Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 6 1,312.4 (1,307.2, 1,317.7) N/A 49,770 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 1,328.9 (1,327.9, 1,329.8) N/A 1,494,912 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.5, 0.0)
Keweenaw County 6 734.9 (553.9, 962.6) 83 (78, 83) 12 falling falling trend -16.9 (-29.8, -0.8)
Houghton County 6 949.0 (874.3, 1,028.3) 82 (77, 83) 124 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.3)
Gogebic County 6 1,020.3 (919.7, 1,128.8) 81 (63, 83) 80 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.2)
Ontonagon County 6 1,057.1 (918.1, 1,211.9) 80 (33, 83) 45 falling falling trend -7.1 (-16.4, -1.2)
Oceana County 6 1,060.2 (977.3, 1,148.4) 79 (64, 82) 125 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Baraga County 6 1,067.9 (924.9, 1,226.7) 78 (36, 83) 42 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Dickinson County 6 1,092.4 (1,008.6, 1,181.3) 77 (56, 82) 131 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.5)
Muskegon County 6 1,092.9 (1,056.8, 1,129.9) 76 (69, 81) 722 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Charlevoix County 6 1,112.8 (1,031.6, 1,198.8) 75 (47, 81) 147 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Mackinac County 6 1,113.3 (994.5, 1,242.4) 74 (28, 82) 68 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Monroe County 6 1,155.5 (1,117.0, 1,194.9) 73 (58, 78) 709 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Ottawa County 6 1,156.2 (1,125.5, 1,187.5) 72 (60, 77) 1,104 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Isabella County 6 1,166.6 (1,099.1, 1,237.1) 71 (43, 79) 233 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Mason County 6 1,174.0 (1,093.3, 1,259.1) 70 (34, 80) 165 stable stable trend 7.8 (-1.2, 13.7)
Presque Isle County 6 1,175.8 (1,065.4, 1,294.6) 69 (20, 81) 92 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.7)
St. Joseph County 6 1,177.3 (1,115.3, 1,242.0) 68 (42, 79) 279 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Menominee County 6 1,177.4 (1,089.2, 1,270.9) 67 (28, 80) 138 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.4, 5.5)
Marquette County 6 1,181.2 (1,122.5, 1,242.2) 66 (42, 78) 320 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Otsego County 6 1,187.9 (1,096.9, 1,284.4) 65 (27, 80) 130 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
Alger County 6 1,207.7 (1,067.3, 1,361.4) 64 (6, 82) 57 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.3, 9.6)
Lenawee County 6 1,210.2 (1,161.5, 1,260.4) 63 (39, 75) 482 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Cheboygan County 6 1,215.5 (1,132.5, 1,303.0) 62 (22, 78) 170 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.9)
Emmet County 6 1,217.6 (1,139.2, 1,300.0) 61 (24, 77) 189 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.1)
Kent County 6 1,223.8 (1,202.0, 1,245.9) 60 (46, 68) 2,503 falling falling trend -2.4 (-6.4, -1.6)
Schoolcraft County 6 1,224.5 (1,077.5, 1,386.0) 59 (2, 81) 54 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Barry County 6 1,232.7 (1,171.1, 1,296.7) 58 (24, 74) 311 stable stable trend 3.4 (-1.2, 10.9)
Iron County 6 1,232.7 (1,109.8, 1,365.6) 57 (5, 80) 82 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Luce County 6 1,236.9 (1,056.8, 1,438.8) 56 (1, 82) 35 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.6, 0.0)
Genesee County 6 1,240.0 (1,215.2, 1,265.3) 55 (40, 65) 1,952 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.7, -1.7)
Ionia County 6 1,241.6 (1,175.1, 1,310.9) 54 (23, 74) 273 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Antrim County 6 1,249.4 (1,161.8, 1,341.8) 53 (13, 75) 159 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Cass County 6 1,255.2 (1,189.9, 1,323.1) 52 (19, 72) 289 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.4)
Allegan County 6 1,258.9 (1,211.4, 1,307.8) 51 (26, 67) 554 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Iosco County 6 1,264.2 (1,181.3, 1,351.5) 50 (11, 73) 186 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 5.2)
Clinton County 6 1,265.9 (1,208.5, 1,325.3) 49 (21, 68) 378 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Ingham County 6 1,266.7 (1,232.9, 1,301.1) 48 (28, 63) 1,120 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Livingston County 6 1,268.0 (1,231.3, 1,305.4) 47 (28, 63) 956 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Branch County 6 1,269.2 (1,193.7, 1,348.3) 46 (13, 72) 218 stable stable trend 4.4 (-0.8, 12.3)
Shiawassee County 6 1,270.7 (1,211.4, 1,332.1) 45 (19, 68) 356 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Washtenaw County 6 1,285.8 (1,255.9, 1,316.2) 44 (25, 58) 1,465 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.8)
