Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 6 N/A 223.8 (222.5, 225.1) N/A 23,925 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 222.9 (222.7, 223.2) N/A 734,330 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 0.0)
Barry County 6 Urban 215.8 (199.5, 233.1) 51 (12, 73) 152 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Bay County 6 Urban 245.5 (232.0, 259.6) 7 (2, 38) 287 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.1)
Benzie County 6 Urban 230.7 (199.4, 266.1) 27 (1, 75) 50 falling falling trend -4.7 (-13.7, -0.4)
Berrien County 6 Urban 224.2 (213.4, 235.4) 38 (12, 60) 368 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 218.9 (207.6, 230.7) 44 (19, 67) 311 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Cass County 6 Urban 209.4 (191.8, 228.3) 61 (18, 75) 123 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Clinton County 6 Urban 212.4 (198.1, 227.5) 56 (21, 72) 181 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Eaton County 6 Urban 232.9 (220.0, 246.4) 26 (6, 53) 274 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Genesee County 6 Urban 201.2 (195.0, 207.6) 66 (51, 72) 879 falling falling trend -7.4 (-9.8, -5.1)
Grand Traverse County 6 Urban 227.0 (213.3, 241.4) 34 (8, 61) 234 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Ingham County 6 Urban 226.9 (218.3, 235.7) 35 (14, 53) 579 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.9)
Ionia County 6 Urban 215.2 (199.8, 231.6) 53 (16, 72) 154 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Jackson County 6 Urban 242.2 (231.4, 253.4) 13 (4, 36) 422 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Kalamazoo County 6 Urban 216.4 (207.9, 225.2) 50 (26, 64) 522 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Kalkaska County 6 Urban 253.4 (221.0, 289.5) 5 (1, 66) 52 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.3)
Kent County 6 Urban 209.4 (204.2, 214.7) 60 (42, 66) 1,340 falling falling trend -1.4 (-3.7, -0.9)
Lapeer County 6 Urban 213.7 (200.3, 227.7) 55 (20, 71) 226 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Leelanau County 6 Urban 224.3 (194.1, 258.4) 37 (2, 75) 55 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.7)
Livingston County 6 Urban 207.8 (198.9, 217.1) 62 (37, 71) 471 falling falling trend -2.0 (-7.5, -1.3)
Macomb County 6 Urban 242.4 (237.8, 247.1) 11 (6, 26) 2,355 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.2)
Midland County 6 Urban 245.2 (230.1, 261.1) 9 (2, 41) 220 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 0.3)
Monroe County 6 Urban 188.7 (179.0, 198.8) 72 (60, 77) 324 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Montcalm County 6 Urban 222.0 (206.4, 238.6) 41 (9, 68) 164 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 0.9)
Muskegon County 6 Urban 162.5 (154.0, 171.4) 79 (74, 82) 307 falling falling trend -17.5 (-27.3, -12.2)
Oakland County 6 Urban 229.2 (225.5, 233.0) 30 (18, 42) 3,217 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.5)
Ottawa County 6 Urban 199.4 (191.7, 207.3) 69 (51, 74) 547 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Saginaw County 6 Urban 235.3 (225.3, 245.6) 20 (6, 45) 473 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
St. Clair County 6 Urban 239.8 (229.2, 250.8) 14 (4, 39) 447 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Washtenaw County 6 Urban 212.2 (205.1, 219.5) 57 (35, 67) 728 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Wayne County 6 Urban 242.7 (239.5, 246.1) 10 (6, 24) 4,522 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.7, -0.8)
Alcona County 6 Rural 262.5 (213.1, 321.3) 3 (1, 72) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.5, 2.5)
Alger County 6 Rural 180.5 (143.2, 226.1) 75 (10, 82) 19 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.3, 0.7)
Allegan County 6 Rural 193.6 (182.4, 205.4) 71 (50, 77) 250 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Alpena County 6 Rural 236.5 (211.4, 263.9) 18 (1, 69) 80 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Antrim County 6 Rural 228.0 (200.0, 259.3) 32 (2, 74) 63 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.6)
Arenac County 6 Rural 251.5 (216.3, 291.5) 6 (1, 68) 47 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.0)
Baraga County 6 Rural 172.8 (135.1, 218.9) 76 (11, 82) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.5, 2.3)
Branch County 6 Rural 198.1 (179.8, 217.8) 70 (29, 78) 97 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Charlevoix County 6 Rural 201.2 (176.5, 228.8) 65 (12, 79) 60 falling falling trend -1.8 (-9.3, -0.1)
Cheboygan County 6 Rural 219.5 (193.2, 248.8) 43 (3, 76) 65 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Chippewa County 6 Rural 217.7 (196.8, 240.5) 47 (7, 74) 87 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.5)
