Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 5 *** 448.8 (447.1, 450.5) N/A 55,623 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 448.6 (448.3, 448.9) N/A 1,703,249 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Keweenaw County 6 *** 330.7 (249.8, 438.3) 83 (10, 83) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.8, 2.6)
Luce County 6 *** 417.2 (359.5, 482.9) 61 (3, 83) 40 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Baraga County 6 *** 379.0 (330.6, 433.4) 79 (21, 83) 48 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Ontonagon County 6 *** 384.6 (331.7, 447.4) 77 (11, 83) 52 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.7)
Schoolcraft County 6 *** 405.1 (355.6, 460.9) 67 (9, 83) 57 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Alger County 6 *** 394.0 (348.9, 444.6) 75 (16, 83) 62 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.2)
Oscoda County 6 *** 507.6 (449.2, 572.4) 3 (1, 61) 72 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.3)
Mackinac County 6 *** 376.4 (334.4, 423.1) 81 (32, 83) 72 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Montmorency County 6 *** 462.0 (410.0, 519.9) 23 (1, 78) 81 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Iron County 6 *** 397.9 (356.2, 444.3) 72 (12, 83) 86 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.4)
Lake County 6 *** 420.3 (379.0, 465.9) 56 (6, 82) 92 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Alcona County 6 *** 439.5 (391.0, 493.8) 39 (1, 81) 95 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Gogebic County 6 *** 383.5 (347.5, 422.8) 78 (35, 83) 98 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.4)
Presque Isle County 6 *** 417.6 (377.2, 462.1) 59 (8, 82) 103 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Missaukee County 6 *** 479.9 (437.4, 525.8) 12 (1, 62) 104 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Crawford County 6 *** 462.1 (420.9, 506.9) 22 (1, 72) 108 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Arenac County 6 *** 466.3 (425.7, 510.4) 18 (1, 70) 114 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Kalkaska County 6 *** 526.6 (485.2, 571.0) 1 (1, 28) 131 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Benzie County 6 *** 480.1 (441.4, 521.7) 10 (1, 58) 137 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3)
Otsego County 6 *** 441.2 (408.9, 475.6) 36 (5, 75) 152 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Oceana County 6 *** 407.8 (377.9, 439.7) 65 (26, 82) 153 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Osceola County 6 *** 455.9 (422.6, 491.3) 30 (2, 70) 153 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.6)
Houghton County 6 *** 365.9 (339.4, 394.0) 82 (63, 83) 155 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Dickinson County 6 *** 423.3 (392.7, 456.0) 53 (15, 80) 161 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Charlevoix County 6 *** 410.9 (380.9, 442.8) 64 (24, 82) 166 stable stable trend -10.7 (-22.8, 3.4)
Mason County 6 *** 378.0 (351.2, 406.6) 80 (51, 83) 168 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Menominee County 6 *** 448.7 (417.1, 482.5) 33 (4, 72) 170 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.7, 4.4)
Leelanau County 6 *** 457.3 (422.0, 495.0) 28 (2, 70) 172 stable stable trend 9.8 (-1.0, 21.9)
Antrim County 6 *** 430.2 (399.4, 463.2) 48 (10, 78) 173 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Manistee County 6 *** 435.9 (405.5, 468.4) 43 (9, 76) 177 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Cheboygan County 6 *** 417.2 (387.7, 448.8) 60 (18, 81) 180 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.0)
Ogemaw County 6 *** 500.9 (465.8, 538.3) 4 (1, 37) 180 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Chippewa County 6 *** 407.2 (381.6, 434.3) 66 (33, 82) 197 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Iosco County 6 *** 431.1 (401.9, 462.3) 46 (10, 77) 201 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Gladwin County 6 *** 464.6 (434.0, 497.2) 21 (3, 62) 203 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Emmet County 6 *** 417.9 (391.1, 446.3) 58 (22, 80) 204 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Alpena County 6 *** 459.4 (430.5, 490.1) 26 (2, 61) 210 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Wexford County 6 *** 499.4 (469.1, 531.2) 5 (1, 32) 221 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Branch County 6 *** 400.1 (376.4, 425.0) 69 (38, 82) 224 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Gratiot County 6 *** 443.3 (417.2, 470.6) 35 (8, 69) 226 stable stable trend 3.1 (0.0, 6.2)
