Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 5 *** 229.3 (227.9, 230.6) N/A 24,481 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 227.6 (227.4, 227.9) N/A 750,329 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Roscommon County 6 *** 280.2 (248.4, 315.6) 1 (1, 34) 83 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.2)
Arenac County 6 *** 276.8 (240.2, 318.1) 2 (1, 51) 52 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Oscoda County 6 *** 268.9 (216.3, 331.5) 3 (1, 78) 25 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.2)
Wexford County 6 *** 262.2 (237.5, 289.0) 4 (1, 51) 94 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Benzie County 6 *** 257.9 (223.4, 296.6) 5 (1, 72) 51 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
Wayne County 7 *** 255.7 (252.3, 259.1) 6 (3, 16) 4,753 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Montmorency County 6 *** 254.9 (206.2, 313.1) 7 (1, 80) 29 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.0)
Osceola County 6 *** 254.7 (226.2, 286.0) 8 (1, 64) 67 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Kalkaska County 6 *** 252.7 (220.9, 288.3) 9 (1, 70) 53 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Leelanau County 6 *** 250.5 (217.3, 287.6) 10 (1, 73) 58 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.4, 3.3)
Missaukee County 6 *** 249.7 (214.7, 289.1) 11 (1, 75) 43 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.3)
Sanilac County 6 *** 249.0 (227.4, 272.2) 12 (1, 56) 116 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.4)
Clare County 6 *** 248.3 (222.9, 276.1) 13 (1, 65) 86 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Bay County 6 *** 247.1 (233.6, 261.1) 14 (3, 45) 289 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.2)
Macomb County 7 *** 246.5 (241.9, 251.2) 15 (7, 26) 2,362 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.6, -0.1)
Ogemaw County 6 *** 245.0 (215.2, 278.2) 16 (1, 74) 64 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.5)
Shiawassee County 6 *** 241.8 (225.5, 259.1) 17 (3, 56) 185 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Tuscola County 6 *** 241.1 (222.6, 260.8) 18 (3, 61) 146 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.2)
Otsego County 6 *** 240.6 (213.4, 270.7) 19 (1, 76) 65 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)
Grand Traverse County 6 *** 238.0 (224.2, 252.6) 20 (5, 57) 252 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
St. Clair County 6 *** 237.8 (227.3, 248.7) 21 (8, 48) 437 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Jackson County 6 *** 237.5 (226.9, 248.5) 22 (7, 51) 418 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Oakland County 7 *** 237.4 (233.6, 241.2) 23 (15, 37) 3,289 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Crawford County 6 *** 236.8 (201.5, 277.2) 24 (1, 80) 40 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Ionia County 6 *** 236.1 (219.5, 253.7) 25 (4, 65) 160 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.8)
Gladwin County 6 *** 235.5 (208.9, 264.9) 26 (1, 76) 72 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Huron County 6 *** 235.3 (210.8, 262.1) 27 (2, 75) 85 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Eaton County 6 *** 233.5 (220.7, 246.9) 28 (8, 61) 280 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Alcona County 6 *** 233.1 (186.4, 289.5) 29 (1, 83) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.5)
Newaygo County 6 *** 233.0 (213.6, 253.8) 30 (4, 71) 124 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8)
Midland County 6 *** 232.8 (218.3, 248.1) 31 (7, 65) 211 rising rising trend 6.1 (2.1, 10.3)
Berrien County 6 *** 232.4 (221.6, 243.6) 32 (11, 57) 393 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Gratiot County 6 *** 232.2 (211.5, 254.5) 33 (4, 74) 98 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Saginaw County 6 *** 232.1 (222.4, 242.1) 34 (13, 57) 487 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Genesee County 6 *** 231.7 (225.1, 238.5) 35 (16, 51) 1,028 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Luce County 6 *** 230.5 (182.6, 288.9) 36 (1, 83) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.7, 4.0)
Charlevoix County 6 *** 229.0 (202.3, 258.6) 37 (3, 78) 66 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.8)
Hillsdale County 6 *** 227.9 (208.2, 249.1) 38 (6, 76) 114 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Lapeer County 6 *** 227.9 (214.1, 242.4) 39 (10, 68) 237 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Muskegon County 6 *** 227.5 (217.5, 237.9) 40 (16, 63) 429 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Menominee County 6 *** 227.3 (200.8, 256.6) 41 (3, 79) 66 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.6, 5.3)
