Incidence Rates Table
County
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan 6 | 106.4 (105.3, 107.6) | N/A | 6,212 |
stable 
|
-0.1 (-0.3, 0.1) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 106.5 (106.3, 106.7) | N/A | 208,914 |
falling 
|
-0.7 (-1.3, -0.2) |
| Leelanau County 6 | 148.5 (115.1, 188.4) | 1 (1, 60) | 14 |
stable
|
-10.6 (-37.1, 26.9) |
| Oscoda County 6 | 142.7 (91.9, 210.7) | 2 (1, 79) | 5 |
stable
|
2.1 (-2.4, 6.8) |
| Benzie County 6 | 136.5 (103.4, 176.8) | 3 (1, 73) | 12 |
stable
|
2.3 (-0.3, 5.0) |
| Montmorency County 6 | 134.6 (87.4, 198.2) | 4 (1, 79) | 5 |
stable
|
0.7 (-2.7, 4.2) |
| Presque Isle County 6 | 131.2 (92.1, 181.5) | 6 (1, 78) | 7 |
stable
|
0.3 (-2.9, 3.5) |
| Roscommon County 6 | 130.4 (100.0, 167.1) | 5 (1, 74) | 13 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-4.0, 2.0) |
| Clare County 6 | 126.6 (102.8, 154.2) | 7 (1, 70) | 20 |
stable
|
1.6 (-0.8, 4.1) |
| Sanilac County 6 | 125.5 (105.2, 148.5) | 8 (1, 64) | 27 |
stable
|
2.0 (-0.2, 4.2) |
| Charlevoix County 6 | 123.1 (97.6, 153.3) | 10 (1, 74) | 16 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.8, 3.1) |
| Tuscola County 6 | 122.1 (104.8, 141.5) | 12 (1, 62) | 36 |
stable
|
-3.3 (-18.2, 14.5) |
| Bay County 6 | 122.1 (109.7, 135.5) | 13 (2, 49) | 72 |
rising 
|
1.2 (0.2, 2.2) |
| Shiawassee County 6 | 121.8 (106.7, 138.4) | 11 (2, 58) | 48 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.7, 1.9) |
| Wexford County 6 | 121.8 (100.1, 146.6) | 9 (1, 70) | 22 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.9, 3.0) |
| Ogemaw County 6 | 119.6 (91.1, 154.1) | 14 (1, 78) | 12 |
stable
|
1.9 (-1.5, 5.4) |
| Newaygo County 6 | 117.6 (99.6, 137.9) | 15 (2, 69) | 31 |
rising
|
2.5 (0.6, 4.5) |
| St. Clair County 6 | 116.5 (106.8, 126.8) | 16 (4, 52) | 108 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.4, 0.7) |
| Mecosta County 6 | 115.9 (95.7, 139.0) | 19 (2, 74) | 24 |
stable
|
1.3 (-1.2, 3.8) |
| Midland County 6 | 115.8 (102.6, 130.2) | 18 (4, 65) | 56 |
rising
|
5.7 (1.9, 9.7) |
| Gratiot County 6 | 115.3 (97.1, 135.8) | 17 (2, 72) | 29 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.6, 2.3) |
| Barry County 6 | 113.5 (97.9, 130.8) | 21 (3, 69) | 38 |
stable
|
1.8 (0.0, 3.7) |
| Montcalm County 6 | 113.2 (98.4, 129.5) | 22 (3, 70) | 43 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.9, 1.9) |
| Kalkaska County 6 | 112.3 (84.5, 146.3) | 20 (1, 78) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-3.1, 2.8) |
| Arenac County 6 | 112.1 (80.6, 151.9) | 26 (1, 79) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-3.4, 2.6) |
| Lapeer County 6 | 111.5 (98.8, 125.4) | 24 (5, 68) | 57 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.4, 1.3) |
| Alcona County 6 | 111.4 (68.3, 171.3) | 27 (1, 79) | 4 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-4.9, 3.6) |
| Otsego County 6 | 110.7 (86.8, 139.3) | 25 (1, 78) | 15 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.8, 2.3) |
| Ingham County 6 | 109.8 (102.5, 117.5) | 28 (12, 59) | 177 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.1, 0.7) |