Clare County 6 *** 480.1 (450.4, 511.4) 9 (1, 49) 227 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Mecosta County 6 *** 436.3 (410.3, 463.6) 42 (12, 71) 235 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Huron County 6 *** 465.4 (437.1, 495.3) 20 (2, 57) 240 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Roscommon County 6 *** 525.5 (491.4, 561.9) 2 (1, 17) 245 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Isabella County 6 *** 399.8 (377.7, 422.9) 70 (41, 82) 260 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Hillsdale County 6 *** 432.0 (408.1, 457.0) 44 (17, 73) 267 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Delta County 6 *** 466.2 (440.0, 493.7) 19 (3, 53) 269 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Sanilac County 6 *** 467.5 (442.1, 494.2) 15 (3, 50) 281 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.2, 8.7)
Newaygo County 6 *** 439.1 (415.5, 463.8) 40 (13, 70) 285 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
St. Joseph County 6 *** 402.3 (381.8, 423.6) 68 (40, 81) 311 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Barry County 6 *** 396.2 (376.1, 417.2) 73 (45, 82) 317 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Cass County 6 *** 429.9 (408.0, 452.9) 49 (18, 74) 318 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4)
Ionia County 6 *** 438.3 (416.5, 461.0) 41 (13, 69) 318 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Montcalm County 6 *** 423.7 (403.3, 444.9) 52 (24, 75) 343 stable stable trend 4.1 (-2.4, 11.0)
Marquette County 6 *** 398.6 (379.2, 418.8) 71 (46, 82) 350 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Tuscola County 6 *** 466.6 (444.1, 490.1) 17 (4, 48) 353 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Clinton County 6 *** 420.8 (402.0, 440.2) 55 (29, 75) 402 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Shiawassee County 6 *** 460.6 (440.2, 481.7) 24 (5, 51) 414 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Van Buren County 6 *** 453.9 (434.4, 474.1) 31 (9, 57) 442 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Midland County 6 *** 424.8 (407.1, 443.1) 51 (29, 72) 463 stable stable trend 4.7 (-1.0, 10.8)
Lenawee County 6 *** 415.1 (399.0, 431.6) 62 (37, 76) 540 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Lapeer County 6 *** 467.0 (448.8, 485.8) 16 (5, 44) 544 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Allegan County 6 *** 418.0 (402.6, 434.0) 57 (36, 75) 590 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 1.0)
Grand Traverse County 6 *** 483.2 (465.5, 501.5) 8 (2, 29) 608 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Eaton County 6 *** 451.6 (435.5, 468.1) 32 (12, 53) 642 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Bay County 6 *** 480.0 (463.5, 496.9) 11 (3, 30) 699 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Calhoun County 6 *** 428.6 (414.4, 443.1) 50 (29, 68) 734 stable stable trend 4.7 (-2.3, 12.2)
Monroe County 6 *** 396.0 (383.1, 409.1) 74 (57, 81) 775 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Jackson County 6 *** 448.6 (435.2, 462.2) 34 (15, 51) 915 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Muskegon County 6 *** 441.0 (428.2, 454.2) 37 (22, 57) 950 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Berrien County 6 *** 457.0 (443.7, 470.5) 29 (12, 44) 970 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
St. Clair County 6 *** 468.7 (455.3, 482.4) 14 (7, 35) 1,002 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Livingston County 6 *** 431.0 (418.8, 443.5) 47 (30, 64) 1,028 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Saginaw County 6 *** 458.3 (446.3, 470.6) 27 (12, 42) 1,187 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Kalamazoo County 6 *** 421.3 (410.5, 432.4) 54 (38, 69) 1,203 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Ottawa County 6 *** 389.6 (379.6, 399.8) 76 (64, 81) 1,206 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.8)
Ingham County 6 *** 431.8 (420.9, 443.0) 45 (30, 62) 1,262 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Washtenaw County 6 *** 440.7 (431.0, 450.6) 38 (24, 54) 1,654 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Genesee County 6 *** 460.1 (451.6, 468.6) 25 (13, 37) 2,385 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Kent County 6 *** 415.0 (408.0, 422.1) 63 (49, 70) 2,822 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Macomb County 7 *** 495.0 (489.0, 501.1) 7 (2, 12) 5,410 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.3)
Oakland County 7 *** 479.4 (474.4, 484.4) 13 (7, 20) 7,459 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Wayne County 7 *** 495.5 (491.1, 499.9) 6 (2, 12) 10,222 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/02/2021 1:10 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
5 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top