Montmorency County 6 1,286.1 (1,153.2, 1,430.2) 43 (1, 78) 75 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Hillsdale County 6 1,287.7 (1,215.7, 1,363.0) 42 (10, 68) 249 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Kalamazoo County 6 1,290.9 (1,256.7, 1,325.8) 41 (23, 57) 1,117 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Manistee County 6 1,291.6 (1,202.7, 1,385.3) 40 (6, 73) 166 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Alcona County 6 1,296.4 (1,176.4, 1,425.6) 39 (2, 77) 95 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Tuscola County 6 1,298.6 (1,233.6, 1,366.2) 38 (12, 65) 307 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Newaygo County 6 1,300.2 (1,230.2, 1,373.2) 37 (9, 67) 268 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.5)
Mecosta County 6 1,303.3 (1,225.7, 1,384.4) 36 (6, 67) 220 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Crawford County 6 1,309.8 (1,193.8, 1,434.0) 35 (2, 74) 98 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Leelanau County 6 1,309.9 (1,219.4, 1,405.4) 34 (4, 69) 172 stable stable trend 4.1 (-1.6, 11.1)
Huron County 6 1,311.4 (1,231.9, 1,394.7) 33 (6, 67) 212 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Montcalm County 6 1,315.6 (1,251.6, 1,382.0) 32 (8, 62) 327 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.2, 8.1)
Missaukee County 6 1,326.2 (1,204.0, 1,457.6) 31 (1, 74) 89 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Berrien County 6 1,331.5 (1,291.5, 1,372.5) 30 (12, 48) 863 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Osceola County 6 1,332.5 (1,233.6, 1,437.4) 29 (2, 68) 139 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Oakland County 6 1,335.4 (1,320.4, 1,350.4) 28 (19, 38) 6,339 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Sanilac County 6 1,335.7 (1,262.0, 1,412.6) 27 (4, 62) 254 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.7, 6.8)
Eaton County 6 1,341.0 (1,292.2, 1,391.2) 26 (8, 50) 592 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Delta County 6 1,341.3 (1,265.0, 1,421.0) 25 (4, 61) 242 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.2, 9.1)
Chippewa County 6 1,342.1 (1,258.5, 1,429.8) 24 (3, 61) 197 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9)
Van Buren County 6 1,344.5 (1,285.2, 1,406.0) 23 (5, 55) 405 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Benzie County 6 1,346.7 (1,241.8, 1,458.3) 22 (1, 66) 128 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Arenac County 6 1,350.5 (1,233.9, 1,475.3) 21 (1, 68) 105 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Midland County 6 1,352.4 (1,296.7, 1,409.8) 20 (5, 49) 455 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.6, 8.4)
Jackson County 6 1,373.7 (1,332.1, 1,416.4) 19 (5, 37) 852 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Oscoda County 6 1,374.3 (1,219.3, 1,543.5) 18 (1, 74) 63 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.7)
Lapeer County 6 1,380.4 (1,325.6, 1,437.0) 17 (3, 40) 502 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.2)
Lake County 6 1,381.2 (1,254.4, 1,517.6) 16 (1, 68) 96 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Wexford County 6 1,384.3 (1,297.1, 1,475.8) 15 (1, 56) 195 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Macomb County 6 1,384.4 (1,366.3, 1,402.7) 14 (8, 26) 4,606 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Calhoun County 6 1,386.3 (1,340.7, 1,433.1) 13 (3, 34) 721 rising rising trend 5.7 (1.9, 10.3)
Gratiot County 6 1,387.6 (1,304.5, 1,474.6) 12 (1, 53) 213 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.4, 6.2)
Wayne County 6 1,389.2 (1,375.7, 1,402.7) 11 (8, 24) 8,530 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
St. Clair County 6 1,403.1 (1,362.5, 1,444.6) 10 (3, 29) 937 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.3, 5.5)
Grand Traverse County 6 1,413.2 (1,359.8, 1,468.2) 9 (1, 31) 555 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Saginaw County 6 1,430.5 (1,392.7, 1,468.9) 8 (1, 21) 1,124 rising rising trend 1.1 (0.5, 1.9)
Kalkaska County 6 1,439.6 (1,318.4, 1,569.1) 7 (1, 56) 111 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 1.0)
Ogemaw County 6 1,455.7 (1,356.4, 1,560.6) 6 (1, 37) 168 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
Alpena County 6 1,456.3 (1,366.2, 1,550.8) 5 (1, 36) 203 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Clare County 6 1,457.3 (1,370.8, 1,547.9) 4 (1, 34) 222 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Gladwin County 6 1,464.8 (1,373.4, 1,560.7) 3 (1, 35) 201 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.2, 5.4)
Bay County 6 1,468.7 (1,418.1, 1,520.6) 2 (1, 17) 660 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.5, 6.2)
Roscommon County 6 1,475.9 (1,387.2, 1,568.9) 1 (1, 28) 228 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/02/2024 4:46 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top