6.1, 9.1)
Muskegon County 6 16.0 (13.6, 18.7) 49 (14, 67) 35 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.1, 4.8)
Gratiot County 6 16.0 (11.4, 21.9) 48 (4, 73) 8 stable stable trend 2.3 (-2.3, 8.2)
Eaton County 6 16.0 (13.1, 19.5) 47 (10, 69) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.7, 3.1)
Lenawee County 6 16.2 (13.1, 19.9) 46 (9, 69) 21 stable stable trend -5.2 (-33.4, 2.8)
Macomb County 6 16.3 (15.2, 17.4) 45 (24, 57) 181 falling falling trend -3.3 (-9.3, -0.3)
Kalamazoo County 6 16.3 (14.3, 18.6) 44 (14, 64) 48 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 2.0)
Ingham County 6 16.5 (14.4, 18.8) 43 (15, 64) 49 rising rising trend 10.8 (3.5, 18.4)
Wayne County 6 16.5 (15.7, 17.3) 42 (24, 53) 344 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.6, -1.4)
Lapeer County 6 16.5 (13.3, 20.3) 41 (8, 69) 21 stable stable trend 2.1 (-8.4, 13.2)
Leelanau County 6 16.6 (10.4, 25.7) 40 (1, 73) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-7.2, 6.8)
Benzie County 6 16.7 (10.2, 26.4) 39 (1, 73) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.7, 6.4)
Dickinson County 6 16.7 (11.1, 24.4) 38 (2, 73) 7
*
*
Jackson County 6 16.8 (14.2, 19.6) 37 (11, 64) 34 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.4)
Kent County 6 17.1 (15.7, 18.6) 36 (16, 54) 120 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 2.5)
Osceola County 6 17.1 (11.2, 25.4) 35 (1, 73) 6 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.6, 2.0)
Mason County 6 17.1 (11.3, 25.1) 34 (1, 73) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.4, 7.1)
Hillsdale County 6 17.2 (12.6, 23.0) 33 (3, 72) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.3, 1.4)
Huron County 6 17.4 (12.1, 24.5) 32 (2, 72) 9 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.0, 8.5)
Berrien County 6 17.4 (14.8, 20.3) 31 (9, 63) 36 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 3.1)
Manistee County 6 17.4 (11.7, 25.4) 30 (1, 73) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.9, 6.1)
Calhoun County 6 17.5 (14.6, 20.7) 29 (7, 64) 29 rising rising trend 11.9 (1.0, 25.7)
Genesee County 6 17.6 (15.9, 19.3) 28 (13, 54) 89 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.1, 2.5)
Sanilac County 6 17.8 (12.8, 24.2) 27 (2, 71) 10 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.7, 7.0)
Montmorency County 6 17.8 (10.4, 31.9) 26 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.7, 6.1)
Barry County 6 17.8 (13.7, 22.8) 25 (3, 69) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.7, 7.0)
Isabella County 6 17.9 (13.5, 23.2) 24 (3, 70) 12 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.2, 6.7)
Allegan County 6 18.2 (15.0, 21.8) 23 (4, 63) 26 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.2, 5.1)
Chippewa County 6 18.2 (13.2, 24.8) 22 (2, 71) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-4.4, 7.9)
St. Clair County 6 18.3 (15.7, 21.1) 21 (6, 58) 40 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.8)
Van Buren County 6 18.6 (14.9, 23.1) 20 (3, 65) 19 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.5, 8.7)
Tuscola County 6 18.9 (14.6, 24.2) 19 (2, 67) 14 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.4, 6.6)
Lake County 6 19.3 (9.4, 35.5) 18 (1, 73) 3 stable stable trend -2.0 (-13.5, 9.9)
Arenac County 6 19.5 (11.3, 31.9) 17 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.1, 5.8)
Gladwin County 6 19.7 (13.9, 27.7) 16 (1, 71) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.0, 6.7)
Newaygo County 6 20.2 (15.2, 26.5) 15 (1, 67) 13 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.6, 5.7)
Wexford County 6 20.6 (14.8, 28.1) 14 (1, 68) 9 stable stable trend 3.0 (-1.3, 8.5)
Delta County 6 20.7 (14.8, 28.2) 13 (1, 68) 10 rising rising trend 6.8 (3.3, 11.9)
Shiawassee County 6 20.7 (16.6, 25.7) 12 (1, 58) 19 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 4.1)
Menominee County 6 21.0 (14.0, 30.5) 11 (1, 72) 7
*
*
Alger County 6 21.0 (12.0, 36.6) 10 (1, 73) 3
*
*
Saginaw County 6 21.1 (18.5, 24.0) 9 (2, 35) 53 stable stable trend 6.5 (-6.4, 20.3)
Oceana County 6 21.4 (14.6, 30.4) 8 (1, 70) 8 stable stable trend 0.6 (-5.8, 8.3)
Clare County 6 21.6 (15.6, 29.4) 7 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.8, 6.1)
Montcalm County 6 21.6 (17.2, 26.9) 6 (1, 52) 18 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.6, 7.0)
Alpena County 6 21.7 (15.1, 30.3) 5 (1, 69) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-5.1, 6.6)
Roscommon County 6 21.7 (14.9, 31.2) 4 (1, 70) 10 rising rising trend 5.0 (2.4, 8.1)
Bay County 6 22.6 (19.0, 26.6) 3 (1, 36) 32 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.1, 6.8)
Kalkaska County 6 24.7 (16.0, 36.7) 2 (1, 68) 6
*
*
Mecosta County 6 27.3 (20.8, 35.4) 1 (1, 38) 13 rising rising trend 5.5 (1.7, 10.8)
Baraga County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keweenaw County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luce County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mackinac County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Missaukee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ontonagon County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oscoda County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presque Isle County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schoolcraft County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 10:11 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top