Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan 5 *** 487.2 (484.5, 489.8) N/A 28,275 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 487.4 (486.9, 487.8) N/A 859,984 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Wayne County 7 *** 553.1 (546.1, 560.1) 4 (1, 9) 5,131 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.7)
Oakland County 7 *** 524.1 (516.4, 531.9) 10 (6, 21) 3,733 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Macomb County 7 *** 537.8 (528.4, 547.2) 6 (3, 16) 2,672 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Kent County 6 *** 448.8 (438.0, 459.8) 55 (41, 69) 1,404 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.2)
Genesee County 6 *** 492.6 (479.7, 505.7) 34 (14, 43) 1,178 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)
Washtenaw County 6 *** 476.0 (461.1, 491.3) 38 (23, 54) 826 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.1)
Ingham County 6 *** 466.7 (449.8, 484.1) 43 (26, 62) 623 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Saginaw County 6 *** 505.0 (486.7, 524.0) 18 (8, 40) 603 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.2)
Ottawa County 6 *** 411.1 (396.2, 426.5) 76 (60, 81) 598 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Kalamazoo County 6 *** 449.1 (432.6, 466.1) 54 (37, 71) 589 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.0, 7.6)
Livingston County 6 *** 463.5 (445.1, 482.6) 46 (27, 66) 530 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
St. Clair County 6 *** 508.2 (488.1, 529.0) 15 (6, 40) 522 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Muskegon County 6 *** 490.9 (471.1, 511.2) 35 (12, 50) 498 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.5)
Berrien County 6 *** 499.4 (479.4, 520.1) 22 (9, 44) 497 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Jackson County 6 *** 507.4 (487.0, 528.5) 17 (7, 41) 496 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Monroe County 6 *** 431.2 (411.7, 451.4) 69 (45, 78) 400 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Calhoun County 6 *** 466.1 (444.6, 488.5) 44 (24, 68) 373 stable stable trend 3.9 (-2.2, 10.5)
Bay County 6 *** 517.7 (492.9, 543.5) 13 (3, 38) 351 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Eaton County 6 *** 498.8 (474.2, 524.4) 24 (7, 49) 333 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Grand Traverse County 6 *** 536.4 (509.3, 564.8) 7 (1, 29) 314 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3)
Allegan County 6 *** 451.3 (428.0, 475.5) 52 (28, 75) 307 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Lapeer County 6 *** 523.5 (495.7, 552.5) 11 (2, 37) 298 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Lenawee County 6 *** 449.8 (425.6, 475.2) 53 (28, 75) 275 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Van Buren County 6 *** 486.7 (457.7, 517.1) 36 (9, 62) 230 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Midland County 6 *** 438.7 (412.9, 465.8) 63 (35, 79) 227 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Shiawassee County 6 *** 495.9 (465.3, 528.1) 29 (6, 57) 210 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Clinton County 6 *** 451.5 (423.7, 480.7) 51 (25, 76) 210 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.5, 0.3)
Marquette County 6 *** 432.2 (404.1, 461.9) 66 (36, 80) 190 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.9)
Montcalm County 6 *** 465.8 (435.5, 497.7) 45 (14, 73) 186 stable stable trend 6.7 (-2.3, 16.4)
Tuscola County 6 *** 499.1 (466.2, 533.8) 23 (5, 58) 186 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Cass County 6 *** 455.9 (424.1, 489.7) 49 (18, 76) 167 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Barry County 6 *** 423.3 (393.8, 454.6) 72 (41, 82) 167 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Ionia County 6 *** 446.8 (415.0, 480.4) 58 (25, 79) 160 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
St. Joseph County 6 *** 407.1 (377.7, 438.3) 77 (48, 82) 151 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Sanilac County 6 *** 493.7 (457.3, 532.5) 32 (4, 64) 148 stable stable trend 6.2 (-2.2, 15.5)
Newaygo County 6 *** 445.2 (411.9, 480.6) 59 (24, 79) 145 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Delta County 6 *** 509.3 (471.1, 550.2) 14 (2, 57) 144 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.1)
Roscommon County 6 *** 575.5 (527.8, 627.6) 2 (1, 24) 140 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Hillsdale County 6 *** 454.3 (419.5, 491.5) 50 (18, 78) 137 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Isabella County 6 *** 425.0 (391.7, 460.5) 71 (35, 82) 129 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.9)