Van Buren County 6 *** 225.2 (210.1, 241.1) 42 (12, 73) 190 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Calhoun County 6 *** 224.8 (213.3, 236.7) 43 (16, 68) 320 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Ingham County 6 *** 224.7 (216.4, 233.3) 44 (21, 63) 594 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Antrim County 6 *** 224.2 (197.1, 254.4) 45 (3, 81) 63 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Montcalm County 6 *** 223.6 (207.3, 240.9) 46 (11, 74) 154 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Washtenaw County 6 *** 222.5 (215.2, 229.9) 47 (26, 64) 763 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Cass County 6 *** 221.7 (203.9, 240.8) 48 (10, 77) 134 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.5)
Mecosta County 6 *** 220.8 (199.3, 244.1) 49 (7, 79) 92 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Delta County 6 *** 220.2 (198.9, 243.4) 50 (7, 80) 96 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.8)
Lake County 6 *** 219.6 (183.8, 261.5) 51 (2, 82) 35 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Alpena County 6 *** 218.6 (195.1, 244.4) 52 (8, 80) 76 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Oceana County 6 *** 217.7 (192.6, 245.4) 53 (6, 82) 63 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.3)
Manistee County 6 *** 217.2 (191.4, 245.9) 54 (6, 81) 63 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Barry County 6 *** 216.8 (200.3, 234.4) 55 (14, 78) 146 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.5)
Cheboygan County 6 *** 216.7 (190.6, 245.8) 56 (6, 82) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Emmet County 6 *** 216.4 (194.0, 240.9) 57 (8, 81) 81 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6)
Dickinson County 6 *** 215.9 (190.4, 244.2) 58 (7, 81) 63 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.7, 2.2)
Kalamazoo County 6 *** 215.7 (207.3, 224.4) 59 (34, 72) 535 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Lenawee County 6 *** 214.9 (202.0, 228.4) 60 (25, 78) 231 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
St. Joseph County 6 *** 214.7 (198.1, 232.4) 61 (18, 79) 137 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Clinton County 6 *** 214.1 (199.7, 229.3) 62 (20, 78) 181 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.1, 1.5)
Allegan County 6 *** 213.2 (201.4, 225.5) 63 (29, 77) 269 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Kent County 6 *** 212.9 (207.7, 218.2) 64 (46, 72) 1,355 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2)
Iosco County 6 *** 211.6 (185.8, 240.5) 65 (7, 82) 63 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Livingston County 6 *** 206.9 (198.0, 216.1) 66 (45, 78) 460 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Ottawa County 6 *** 205.2 (197.4, 213.3) 67 (51, 78) 552 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Iron County 6 *** 204.2 (167.4, 248.1) 68 (3, 83) 31 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.8, 0.8)
Chippewa County 6 *** 203.6 (183.6, 225.3) 69 (24, 82) 83 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Monroe County 6 *** 202.8 (192.7, 213.2) 70 (47, 80) 347 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Marquette County 6 *** 202.7 (187.1, 219.4) 71 (36, 82) 147 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Mackinac County 6 *** 202.6 (165.4, 246.9) 72 (3, 83) 27 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.6)
Presque Isle County 6 *** 202.5 (166.6, 244.8) 73 (5, 83) 31 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.1)
Schoolcraft County 6 *** 201.2 (159.6, 252.1) 74 (3, 83) 21 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.4)
Isabella County 6 *** 200.6 (183.9, 218.4) 75 (36, 82) 118 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Baraga County 6 *** 198.7 (158.9, 246.6) 76 (4, 83) 20 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.5)
Mason County 6 *** 194.4 (171.6, 219.6) 77 (28, 83) 64 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.6)
Branch County 6 *** 191.0 (172.8, 210.7) 78 (47, 83) 90 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Gogebic County 6 *** 190.3 (159.9, 225.3) 79 (16, 83) 34 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.4)
Houghton County 6 *** 188.6 (166.6, 212.7) 80 (42, 83) 61 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Ontonagon County 6 *** 183.7 (137.0, 246.3) 81 (2, 83) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 2.0)
Alger County 6 *** 178.7 (142.8, 222.5) 82 (19, 83) 21 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
Keweenaw County 6 *** 153.0 (84.6, 265.1) 83 (1, 83) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-6.6, 5.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/03/2021 2:43 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
5 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top