| Macomb County 6 | 109.7 (105.7, 113.7) | 29 (17, 49) | 586 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.7, 0.4) |
| Crawford County 6 | 109.5 (77.0, 151.1) | 31 (1, 79) | 8 |
stable
|
0.1 (-2.2, 2.5) |
| Oakland County 6 | 109.5 (106.2, 112.8) | 30 (18, 47) | 854 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-0.6, 0.1) |
| Manistee County 6 | 108.7 (84.0, 138.4) | 23 (1, 78) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-2.3, 2.1) |
| Clinton County 6 | 108.0 (95.1, 122.1) | 32 (7, 72) | 51 |
stable
|
2.1 (0.0, 4.1) |
| Iosco County 6 | 107.8 (82.6, 138.3) | 36 (2, 79) | 13 |
stable
|
1.9 (-1.2, 5.2) |
| Wayne County 6 | 107.7 (104.9, 110.5) | 34 (21, 50) | 1,141 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.4, 0.2) |
| Eaton County 6 | 107.5 (96.3, 119.7) | 35 (8, 71) | 67 |
stable
|
-6.4 (-14.4, 2.4) |
| Huron County 6 | 107.4 (85.0, 133.9) | 37 (2, 78) | 16 |
stable
|
1.1 (-0.6, 2.9) |
| Emmet County 6 | 107.3 (86.8, 131.2) | 38 (3, 77) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-2.5, 1.1) |
| Jackson County 6 | 107.0 (97.7, 116.9) | 33 (10, 67) | 99 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-1.8, 0.3) |
| Berrien County 6 | 106.1 (96.6, 116.4) | 41 (11, 69) | 92 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.9, 0.5) |
| Kalamazoo County 6 | 105.9 (98.5, 113.6) | 42 (16, 66) | 158 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.4, 1.4) |
| Calhoun County 6 | 105.9 (95.8, 116.7) | 40 (10, 69) | 82 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.1, 0.9) |
| Van Buren County 6 | 105.8 (92.4, 120.6) | 39 (7, 73) | 45 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.1, 1.2) |
| Washtenaw County 6 | 104.6 (98.5, 111.0) | 44 (19, 65) | 225 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.5, 0.3) |
| Hillsdale County 6 | 104.5 (87.3, 124.0) | 45 (5, 77) | 26 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.1, 1.8) |
| Saginaw County 6 | 103.5 (95.0, 112.6) | 46 (16, 71) | 110 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.4, 0.8) |
| St. Joseph County 6 | 103.5 (88.6, 120.0) | 50 (8, 76) | 35 |
stable
|
0.1 (-1.6, 1.9) |
| Kent County 6 | 103.2 (98.7, 107.8) | 48 (26, 62) | 408 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.5, 0.8) |
| Ionia County 6 | 103.0 (89.4, 117.9) | 49 (9, 76) | 42 |
stable
|
1.4 (0.0, 2.9) |
| Missaukee County 6 | 102.9 (72.9, 140.8) | 43 (1, 79) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-4.0, 2.3) |
| Antrim County 6 | 102.8 (77.4, 133.8) | 51 (2, 79) | 11 |
stable
|
0.6 (-2.1, 3.4) |
| Ottawa County 6 | 102.2 (95.3, 109.4) | 52 (23, 69) | 168 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.5, 1.1) |
| Grand Traverse County 6 | 102.0 (90.2, 115.0) | 47 (11, 74) | 54 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.6, -0.3) |
| Monroe County 6 | 101.7 (92.3, 111.7) | 53 (18, 73) | 88 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.0, 1.7) |
| Genesee County 6 | 100.8 (95.1, 106.7) | 55 (25, 68) | 241 |
falling
|
-5.3 (-9.9, -0.3) |
| Osceola County 6 | 100.7 (77.2, 129.0) | 56 (3, 79) | 13 |
stable
|
-2.2 (-4.9, 0.5) |