Mecosta County 6 *** 496.1 (456.4, 538.6) 28 (3, 68) 128 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Huron County 6 *** 500.4 (459.7, 544.2) 20 (2, 61) 126 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Clare County 6 *** 494.2 (453.3, 538.3) 30 (3, 68) 120 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Wexford County 6 *** 528.7 (485.3, 575.2) 9 (1, 47) 117 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Branch County 6 *** 431.7 (396.1, 469.7) 68 (28, 81) 115 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Gladwin County 6 *** 498.5 (455.4, 545.4) 25 (2, 69) 111 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Iosco County 6 *** 473.9 (432.0, 519.7) 39 (7, 77) 111 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Gratiot County 6 *** 447.9 (410.6, 487.8) 57 (19, 80) 110 stable stable trend 2.8 (-3.5, 9.5)
Chippewa County 6 *** 443.2 (406.1, 483.1) 60 (21, 81) 109 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Alpena County 6 *** 497.7 (454.6, 544.3) 26 (2, 68) 107 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.5)
Emmet County 6 *** 448.2 (409.1, 490.4) 56 (18, 80) 107 stable stable trend -13.1 (-26.7, 3.0)
Antrim County 6 *** 520.0 (473.4, 570.7) 12 (1, 59) 105 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Ogemaw County 6 *** 568.1 (515.6, 625.3) 3 (1, 32) 100 stable stable trend 11.1 (-2.2, 26.3)
Cheboygan County 6 *** 458.0 (415.2, 504.8) 47 (10, 79) 98 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.5)
Leelanau County 6 *** 508.2 (457.4, 563.9) 16 (1, 68) 96 stable stable trend 13.8 (-1.3, 31.1)
Menominee County 6 *** 482.7 (437.9, 531.7) 37 (4, 75) 93 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.8, 3.9)
Manistee County 6 *** 440.0 (398.8, 485.0) 62 (18, 82) 92 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.2)
Mason County 6 *** 402.9 (364.2, 445.1) 78 (43, 82) 88 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.2)
Charlevoix County 6 *** 433.6 (391.5, 479.6) 65 (22, 82) 87 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Houghton County 6 *** 400.9 (362.3, 442.6) 79 (44, 83) 85 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
Osceola County 6 *** 499.9 (451.2, 553.0) 21 (1, 70) 83 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -1.0)
Dickinson County 6 *** 440.1 (396.8, 487.3) 61 (17, 81) 83 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Otsego County 6 *** 472.8 (426.0, 523.9) 41 (5, 78) 81 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.5)
Oceana County 6 *** 431.8 (388.6, 478.9) 67 (21, 82) 80 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -1.0)
Benzie County 6 *** 531.3 (475.5, 592.8) 8 (1, 61) 77 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.2)
Kalkaska County 6 *** 592.1 (530.5, 659.6) 1 (1, 27) 74 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.7)
Arenac County 6 *** 496.4 (438.3, 561.3) 27 (1, 76) 62 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.1)
Crawford County 6 *** 492.7 (435.1, 557.5) 33 (1, 77) 61 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Missaukee County 6 *** 542.2 (479.8, 611.3) 5 (1, 63) 60 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 2.0)
Presque Isle County 6 *** 472.1 (412.7, 539.7) 42 (3, 81) 58 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Alcona County 6 *** 473.8 (407.2, 551.6) 40 (1, 81) 54 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Gogebic County 6 *** 395.0 (345.6, 450.5) 80 (37, 83) 51 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.8, 1.6)
Lake County 6 *** 433.9 (377.9, 498.1) 64 (10, 82) 51 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Montmorency County 6 *** 500.4 (430.3, 581.8) 19 (1, 78) 47 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.0)
Iron County 6 *** 384.9 (329.5, 449.4) 81 (35, 83) 42 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.3, -0.5)
Mackinac County 6 *** 414.8 (354.3, 484.6) 73 (14, 83) 40 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.3)
Oscoda County 6 *** 493.8 (420.5, 579.0) 31 (1, 80) 38 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.6)
Alger County 6 *** 413.4 (352.1, 484.8) 75 (10, 83) 35 stable stable trend 5.4 (-2.9, 14.3)
Schoolcraft County 6 *** 456.9 (381.4, 545.7) 48 (2, 82) 31 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.6, -1.4)
Ontonagon County 6 *** 366.6 (306.6, 444.9) 82 (42, 83) 29 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.4)
Baraga County 6 *** 414.7 (346.9, 493.8) 74 (8, 83) 28 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Luce County 6 *** 428.5 (350.0, 521.5) 70 (3, 83) 21 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.8, 0.9)
Keweenaw County 6 *** 264.0 (173.4, 408.4) 83 (51, 83) 7 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.6, -0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 01/18/2022 11:38 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
5 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
7 Source: SEER November 2020 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top