Clare County 6 Rural 237.1 (212.5, 263.9) 17 (2, 67) 85 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.7)
Crawford County 6 Rural 242.3 (205.1, 285.2) 12 (1, 74) 40 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.4)
Delta County 6 Rural 217.1 (195.8, 240.2) 49 (6, 75) 93 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.7)
Dickinson County 6 Rural 181.4 (158.0, 207.6) 74 (37, 82) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.4)
Emmet County 6 Rural 234.1 (210.5, 259.7) 24 (2, 70) 86 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Gladwin County 6 Rural 278.9 (249.4, 311.4) 1 (1, 27) 84 rising rising trend 7.6 (0.1, 18.0)
Gogebic County 6 Rural 152.0 (124.4, 184.5) 81 (64, 82) 28 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.6)
Gratiot County 6 Rural 218.2 (198.2, 239.8) 46 (7, 74) 94 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Hillsdale County 6 Rural 204.2 (185.7, 224.3) 63 (19, 77) 104 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Houghton County 6 Rural 151.3 (131.7, 173.1) 82 (72, 82) 49 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Huron County 6 Rural 224.4 (200.7, 250.5) 36 (3, 72) 82 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.2)
Iosco County 6 Rural 230.7 (202.8, 261.7) 28 (2, 72) 66 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.7)
Iron County 6 Rural 200.4 (162.5, 245.5) 67 (3, 82) 26 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.3, 0.9)
Isabella County 6 Rural 210.8 (193.1, 229.7) 59 (16, 75) 117 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Lake County 6 Rural 255.1 (215.1, 301.5) 4 (1, 70) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Lenawee County 6 Rural 199.9 (187.5, 212.9) 68 (40, 75) 218 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Luce County 6 Rural 234.6 (179.3, 303.3) 22 (1, 81) 15 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.6, 4.8)
Mackinac County 6 Rural 227.5 (187.5, 274.7) 33 (1, 78) 29 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.6, 2.7)
Manistee County 6 Rural 223.3 (196.3, 253.2) 39 (3, 75) 63 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.4)
Marquette County 6 Rural 182.3 (167.3, 198.4) 73 (57, 80) 126 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Mason County 6 Rural 222.8 (198.0, 250.0) 40 (3, 74) 72 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.4)
Mecosta County 6 Rural 230.4 (208.0, 254.7) 29 (3, 69) 92 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Menominee County 6 Rural 202.8 (176.8, 232.0) 64 (10, 79) 55 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.2)
Missaukee County 6 Rural 212.0 (179.4, 249.2) 58 (3, 79) 36 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Montmorency County 6 Rural 275.2 (223.0, 337.1) 2 (1, 70) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.1)
Newaygo County 6 Rural 235.1 (215.7, 256.0) 21 (2, 64) 128 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0)
Oceana County 6 Rural 163.7 (141.9, 188.0) 78 (64, 82) 48 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.3)
Ogemaw County 6 Rural 238.3 (207.7, 272.6) 16 (1, 71) 59 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.2)
Ontonagon County 6 Rural 157.1 (112.1, 219.3) 80 (8, 82) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 2.4)
Osceola County 6 Rural 220.1 (193.4, 249.8) 42 (3, 75) 57 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Oscoda County 6 Rural 217.1 (169.0, 275.5) 48 (1, 82) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 2.5)
Otsego County 6 Rural 233.4 (206.3, 263.4) 25 (1, 71) 63 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8)
Presque Isle County 6 Rural 238.8 (198.6, 285.6) 15 (1, 76) 35 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.4, 1.4)
Roscommon County 6 Rural 234.4 (205.6, 266.7) 23 (1, 72) 73 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Sanilac County 6 Rural 245.3 (223.5, 268.8) 8 (1, 55) 113 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.0)
Schoolcraft County 6 Rural 167.7 (131.3, 213.3) 77 (22, 82) 19 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.1)
Shiawassee County 6 Rural 229.0 (213.0, 245.9) 31 (5, 63) 177 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
St. Joseph County 6 Rural 214.6 (197.8, 232.5) 54 (14, 73) 135 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
Tuscola County 6 Rural 215.7 (198.1, 234.6) 52 (8, 73) 131 stable stable trend 0.3 (-7.3, 5.1)
Van Buren County 6 Rural 218.5 (203.5, 234.4) 45 (13, 69) 182 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Wexford County 6 Rural 235.5 (212.3, 260.7) 19 (2, 68) 87 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Keweenaw County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/12/2024 9:24 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top