| Cass County 6 | 100.5 (84.4, 118.7) | 57 (9, 78) | 28 |
stable
|
0.9 (-1.7, 3.6) |
| Cheboygan County 6 | 100.0 (76.7, 128.2) | 54 (3, 79) | 13 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.8, 2.6) |
| Dickinson County 6 | 99.8 (76.9, 127.4) | 59 (3, 79) | 13 |
stable
|
0.7 (-2.4, 3.9) |
| Livingston County 6 | 99.5 (91.4, 108.1) | 58 (22, 73) | 115 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.3, -0.3) |
| Gladwin County 6 | 99.5 (75.9, 128.1) | 60 (4, 79) | 12 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-2.6, 2.1) |
| Mason County 6 | 98.4 (77.0, 123.8) | 61 (5, 79) | 15 |
stable
|
0.3 (-2.6, 3.3) |
| Oceana County 6 | 97.0 (75.2, 123.0) | 63 (4, 79) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-4.1, 2.7) |
| Alpena County 6 | 96.8 (75.6, 122.0) | 62 (4, 79) | 14 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-3.6, 1.6) |
| Lenawee County 6 | 95.9 (84.9, 108.0) | 64 (21, 77) | 55 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-1.8, 1.2) |
| Chippewa County 6 | 95.5 (78.2, 115.6) | 66 (10, 79) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-3.1, 2.0) |
| Allegan County 6 | 95.4 (85.2, 106.4) | 65 (23, 77) | 64 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.8, 1.7) |
| Muskegon County 6 | 94.8 (86.4, 103.7) | 67 (33, 76) | 95 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.5, 0.3) |
| Marquette County 6 | 93.9 (79.9, 109.7) | 68 (20, 79) | 33 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-3.0, 0.9) |
| Branch County 6 | 92.8 (76.6, 111.3) | 69 (12, 79) | 23 |
stable
|
1.4 (-0.3, 3.1) |
| Delta County 6 | 92.0 (73.6, 113.6) | 70 (10, 79) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.5, 1.8) |
| Isabella County 6 | 91.7 (77.4, 107.7) | 71 (19, 79) | 31 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.2, 0.5) |
| Gogebic County 6 | 88.6 (61.2, 124.1) | 72 (4, 79) | 7 |
stable
|
3.2 (-1.1, 7.8) |
| Menominee County 6 | 87.7 (65.1, 115.5) | 73 (8, 79) | 10 |
stable
|
0.3 (-3.6, 4.2) |
| Mackinac County 6 | 84.7 (52.7, 129.1) | 74 (2, 79) | 4 |
stable
|
-0.3 (-3.8, 3.3) |
| Luce County 6 | 82.7 (47.1, 135.6) | 75 (2, 79) | 3 |
stable
|
1.4 (-5.2, 8.5) |
| Houghton County 6 | 81.9 (63.3, 104.0) | 77 (20, 79) | 14 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-3.6, 1.0) |
| Lake County 6 | 81.6 (51.9, 122.6) | 78 (4, 79) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-4.2, 1.7) |
| Iron County 6 | 78.9 (47.3, 123.5) | 79 (4, 79) | 4 |
stable
|
-3.4 (-6.9, 0.2) |
| Baraga County 6 | 76.3 (45.0, 121.3) | 76 (2, 79) | 4 |
|
|
| Alger County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Keweenaw County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ontonagon County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Schoolcraft County 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2023 8:08 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alger, Keweenaw, Ontonagon, Schoolcraft
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2023 8:08 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Alger, Keweenaw, Ontonagon, Schoolcraft
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.